Summary of experience with IPM measurements at BNL-RHIC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
5/3/2015J-PARC1 Transverse Matching Using Transverse Profiles and Longitudinal Beam arrival Times.
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
FNAL Emittance Devices Flying Wires (FW) Sync Lite Ion Profile Monitors (IPM) aah,6/20/2000.
APEX Report April 28-29, 2009 May 4, 2009 Fulvia Pilat Time Meeting, May
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Intra-beam Scattering -- a RHIC Perspective J. Wei, W. Fischer Collider-Accelerator Department EIC Workshop,
Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring David L. Rubin December 22, 2011.
Craig Drennan Linac and Booster Beam Diagnostics Proton Source Workshop December 7 and 8, 2010.
Beam-beam Observations in RHIC Y. Luo, W. Fischer Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA ICFA Mini-workshop on Beam-Beam Effects in Hadron Colliders, March.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
IPM status and plans 1.Yellow vertical detector has extremely low coupling to beam and to signal-gating grid. It also has improved resolution due to reduced.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
RHIC Run14 Time Meeting. Run14 Status – Apr. 29 Operations running well, 11 full stores over the past 7 days; setting STAR ZDC rates to 50 khz is now.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Beam diagnostics in the beamlines
RHIC Status: Startup Run 12 V. Schoefer RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 1/13/12.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
RHIC Run14 Time Meeting. Run14 Status – Apr. 15 Operations running well, 12 stores over the past 7 days with 1 lost to another “super quench”. Testing.
RHIC Run14 Time Meeting. Run14 Status – Apr. 22 Operations running well, 12 stores over the past 7 days with 1 “super store” of 17 hours. Repositioned.
October 4-5, Overview of ARRA funded AIPs at C-AD Wolfram Fischer October 4, 2010.
The Quadrupole Pick-up in the CPS -intro and progress report PPC 3 Dec 1999 A. Jansson.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
» RHIC Polarimetry « Oleg Eyser for the RHIC Polarimetry Group 2014 RHIC Retreat, August 14.
Low Energy operation of RHIC AGS low energy extraction performance N. Tsoupas et. al. BNL.
Polarized proton projections Wolfram Fischer 11 May 2012 RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting BNL.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
F All Experimenters' Mtg - 2 Jun 03 Weeks in Review: 05/19/03 –06/02/03 Keith Gollwitzer – FNAL Stores and Operations Summary Standard Plots.
The RHIC C-CNI polarimeter upgrade for 2009 Run. RSC Meeting, December 16, 2008 Anatoli Zelenski for polarimeter upgrade group. T.Russo, T.Curcio, D.Lehn,
IPM EM Simulations 9 th DITANET Topical Workshop on Non-Invasive Beam Size Measurement for High Brightness Proton and Heavy Ion Accelerators April.
RECYCLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RECYCLER RING & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
Vladimir Litvinenko, APEX Workshop 11/02/20006 IBS suppression lattice Mei Bai, Joanne Beebe-Wang, Peter Cameron, Roger Connolly, Angelika Drees, Alexei.
Prospects for RHIC Low-Energy Operations Todd Satogata (W. Fischer, T. Roser, A. Fedotov, N. Tsoupas, M. Brennan, C. Montag, and others) “Can We Discover.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Proton Polarimetry Proton polarimeter reactions RHIC polarimeters.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Polarized Proton at RHIC: Status and Future Plan Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Dept. BNL A Special Beam Physics Symposium in Honor of Yaroslav Derbenev's.
P OSSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING AA AND PP CAPABILITIES IN PARALLEL WITH E RHIC V. Ptitsyn Collider-Accelerator Department BNL RHIC and AGS Users Meeting,
05/12/2014 Gerrit Jan Focker, BE/BI/PM 1 PSB-Injection H - and H 0 Dump detectors and Stripping Foil current measurement.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
APEX RUN-11 APEX Schedule May 11, 2011 Injection 12am8am BBA Minty, Jordan, Liu, Rob, Rob, Kevin, … Spin Flipper Bai, Pablo, Oddo, Craig, Kevin IPM calibration.
10/3/2003Andreas Jansson - Tevatron IPM review1 Tevatron IPM Proposed design.
LEReC BPM Status P. Cernigla, R. Hulsart, R. Michnoff, Z. Sorrell June 2, 2016.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
IPM Simulations at Fermilab 3-4 March 2016 Randy Thurman-Keup.
Ion Profile Monitors _ 2017 Jim Zagel GSI - IPM17 Workshop
News from J-PARC: the system, the data and the simulation code
Momentum and Momentum Spread Measurements
Operational experience of the AGS eIPMs
Alexander Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge, USA
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
Summary of experience with Tevatron synchrotron light diagnostics
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
Large Booster and Collider Ring
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Status of muon monitor R&D and construction
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Another Immortal Fill….
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
Pulsed electron beam cooling experiments: data & preliminary results
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

Summary of experience with IPM measurements at BNL-RHIC R. Connolly, R. Michnoff, M. Minty, S. Tepikian measurement concept and architecture first prototype test and first tests in RHIC design challenges and solutions electron clouds sensitivity to beam loss dynamic MCP saturation rf coupling from beam electronic noise need and plans for absolute beam emittance measurements M. Minty (BNL) April 15, 2013

Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) INJECTION COLLISIONS ACCELERATION PHENIX STAR RHIC consists of 2 separate superconducting accelerators, 2.4 miles (3.8 km) long LINAC Booster EBIS AGS Tandems RHIC beams: 110 bunches, each bunch contains ~1E9 ions or ~2E11 protons RHIC bunches are guided and focused using ~ 1750 superconducting magnets RHIC bunches are 100 mm at the colliding beam experiements RHIC bunches circulate at ~ 80 kHz

Measurement Concept In RHIC the IPMs measure the distribution of free electrons created by ionization of the residual gas. These electrons are swept from the beamline by a transverse electric field, amplified by a microchannel plate (MCP), and collected on an anode consisting of 64 strips oriented parallel to the beam axis. A beam bunch produces a charge pulse on each strip that is amplified, integrated, and digitized. The application fits a Gaussian profile to the data. The emittance is calculated using the rms width of the fit and the beta function from the online model.

System Architecture 4 IPMs in RHIC (horizontal and vertical in each of the 2 rings) tunnel 2 set of preamps MCP bias e- sweep provides beam synchronous triggers and bunch pattern request (analog) service building digitizers receives from online model dispersion and beta functions; performs fits and displays results

Blue Ring vertical IPM – view inside tunnel signal amplifiers MCP bias control sweep voltage control corrector magnet detector magnet

IPM signal processing in service building power supplies vacuum interlock vacuum gauges VME crates diagnostic patch panel

Dec, 1996 – sextant test A Prototype Ionization Profile Monitor for RHIC, R. Connolly et al, PAC 1997

August, 1999 – first measurements in RHIC The RHIC Ionization Profile Monitor, R. Connolly et al, PAC 1999 Beam profile measurements and transverse phase-space reconstruction on the relativistic heavy-ion collider, R. Connolly et al, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 443 (2000)

Challenges and solutions: electron clouds and sensitivity to beam position Initially it was thought that dipole would dominate electron transport so no effort was made to shape the electric field. However the beam sizes were observed to vary as the beam was scanned across the aperture. In addition, electron clouds produced large backgrounds profile before profile after Both addressed (~2002) by field shaping – extending the high voltage electrodes several cm beyond the volume defined by the MCP aperture

Challenges and solutions: radiation spray from upstream beam losses Addressed (~2002) by moving the collector away from the narrow opening angle of the backgrounds and placing the collector in the shadow of several cm of steel

Challenges and solutions: MCP saturation 2003 – signal levels large enough to suppress dynamically the gain of the MCP channels at the center of the beam 2003 – exposure management by switching power supplies on/off inadequate leading to MCP damage 2005 – fast signal gating added to allow MCP to be biased while input signal is absent

Challenges and solutions: rf coupling from the beam … due largely to non-negligible detector impedance and antenna-like geometry 2002 – placed rf screen between beam and collector electronics 2005 – replaced screen with hexagonal Al mesh (95% open area, rf attenuation by 80 dB) Residual-Gas Ionization Profile Monitors in RHIC, R. Connolly et al, PAC 2005

Challenges and solutions: rf coupling from the beam, continued 2007 – all electronics inside Faraday cage electronics  smoother surfaces (low impedance); all electronics out of path of image current

Present RHIC IPM design (mechanical engineering by J. Fite) Residual-Gas Ionization Beam Profile Monitors in RHIC, R. Connolly et al, PAC 2010

Residual-Gas Ionization Beam Profile Monitors in RHIC, R Residual-Gas Ionization Beam Profile Monitors in RHIC, R. Connolly et al, 2010 Beam Instrumentation Workshop

Challenges and solutions: electronic noise 2011: reported emittance changes with separation bump collapse at 3rd colliding beam experiment motivated calibration scans which were performed by moving the beam in discrete steps across each IPM and recording images (figures from R. Connolly, 05/13/11 APEX meeting presentation) MCP depletion correction implemented, but puzzles remained

hypothesis: channel-by-channel (anode board + processing electronics) systematics relevant 64 signal channels

channel-by-channel gain calibration algorithm (M. Minty) Gauss-fit each profile in the data set 2. calculate chi-squared of Gaussian fit 3. calculate figure of merit: mean chi-squared averaged of all profiles iterate over a range of gain settings 5. polynomial fit to figure of merit versus gain to extract gain corresponding to minimum average chi-squared implement this gain 7. iterate over channels

Offline comparison before and after calibration raw data corrected data MCP counts y (mm) offline analyses confirmed that channel-to-channel variations dominated measurement error

Online comparison before and after calibration run-11, Au+Au (100 GeV) run-12, Au+Cu (100 GeV) from Developments in beam instrumentation and control, M. Minty et al, 2012 RHIC Retreat

Challenges and solutions: absolute emittance measurements Motivation – fixed energy: Motivation – energy ramp: (protons) discrepancies between IPM and luminosity-based emittances smoothly varying beam sigma (ions) non-equal horizontal and vertical emittances with coupled beams and stochastic cooling unphysical emittance 2011 data bad model beta functions! March, 2013 (This is an extreme case, however we do often observe reported emittance growth and shrinkage during ramping) Next a preview of work in progress…

2013: ramp optics measurements In 2012 we demonstrated high precision turn-by-turn BPM measurements (~15 microns, rms) with pinged-beams allowing for phase determination with 0.1 deg rms phase precision (P. Thieberger, C. Liu) 255 GeV In 2013 we’ve combined this analysis to measure the beam optics along the energy ramp (A. Marusic, R. Michnoff, R. Hulsart et al) Feb, 2013 2013: ramp optics measurements

April, 2013: beta functions at the IPMs during the energy ramp Blue Ring horizontal Blue Ring vertical Yellow Ring horizontal Yellow Ring vertical (beam loss) (by C. Liu)

Present status: largest systematic in IPM emittance measurement is knowledge of beta function Present status: largest systematic in IPM emittance measurement is knowledge of beta function propagation of beta functions to IPM locations based on measurements at adjacent BPMs necessarily requires model we will analyze the error in that approach and continue work on fixing the lattice (both at store energy and along the energy ramp) April, 2013: global optics correction (1 iteration) at store energy by C. Liu

Summary of experience with IPM measurements at BNL-RHIC reviewed measurement concept and architecture showed first prototype test and first tests in RHIC reviewed design challenges and solutions electron clouds sensitivity to beam loss dynamic MCP saturation rf coupling from beam electronic noise demonstrated need and described plans for determining absolute beam emittances using the IPMs

Gate is opened for 1 turn every 100 turns Gate is opened for 1 turn every 100 turns. During this turn the digitizers are triggered on all buckets of interest. Gate is held open for 2.3 ms (~200 turns). During this time the digitizers are triggered on every turn.