Verification Details US Belle II WBS 1.03 Readout Electronics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A scalable DAQ system using the DRS4 sampling chip H.Friederich 1, G.Davatz 1, U.Hartmann 2, A.Howard 1, H.Meyer 1, D.Murer 1, S.Ritt 2, N.Schlumpf 2 1.
Advertisements

ITOP LEPS Beam Test Analysis LYNN WOOD JULY 17, 2013 PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY.
Fabrication Process Options Gary Varner Specification Details are often Application Specific Is IBM 130nm always the best choice? 1 6-OCT-2010 Electronics.
RPC Electronics Status Overall system TDC –Digitizing frequency issue (determine the bin size of the TDC value) Discriminator test result Trigger module.
Large Area, High Speed Photo-detectors Readout Jean-Francois Genat + On behalf and with the help of Herve Grabas +, Samuel Meehan +, Eric Oberla +, Fukun.
J. Estrada - Fermilab1 AFEII in the test cryostat at DAB J. Estrada, C. Garcia, B. Hoeneisen, P. Rubinov First VLPC spectrum with the TriP chip Z measurement.
Readout Status and Plans
Update on Electronics for the SSL 8” Ceramic Detector Matt Andrew, Kurtis Nishimura, Gary S. Varner University of Hawai’i 28-MAR-2012 Discussion 1.
Preliminary measurements for the 8 channel prototype of SPD discriminator ASIC I.The 8 channel prototype. II.Status of the test. III.Noise. IV.Gain. V.Test.
21-Aug-06DoE Site Review / Harvard(1) Front End Electronics for the NOvA Neutrino Detector John Oliver Long baseline neutrino experiment Fermilab (Chicago)
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
Scintillator Tiles and Test Beam Plans Calice Collaboration Meeting – Casablanca 2010 Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
Two-stage amplifier status test buffer – to be replaced with IRSX i signal recent / final (hopefully) design uses load resistor and voltage gain stage.
1 iTOP readout firmware development K. Nishimura and G. Varner 25-MAR-2011 lDAQ meeting Not shown: Joshua Sopher (firmware) Lili Zhang (DSP coding)
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
NUMI Off Axis NUMI Off Axis Workshop Workshop Argonne Meeting Electronics for RPCs Gary Drake, Charlie Nelson Apr. 25, 2003 p. 1.
MPPC status M.Taguchi(kyoto) T2K ND /7/7.
PMT gain check at Indiana University. Test setup inside dark box LED white paper PMT # JT0298 channel #2 (per HPK numbering) OTHER CHANNELS MASKED WITH.
KLM Trigger Status Barrel KLM RPC Front-End Brandon Kunkler, Gerard Visser Belle II Trigger and Data Acquistion Workshop January 17, 2012.
Slide 1Turisini M. Frontend Electronics M.Turisini, E. Cisbani, P. Musico CLAS12 RICH Technical Review, 2013 June Requirements 2.Description of.
1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.
26/May/2008Calor LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating pad detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring Eduardo Picatoste Universitat.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
Mai 31th 2011 Christophe Beigbeder PID meeting1 ETD meeting Test setup : Activities in Bari, Univ of Maryland and at Orsay Test setup : Activities in Bari,
Update on works with SiPMs at Pisa Matteo Morrocchi.
Digitization at Feed Through R&D (2) Digitizer Performance Evaluation Student: John Odeghe ; SC State, Fermi Lab Intern Supervisor: JinYuan Wu; Fermi Lab.
US Belle II Project – Technical Elements David Asner Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
B-KLM DAQ 2011/01/25 Trigger/DAQ workshop K. Sumisawa (KEK) Introduction Summary +7 pages.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
TOP Electronics Status & Beam Test Experience Kurtis Nishimura January 16, 2012 University of Hawaii Belle II TRG/DAQ Workshop Belle II TRG/DAQ - January.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
1 The Scintillation Tile Hodoscope (SciTil) ● Motivation ● Event timing/ event building/ software trigger ● Conversion detection ● Charged particle TOF.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Dmitri Kotchetkov University of Hawaii at Manoa
"North American" Electronics
DAQ ACQUISITION FOR THE dE/dX DETECTOR
WBS 1.03 Readout Systems Specifications, Design and Acceptance
A 12-bit low-power ADC for SKIROC
A 2 Gsps Waveform Digitizer ASIC in CMOS 180 nm Technology
WBS 1.03 Readout Systems Scope, Cost and Schedule
CTA-LST meeting February 2015
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
96-channel, 10-bit, 20 MSPS ADC board with Gb Ethernet optical output
Update of time measurement results with the USB WaveCatcher board & Electronics for the DIRC-like TOF prototype at SLAC D.Breton , L.Burmistov,
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
MCPPMT test bench at LAL D. Breton, L. Burmistov, J. Maalmi, V
Ongoing R&D in Orsay/Saclay on ps time measurement: a USB-powered 2-channel 3.2GS/s 12-bit digitizer D.Breton (LAL Orsay), E.Delagnes (CEA/IRFU) Séminaire.
Power pulsing of AFTER in magnetic field
Hellenic Open University
TDC at OMEGA I will talk about SPACIROC asic
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Front-end electronic system for large area photomultipliers readout
Christophe Beigbeder/ ETD PID meeting
Phase shifter design for Macro Pixel ASIC
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
Felix Sefkow CALICE/EUDET electronics meeting CERN, July 12, 2007
CLAS12 Timing Calibration
The New Readout Electronics for the SLAC Focusing DIRC Prototype (SLAC experiment T-492 ) L. L. Ruckman, G. S. Varner Instrumentation Development Laboratory.
BESIII EMC electronics
Optical links in the 25ns test beam
Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
RPC Front End Electronics
MPPC for T2K Fine-Grained Detector
The ATLAS LAr. Calibration board K. Jakobs, U. Schaefer, D. Schroff
Scintillator HCal Prototype
TOF read-out for high resolution timing
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
Presentation transcript:

Verification Details US Belle II WBS 1.03 Readout Electronics Gary Varner University of Hawaii

Waveform sampling ASIC iTOP Readout Waveform sampling ASIC 64 DAQ fiber transceivers 8k channels 1k 8-ch. ASICs 64 “board stacks” Low-jitter clock 512 channels/iTOP module (16) 8k channels/ TOP subdetector 4 Boardstacks/iTOP module 4 Carriers/Boardstack 4 ASICs (32 ch.)/Carrier 64 SRM

Key Performance Parameters (iTOP) Tolerance Threshold Objective Specification Verification 70 Boardstacks Good Channels 90% 98% 99% Trigger threshold, efficiency, gain, noise 100% Deadtimeless Occupancy 1% 2.5% 4% Throughput during calibration 3.8% Belle2link readout** Single photon, fast feature extracted timing 100ps 50ps 35ps Single photon laser scan 70.8 +/- 6.4 ps Event Time Zero 30ps Pulser timing across SuperKEKB Ref clock boundary 27.6 +/- 1.8 ps Event Trigger timing 10ns 4ns 2ns Trigger timestamping during single photon laser 8.2 +/- 1.0 ns * 17 TOP Modules * 4 Boardstacks/Module = 68 Boardstacks (2 spares) ** >40MBytes/s sustained indefinitely (COPPER backend limit) June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 3

iTOP Acceptance Criteria IRSX ASIC Noise test, pedestal test All samples, windows operational Timebase generator verification DLL Feedback scan Electrical (2-pulse timing) verification SCROD and Carrier (electrical test) IBERT and DRAM Injected signal/amplifier chain gain Integrated Boardstacks (laser test) Single photon trigger efficiency and gain Single photon timing DLL Feedback scan 2-pulse timing (<25ps) June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 4

iTOP Acceptance Testing 2x Carrier test stations at South Carolina, 1x backup in Hawaii Laser test stand Hawaii SCROD test stand in Pittsburgh Firmware test at PNNL Carrier test stand Laser scan June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 5

CD-4 Independent Project Review Gain and Efficiency June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 6

PerformancE summaries June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 7

Example laser timing Residual ~31ps TDC+phase SL-10 TTS ~35ps IRSX electronics: ~33ps Use SSTin period constraint to calibrate absolute timebase June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 8

Threshold Scan (x4 gain trigger, using noise)

Timebase Generator Confirmation A1 is 10937500 - should be 10937500 OK A2 is 10937500 - should be 10937500 OK B1 is 10937500 - should be 10937500 OK B2 is 10937501 - should be 10937500 OK PHASE is 21875001 - should be 21875000 OK PHAB is 10937500 - should be 10937500 OK SSP is 21875000 - should be 21875000 OK WRSTRB is 21875000 - should be 21875000 OK SSTOUT is 21875000 - should be 21875000 OK

Pedestal (offset/baseline) 1 entry per 64-sample window, 512 windows (32k storage cells/channel)

Pedestal (noise/RMS) Amplifiers OFF (2-3 ADC counts ~ 1-2mV) [only done on FMC – for reference] Plot in bins of 512 windows 64 samples * 512 windows per channel (8 channels /ASIC) Amplifiers ON (6-8 ADC counts ~ 3-5mV) [on Carrier]

CD-4 Independent Project Review Timebase Alignment FB_tap value optFB optValue 106 189.857 106 144.157 107 133.122 107 87.422 108 87.126 108 41.426 109 25.5541 109 20.1459 110 45.0684 110 0.6316 111 102.557 110 0.6316 112 153.384 110 0.6316 113 203.674 110 0.6316 114 233.623 110 0.6316 115 258.023 110 0.6316 116 280.968 110 0.6316 117 284.681 110 0.6316 118 291.84 110 0.6316 119 281.845 110 0.6316 120 263.253 110 0.6316 Found optimal FB at 110  setting the optimal value.. Delay Lock Loop (DLL) Feedback parameter Adjust to minimize misalignment of 160MHz sine crossing 128-sample window boundary June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 13

Fast Pulse Timing Verification 50% CFD 50% CFD Interpolate between points to extract timing ADC counts [~0.6mV/ADC] Sample number [~0.368ns/sample] June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 14

CD-4 Independent Project Review Timing Verification RMS of under <25ps> per extracted timing edge June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 15

Laser Calibration steps Pedestal subtract Correct Amplitude dependence Run dT Minimizer, obtain results Apply dT values All binned, so easily implemented at Look-up tables on the SCROD FPGA Both gain/efficiency and timing data taken at same time About 8 hours per 128 channel board stack June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 16

CD-4 Independent Project Review 1. Ped subtract & 50% CFD Measure peak to determine 50% threshold Before pedestal subtraction Determine timing from interpolation Default samples are ~ 0.37ns/point June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 17

CD-4 Independent Project Review 1. After 50% CFD algorithm No corrections applied TDC assumed exactly 25ps/lsb TDC INL not considered Kinematic p.e. recoil tail June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 18

CD-4 Independent Project Review 2. Voltage dependence June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 19

CD-4 Independent Project Review 2. Improved Residual June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 20

2. TDC resolution residual Differential and Integral non-linearity in sampling timebase (expected for these types of Switched Capacitor Array ASICs) June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 21

3. After Autocalibration Compare with previous slide – timebase uniform and absolute timing calibrated (clock period closure constraint) June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 22

Output After “dT minimizer” algorithm Time between pulses in agreement, No matter where look in the window Absolute timebase cross-calibrated With respect to SSTin clock period June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 23

KPP Verification: single photon timing 1 entry per channel Note: CAMAC TDC and phototube TTS contributions included: actual resolution is better June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 24

KPP Verification: Event Time Zero U. South Carolina Tested (higher noise) Hawaii Tested Spec Obj Thresh June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 25

KPP Verification: Event Trigger Time Note: Using coarser AXI clock during production testing. 4x faster clock (expect 4x improved resolution) in final trigger firmware [not yet ready] Trigger time resolution [ns] June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 26

Klm Baseline Scope 1288 16-channel waveform sampling ASICs 136 boards June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 27

KLM Readout Baseline Scope Benchtop testing 3 1 2 4 2 1) KLM Motherboard (136) 2) KLM Ribbon Header Interface Card [RHIC] (136) 3) KLM SCROD Rev A (136) 4) TARGETX Daughtercards (1288) 4 104 Barrel sets 32 Endcap 28 June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review

Key Performance Parameters 132 9U MB + RHIC + SCROD + 10 DC sets >21,000 channels All channels tested with actual MPPCs Tolerance Threshold Objective Specification Verification 136 Sets Good Channels 90% 98% 99% Trigger threshold, efficiency, gain, noise 100% Deadtimeless Occupancy 0.5% 1% 2% Throughput during calibration 2.5% 99% m.i.p. efficiency 10p.e. 7p.e. 6.5p.e. Reduced size scintillator test stand (“SciFi”) < 5 p.e. Event Timing 10ns 5ns 2ns 40 MHz sine scan (SuperKEKB reference clock) <0.1 ns Event Trigger timing 20ns Trigger timestamping during SciFi testing 8 ns * 32 Barrel and 104 Endcap sets (+9 pre-production [usable] spares) June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 29

KLM Acceptance Criteria TargetX Noise test, pedestal test All samples, windows operational Timing calibration for best performance 40MHz sine input @ 600mVpp Per chip scan of Delay Lock Loop feedback Analog Front-end MPPC bias test Preamplifier carrier temperature readout Trigger threshold scan Waveform sampling triggered by MPPCs Input noise ~2.25 mVrms optimization BEFORE optimization AFTER June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 30

KLM Acceptance Testing 4x parallel Motherboard + DC test stations Final RHIC test station with 2x Scintillating Fiber trackers ASIC Pre-screened (ASIC check on MB) and bar-code entered 31 June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review

KPP Verification: KLM Throughput Because data flows through the RPC data concentrator, Need to model throughput (queuing important) June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 32

KPP Verification: Trigger Efficiency Random readout – monitor trigger vs. amplitude June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 33

KPP Verification: KLM Event Timing Entries (per 25ps bin) Zero-crossing timing determination June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 34

KPP Verification: KLM Trigger Timing Trigger time stamp offset for reconstructed pulses June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 35

CD-4 Independent Project Review backup June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 36

IRSX Testing protocol overview 3,5 6 2 4 1 37 June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review

CD-4 Independent Project Review HV Testing “Bare” HVB test fixture Finished HVB test fixture June 1, 2016 CD-4 Independent Project Review 38

PoGO pin installation Carrier Pogo pins soldered at PNNL Completed High Voltage Pogo pins soldered at Indiana U. Pogo pin variation < 0.15mm  within acceptance 39