Figure 1. Experiment 1A: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS females of water and maltodextrin (MD-6) and maltodextrin-sucralose (MD-6 + SUX) mixtures. In this and.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

From: An open day in the metric space

Advertisements

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.

Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.

Figure 1. Financial income in Germany (% of GDP)

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.

Figure 1 Theoretical link between welfare state policy and fear of crime From: Social Insecurities and Fear of Crime: A Cross-National Study on the Impact.

Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

Figure 1. Conceptual framework.

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1. Bevo I, ca. 1920, photographer unknown

Figure 1 Individual Lifted from Group Photograph

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

From: Unmasking Masks in Makkah: Preventing Influenza at Hajj

Fig. 1 Proportion of study participants with ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics by self-rated health. Ideal category of Cardiovascular Health Metrics.

Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis in patients

Fig. 4 Glucose concentration in the first 3 h of the dialysis session (blue circles) or equivalent time of the following day without dialysis (red circles).

From: Where do we go from here

Figure 1. Overall survival of patients receiving alternative medicine (solid lines) vs conventional cancer treatment (dashed lines). Overall survival of.

Example 14. Schubert, Quartet in G Major, D

Figure 1. Nonadherence to guidelines for prescribing antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in 144 patients with atrial fibrillation who attend a Spanish.

Figure 1. Relationship between Log Transfers and Age of Eldest HH Member(a) Bandwidth 0.05(b) Bandwidth 0.1(c) Bandwidth 0.5 From: The Effect of a Transfer.

Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.

Fig. 1 Selection of patients

Figure 1. Dynamic supply chain model of second line tuberculosis drugs in the Western Cape Province, South Africa From: Reducing stock-outs of essential.

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of patient selection and study design.

Figure 1. Academic productivity and high academic income: top earners vs. the rest of academics. The average number of ‘peer-reviewed article equivalents’

Figure 1 Effects of time constant and time-varying characteristics on occupational status at the start of a career and at the time of change in the time.

Figure 1. Characteristics of Policy Outcomes and Multi-level Governments. From: What Are the Areas of Competence for Central and Local Governments? Accountability.

Figure 1 Flow of data processing

Figure 1: Changing American Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage. Mean support for marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization. N=4,079. Source:

Figure 1. Examples of e-cigarette discussions in social media

Fig. 1. The required sample sizes nPPV and nNPV versus the sample allocation fraction P for the case study. From: Sample size for.

From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery

Figure 3. Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA)-axis functioning moderates crime exposure: regions of significance on X (crime). The lines represent two.

Figure 1. Time of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia according to who initiated it. Note the logarithmic scaling of the vertical axis. From: Initiation.

Figure 1. Publication channels used by scholars at the faculty of Arts, 2006–2013. From: Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems.

Figure 1: Logistic regression showing association of prescribing provider and patient panel characteristics with occurrence of a hospitalization or ED.

Figure 1 Percentage and number of arrivals with YFV check per entry location in Tanzania. Numbers in chart indicate number of arrivals per entry location.

NOTE.—Error bars in all figures represent standard errors of the means. From: So Close I Can Almost Sense It: The Interplay between Sensory Imagery and.

Figure 1. Percentage of trainees is represented on the y-axis for each competency/knowledge item represented in the x-axis. Only Poor/Fair (P/F) ratings.

From: The Effect of Vapor of Propylene Glycol on Rats

Figure 1. Distribution of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels at the baseline visit in a study population of adults aged 18–59 years (n = 309), Toronto,

From: Consumer Bankruptcy, Bank Mergers, and Information *

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review. From: How effective are weight-loss.

Figure 1. Impact ratings for prospective memory lapses for younger (~age 30), middle-age (~age 50), and older (~age 65) adults. From: Daily Memory Lapses.

Figure 3. Biodistribution of Nickel was measured by using ICP-OES technique in (a) liver, (b) kidneys, (c) brain, (d) spleen, (e) heart, (f) blood, (g)

Figure 2. Entrance dose at the detector for the clinical (light grey bars) and reference (dark bars) protocols. From: COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS.

Figure 6. RRs for clinical cure rates stratified by different diseases

Figure 1. Example of phase shift angles among three different terns where one of them has been taken as a reference. From: Assessment of ELF magnetic fields.

Fig. 5. A GC content and het/nonref-hom ratio relationship for exome regions. B GC content and het/nonref-hom ratio relationship for intron regions. C.

Figure 1. Percentage of participants in each group (holocaust survivors, prewar immigrants, and postwar immigrants) by the main coded strategies. From:

Figure 5. Tungiasis: a 21-year-old woman returned from Peru with painful nodules on her toes. From: Illness in Travelers Returned From Brazil: The GeoSentinel.

Figure 2 Map of traveller arrivals to Tanzania and performed checks (arrivals with checks/all arrivals). Change: change of aircraft, no change: no change.

Figure 1. The cell-lineage specification of the early mouse embryo

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1: Yearly net investment flows from Japan

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Experiment 1A: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS females of water and maltodextrin (MD-6) and maltodextrin-sucralose (MD-6 + SUX) mixtures. In this and in Figures 2-12, tastants are shown on the x-axis in the order in which they were tested (except where noted otherwise). From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 2. Experiment 1B: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS females and males of water and of maltodextrin (MD-6) and maltodextrin-sucralose (MD-6 + SUX) mixtures with and without sugars (glucose + maltose) added. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 3. Experiment 1C: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of maltodextrin-sucralose (MD-6 + SUX) mixtures with more sugar (glucose) added. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 4. Experiment 1D: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of Splenda. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 5. Experiment 1D: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of maltodextrin (Malto) in 3 tests. Testing order was balanced for the first 2 tests (plain MD-6 or Polycose); the third test was with a Polycose/sucralose (Poly + SUX) mixture. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 6. Experiment 2A: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of low concentrations of stevia. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 7. Experiment 2B: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of higher concentrations of stevia. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 8. Experiment 2C: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females of water and of rebaudioside A. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 9. Experiment 2D: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of 0.1 g/L stevia versus 0–7.5 g/L sucrose. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 12. Experiment 3B: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of 5 sweeteners. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 11. Experiment 3A: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of acesulfame potassium (Ace K) versus water. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Figure 10. Experiment 2E: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of 1 g/L stevia versus 0–20 g/L sucrose. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5):381-392. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com