Prepared by LF Pardo (France)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNECE Regulation 13 (braking) Proposed amendment to extend Annex 19 and Annex 20 to cover motor vehicles, especially a vehicle stability function Sheet.
Advertisements

Informal document No.GRB-47-4 (47th GRB, February 2008 Agenda item 3 (a) CLEPA presentations supporting justifications of informal documents GRB-47-2.
QRTV for UN Regulation GRB 61 Transmitted by IWG QRTV for UN Regulation Informal document GRB (61st GRB, January 2015, agenda item 11)
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
ECE R41 revision Outline of main modules with crossreference to draft amending text Presentation by Data Expert Group to R41WG 19 February 2008 Informal.
Draft interstate standard Draft interstate standard “Automotive vehicles. Internal noise. Admissible levels and test methods” Developer: Testing centre.
France consideration on maximum noise in Global Technical Regulation on Quiet Road Transport Vehicles ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRB-58 Informal document GRB
Inquiry Results and Revision Plan Draft Title: Vehicle speed measurement systems.
Transmitted by the representative of JAPAN Toward Realization of the “Mutual Recognition of International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA)” under the.
QRTV for UN Regulation GRB 62 Transmitted by IWG QRTV for UN Regulation Informal document GRB (62nd GRB, 1-3 September 2015, agenda item 11)
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Transmitted by the expert from Germany The French/German ASEP proposal Informal.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
Additional Sound Emission Provisions Proposal from France GRBIG-ASEP
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Handling of Manual Mode with Automatic Transmission. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-06-17e.
Anchor points in ASEP the shifting in the various proposals as the chairman has understood it ASEP meeting June 2008 v4.
Motorcycle Noise Emissions - The German Position – - ISO response - 4. GRB Informal Group Meeting 25./26. August 2005 Milwaukee.
GRB – ASEP – 08 Criteria to compare proposals Den Hagg – September 2007.
Starting note on gearshift issues
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
Motorcycle Noise Emission
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Chapter 41: Transmission 1
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016
The Implement of ECE R51 03series in China
Transmitted by the expert from Japan
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Transmitted by the expert from Germany
Prepared by LF Pardo (France)
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-012
Indoor pass by noise France Presented by Louis-Ferdinand PARDO
UN Regulation No. 94  or Door locking status at engine running
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Transmitted by the experts from OICA
UN Regulation No. 95 *  or Door locking status at engine running
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
Reversing audible warning devices for M- and N- Vehicles
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 65th
ASEP, from 2005 to 2019 Background informations and future works
ASEP for L5 vehicles with CVT/AT
Pilot project: Analysis of the relevance of influencing factors when determining CO2 emissions and fuel consumption during type approval of passenger cars.
Amendment proposals for Regulation Nos 9, 63 and 92
Additional Explanations to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2016/35
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-12
Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulation
Suggestions on development of UN Regulation No. 51
QRTV for UN Regulation GRB 61.
Safety concept for automated driving systems
Behaviour of M2 & M3 general construction in case of Fire Event
Snow tyres provisions - status report
Progress report of GRSG informal group
IMMA proposal for a test procedure towards real driving conditions
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Transmitted by the experts of IWG ASEP
Informal document GRRF-78-41
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
Comments on tyre choosing of UN Regulation No
China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.
UN R13 and Electro Mechanical Brakes
Chinese Mandatory National Standard
Presentation transcript:

Prepared by LF Pardo (France) Transmitted by the expert from France Informal document GRB-65-12 (65th GRB, 15-17 February 2017, agenda items 4 and 17) Some proposals of interpretations on UN R51.03 following GRB-64-15 - (France) Some proposals to improve efficiency of road vehicle noise regulations Prepared by LF Pardo (France)

Transmission Set Up of the representative vehicle “If the vehicle allows different transmission setups like automatic or manual gear selection and/or different software programs or modes (e.g. sporty, winter, adaptive) leading to valid accelerations, the vehicle manufacturer shall prove to the satisfaction of the Technical Service, that the vehicle is tested in the mode which achieves an acceleration being closest to awot ref.”  Could we consider that the mode which usually achieves an acceleration being closest to awot ref is locked-gear (using 1 gear with a wot ref ± 5% or 2 gears).

Transmission Set Up of the representative vehicle Could principle be extend to transmission variant in a vehicle type ?  For a vehicle-type which can equipped either with locked or with non-locked transmission, could we recommend that the vehicle shall be tested only in locked gear instead of both with locked and non-locked gear. MT Locked gear mode AT Non-locked gear mode

Transmission Set Up of the representative vehicle “The vehicle transmission, gear, or gear ratio may be controlled by electronic or mechanical measures to avoid the activation of a kick-down function. Therefore, it is permitted to establish and use electronic or mechanical devices, including alternate gear selector positions, to prevent a downshift to a gear ratio which is typically not used for the specified test condition in urban traffic.”  Could we precise the use of electronic device by manufacturer to test in alternate gear ?

Transmission Set Up of the representative vehicle “The vehicle transmission, gear, or gear ratio may be controlled by electronic or mechanical measures to avoid the activation of a kick-down function.” How to define Kick-down function ? Gear shifting x gear shifting or gear shifting to a gear ratio which is typically not used for the specified test condition in urban traffic Notch on pedal position close to end position …  Could we precise kickdown function ?

Mass of the representative vehicle The test mass has to be measured with +/- 5% compared to target mass. Mass is not part of the Vehicle Type definition. In that case the representative vehicle selected for testing could be for example, a 5 seats or 7 seats, with or without option, …  There is not only one mass in running order (target mass) but a range of mass in running order.

Mass of the representative vehicle  Could we consider range of m ro ?  Could we precise how to select representative vehicle regarding range of m ro ?  How to consider PMR, a wot ref, a urban, L urban calculation… regarding m ro range ? e.g.