High Q R&D at Fermilab Anna Grassellino TTC Topical Meeting on CW SCRF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Ingot Niobium Andrew Hutton SSTIN10 Symposium Jefferson Lab Sept 22-24, 2010.
Advertisements

Laser etching of GaN Jonathan Winterstein Dr. Tim Sands, Advisor.
ILC PM Meeting S0 Webex Global Design Effort 1 S0/S1 Next Steps Lutz Lilje GDE.
Rong-Li Geng Jefferson Lab High Efficiency High Gradient Cavities - Toward Cutting Down ILC Dynamic Heat Load by Factor of Four R.L. Geng, ALCW2015,
Jim Kerby, Fermilab for Rongli Geng and the S0 Cavity Team 23 May 2010 Current Status of SCRF Cavity Development SCRF Cavity Technology and Industrialization.
1Claire AntoineCEA/Saclay - Fermilab (Innovative) Processing of materials SRF materials Workshop Fermilab May 23-24, 2007 Today’s process is long, complex,
High Q R&D at JLab G. Ciovati, P. Dhakal, R. Geng, P. Kneisel, G. Myneni TTC Topical Meeting on CW SRF Cornell Univ., June 12 th -14 th, 2013.
CAVITY TREATMENT (BCP, HEAT TREATMENT & HPR) Sergio Calatroni with many contributions from: Rama Calaga, Leonel Ferreira, Antonio Mongelluzzo LHC CCEM,
R.L. Geng, 5/27-31,2013 ECFA LC2013, DESY 1 Update on Raising Q0 at Ultra-High Gradient via Large-Grain Niobium Material Rongli Geng Jefferson Lab ECFA.
S.M. Deambrosis*^, G. Keppel*, N. Pretto^, V. Rampazzo*, R.G. Sharma°, D. Tonini * and V. Palmieri*^ Padova University, Material Science Dept * INFN -
R&D Expected in Cooperation with Vendors ILC Baseline Assessment Workshop Mark Champion September 09, 2010.
Americas Cavity Specification C.M. Ginsburg (Fermilab) On behalf of the Fermilab cavity crew October 20, 2010.
CRAB for HL-LHC KEK activity 2010DEC Yoshiyuki MORITA.
Update on S0 Work in the Americas Region Mark Champion 17 June 2008.
CEPC 1.3GHz & 650MHz SC cavity high Q R&D Z.C. LIU #, P. Sha, H.J. Zheng, J.Y. Zhai, M.Y. Wang, G.W. Wang, Y. Sun, J. Gao
Curtis Crawford, Georg H. Hoffstaetter Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics Optimization of f 9-cell Vertical Electro Polishing.
High Temperature Heat Treatment to Raise the Quality Factor of Large Grain Niobium Cavities Pashupati Dhakal Gianluigi Ciovati Ganapati Rao Myneni July.
Hydroformed Multi-Cell Cavities. Update Waldemar Singer, DESY Peter Kneisel, JLab.
SRF Cost Reduction for Project X Bob Kephart. SRF Challenges for Project X Adoption of a 3 GeV CW linac followed by a 3-8 GeV pulsed linac for Project.
Annual Meeting CERN - November 2005 Bernard V ISENTIN.
SRF Test Facilities – Functions and Costs Alexander Romanenko Test Facilities Review 17 Mar 2015.
Possible Relationship Between Defect Pre-Heating and Defect Size H. Padamsee Cornell S0 Meeting, Jan 26, 2009.
High-Q, High Gradient Niobium-Coated Cavities at CERN
Surface Resistance of a bulk-like Nb Film Sarah Aull, Anne-Marie Valente-Feliciano, Tobias Junginger and Jens Knobloch.
Rongli Geng ILC Cavity Group Meeting October 25, 2011
LCLS-II Cavity Production and Vertical Testing
Update on the US decadal roadmap on SRF technology for HEP accelerators Sergey Belomestnykh FCC Week 2017 in Berlin 30 May 2017.
Cavity Test Results for PIP-II
Condition of electron beam welding toward a high gradient application
Energy (ILC) and Intensity (Project X) SRF Cavity Needs
CEPC Nitrogen Doping Study
Results on second sound method
New Cavity Techniques and Future Prospects
JLab infusion and LG flux expulsion update
Odu/slac rf-dipole prototype
Peng Sha Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
CEPC 1.3GHz and 650MHz high Q Nitrogen doping R&D progress
High Q via N infusion R&D at Jefferson Lab
ELLIPTICAL SCRF CAVITIES
Some History of Electropolishing of Niobium 1970 – 1990
VERTICAL TEST RESULTS OF SPOKE RESONATOR AT IPNO
A COMMON R&D ON THE HIGH GRADIENT Nb CAVITIES
N infusion study at DESY
9-cell Vender Qualification test for LCLS-II
Recent SCRF Activities in IHEP
2. SCRF General Preparation for the AD&I Preparation for AAP Review
Materials, Advanced Accelerator Science & Cryogenics Division
TTC High Q0 Working Group Summary of developments since last TTC meeting C. Reece.
Mechanical Polishing of 1.3 GHz Niobium Cavities
TTC topical-meeting on CW SRF 2013
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Update from single-cell low temperature doping runs at JLab
Status of CEPC SC RF Study
N-infusion, Vertical-EP, and ILC cost reduction efforts at Cornell
LCLS-II High Q0 Cavities: Lessons Learned
Cavity Treatment for High Q0 in Realistic Magnetic Fields
SRF Surface Studies and the High Field Q-slope Mystery
Red – ASTM 5 Black - ASTM 6 Blue - ASTM 7 * Not 900°C
Vertical Test Results of 9-Cell Cavities for LCLS-II
Recent 160 C “N infusion” impurity doping results
Surface resistance studies as a function of the mean free path
FNAL update Martina Martinello.
Peng SHA, On behalf of CEPC SRF group
Nb films Sergio Calatroni for the new CERN SRF & films team 5/21/2019
JLab Doping Protocol Exploration
Quench Studies in Single and Multicell N-Doped Cavities
Low-T Baking at Cornell
JLab Work on Low Temperature Near-Surface Diffusion aka “Infusion”
First results Plasma etching
The LCLS-II HE High Q0 and Gradient R&D Program
Presentation transcript:

High Q R&D at Fermilab Anna Grassellino TTC Topical Meeting on CW SCRF Cornell University, June 13th 2013

Outline What is typical Q and, in particular, residual and BCS resistance for standard treatments, as a function of field? (study performed at 1.3 GHz) New processing techniques for Q maximization (studies performed at 1.3 GHz) Transferring high Q recipes to 650 MHz cavities for PX

What is Q and Rs(B) for standard treatments?

Field Dependence of Surface Resistance for typical treatments Q = G/Rs, where Rs = RBCS(T) + Rs Crucial question – how does medium field Q-slope emerge from its components RBCS (B) and Rs (B)? Answering allows: Obtain Rs(B,T) predictions for any standard treatment (EP, BCP, mild bake, anneal…) to design accelerators -> missing input for optimization Baseline for comparison with new, innovative treatments Fundamental understanding of “Q-slopes”

Approach A. Romanenko and A.Grassellino http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.4516 Obtain as many Q(B,T) measurements as practical at ALL fields (not only at a single low field as is customary) At each fixed field fit corresponding Q(T) to extract Rres Also gives Rbcs(T) = Rs(T)-Rres Bath temperature

Results (1.3 GHz) A. Romanenko and A.Grassellino http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.4516 Medium field Q slope is a combination of both R0(B) and RBCS(B) RBCS decreases but becomes strongly field dependent after 120C Medium field Q slope is NOT due to thermal feedback Stronger R0(B) for BCP vs EP

New surface processing techniques for Q maximization

Annealing with caps+ no chemistry produces extra-low residual resistance 1.3 GHz, 2K A.Grassellino et al, http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2182 Systematically low R0 Extra cost savings from skipping the post furnace chemical processing See also G. Ciovati, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13, 022002 (2010)

Long annealing produces extra-low R0(B)

Heat treatments in nitrogen produce unprecedented values of RBCS(B) 1.3 GHz, 2K A.Grassellino et al, http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0288

Heat treatments in nitrogen produce unprecedented values of BCS Q curves as a function of material removal via EP post-nitrogen treatment: 1.3 GHz, 2K 1.3 GHz, 2K 1.3 GHz, 2K

Is doping with interstitial impurities a long sought solution to the medium field Q-slope?

Doping with interstitial impurities: a solution for MFQS? The cavity baked with argon Cavity baked at 800C for an hour in UHV, followed by an hour at 800C in partial pressure ~2x10-2 T of Argon  Q ~1x107 Then ~ 7 micron removal via EP  again anti-Qslope! Interesting note: anti-Q-slope result recently reported by Jlab also has argon injection at high T in the preparation steps Interstial impurities doping may be the common root of the anti-slope results 1.3 GHz, 2K A.Grassellino et al, http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0288

Applying the high Q recipes to 650 MHz cavities for PX (first results)

Applying the findings to 650 MHz PX cavities Very low residual resistance (~2 nΩ) even with just baseline EP or BCP (indication of frequency dependence of residual resistance?) Cavities have not been high temperature baked yet HF rinse successful in raising Q! ~ 40% Slope due to both residual and BCS Will try annealing with caps and nitrogen/argon treatments next

Conclusions Different recipes found for Q maximization for different applications For applications requiring extra high Q, no operating T constraints (ie cavity QED): anneal followed by no chemistry, long anneals For large CW machines, where operating T range is constrained to above 1.8K: two new surface treatments have been found which: Reverse medium field Q-slope! Up to 150% gain in Q in the T range of interest for CW accelerators Recipes are extremely simple, can be replicated at any lab with access to a standard hydrogen degassing furnace FNAL will try soon interstitial doping on 3.9 GHz cavity: potential for even larger gains! An improvement in BCS has the advantage to be “robust” and fully maintained in cryomodule

The work presented comes from a team effort: A.Grassellino, A.Romanenko, O.Melnychuk, A.Crawford, A.Rowe, M.Wong, D.Sergatskov, T.Khabiboulline, A. Sukhanov, Y.Trenikhina, F.Barkov, D.Bice, B.Stone, C.Baker, Y. Pischalnikov, C. Ginsburg, V.Yakovlev, R.D.Kephart

N total Mean sigma Minimum Median Maximum Not tumbled 11 2.6 0.50796 1.43 2.73 3.14 Tumbled 2.69273 0.71337 1.53 2.51 4.24 N total Mean sigma Minimum Median Maximum Not tumbled 10 1.777 0.39556 1.16 1.95 2.17 Tumbled 11 1.89182 0.52759 0.99 1.98 2.87

Heating is negligible, Rbcs increase with field is a genuine effect From combined T-map/RF measurements Heating is negligible, Rbcs increase with field is a genuine effect Thermal feedback does not explain the medium field Q slope

After 800C 10 min with N plus 5 micron EP (perfectly smooth, nothing noticeable) After 800C 10 min with N plus 5 micron EP plus 15 micron BCP, signs of preferential etching

Nitrided surfaces: laser microscopy – post chemistry (10 minutes nitridization plus 10 microns BCP) 10x 20x 50x 100x