Neutrinos from BBfit J. Brunner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Data / MC Comparisons for Low Hadronic Energy CC-like Events Reminder of problem Fiducial studies with more MC statistics Effect of offset in.
Advertisements

JNM Dec Annecy, France The High Resolution Fly’s Eye John Matthews University of Utah Department of Physics and High Energy Astrophysics Institute.
Soudan 2 Peter Litchfield University of Minnesota For the Soudan 2 collaboration Argonne-Minnesota-Oxford-RAL-Tufts-Western Washington  Analysis of all.
Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.
Detection of atmospheric muon bundles using ALICE detectors A. Fernández Tellez Universidad Autonoma de Puebla for the ALICE Collaboration VIII Simposio.
PROGRESS ON WATER PROPERTIES ON TRACKS RECONSTRUCTION Harold Yepes-Ramirez 17/11/2011.
PROGRESS ON WATER PROPERTIES ON TRACKS RECONSTRUCTION Harold Yepes-Ramirez 09/11/2011.
Work SummaryNSF Report, 16 Nov Patrick Ryan, MSU Summary of Work Single Top Single Top trigger Have determined the optimum lepton triggers (mu20i,
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
PROGRESS ON WATER PROPERTIES ON TRACKS RECONSTRUCTION H Yepes -Ramirez IFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València) ANTARES Collaboration Meeting Strasbourg,
PROGRESS ON WATER PROPERTIES ON TRACKS RECONSTRUCTION H Yepes -Ramirez IFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València) ANTARES Collaboration Meeting Strasbourg,
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
IMPACT OF WATER OPTICAL PROPERTIES ON TRACKS RECONSTRUCTION H Yepes -Ramirez IFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València) ANTARES Collaboration Meeting Moscow,
Application of Kalman filter methods to event filtering and reconstruction for Neutrino Telescopy A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
IceCube 40Point Source AnalysisResultsConclusions Search for neutrino point sources with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory Menlo Park, California TeVPA.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Preliminary analysis of p-Pb data update n. 6 Lorenzo Bonechi LHCf Catania meeting – 19 December 2013.
N. Saoulidou Fermilab 1 Status & Update of track reconstruction in the Near Detector N. Saoulidou, Fermilab
Online Reconstruction used in the Antares-Tarot alert system J ü rgen Brunner The online reconstruction concept Performance Neutrino doublets and high.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
First Look at Data and MC Comparisons for Cedar and Birch ● Comparisons of physics quantities for CC events with permutations of Cedar, Birch, Data and.
The ORCA Letter of Intent Oscillation Research with Cosmics in the Abyss ORCA Antoine Kouchner University Paris 7 Diderot- AstroParticle and Cosmology.
Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.
One,Two pion channels from PE target August 2014 (~10 hours of beam) 50 MLN events (1.2 shift) Day 232/233 Piotr & Witek.
Sergey Burdin FNAL DØ Collaboration 8/12/2005 Chicago Flavor New Bs Mixing Result from DØ.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS Collaboration Meeting Fermilab, Oct. 05 Data/MC Comparisons and Estimating the ND Flux with QE Events ● Update on QE event selection.
T2K muon measurement 2014 Momentum module A.Ariga, C. Pistillo University of Bern S. Aoki Kobe University 1.
Bug fix on km3 scattering tables First tests with new tables Jürgen Brunner.
Introduction to Irene’s talk (reminder) Coincidence window  500s  GWHEN group, Astropart. Phys. 35 (2011) 1-7 Ph. D Thesis of I. Di Palma (AEI) Ph. D.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Soft QCD WG Meeting 29/04/2013.
28/4/2006Chris Collins-Tooth tth, (h → bb) with EventViews Chris Collins-Tooth, Christian Shaw 03-May-2006.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
ORCA from ANTARES modules J. Brunner 06/10/2012. Detector Hexagonal layout a la IceCube 37 lines, distance 20m 25 ANTARES storeys  z = 4.5m Equipped.
Upgrade of BBfit v3r6  v4r0 C. Reed development of method S. Galata implementation into SeaTray J. B. Implementation into online (standalone) version.
The Performance of the ALICE experiment for cosmic ray physics B. Alessandro, V. Canoa, A. Fernández, M. Rodríguez, M. Subieta for the ALICE Collaboration.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
M. Martemianov, ITEP, October 2003 Analysis of ratio BR(K     0 )/BR(K    ) M. Martemianov V. Kulikov Motivation Selection and cuts Trigger efficiency.
ANL Worksop Impressions The facility is really nice, with office space (Duke has one), printer, video connection, etc… The jamboree format (and the confined.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS WITW June 05 An Update on Using QE Events to Estimate the Neutrino Flux and Some Preliminary Data/MC Comparisons for a QE Enriched.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
A Measurement of the Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum with the HiRes FADC Detector (HiRes-2) Andreas Zech (for the HiRes Collaboration) Rutgers University.
IC-22 Point Source Analysis with Unbinned Maximum Likelihood C. Finley, J. Dumm, T. Montaruli 2008 May 2.
Update on Track Efficiency Fitting using Kshorts 17. May 2010 Till Eifert, Grant Gorfine.
Detection of atmospheric muons using ALICE detectors
Update on the GRB Triggered Shower Analysis
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data
P0D reconstruction/analysis update
BBfit v3.2 Hit selection Fit function Amplitude Distance
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
(2001) Data Filtering: UPDATE
IC22 Unbinned GRB Search Utrecht Collaboration Meeting
Zenith dependence in various Log nergy bins
Hough Transform on SZ Plane
Preliminary Comparison of Monte Carlo and 9-string IceCube Data
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
Samples and MC Selection
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Hellenic Open University
Presentation transcript:

Neutrinos from BBfit J. Brunner

Data selection (3N trigger) 01/02/07-25/05/07 25/05/07-04/12/07 Au 36.6 days 90.7 days Ag-Au 10.5 days 29.8 days Ag 47.1 days 120.5 days Adding Ag-Au data (~30%) decreases rates by 10-15% whereas MC stays the same (produced with Au reference run) Strasbourg This presentation

Data Selection Data sample comparison : Strasbourg versus now 120.5 days 2.5 M muons 11.5 M muons 36.8 days

Event rates muons Data(1) neutrinos Basic cuts(2) 1.23 Hz 1.18 Hz 4.8/day Single line 0.54 Hz 0.51 Hz Multi line 0.69 Hz 0.67 Hz 1L upward 1501/day 1835/day 2.0/day 2L upward 657/day 894/day 2.8/day Scaled with 1.2 for trigger bug (see analysis elog 125) 6 hits at least && track fit better than bright point fit

Zenith angles multi-line basic cuts Good match MC-data MC truth shape well maintained 0.67Hz 0.69Hz 657/day 894/day 2.8/day

Zenith angles single-line basic cuts Good match MC-data MC truth shape well maintained 0.51Hz 0.54Hz 1501/day 1835/day 2.0/day

Fit Quality Slight difference between data and atm. muon MC Multi line fit Slight difference between data and atm. muon MC Not yet understood Might also be related to atm. muon physics (hadronic model, composition) Better agreement for neutrinos (see below) Single line fit

Fit Quality for upward going tracks Multi line fit Single line fit Cut for multi lines: 4.3 Purity better than 95% Cut : 2.7 , ct>0.5 Purity better than 80% PP? 0.36/day 0.78/day 0.70/day 0.45/day 0.005/day 0.07/day

Angular error for zenith angle Mean values of log of zenith angle difference muons neutrinos 2.0º 2.1º 0.7º (15%) 0.7º (25%) No ghost peak at 90 degree Neutrino reconstruction not better than muon reconstruction Cut gains factor 3 in precision for 15-25% subsample

Angular error for space angle Mean values of log of space angle difference muons neutrinos 6.5º 8.9º 3.1º (15%) 4.4º (25%) No ghost peak at 90 degree Neutrino reconstruction not better than muon reconstruction Cut gains factor 2 in precision for 15-25% subsample

Neutrino count : 155 / 167 days 01/02/07-25/05/07 25/05/07-04/12/07 Au 1L : 18 2L : 16 Ag-Au 1L : 3 2L : 4 Ag 1L : 21 2L : 20 1L : 36 2L : 78 Ag-Au runs contribute marginally (to be verified for other periods) Strasbourg This presentation

Zenith angles multi-lines update 78 neutrinos 78 neutrinos PP?

Zenith angles single-line PP? 36 neutrinos 36 neutrinos

Bright neutrinos

Bright neutrinos

10 lines analysis Data Dec 2007 – Apr 2008; Ag runs : 100 active days Multi line Single line Use same cut: 4.3 Use same cuts: 2.7 costh > 0.5

10 lines analysis Data Dec 2007 – Apr 2008; Ag runs : 100 active days Multi line Single line 208 neutrino 88 neutrino PP?

Bright neutrinos