Chapter 3 Logic Active Learning Lecture Slides

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

 Writing conditionals  Using definitions as conditional statements  Writing biconditionals  Making truth tables.

Advertisements

EXAMPLE 2 Write four related conditional statements Write the if-then form, the converse, the inverse, and the contrapositive of the conditional statement.

Slide Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response Systems Chapter 3 Logic.

Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.3 Valid & Invalid Arguments.

Chapter 3 Section 5 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.

Analyze Conditional Statements

Propositions and Truth Tables

Chapter 3 Section 4 – Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.

Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.3, Slide Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.

2.5 Verifying Arguments Write arguments symbolically. Determine when arguments are valid or invalid. Recognize form of standard arguments. Recognize common.

Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.3, Slide Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.

Section 3.5 Symbolic Arguments

Slide Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response Systems Chapter 3 Logic.

Analyzing Conditional Statements A _______________________________ is a logical statement that has two parts, a hypothesis and a conclusion.

Verifying Arguments MATH 102 Contemporary Math S. Rook.

The Inverse Error Jeffrey Martinez Math 170 Dr. Lipika Deka 10/15/13.

2.2 Conditional Statements You can describe some mathematical relationships using a variety of if-then statements. A conditional – an if-then statement.

Lecture 4. CONDITIONAL STATEMENTS: Consider the statement: "If you earn an A in Math, then I'll buy you a computer." This statement is made up of two.

 What are conditionals & biconditionals?  How do you write converses, inverses, and contrapositives?

Chapter 2.2 Notes: Analyze Conditional Statements Goal: You will write definitions as conditional statements.

© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 3 Logic.

Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.

Section 2-2: Conditional Statements. Conditional A statement that can be written in If-then form symbol: If p —>, then q.

Unit 01 – Lesson 07 – Conditional Statements

Section 3.3 Using Laws of Logic. Using contrapositives  The negation of a hypothesis or of a conclusion is formed by denying the original hypothesis.

Slide Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response Systems Chapter 2 Sets.

Venn Diagrams Truth Sets & Valid Arguments Truth Sets & Valid Arguments Truth Tables Implications Truth Tables Implications Truth Tables Converse, Inverse,

Chapter 2 Review Conditional Statements Laws of Logic.

Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 3.4, Slide 1 3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between 3.

Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning

2-2 Conditional Statements Objectives: To recognize conditional statements and their parts To write converses, inverses, and contrapositives of conditionals.

Discrete Mathematics Lecture # 4. Conditional Statements or Implication  If p and q are statement variables, the conditional of q by p is “If p then.

CS-7081 Application - 1. CS-7082 Example - 2 CS-7083 Simplifying a Statement – 3.

Chapter 1 Propositional Logic

Conditional Statements

Analyze Conditional Statements

Logic Day #2 Math Studies IB NPHS Miss Rose

Lecture 03 Logic and Propositional Calculus Profs. Koike and Yukita

Equivalent Statements and Variations of Conditional Statements

Principles of Computing – UFCFA3-30-1

Chapter 8 Logic Topics

2 Chapter Introduction to Logic and Sets

CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I

Section 3.5 Symbolic Arguments

Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.

3.5 Symbolic Arguments.

Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.

Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.

Section 3.4 Equivalent Statements

Warmup State whether each sentence is true or false.

(1.4) An Introduction to Logic

1 Chapter An Introduction to Problem Solving

1 Chapter An Introduction to Problem Solving

Conditional Statements

Conditional Statements

Equivalent Statements

CHAPTER 3 Logic.

CHAPTER 3 Logic.

Section 3.4 Equivalent Statements

Logic and Reasoning.

TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2

TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2

Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley.

CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I

Chapter 2 Sets Active Learning Lecture Slides

Conditional Statements

3.5 Symbolic Arguments.

CHAPTER 3 Logic.

Chapter 2 Reasoning and Proof.

Presentation transcript:

Chapter 3 Logic Active Learning Lecture Slides AND Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response Systems Chapter 3 Logic

Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer. q Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer q. Mike is a musician r. Brian is a lawyer Mike is not a musician or Doug is not an engineer. a. b. c. d.

Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer. q Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer q. Mike is a musician r. Brian is a lawyer Mike is not a musician or Doug is not an engineer. a. b. c. d.

Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer. q Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer q. Mike is a musician r. Brian is a lawyer If Brian is a lawyer, then Mike is a musician and Doug is an engineer. a. b. c. d.

Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer. q Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer q. Mike is a musician r. Brian is a lawyer If Brian is a lawyer, then Mike is a musician and Doug is an engineer. a. b. c. d.

Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer. q Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer q. Mike is a musician r. Brian is a lawyer Doug is an engineer if and only if Brian is a lawyer and then Mike is not a musician. a. b. c. d.

Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer. q Write the statement in symbolic form. p. Doug is an engineer q. Mike is a musician r. Brian is a lawyer Doug is an engineer if and only if Brian is a lawyer and then Mike is not a musician. a. b. c. d.

Write each symbolic statement in words. p. Doug is an engineer. q Write each symbolic statement in words. p. Doug is an engineer q. Mike is a musician r. Brian is a lawyer a. If it is true that Doug is an engineer and Brian is a lawyer, then Mike is not a musician. b. If it is true that Doug is an engineer or Brian is a lawyer, then Mike is not a musician. c. If it is not true that Doug is an engineer or Brian is a lawyer, then Mike is not a musician. d. If it is not true that Doug is an engineer and Brian is a lawyer, then Mike is not a musician.

Write each symbolic statement in words. p. Doug is an engineer. q Write each symbolic statement in words. p. Doug is an engineer q. Mike is a musician r. Brian is a lawyer a. If it is true that Doug is an engineer and Brian is a lawyer, then Mike is not a musician. b. If it is true that Doug is an engineer or Brian is a lawyer, then Mike is not a musician. c. If it is not true that Doug is an engineer or Brian is a lawyer, then Mike is not a musician. d. If it is not true that Doug is an engineer and Brian is a lawyer, then Mike is not a musician.

Write each symbolic statement in words. p. Doug is an engineer. q Write each symbolic statement in words. p. Doug is an engineer q. Mike is a musician r. Brian is a lawyer a. Brian is a lawyer and Mike is a musician, or Doug is not an engineer. b. Brian is a lawyer or Mike is a musician, and Doug is not an engineer. c. If Brian is a lawyer or Mike is a musician, then Doug is not an engineer. d. If Brian is a lawyer or Mike is a musician, then Doug is an engineer.

Write each symbolic statement in words. p. Doug is an engineer. q Write each symbolic statement in words. p. Doug is an engineer q. Mike is a musician r. Brian is a lawyer a. Brian is a lawyer and Mike is a musician, or Doug is not an engineer. b. Brian is a lawyer or Mike is a musician, and Doug is not an engineer. c. If Brian is a lawyer or Mike is a musician, then Doug is not an engineer. d. If Brian is a lawyer or Mike is a musician, then Doug is an engineer.

Find the truth value of the statement. 3 – 8 = 5 or 14 – 8 = 6 a. True b. False c. Can’t determine

Find the truth value of the statement. 3 – 8 = 5 or 14 – 8 = 6 a. True b. False c. Can’t determine

Find the truth value of the statement Find the truth value of the statement. If ice cream contains milk and a penny can cut wood, then the sky is blue. a. True b. False c. Can’t determine

Find the truth value of the statement Find the truth value of the statement. If ice cream contains milk and a penny can cut wood, then the sky is blue. a. True b. False c. Can’t determine

Given that p is true, q is false, and r is true, determine the truth value of the statement. a. True b. False c. Can’t determine

Given that p is true, q is false, and r is true, determine the truth value of the statement. a. True b. False c. Can’t determine

Given that p is true, q is false, and r is true, determine the truth value of the statement. a. True b. False c. Can’t determine

Given that p is true, q is false, and r is true, determine the truth value of the statement. a. True b. False c. Can’t determine

Determine whether the two statements are equivalent. a. Equivalent b. Not Equivalent c. Can’t determine

Determine whether the two statements are equivalent. a. Equivalent b. Not Equivalent c. Can’t determine

Determine which, if any, of the three statements are equivalent Determine which, if any, of the three statements are equivalent. a) If Kelly can sing, then she can dance. b) Kelly can sing and she can dance. c) If Kelly cannot sing, then she cannot dance. a. a and b b. a and c c. b and c d. None of the statements are equivalent.

Determine which, if any, of the three statements are equivalent Determine which, if any, of the three statements are equivalent. a) If Kelly can sing, then she can dance. b) Kelly can sing and she can dance. c) If Kelly cannot sing, then she cannot dance. a. a and b b. a and c c. b and c d. None of the statements are equivalent.

Determine which, if any, of the three statements are equivalent. a) I ordered two pictures and one frame. b) I did not order two pictures and I ordered one frame. c) It is not true that I did not order two pictures or one frame. a. a and b b. a and c c. b and c d. None of the statements are equivalent.

Determine which, if any, of the three statements are equivalent. a) I ordered two pictures and one frame. b) I did not order two pictures and I ordered one frame. c) It is not true that I did not order two pictures or one frame. a. a and b b. a and c c. b and c d. None of the statements are equivalent.

Translate the following argument into symbolic form Translate the following argument into symbolic form. Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. If Jenny gets some rest, then she will feel better. If Jenny feels better, then she will help me paint my bedroom. Therefore, if my bedroom is painted, then Jenny must have gotten some rest.

Translate the following argument into symbolic form Translate the following argument into symbolic form. Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. If Jenny gets some rest, then she will feel better. If Jenny feels better, then she will help me paint my bedroom. Therefore, if my bedroom is painted, then Jenny must have gotten some rest.

Determine whether the syllogism is valid or is a fallacy. Some teachers teach math. Some teachers teach English. Therefore, some teachers teach math and English. a. Valid b. Fallacy c. Can’t determine

Determine whether the syllogism is valid or is a fallacy. Some teachers teach math. Some teachers teach English. Therefore, some teachers teach math and English. a. Valid b. Fallacy c. Can’t determine

Write the negation of the statement. All robins can fly. a. No robins can fly. b. All robins cannot fly. c. Some robins cannot fly. d. Some robins can fly.

Write the negation of the statement. All robins can fly. a. No robins can fly. b. All robins cannot fly. c. Some robins cannot fly. d. Some robins can fly.

Write the negation of the statement. Some basketball players are tall. a. No basketball players are tall. b. All basketball players are not tall. c. Some basketball players are not tall. d. All basketball players are tall.

Write the negation of the statement. Some basketball players are tall. a. No basketball players are tall. b. All basketball players are not tall. c. Some basketball players are not tall. d. All basketball players are tall.

Write the converse of the conditional statement Write the converse of the conditional statement. If the apple is red, then I will eat it. a. If I eat the apple, then it is red. b. If the apple is not red, then I will eat it. c. If I will not eat the apple, then it is not red. d. If the apple is not red, then I will not eat it.

Write the converse of the conditional statement Write the converse of the conditional statement. If the apple is red, then I will eat it. a. If I eat the apple, then it is red. b. If the apple is not red, then I will eat it. c. If I will not eat the apple, then it is not red. d. If the apple is not red, then I will not eat it.

Write the inverse of the conditional statement Write the inverse of the conditional statement. If the apple is red, then I will eat it. a. If I eat the apple, then it is red. b. If the apple is not red, then I will eat it. c. If I will not eat the apple, then it is not red. d. If the apple is not red, then I will not eat it.

Write the inverse of the conditional statement Write the inverse of the conditional statement. If the apple is red, then I will eat it. a. If I eat the apple, then it is red. b. If the apple is not red, then I will eat it. c. If I will not eat the apple, then it is not red. d. If the apple is not red, then I will not eat it.

Write the contrapositive of the conditional statement Write the contrapositive of the conditional statement. If the apple is red, then I will eat it. a. If I eat the apple, then it is red. b. If the apple is not red, then I will eat it. c. If I will not eat the apple, then it is not red. d. If the apple is not red, then I will not eat it.

Write the contrapositive of the conditional statement Write the contrapositive of the conditional statement. If the apple is red, then I will eat it. a. If I eat the apple, then it is red. b. If the apple is not red, then I will eat it. c. If I will not eat the apple, then it is not red. d. If the apple is not red, then I will not eat it.