A Farmer-Friendly Tool for Predicting Soil Organic Matter

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
: A service of the Southeast Climate Consortium C. Fraisse, D. Zierden, and J. Paz Climate Prediction Application Science Workshop Chapel Hill, NC March.
Advertisements

Session 1. Gather practical experience gained with the cultivation of traditional bioenergy crops in the Mediterranean with respect to their environmental.
Simulating Cropping Systems in the Guinea Savanna Zone of Northern Ghana with DSSAT-CENTURY J. B. Naab 1, Jawoo Koo 2, J.W. Jones 2, and K. J. Boote 2,
Soil C change with management Balancing Crop Biomass for Bioenergy and Conservation REAP - Renewable Energy Assessment Project Jane M-F Johnson 1, Ronald.
Economic Potential for Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Nioro Region of Senegal’s Peanut Basin by John Antle, Bocar Diagana, Jetse Stoorvogel and Kara.
Julia W. Gaskin Sustainable Agriculture Coordinator Crop & Soil Science Dept College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences.
CENTURY ECOSYSTEM MODEL Introduction to CENTURY. WHY CENTURY Evaluate Effects of Environmental Change Evaluate Changes in Management.
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Introduction The agricultural practice of field tillage has dramatic effects on surface hydrologic properties, significantly altering the processes of.
By Dr. Thongchai Tangpremsri by Dr. Thongchai Tangpremsri Thailand Country Report on Conservation Agriculture.
Soil Carbon and Agricultural Land Management in Semi-Arid Central Spain Darcy Boellstorff Assistant Professor, Bridgewater State College, Massachusetts.
Modeling of Soil Nutrients – An Introduction to Logical Spreadsheeting Russell Yost Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Science, University of Hawai`i.
Introduction The agricultural practice of field tillage has dramatic effects on surface hydrologic properties, significantly altering the processes of.
Nowlin Chair Crop Modeling Symposium November 10-11, 2000 Future Needs for Effective Model Applications James W. Jones  Users  Model Capabilities  Data.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Integrating Cropland Management into.
Biomass Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Forest-based Fuels and Products Al Lucier, NCASI Reid Miner, NCASI
Making sure we can handle the extremes! Carolyn Olson, Ph.D. 90 th Annual Outlook Forum February 20-21, 2014.
An assessment of the global land use change and food security effects of the use of agricultural residues for bioenergy production Edward Smeets, Andrzej.
Trade-offs between sequestration and bioenergy benefits Nicolas VUICHARD (1,2) Philippe CIAIS (2) Luca BELELLI (3) Riccardo VALENTINI (3) (1)CIRED – Nogent.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
Tradeoff Analysis: From Science to Policy John M. Antle Department of Ag Econ & Econ Montana State University.
WLI REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE WORKSHOP ON DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS AND MODELS SEPTEMBER, 2013, JERBA, TUNISIA Economic analysis of improved water.
Cotton Modeling to Assess Climate Change and Crop Management December 2005 V. R. Reddy 1 and K. R. Reddy 2 1 USDA-ARS, Crop Systems and Global Change Laboratory,
Assessment of Different Quantification Approaches and Application of Multiple Practices for a Single Farm Unit Dennis Haak, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada.
SOIL CONDITION INDEX – (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AT THE FARM BUTMIR NEAR SARAJEVO Prof. Dr. Hamid Čustović Tvica Mirza.
Soil carbon in dynamic land use optimization models Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
European Carbon Sinks Modeling Status, Data, Analytical Gaps, EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL IN SMALLHOLDER FARMING SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN GHANA Jawoo Koo 1, J.B. Naab 2, J.W. Jones 1, W.M. Bostick 1 and K.J. Boote 3.
Overview of Economic Methods to Simulate Land Competition Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum National Conservation Training Center.
Acknowledgements: This research was supported by the USDA-ARS Specific Cooperative Agreement Biologically Based Weed Management for Organic Farming Systems.
Soil and the Characteristics Important for Plant Growth Sustainable Small Acreage Farming and Ranching Slides adapted from the Living on the Land curriculum,
Using the Soil Conditioning Index to Assess Management Effects on Soil Carbon USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Quality National Technology.
Results of Long-Term Experiments With Conservation Tillage in Austria Introduction On-site and off-site damages of soil erosion cause serious problems.
Modelling the optimal phosphate fertiliser and soil management strategy for crops James Heppell August 2014.
Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study -- Irrigation and Municipal & Industrial (M&I) Benefits Public Meeting August 9, 2013.
A Cropping System Oriented Carbon-Nitrogen Simulation Model Claudio O. Stöckle, Armen R. Kemanian Biological Systems Engineering Department Washington.
Linking Land use, Biophysical, and Economic Models for Policy Analysis Catherine L. Kling Iowa State University October 13, 2015 Prepared for “Coupling.
An Evaluation of the Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Corn Grain Ethanol Industry on the Agricultural Sector Western Agricultural Economics Association.
Pre-workshop exercise on SOC stock simulation / calibration of DNDC Steven Sleutel Dept. Soil Management & Soil Care Ghent University.
Missouri and Biofuels Bioenergy 101 Warrensburg November 2008.
Rao Mylavarapu Professor, Soil & Nutrient Management Director of IFAS ANSERV Laboratories Soil & Water Science Department University of Florida.
Kg P per county (1000) > < 45 Figure 4 Estimated P production from confined livestock. kg N per county (1000) > 908 Figure.
Agriculture and the Changing Climate: Resilience in Uncertain Times Kim McCracken NRCS State Soil Scientist November 7, 2015.
Eurostat activities concerning regional nutrient balances.
Simulated Sorghum Grain and Biomass Yield, Water Use, Soil Erosion and Carbon Evolution, and Potential Ethanol Production in Central and South Texas Manyowa.
5th Shire River Basin Conference 22 February 2017 Shire River Basin Management Project Shire Basin Planning Tool Sub-Component A1 Development of a.
Carbon Sequestration Akilah Martin Fall 2005.
Implications of Alternative Crop Yield Assumptions on Land Management, Commodity Markets, and GHG Emissions Projections Justin S. Baker, Ph.D.1 with B.A.
Soil Carbon – What does it mean?
Economics of Cover Crops
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Kostas Seferis, i2S Data science and e-infrastructures can help aquaculture to improve performance and sustainability!
Irrigation Investment Calculator
Carbon Cycling in Perennial Biofuel Management Systems
Lyubov Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao
Tradeoffs Between Soil Carbon Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Grazed Pastures of Northeastern US Organic Dairy Farms Alexandra Contosta1,
Partial Nutrient Balance at Farm plot level under Different Irrigation Water Management for Tomato production Muluye Gedfew1, Petra Schmitter2, Prossie.
Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases
Lyubov Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao
NADSS Overview An Application of Geo-Spatial Decision Support to Agriculture Risk Management.
Actuaries Climate Index™
ASSESSING AND MANAGING SOIL QUALITY FOR SUSTAINABLE
Sustainable Agriculture
Soil carbon and farming systems
DOE 1605(b) Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Registry and
Applying an agroecosystem model to inform integrated assessments of climate change mitigation opportunities AM Thomson, RC Izaurralde, GP Kyle, X Zhang,
Institute for the Study of Society and Environment
RC Izaurralde – JGCRI With contributions from NJ Rosenberg – JGCRI
Soil Carbon Sequestration and Other Soil Ecosystem Service
Cool Farms Tool – Crop GHG Calculator (CSAb)
Presentation transcript:

A Farmer-Friendly Tool for Predicting Soil Organic Matter 2013 ASA, CSSA and SSSA International Annual Meetings | Tampa, Florida A Farmer-Friendly Tool for Predicting Soil Organic Matter ASA Section: Environmental Quality Session 359 | Poster# 1309 Vinayak Shedekar1, Khandakar R. Islam2, Randall C Reeder1 and Jerry Grigar Jr.3 (1)Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH, (2)Soil, Water and Bioenergy Resources, The Ohio State University South Centers, Piketon OH, (3)USDA-NRCS, East Lansing, MI Introduction Removal of crop residue for biofuels and other purposes is becoming a common practice in the Midwest. However, removal of crop residue adversely impacts the stability of soil organic matter (SOM) stock. Management practices like continuous no-till, cover crops, and manure can offset the SOM losses. Therefore, there is a growing interest among farmers, crop consultants, and bio-energy related industry for a tool that can help optimize their management practices and crop residue removal rates, while maintaining a good soil health in the long term. A few tools are available to quantify SOM changes when crop residue is removed, e.g. Soil conditioning index CENTURY DAISY Comet VR , COMET-FARM™ and more… Some of these are “User Friendly”…But none are “Farmer-friendly” Objective Our goal was to develop a farmer-friendly tool for predicting SOM, nutrients, and overall soil quality. Conceptual model The SOM is divided into two pools, viz. active organic matter and passive (old) organic matter. The active pool is assumed to decompose at a faster rate, exponentially with time (years 1 to 5). The passive pool, on the other hand, is expected to have a very slow and constant decomposition rate (linear), which depends on local climate, native vegetation, soil type, and management practices. User Guide Printable Report Performance Evaluation Future work Regional validation using a GIS to extend the applicability of calculator over the Midwest A web-application and/or a stand-alone program that can further make this calculator easy to use and widely accessible Provide a capability to estimate carbon credits Further improve accuracy by expanding the options and modules for biomass type and management inputs Precipitation Temperature Soil Texture Location Natural factors Crop Rotation Tillage Cover Crops Manure/Organic amendments Gypsum/Lime Drainage/ Irrigation Management Scenarios Native SOM Predictable SOM *Time interval Lucas Model Soil Quality Active OM Passive OM Active N Total N CO2 Predictable output 1913-1955 1955-1990 Morrow plots (North C) – Continuous corn Standard Crop Residue (PRE) Data from 12 different experiments in Michigan and Illinois Materials and methods Characteristics of a “Farmer-Friendly” tool: Theoretical Basis: The calculator is based on a 2-pool exponential decay model initially suggested by Dr. Robert Lucas (Lucas et al., 1978). SOM Calculator Extension activities Summary and Conclusions We developed a spreadsheet-based SOM calculator in Microsoft Excel using VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) environment. The calculator is capable of assessing soil health by simulating the dynamics of SOM content in response to residue removal and various management scenarios. The calculator can predict scenarios for up to 50 years with satisfactory accuracy. The ability of the tool to estimate soil C sequestration can provide a tool for calculating C credits in C trading. In addition to farmers, the calculator can also be used by private crop consultants, University Extension Educators, and USDA professionals to help guide farmers. The calculator is available as a “Macro Enabled Excel File” Date Place Event Dec. 2012 Paw Paw, MI SWCD farmer meeting Jan. 2013 Adrian, MI Center for Excellence annual meeting Feb. 2013 Allegan, MI May, 2013 Mt. Vernon, Springfield, Sycamore Three one-day Sustainable Agriculture and Soil Health Workshops in Illinois Oct. 2013 Clarksville, Gaylord, Owosso Three one-day Sustainable Agriculture and Soil Health Workshops in Michigan Nov. 2013 Tampa, FL Poster and oral presentations at Annual International ASA meeting Easy to install, use, maintain Clear and easy to interpret outputs Less data intensive Capable of scenario generation Simple and sequential inputs Capable of generating reports ‘How to use’ guide     Crop-related inputs Tillage-related inputs Manure-related inputs Soil-related & Management inputs Residue removal inputs Copyright Vinayak Shedekar NEW POOL OLD POOL Some important model components CROP YIELD: Yield information for more than 18 crops was collected from the Census of Agriculture for Michigan (USDA, 1998, 2003 & 2007). CROP PRE: The crop residue values were obtained from several sources and compiled together to represent average residue amounts. The major sources of these data are RR-358, and the Midwest Cover Crops Council (MCCC) Cover Crop Decision Tool. COVER CROPS: The yield and residue data were obtained for main cover crops in Michigan and Ohio. Most of the yield data were obtained from Field studies in Ohio, Census of Agriculture for Michigan (USDA, 1998, 2003 & 2007) and Midwest Cover Crops Council. MANURE: The amount of dry-matter from each manure type is converted to PRE based on the laboratory and field analysis results of 18 Livestock manure types. TILLAGE: The effect of tillage type is simulated based on data summarized from studies reported worldwide. This module is based on the assumption that the net effect of tillage variations on SOM dynamics can be reflected through changes in crop yield, and hence the crop PRE. Thus, changing from conventional to conservation tillage is associated with certain yield benefits which translate into additional amounts of PRE added to soil. TEST SCENARIOS: Users can use “Test Scenarios” button to open a form that allows you to test different scenarios on the existing spreadsheet. After first run of the model, users can modify individual components and evaluate their effect on Soil Organic Matter dynamics. Acknowledgments This work was the result of cooperation among Corn Marketing Program of Michigan, the Soil, Water and Bioenergy program at the Ohio State University’s South Centers, and the Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering. We thank the following individuals and units: The Corn Marketing Program of Michigan and the Ohio State University South Centers (financial support) Michigan USDA-NRCS (technical help) Prof. Delbert Mokma , MSU (field data) Sponsored Research Program of the Ohio State University Where to get it? The SOM calculator is available for download free of cost to the members of the Michigan Corn Growers Association. It is also available to the educators and researchers after due request. Please visit the following link for more details: http://southcenters.osu.edu/soil Scan this QR code for download