California State University Libraries of the Future Taskforce Update Print Archive Network Forum/ALA MW January 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KAT HAGEDORN HATHITRUST SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LIBRARIES OCTOBER 9, 2009 Seamless Sharing: NYU, HathiTrust, ReCAP and the.
Advertisements

HathiTrust Sharing a Federal Print Repository: Issues and Opportunities May 25, 2011 Heather Christenson.
KAT HAGEDORN HATHITRUST SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LIBRARIES OCTOBER 9, 2009 Seamless Sharing: NYU, HathiTrust, ReCAP and the.
Dr. Clem Guthro, Director of the Colby College Libraries MSCS Project Co-PI Maine Shared Collections Strategy: Print Archive Network Update
Tony Melvyn Product Manager OCLC Delivery Services Enhancement Overview for ALI, Academic Libraries of Indiana March 11, 2011.
SHARED COLLECTIONS, SHARED RECORDS? RESOURCE SHARING AT THE META-LEVEL Charley Pennell, NCSU - Natalie Sommerville, Duke TRLN Annual Meeting, 13 July 2012.
Caren Milloy, Head of Projects, JISC Collections & Ellen Collins, Research Officer, Research Information #oapenuk.
A Fine Balance: Tangible or Electronic? Gretchen Gould Reference Librarian & Bibliographer University of Northern Iowa
Cooperative Print Archiving by Discipline Developing an Infrastructure to Sustain Scholarly Resources in Agriculture Amy Wood Project Director Center for.
Print Retention at the Central Iowa Collaborative Collections Initiative (CI-CCI) Teri Koch, Drake University Print Archive Network Forum ALA Midwinter.
Moving Shared Print to the Network Level Emily Stambaugh ALA Annual Conference Las Vegas, NV June 27, 2014 “Looking to the Future of Shared Print” Shared.
Cataloging: Millennium Silver and Beyond Claudia Conrad Product Manager, Cataloging ALA Annual 2004.
Integrated Library Management System
Providing Online Access to the HKUST University Archives: EAD to INNOPAC Sintra Tsang and K.T. Lam The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 7th.
A Tale of Two Mega-regions and Many Systems: The Californias and Shared Print Projects Print Archive Network Forum ALA Midwinter Philadelphia, PA January.
Large scale shared print and futures for shared monographs Regional Print Management Symposium March 27-28, 2014 OCLC Research, CIC, OSU Libraries Emily.
CERES AND COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES. PROJECT CERES Begun in 2013, Project CERES is a Center for Research Libraries Global Resources Agriculture.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Data Mining Library Collection Silos: Print Books and E-books in Library Collections Lynn Silipigni Connaway Ed O’Neill.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Partnering with OCLC for Cataloging and Selection ALA Midwinter January 20, 2007.
California State University Libraries of the Future Taskforce Update Print Archive Network Forum/ALA MW January 25, 2013.
Metadata Guidelines for Disclosing Shared Print Commitments Lizanne Payne Shared Print Consultant ALA Midwinter 2013.
Shared Print Planning and Organization at the University of California Libraries Emily Stambaugh, Shared Print Manager CRL PAN meeting, January 24, 2014.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Kathy Kie December 2007 OCLC Cataloging & Metadata Services an introduction.
Let VRS Work for You! ELUNA Conference 2008 Presenter: Kelly P. Robinson GIL Service Georgia State University
Running a Report.  List Bibliography Report  Found under: All Titles Purpose : Creates customized bibliographies by catalog, call number, or item characteristics.
The Legislative Library of Ontario’s Ontario Documents Repository Road to Partnership.
Relational Databases Melton, Beth “Databases: Access Terminology and Relational Database Concepts.” 09/LPMArticle.asp?ID=73http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/Pub00.
Prospector Director’s Meeting Rose Nelson-Assistant Director.
Collection Management Strategies in a Digital Environment Cecily Johns CMI Project Director August 2001.
E-Text Research Project Results & Recommendations presented to the CSU Advisory Committee for Services to Students with Disabilities November 22, 2002.
How OAIS and OA IR you? Developing workflows in publishing, promoting, and preserving faculty grey literature within a university Plato L. Smith II; Digital.
Data Staging Data Loading and Cleaning Marakas pg. 25 BCIS 4660 Spring 2012.
Big Heads July 10, 2009 Next Generation Technical Services Rethinking Library Technical Services for the University of California.
OPAC/Holdings Tutorial Rolande St-Gelais DRA Information Stockholm, August 10, 1999.
Public Library Survey FY 2015 SDC General Session December 08, 2015.
FDMS modules and units FDMS has 22 unique modules Comprising 3 Maintenance units, 7 Commitment units, 4 Report units, 1 Project unit, 2 Funding units,
After the RAE: Continuing to manage research outputs Morag Watson Digital Library Development Manager University of Edinburgh.
Assessing current print periodical usage for collection development Gracemary Smulewitz Distributed Technical Services Rutgers University Libraries.
1 JRNL: Journal Retention and Needs Listing A Software Tool for Print Journal Archives Judith C. Russell Dean of University Libraries Benjamin Walker Assistant.
Legal Issues with Cataloging Supplied by MARCIVE Joan Chapa.
SCURL SCS/GreenGlass Update Andrew Hall Sales Manager, UKI.
IAUTL June 2002 Michelle Cadoree, Library of Congress Virtual Reference: Making it Work For You.
AN ARCHETYPE FOR INFORMATION ORGANIZATION AND CLASSIFICATION OCLC WorldCat.
7th Annual Hong Kong Innovative Users Group Meeting
Xiaoli Li Co-head of Content Support Services
Michigan Shared Print Initiative
Creating Workflow Efficiencies in the E-book Ecosystem
Headline.
Maine Shared Collections Strategy: Print Archive Network Update
Michigan Shared Print Initiative
BIBFLOW Project Update
Configuration Management and Prince2
Central Iowa Collaborative Collections Initiative Survey
Tools and Techniques to Clean Up your Database
Tools and Techniques to Clean Up your Database
Headline.
Eastern Academic Scholars’ Trust (EAST)
Tableau Data Visualizations and Collection Analysis for Shared Print
PAN FORUM UPDATE June 2018 Kim Armstrong, Chair, Operations Committee
Metadata Guidelines for Disclosing Shared Print Commitments
Murdoch University Library
IDEALS at the University Of Illinois: A Case Study of Integration Between an IR and Library Discovery Systems Sarah L. Shreeves University of Illinois.
When to Hold On and When to Let Go: A Distributed Retrospective Library Assessment Conference, December 6, 2018 Jean Blackburn, Collections Librarian,
The Sky’s the Limit: Scholarly Communication, Digital Initiatives, Institutional Repositories, and Subject Librarians University of Central Florida Libraries.
Empire Shared collection program update
When to Hold On and When to Let Go: "Last Copy" Shared Print Archiving and Book Deselection VILSC, April Jean Blackburn, Collections Librarian,
WEST Program Assessments Past and Present
Mary Miller Director of Collection Management & Preservation
Looking Beyond Academic Libraries in Shared Print
Collection Analysis with Circulation, ILL and Collection Statistics: A Follow-up Presentation Lynn Silipigni Connaway OCLC, Inc. Heather Wicht University.
Presentation transcript:

California State University Libraries of the Future Taskforce Update Print Archive Network Forum/ALA MW January 25, 2013

LOFT (Libraries of the Future Taskforce) Chancellor’s Office Initiative Prompted by Education Advisory Board report LOFT membership includes Provosts CIOs Chancellor’s Office staff Faculty in several disciplines University Librarians Print Management is one of three components Sustainablecollections.com

CSU = An Excellent Laboratory Scale LA basin libraries pilot (6) Entire CSU system (23) Geography Central funding Administrative mandate A track record of collaboration Sustainablecollections.com

SCS Role Provide tools & services: data management, analysis & interpretation Develop and propose scenarios based on group’s preferences Facilitate discussions and decisions Quantify the yield and trade-offs associated with various strategies Help the non-librarians in LOFT understand the library’s context Sustainablecollections.com

Project Scope: LA Basin Libraries Primary focus: Circulating print monographs Reference books Juvenile books Out of Scope eBooks (may be discussed further) Government Documents Non-print Maps, Scores Journals Special Collections Sustainablecollections.com

Assembling the data (July 1-31) Bib, item & circulation data Individual calls on scoping, data mapping and technical issues with all 6 libraries 4-5 people from each library on the calls Excellent responsiveness, sharing of expertise Innovative Interfaces (system vendor) very helpful in adjusting data export profiles 1-2 days’ effort per library Sustainablecollections.com

CSU Data Set Library Bib Records Received Filtered Bib Records Dominguez Hills 384,752 380,584 Fullerton 695,567 683,025 Long Beach 627,417 614,951 Los Angeles 681,923 659,375 Northridge 790,736 758,984 Pomona 485,025 478,402 Total 3,665,420 3,575,321 Sustainablecollections.com

Preparing the libraries’ data Bibliographic, item, circulation, and holdings data extracted, transformed, loaded (ETL process) Eliminate duplicate bib records Normalize call numbers Eliminate trailing spaces in control numbers Validate OCLC numbers Match bib records on OCLC number (with title-string check) LCCN/title-string lookups for records lacking OCLC# Identify and accommodate unusual implementations of MARC (local call # typically in 090 --- one pilot library stores some in 099, etc., etc.) Filter out-of scope bib records (eBooks, maps, scores, DVDs, Gov Docs) Sustainablecollections.com

Categories of bib records filtered out Government documents Record type not ‘a’ (non-language materials) Bib level not equal to ‘m’ (non-monographic materials) Non-print resources (videos, sound recordings, eBooks) Unable to obtain an OCLC number Bib title or author mismatch with OCLC record Multiple OCLC numbers in the local record Sustainablecollections.com

Shared Circulation History? Library Circ Data from Number of Years Earliest Last Charge Date Dominguez Hills 2002 10 years 2001-05-12 Fullerton 1988 24 years 2000-01-03 Long Beach 1993 19 years 2000-01-04 Los Angeles Northridge 1980 32 years Pomona 1990 22 years Sustainablecollections.com

WorldCat™ Holdings SCS licensed access to WorldCat API US, State Holdings Peer Holdings LA Basin Peer Holding: other CSU Peer Holdings UC SkyRiver

CSU: LA Basin Libraries Database Bib, circ & item data from each library, normalized & supplemented with WorldCat holdings in specified categories Data from individual libraries combined into group ‘roll-up’ Held in SCS postgresql database in AWS cloud SCS queries against the group database using the PG Admin client Output: Group Collection Summary & lists Sustainablecollections.com

Group collection summary: first iteration delivered 9/18/12

By “titles” we can mean two different things 1. Title Set Dominguez Fullerton Long Beach Los Angeles Northridge Pomona 2. Title Holding California in the New Millennium: The Changing Social and Political Landscape, Publication Year 2000 (Paperback version 2002) This Title is held by all 23 CSU Libraries – we have details on the 6 in the Pilot Group

Each “Title-Holding” has different characteristics Dominguez Hills Fullerton Long Beach Los Angeles Northridge Pomona 0 circs 19 circs 16 circs 12 circs 13 circs 8 circs Total Circulations -none- 11/30/11 12/16/08 5/30/07 4/27/07 3/11/08 Last Circulation Date 6/27/02 4/23/02 9/21/01 5/03/00 11/11/02 8/11/00 Date added to Collection

Pilot Group Holdings and Avg Total Charges by LC

Holdings Within Group by Publication Year Sustainablecollections.com

Please Note The following slides outline only the facets of the data that were explored. Specific results will be released after additional vetting & discussion among the participants Graphs are based on sample data & intended only to demonstrate concepts, not to reflect CSU’s specific activity. Sustainablecollections.com

CSU Library Title-Holding Counts Circulation Counts CSU Library Title-Holding Counts All Libraries Percent 1 All Title Holdings - Filtered 3,575,321 100% 2 Total Charges = 0 (all available circ data) 3 Total Charges = 1 to 3 (all available circ data) 4 Total Charges = 4 to 9 (all available circ data) 5 Total Charges = 10+ (all available circ data) 6 Last charge after 2010 7 Last charge after 2007 8 Last charge after 2005

CSU Library Title-Holding Counts WorldCat™ Counts CSU Library Title-Holding Counts All Libraries Percent 1 All Title Holdings - Filtered 3,575,321 100% 9 0-9 Holdings in USA 10 10-19 Holdings in USA 11 20-49 Holdings in USA 12 50-99 Holdings in USA 13 100-199 Holdings In USA 14 200+ Holdings in USA 15 0-9 Holdings in California 16 10-49 Holdings in California 17 50+ Holdings in California

Overlap within LA Basin Group CSU Library Title-Holding Counts All Libraries Percent 1 All Title Holdings - Filtered 3,575,321 100% 18 Title-holdings present in 1 library 19 Title-holdings present in 2 libraries 20 Titles-holdings present in > 2 libraries 21 Title-holdings present in 3 libraries 22 Title-holdings present in 4 libraries 23 Title-holdings present in 5 libraries 24 Title-holdings present in 6 libraries

Overlap with other CSU Libraries CSU Library Title-Holding Counts All Libraries Percent 1 All Title Holdings - Filtered 3,575,321 100% 25 WorldCat holdings set in 1-5 more libraries 26 WorldCat Holdings set in 6-10 more libraries 27 WorldCat Holdings set in 11-17 more libraries * WorldCat Holdings set in all 23 CSU libraries

CSU Library Title-Holding Counts Date Related Counts CSU Library Title-Holding Counts All Libraries Percent 1 All Title Holdings - Filtered 3,575,321 100% 30 Publication Year before 2005 31 Publication Year before 2000 32 Publication Year before 1990 33 Last Item Add-Date before 2005

Hathi Trust and CHOICE Matches CSU Library Title-Holding Counts All Libraries Percent 1 All Title Holdings - Filtered 3,575,321 100% 34 Hathi Trust Public Domain Match 35 Hathi Trust In-Copyright Match 36 Reviewed in CHOICE

Sample Scenarios: Calculating the opportunity

Uniquely Held Titles

Titles Published and Acquired before 2000 Shared Withdrawal Scenarios 0 Circulations 1 or fewer circulations 3 or fewer circulations Keep 1 Title-holding Keep 2 Title-holdings Keep 3 Title-holdings Sustainablecollections.com

Discussion and next steps

Design of Broader Project? Space goals? Required yield? Desired service levels (delivery time) Single CSU Collection? Three Regions? Archive copies vs. Service copies CSU ‘unique’ titles: how to handle Retention commitments? Preservation commitments (in what context?) Role/relationship with UC system? Regional partners?

Defining Criteria for Shared Print How will decisions be made? Allocation of retention commitments & withdrawal opportunities: on what basis? How many title holdings should be retained in the system? In each region? Is it appropriate for some titles to be discarded from the CSU system? Legal aspects? MOU needed?

Sustainablecollections.com

Sustainablecollections.com

Conclusions Data and scenario modeling improve decision- making Use of third-party services expands capacity and speeds up the process Tools and services still evolving Sustainablecollections.com

Contact Info http://sustainablecollections.com rick@sustainablecollections.com Twitter: @SCSinsight; @ricklugg Sustainablecollections.com