Final Project Presentation

Final Project Presentation This critical formal review serves as your Final Exam for SD2 Date: Friday, May 6th, 2016 Begins sharply at 10:00 AM in ERB 208 (note: may change venue to ERB 435) each team will set up in your cubicle or designated area in other venue Format is “Science Fair” Continuous, interactive demos Poster board Q&A

Final Project Presentation Hints for Success: Dress professionally and present at your best Rehearse demo and discussion topics as a team – coach each other Practice your demo so you can show what you’ve done in no more than 10 minutes.

Final Project Presentation Other Info: Friends, family, significant others are invited/encouraged to attend especially your sponsor/product owner Each team’s display/demo area must have on display a 3-part posterboard project summary Picture of team, title of project, key roles & responsibilities Product concept/description – bullets, not paragraphs Architectural design diagram Key requirements, with completion indicator Lessons Learned Photos, graphics, etc. as required for emphasis

Final Product Prototype Demonstrations Demos will be set up in the venue before 10:00 AM, 5/6 Your project poster board will be prominently displayed for the demo and should be used for talking points of your discussion Each team will be available in their area to discuss and demonstrate their product prototype to reviewers and guests. Final product prototype scoring is by instructor per the following scale. Grading: Group Deliverable - Completed product 75/300 points Final Deliverables (sub for prior final exam) - Demo, discussion, poster board, final documents – 25% of grade

Final Product Scoring Guideline 100: fully operational prototype, fully functional per plan, professionally packaged (extremely rare) 95-99: operational prototype, with minor functional deficiencies, cleanly and neatly packaged (rare) 90-94: operational prototype, some major functional deficiencies, packaged well as a prototype (somewhat common) 85-89: operational prototype, numerous functional deficiencies, not well packaged (most common) 80-84: functioning prototype, with minimal features operational, not well packaged or not packaged at all (frequent) 70-79: non-functioning prototype, unable to demonstrate key/critical features, prototype is not worthy of display (occasional) <70: non operational bread-boarded design only, numerous functional deficiencies, unable to demonstrate critical features (rare)