High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Emergency Department Patients With Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema: A Randomized Controlled Trial Onlak Makdee, MD, Apichaya Monsomboon, MD, Usapan Surabenjawong, MD, Nattakarn Praphruetkit, MD, Wansiri Chaisirin, MD, Tipa Chakorn, MD, Chairat Permpikul, MD, Phakphoom Thiravit, MD, Tanyaporn Nakornchai, MD Annals of Emergency Medicine Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 465-472.e2 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.028 Copyright © 2017 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Patient screening and enrollment. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2017 70, 465-472.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.028) Copyright © 2017 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Enrollment and randomization of study participants. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2017 70, 465-472.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.028) Copyright © 2017 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Respiratory rate at each point. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2017 70, 465-472.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.028) Copyright © 2017 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Changes in respiratory rates. Waterfall plot depicts subject respiratory rate at the start (0 minutes) and end (60 minutes) of the protocol. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2017 70, 465-472.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.028) Copyright © 2017 American College of Emergency Physicians Terms and Conditions