SDD Quality Assurance (& DQM)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Advertisements

5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
11th April 2008TOF DA & ppChiara Zampolli. DAQ-DA Three DAQ-DAs implemented, deployed, validated, and tested: TOFda TOFnoiseda TOFpulserda DCS-DA One.
DQM news Technical side. Web tools  Advantages  Can be ran out of P2 with access rights  Centrally maintained -> can’t be altered on machines  Modern.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
SCT Analyses on Cosmics. Efficiency 2 methods –Online- quick/biased -> located in SCT_Monitoring –Offline- slow/unbiased In agreement with each other.
STAR HFT STAR Collaboration Meeting - LBNL IST Software Status Yaping Wang (University of Illinois at Chicago) Outline Offline software infrastructure.
Quality Control B. von Haller 8th June 2015 CERN.
SSD Status P. Christakoglou (NIKHEF-UU) for the SSD collaboration Thanks to: Marco vL, Enrico, Mino, Marek and Massimo.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 April 2008.
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
Offline Wek, CERN, April 2008 Andrea Dainese 1 Status of ITS tracking A. Dainese (INFN Legnaro)
CMS pixel data quality monitoring Petra Merkel, Purdue University For the CMS Pixel DQM Group Vertex 2008, Sweden.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
AliRoot survey P.Hristov 11/06/2013. Offline framework  AliRoot in development since 1998  Directly based on ROOT  Used since the detector TDR’s for.
1 ITS Quality Assurance (& DQM) P. Cerello, P. Christakoglou, W. Ferrarese, M. Nicassio, M. Siciliano ALICE OFFLINE WEEK – April 2008.
September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.
T0 offline status Alla Maevskaya for T0 team 8 March 2011 ALICE offline week.
1 SDD: DA and preprocessor Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – April 11th 2008.
1 ENH1 Detector Integration Meeting 18/6/2015 D.Autiero (IPNL) WA105:  Detector installation requirements  Detector racks and power requirements Note:
TPC QA + experience with the AMORE framework Marian Ivanov, Peter Christiansen + GSI group.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – March 15th 2010.
ITS Calibration Database Requirements Updated By Bjørn S. Nilsen On behalf of the ALICE ITS Sub-detector Group.
Page 1 of 18 Bjorn S. Nilsen, ALICE November 16 ITS Software meeting ITS Alignment Status Plus other things By Bjørn S. Nilsen The Ohio State University.
Computing for Alice at GSI (Proposal) (Marian Ivanov)
1 The status of the SDD detector - OFFLINE - Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE CLUB – October 14th 2008.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – October 20th 2008.
Quality assurance for TPC. Quality assurance ● Process: ● Detect the problems ● Define, what is the problem ● What do we expect? ● Defined in the TDR.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 July 2008.
LHC CMS Detector Upgrade Project RCT/CTP7 Readout Isobel Ojalvo, U. Wisconsin Level-1 Trigger Meeting June 4, June 2015, Isobel Ojalvo Trigger Meeting:
Report from TRD on Raw Data Christoph Blume ALICE Offline Week, October, 2006.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
 offline code: changes/updates, open items, readiness  1 st data taking plans and readiness.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
FTK high level simulation & the physics case The FTK simulation problem G. Volpi Laboratori Nazionali Frascati, CERN Associate FP07 MC Fellow.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Barthélémy von Haller CERN PH/AID For the ALICE Collaboration The ALICE data quality monitoring system.
10/8/ HMPID offline status D. Di Bari, A. Mastroserio, L.Molnar, G. Volpe HMPID Group Alice Offline Week.
V4-19-Release P. Hristov 11/10/ Not ready (27/09/10) #73618 Problems in the minimum bias PbPb MC production at 2.76 TeV #72642 EMCAL: Modifications.
CALIBRATION: PREPARATION FOR RUN2 ALICE Offline Week, 25 June 2014 C. Zampolli.
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Data Quality Assessment and Performance
V4-18-Release P. Hristov 21/06/2010.
Federico Lasagni Manghi - University of Bologna
Christoph Blume Offline Week, July, 2008
GRAPES-3: Status of ROOT Based Monitoring and Analysis
Marian Ivanov TPC status report.
DPG Activities DPG Session, ALICE Monthly Mini Week
Massimo Masera INFN sezione di Torino
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
v4-18-Release: really the last revision!
CLAS12 Calibration and Commissioning (CALCOM)
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
ALICE Offline Week, CERN
EMCal Offline Code Status: Introduction and tasks
Experience between AMORE/Offline and sub-systems
Large CMS GEM with APV & SRS electronics
Alexandre Rachevski, Francesco Prino
SDD in February ‘08 cosmic run
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Measuring plane efficiencies
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Analysis Drift velocity of the SDD Detector
Offline framework for conditions data
Presentation transcript:

SDD Quality Assurance (& DQM) P. Cerello, W. Ferrarese, M. Siciliano ALICE OFFLINE WEEK – October 2007

Summary Offline QA Online DQM What’s Next… Goals Approach Existing code Online DQM Plans What’s Next…

Offline QA Goals Approach Provide an assessment of the overall data quality by analysing all the events Format/meaning to be defined in detail Approach Analyse RAW SDD Data being taken at Point2 Debugging of the Data Decoding (see Melinda’s talk last Monday) Assessment of the Decoding Speed Feedback to the HW and DAQ SDD teams Build some QA-like distributions on real Data 8 SDD modules, No zero suppression Event size equivalent to 3% occupancy, comparable to central Pb-Pb Baseline & Noise Injectors

Offline QA Debugging of the Data Decoding Several bugs found in decoding SW, SDD DAQ, one in DAQ SDD buffer decoding under control now Assessment of the Decoding Speed Not satisfactory 3% occupancy, about 2Hz Where is the bottleneck? It may be the buffer structure, SDD DAQ team involved

Offline QA Feedback to the HW and DAQ SDD teams Some SDD DAQ control words must be changed Preliminary Analysis of baseline, noise

Offline QA Feedback to the HW and DAQ SDD teams Preliminary Analysis of baseline, noise Pressure frow HW team to analyse last week data First bunch with 20% SDDs ON These are also DQM/QA distributions uncorrected CMN corrected

Offline QA Existing code A “Maker” and a “Checker” RAW Data read & analysed from macros: ITSSDDQAMaker.C ITSSDDQAChecker.C Aliroot classes AliITSSDDQAMaker AliITSSDDQAChecker Ready to be filled with histograms

Offline QA Preliminary Control List Digit (module, anode, time, charge) Level - Detector Performance Baselines ( -> dead channels) Noise Injectors Layer 1/Layer 2 entries Layer Level N_entries vs Ladder Number Ladder Level N_entries vs Detector Number Detector Level Patterns (N_entries vs. Anode, Time Bin) Q_Average vs Anode Q_Average vs Time …

Offline QA Preliminary Control List RecPoint/Cluster (module, X, Y) Level - Reconstruction Validation (…not for ONLINE…) Layer 1/Layer 2 entries Layer Level N_entries vs Ladder Number Ladder Level N_entries vs Detector Number Detector Level Patterns (N_entries vs. X, Y) Q_Average vs X Q_Average vs Y …

What’s Next? OFFLINE QA Create & Fill histograms in AliRoot Maker class Add the calls so as to fill histograms in the reconstruction flow In order not to read RAW DATA twice, it should go inside the ClusterFinder function Write a proto-QA Checker & test it on non-zero-suppressed real data on simulated data asap on Cosmic Rays Data Provide Checker output in the required common format Get (& use) information on Dead Channels, expected Baseline, Noise etc. from OCDB

What’s Next? ONLINE QA Meeting last Tuesday with Sandra, Filimon, Pierre Agreement on how to proceed in case of problems: expert custom analysis will start from RAW DATA So, almost Same Goals of Offline-QA The same (or very similar) set of histograms will provide feedback on the detector performance Install AMORE and learn how to use it to generate information to be published Short term goal: publish one distribution … then add the others… Can we use the very same AliRoot code? If yes, use it If not, we’ll have to “adapt and duplicate it”