Structure-based design of peptide presentation on a viral surface: the crystal structure of a plant/animal virus chimera at 2.8 å resolution  Tianwei.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages (July 1998)
by Andrew D. Ferguson, Eckhard Hofmann, James W
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages (October 2004)
New Addresses on an Addressable Virus Nanoblock
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Mark Ultsch, Nathalie A Lokker, Paul J Godowski, Abraham M de Vos 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages (November 1998)
Subunit Folds and Maturation Pathway of a dsRNA Virus Capsid
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Structure of Cry2Aa Suggests an Unexpected Receptor Binding Epitope
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
The structure of coxsackievirus B3 at 3.5 å resolution
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Zheng Liu, Fei Guo, Feng Wang, Tian-Cheng Li, Wen Jiang  Structure 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Investigating Lipid Composition Effects on the Mechanosensitive Channel of Large Conductance (MscL) Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Donald E. Elmore,
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Molding Atomic Structures into Intermediate- Resolution Cryo-EM Density Maps of Ribosomal Complexes Using Real-Space Refinement  Haixiao Gao, Joachim.
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1995)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 1994)
Structural Basis for Dimerization of ICAM-1 on the Cell Surface
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Crystal structures of reduced, oxidized, and mutated human thioredoxins: evidence for a regulatory homodimer  Andrzej Weichsel, John R Gasdaska, Garth.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages (July 1994)
The Structure of the Mammalian 20S Proteasome at 2.75 Å Resolution
T Barrett, CG Suresh, SP Tolley, EJ Dodson, MA Hughes  Structure 
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages e3 (June 2018)
Gydo C.P. van Zundert, Adrien S.J. Melquiond, Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Erik Martínez-Hackert, Ann M Stock  Structure 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Qing Yao, Sara J. Weaver, Jee-Young Mock, Grant J. Jensen  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Structure-based design of peptide presentation on a viral surface: the crystal structure of a plant/animal virus chimera at 2.8 å resolution  Tianwei Lin, Claudine Porta, George Lomonossoff, John E Johnson  Folding and Design  Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 179-187 (June 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00030-2 Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Generation of the CPMV chimera. (a) Residues in the βB-βC loops of CPMV and the location of restriction sites, as well as the residues in the chimera and the position of the spontaneous cleavage in the chimera. (b) The location of the exposed loop of the chimera on the particle surface with the insertion represented in red. There are two unique restriction enzyme sites, NheI (natural) and AatII (prepared by site-directed mutagenesis), in the region encoding the βB-βC loop of the small subunit in the infectious clone. These two sites were used in the cassette mutagenesis. Oligonucleotides were introduced to restore the native sequence of those residues removed that participate in secondary structure hydrogen bonds (CPMV residues 16–19) and to insert the NIm-IA antigenic sequence of HRV14 between Ala22 and Pro23. Two residues, Asp1091 and Glu1095 (numbering from HRV14), that were important for the NIm-IA immunogenicity are drawn as larger circles. The chimera thus generated has the foreign sequence presented at the pentamers of the virus capsid (lower right). The majority of the virus isolated was fragmented between Lys1097 and Leu1098. Folding and Design 1996 1, 179-187DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00030-2) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Generation of the CPMV chimera. (a) Residues in the βB-βC loops of CPMV and the location of restriction sites, as well as the residues in the chimera and the position of the spontaneous cleavage in the chimera. (b) The location of the exposed loop of the chimera on the particle surface with the insertion represented in red. There are two unique restriction enzyme sites, NheI (natural) and AatII (prepared by site-directed mutagenesis), in the region encoding the βB-βC loop of the small subunit in the infectious clone. These two sites were used in the cassette mutagenesis. Oligonucleotides were introduced to restore the native sequence of those residues removed that participate in secondary structure hydrogen bonds (CPMV residues 16–19) and to insert the NIm-IA antigenic sequence of HRV14 between Ala22 and Pro23. Two residues, Asp1091 and Glu1095 (numbering from HRV14), that were important for the NIm-IA immunogenicity are drawn as larger circles. The chimera thus generated has the foreign sequence presented at the pentamers of the virus capsid (lower right). The majority of the virus isolated was fragmented between Lys1097 and Leu1098. Folding and Design 1996 1, 179-187DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00030-2) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 An averaged, difference electron density map, with coefficients (|Fnative|–|Fchimera|)eiα(native)employed in the Fourier series. (a) A stereoview of the electron density for the entire icosahedral asymmetric unit showing that the only significant differences between the native and chimera structures are at the βB-βC loop (top of figure). (b) A close view of the strong density observed for residues in the native structure (shown as the refined model) that changed position due to the inserted polypeptide. In the native structure, Phe24 is in a hydrophobic environment between residues in the loop connecting βB and βC strands and the loop connecting the βH and βI strands. Folding and Design 1996 1, 179-187DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00030-2) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 An averaged, difference electron density map, with coefficients (|Fnative|–|Fchimera|)eiα(native)employed in the Fourier series. (a) A stereoview of the electron density for the entire icosahedral asymmetric unit showing that the only significant differences between the native and chimera structures are at the βB-βC loop (top of figure). (b) A close view of the strong density observed for residues in the native structure (shown as the refined model) that changed position due to the inserted polypeptide. In the native structure, Phe24 is in a hydrophobic environment between residues in the loop connecting βB and βC strands and the loop connecting the βH and βI strands. Folding and Design 1996 1, 179-187DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00030-2) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Electron density for the chimera particle. The mainchain of the modified βB-βC loop was clearly defined in the averaged electron density map computed with amplitudes Fchimeraeiα(real space averaging) and sidechains of 12 of the 14 inserted residues were unambiguously modeled. The model is shown below and fit to the density above. The β-strands and sidechains that comprise the immediate environment of Phe24 are also shown in gray. Folding and Design 1996 1, 179-187DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00030-2) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Electron density for the chimera particle. The mainchain of the modified βB-βC loop was clearly defined in the averaged electron density map computed with amplitudes Fchimeraeiα(real space averaging) and sidechains of 12 of the 14 inserted residues were unambiguously modeled. The model is shown below and fit to the density above. The β-strands and sidechains that comprise the immediate environment of Phe24 are also shown in gray. Folding and Design 1996 1, 179-187DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00030-2) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A ribbon diagram of the icosahedral asymmetric unit of the chimera. The inserted loop of the chimera is in red. The loop in yellow shows the original position of the native βB-βC loop of CPMV. The icosahedral asymmetric unit of CPMV is occupied by two gene products, the large (L) subunit composed of a single polypeptide chain with two β-barrel domains (shown in different shades of green) and the small (S) subunit composed of one β-barrel domain (shown in blue). The structure of the L subunit was not affected by the changes made in the S subunit (see Figure 2a). The CPMV structure is organized like the picornavirus capsids with L corresponding to VP2 (dark green) and VP3 (blue-green) and S corresponding to VP1. The ribbon diagrams were generated by the program RIBBONS [18]. Folding and Design 1996 1, 179-187DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00030-2) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A stereoview comparing the chimera loop (in red) with the native NIm-IA loop of HRV14 (in gray); Asp1091 and Glu1095 define the NIm-IA epitope, in that changes to either of these residues stop the virus from being neutralized by specific monoclonal antibodies, and are labeled in both loops. The NIm-IA loop displayed three turns, with the two ends of the loop 9 å apart; the chimera loop was relatively smooth and 19 å separate the two ends. The ribbons in this figure were forced to pass through the Cα positions in both structures. Folding and Design 1996 1, 179-187DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00030-2) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 A stereoview of the space-filling drawing of CPMV particles carrying the inserted residues. The large subunit is shown in blue-green (VP3-like domain) and green (VP2-like domain). The small subunit is shown in blue and the inserted residues are in red. All atoms are shown as spheres of 1.8 å. The maximum radial extent of the inserted (red) loop is 167 å from the particle center, compared to a maximum radial extent of 158 å found in the native structure. The space-filling drawing was made with the program MidasPlus [19,20]. Folding and Design 1996 1, 179-187DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00030-2) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions