The REVA Tyrosine Polycarbonate Bioresorbable Stent: Lessons Learned and Future Directions Robert K. Schultz, PhD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides PEPCAD II ISR Study Paclitaxel-eluting devices: randomized comparison of the SeQuent™ please.
Advertisements

PCI Unmet Clinical Needs
Θεματική ενότητα: Stenting Μ. Ματσάγκας, MD, PhD, FEBVS Σάββατο 9 Φεβρουαρίου 2013.
Coronary Stent Megan French. What is a Stent A small, mesh-like device made of metal Acts as a support or scaffold, in keeping the vessel open Stent helps.
3rd CEEGI Advisory Board1 Resolute in the DES era: Indications & Limitations Georgios I. Papaioannou, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI Athens Medical Center Cardiac.
University Hospital La Paz
Click to edit Master title style June Custom tools for complex markets Custom software and research to support market validation for the life sciences.
The Emerging Paradigm of Stent Biocompatibility: Current Status and Future Directions Dr Miles Dalby Consultant Cardiologist Honorary Senior Lecturer Royal.
The REVA Tyrosine-Derived Polycarbonate Bioresorbable Scaffold: Long-term Outcomes Using Multimodality Imaging Greg L. Kaluza, MD, PhD, FACC Director of.
Ms. Leonardo Roever Coronary Stents. Coronary Artery Disease Leading cause of death in United States for men and women Caused by buildup of plaque in.
How we make implants disappear after operations Andreas Karau June 21, 2016, Essen, Germany.
Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON) Trial Presented at The American College.
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
Issues and Current Situations in the Development of Endovascular Treatment Devices for Pediatric Cardiology in the US – US Industry Dan Gutfinger, MD,
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
William A. Gray, MD DISCLOSURES Consulting Fees
Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
Josiah N. Wilcox, Ph.D. Chief Scientific Officer
Regulatory Challenges for Bioabsorbable Stent Approval
My initial ABSORB experience Assoc. Prof. I. Petrov
Andrew Farb, MD Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Latvian Centre of Cardiology real-life registry
Hina M. Pinto, MSE Scientific Reviewer
DCB for In-Stent Restenosis: Is It Superior to DES?
Jacques Koolen Amsterdam The Netherlands
Abbott Vascular Bifurcation Program
The Abbott Vascular DES Pipeline
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Elena Matteucci Global Product Manager - CID Spa
Regulatory Challenges for Bioasorbable Stent Approval
Bioresorbable Scaffolds: State of the Field and Lessons Learned
One DES Eluting Two Drugs: Is it Feasible? Robert Falotico, PhD
Regulatory Challenges for Biodegradable Scaffolds Approval
ReZolve® Clinical Program Update
A Novel “Stent-On-A-Wire”Ultra Low Profile Stent Delivery System
Bioabsorbable DES and Biodegradable Polymers – FDA View
One DES Eluting Two Drugs: Is it Feasible?
Bioresorbable Stent Clinical Study: FDA
A Fixed Guidewire Stent Delivery System
Medical Device Evaluation Division,
ABSORB Japan: 3-year Clinical and Angiographic Results of a Randomized trial Evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Metallic Drug-eluting.
Greg L. Kaluza, MD, PhD, FACC Cardiovascular Research Foundation
DES Bioabsorbable and DCB Technologies
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
Bioresorbable scaffold: the advent of a new era in percutaneous coronary revascularisation Clinical Data Update Ron Waksman, MD, FACC Director, Cardiovascular.
Improved Technology: Evaluating Device Modifications
The XIENCE V EXCEED Study
Regulatory Challenges for Biodegradable Scaffold Approval
Stent Thrombosis Rates in Contemporary Clinical Practice: Insight from a Large Australian Multi-centre Registry BP Yan*, TJ Kiernan, SJ Duffy, DJ Clark,
OCT-Guided PCI What needs to be done to establish criteria?
Medtronic Non-Polymeric DES Development: Update on the Drug Filled Stent Josiah N. Wilcox, Ph.D. Vice President and Resident Scholar Science and Technology.
The Biotronik Magnesium Alloy Bioabsorbable Stent Program: Lessons Learned and Future Directions Ron Waksman, MD Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) Georgetown.
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons – FDA View
DVP, WW Clinical Research
Stenting of Coronary Arteries in Non Stress/Benestent Disease
4/19/2002, Wednesday Three Stages Fatigue Fracture
SIRIUS Trial: Diameter Restenosis
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Stephan Windecker
REALITY: 8 month results
Presented at ACC 2003 Late Breaking Clinical Trials
1/18/2019 6:28 AM C h a p t e r 8 Failure Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba, PE.
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
DEScover: One-Year Clinical Results
Sirolimus Stent vs. Bare Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
TYPHOON Trial Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON) Trial Presented at.
Drug-eluting coronary stent market overview
Presentation transcript:

The REVA Tyrosine Polycarbonate Bioresorbable Stent: Lessons Learned and Future Directions Robert K. Schultz, PhD

Disclosures President, REVA Medical, Inc. 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

About REVA R&D company focused primarily on development of a novel bioresorbable stent Strong stent design and polymer expertise Solid IP position (stents and polymers) Quality investment partners Additional product opportunities 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Potential Benefits of Bioresorbable Stents Non-permanent treatment option Treatment of multi-vessel, prolific disease Decrease of late adverse events Late thrombosis, hypersensitivity Allows arterial remodeling May lead to better healing outcomes May allow for earlier discontinuation of Plavix 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Goals of the REVA Program To develop a stent that provides the benefits of metal without the permanency Strength Maintain acute lumen gain Maintain support throughout remodeling process Performance Expansion range to accommodate “real world” clinical use Visibility Visualize entire stent during and after deployment 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Challenges of Working with Polymers Inherently weaker than metal Less amenable to deformation Lack radiopacity 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Unique Stent Geometry Unique Material The REVA Approach Unique Stent Geometry Unique Material From the beginning, REVA took a unique approach, to fully integrate both a novel design and material, to develop a stent that provides the benefits of metal without the permanency. 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Improved performance with no change to clinical practice Design: Slide & Lock Steel-like performance in a polymer stent Exceptional radial strength Negligible recoil Expansion range to accommodate “real world” clinical use Extremely flexible design Deploys (expands) in artery with sliding, locking parts rather than material deformation Improved performance with no change to clinical practice 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Material: RESORB™ Bioresorbable Polymer Tyrosine-derived polycarbonate Optimized for stent performance Inherently radiopaque, x-ray visible Resorption time can be modified Biocompatible MRI/CT compatible Radiopacity of the REVA Bioresorbable Coronary Stent shortly after implant in a porcine animal model. Desired features for optimal polymer stent performance 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Positive Signals from Early FIM First Generation Device Strength ACUTE GAIN Pre- Post- MLD (mm) 0.88 ± 0.39 2.76 ± 0.36 DS (%) 70% 5.9% Lesion Types Type A 16% Type B1 48% Type B2 28% Type C 8% MAINTAIN GAIN: RESISTING VESSEL RECOIL Implant Follow up EEL (mm2) 15.5±4.0 15.3±3.1 Performance 3.0 mm device targeted to treat 2.9 to 3.4 vessels (Actual treatment of 2.7 to 3.3 mm vessels in FIM) 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Challenges to Overcome TLR Rate: Higher than anticipated between 4-6 months post-implant Key Learnings: Probable failure mode primarily related to polymer performance More predictive bench and preclinical tests required for polymer stenting Tests and standards developed for metal stents do not yield enough insight to polymer stent performance in the clinical environment 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Polymer Stents Model for Potential Failure Modes Regime I: Stent deployment Possible brittle fracture upon high-frequency deployment Regime II: Early stages after deployment Change in material properties due to rapid plasticization Onset of physical aging Regime III: Later stages Possible low frequency fatigue failure 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

REVA Polymer Enhancements Post FIM Polymer Evaluation Regime I No changes to material properties required Regime II Reduction of aqueous plasticization Minimize physical aging Regime III Improve fatigue resistance: Most clinically relevant 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Performance of Modified Polymer Stent Deployment Like FIM polymer - robust deployment Ductility Elongation at break is 7 times higher (350%) Water sorption Lower water sorption and no sharp change in material properties 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Method to Evaluate Polymer Formulations DMA Multi-Frequency Stress Mode Metal stent collapses at cycling force 0.4N Test Parameters Oscillating force 0.3N Temperature 37ºC Water Frequency 1.2 Hz Monitored Parameters OD of the stents Amplitude Stiffness Storage Modulus 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Regime II: Improved Dimensional Stability From Modified Polymer 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Regime III: Material Robustness In Vivo Accessing “real life” fatigue performance FIM Polymer Modified Polymer 1 month time point In-vivo partial stent overlap test. Polymeric stents were deployed into porcine coronary arteries followed by the partially overlapped deployment of a metal stent. One-month results demonstrated the modified polymer’s ability to maintain structural integrity under harsh in vivo conditions. 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Structural Robustness Rigorous Testing of Overall Structure 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Optimized for Commercial Success Features of the ReZolve™ Bioresorbable Stent Radiopaque polymer with improved material robustness Minor modifications to meet clinical demand Spiral slide & lock design Optimized for commercial performance Elution of a –limus drug done 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

Preclinical Evaluation Bare vs. Drug-Coated Overstretch study One-month results demonstrated drug effect No apparent catch up at 3 months. 30-day OCT (bare) 30-day OCT (drug-eluting) 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

ReZolve™ Bioresorbable Stent Restore. Remodel. Resorb. Anticipate Clinical Re-Entry 2010 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.

End 2/22/2010 REVA Medical, Inc.