Alignment status & plans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Advertisements

1 LA general training session, Cascina Virgo alignment - overview - Nonlinear alignment = prealignment Linear alignment = autoalignment.
Status of the Virgo Commissioning G.Losurdo – INFN Firenze/Urbino for the Virgo Collaboration.
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Locking improvements after the end of VSR1 Gabriele Vajente for the Locking Group 14 th ILIAS WG1 meeting Cascina – March 6 th 2008.
European Gravitational Observatory25/01/20061 Alignment : Hardware & Software Status Henrich Heitmann, Julien Marque with the contribution of: INFN Frascati,
1 ILIAS WG1 meeting, Hannover, Alignment electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
Virgo commissioning update - VSR1 first month summary E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Cascina June 20 th,2007.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress and plans ILIAS, Jan 23 rd 2007 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
VSR1 summary - post VSR1 Commissioning plans E. Tournefier (LAPP-CNRS) LSC-Virgo meeting Oct 22 nd, 2007.
rd ILIAS-GW annual general meeting 1 VIRGO Commissioning progress J. Marque (EGO)
Use ofSiesta in VIRGO commissioning Lisa Barsotti University of Pisa – INFN Pisa For the Virgo collaboration Caltech, December 19th 2003.
SIESTA for Virgo locking experience L. Barsotti University of Pisa – INFN Pisa on behalf of the Virgo Locking Group Cascina, March 16th 2004 Simulation.
COMMISSIONING PROGRESS G.LOSURDO – INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
1 Virgo commissioning since the end of VSR1 E. Tournefier for the commissioning team ILIAS WG1, Cascina March 5 th,2008.
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
1 LA electronics meeting, Cascina, Virgo alignment system overview ● Linear Alignment principle ● Optical configuration ● Present situation.
1 Ist Virgo+ review Cascina H. Heitmann Alignment: Virgo+ changes.
Status of Virgo Gabriele Vajente INFN Pisa and Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration 11 th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
1 1.ISC scope and activities 2.Initial Virgo status 3.Design requirements 4.Reference solution and design status 5.Plans toward completion 6.Technical.
Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.
1 Noise sources at high frequency in Virgo E. Tournefier (LAPP-CNRS) ILAS WG1 meeting, Hannover December 12 th,2005 Recycled ITF sensitivities Noise sources.
Gabriele Vajente ILIAS WG1 meeting - Perugia Couplings of angular noises into dark fringe Diffused light studies.
04. November 2004 A. Freise A. Freise, M. Loupias Collaboration Meeting November 04, 2004 Alignment Status.
Takanori Sekiguchi External Review Control and tuning of suspension 1 T. Sekiguchi KAGRA 4th External Review.
1 Virgo commissioning: Next steps December 12 st 2005 Hannover, ILIAS-GWA WG1 Matteo Barsuglia, LAL/CNRS.
1 Virgo Commissioning progress ILIAS, Nov 13 th 2006 Matteo Barsuglia on behalf of the Commissioning Team.
LSC-VIRGO joint meeting - Pisa1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect Frequency modulation PRCL length in Virgo Some results from a Finesse simulation.
1 1.Definition 2.Deliverables 3.Status of preliminary design 4.Risks 5.Tasks to be done 6.Decisions to be taken 7.Required simulations 8.Planning ISC workshop:
1 The Virgo noise budget Romain Gouaty For the Virgo collaboration GWADW 2006, Isola d’Elba.
MSC - 18 Oct 071 LOW FREQUENCY SEISMIC NOISE: LOCKING AND SENSITIVITY ISSUE Paolo Ruggi noise meeting.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Noise analysis in Virgo Cascina, 7-8 July 2004 Analysis of noise in VIRGO.
Lisa Barsotti - University and INFN Pisa – on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration CASCINA - January 24 th, 2005 ILIAS  Locking of Full Virgo Status of VIRGO.
Status of VIRGO Lisa Barsotti - University and INFN Pisa – on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration ANNECY - December 15 th, 2004  Status of the Commissioning.
1 PAY Review Meeting 1 18/3/2009 Piero Rapagnani 18/03/2009.
M. Mantovani, ILIAS Meeting 7 April 2005 Hannover Linear Alignment System for the VIRGO Interferometer M. Mantovani, A. Freise, J. Marque, G. Vajente.
Analysis of the Virgo runs sensitivities Raffaele Flaminio, Romain Gouaty, Edwige Tournefier Summary : - Introduction : goal of the study / Overview on.
Laser Frequency Stabilization – 2004, May 04 1 Laser Frequency Stabilization François BONDU CNRS – ARTEMIS, Nice VIRGO How it works (Design) Make it work.
1 Virgo Commissioning Status WG1 meeting Potsdam, 21 st July 2006.
1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized.
MSC winter, short-term schedule Commissioning meeting Cascina 2 Oct 2006.
Paolo La Penna ILIAS N5-WP1 meeting Commissioning Progress Hannover, July 2004 VIRGO commissioning progress report.
M. Mantovani ILIAS Cascina March 2008 Automatic Alignment system Improvements after the VSR1 M. Mantovani for the Alignment team.
Gabriele Vajente ILIAS WG1 meeting - Frascati Noise Analysis Tools at Virgo.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
Status of Virgo a short update Michele Punturo. A bit of History July 29 – August –C6 run Duty cycle: Locking 89%, Science Mode 86% September.
CITF A. Allocca, M. Mantovani. Outline CITF schematic Resonance conditions Effect of the misalignment on the error signals Comparison with Virgo+ Effect.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
1 DC readout for Virgo+? E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Hannover January 23 rd,2007 DC vs AC readout: technical noises Output mode cleaner for DC readout.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
1 Frequency Noise in Virgo by Matt Evans. 2 The Actors  Noise Sources  Input Mode Cleaner length noise  Sensing noise on IMC lock  Frequency Servo.
Sensitivity of Virgo E. Tournefier (LAPP-CNRS) LSC-Virgo week May 23 rd,2007 LIGO-G Z.
ILIAS - Geneve1 Input mirrors thermal lensing effect in Virgo J. Marque.
20-22 July 2006 Maddalena Mantovani Automatic Alignment Noise Improvement M. Mantovani, H. Heitmann, J. Marque, P. Ruggi.
1 ILIAS WG1 meeting, Hannover The 2 nd modulation frequency project.
Automation of the Lock Acquisition of the 3 km Arm Virgo Interferometer F. Carbognani for The Virgo Collaboration ICALEPCS - Geneva 14 October, 2005.
Edwige Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration The status of Virgo.
(Some) noise hunting issues at Virgo
MSC report September weekly meeting EM-MSC
GEO – VIRGO joint noise hunting project
Virgo – Injection SYStem
Electronics: Demod + 4Q FE
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Frequency Noise in Virgo
Virgo Update – LSC meeting
Status at the Prague meeting
Presentation transcript:

Alignment status & plans

2nd modulation frequency absolute (demodulated) reference for common end alignment (not available with one fmod) Previously aligned with ITF reflection Q21_DC 2nd mod. (8.35 MHz) IMC mod. (22.4 MHz) Virgo mod. (6.26 MHz) 2nd mod. on the same EOM => line forest => difficult Solution: 2nd EOM => Much less problems but modulation must be weak (m=0.01 instead of 0.17) for avoiding perturbations => to be investigated

2nd fmod layout WSR10 alignment layout 6.26 MHz 8.35 MHz

2nd fmod: results 8 MHz modulation is working Common end loop adapted Low modulation index => Q22 signal noisy => use at LF Common end loop adapted Error signal remains Q21_DC Absolute Q21 position set by shifting until Q22_AC = 0 (Alp loop; stopped in science mode) Alternative possibility “Mix” Q22_AC (LF) <=> Q21_DC (HF) One error signal; filters in sensing matrix Advantage: absolute DC reference is kept during science mode Q21_DC Q22_8 MHz

End mirror beam centering - before DSP Drift control QD error signal B8_q1_DC B8_q2_DC B7_q1_DC B7_q2_DC B8_q1 B8_q2 B8 WE B7_q1 WI PR NI NE B7_q2 BS B7

End mirror beam centering - now Alp Drift control Alp error signal 7...8 Hz line on NE/WE tx/ty Locking correction in z => control input mirrors Noise reduction but: upconversion 10-15 Hz ?! B8_q1 B8_q2 B8 10 Hz before after (high ISYS noise!) WE B7_q1 WI PR NI NE B7_q2 BS B7

Alignment noise in dark fringe G. Vajente Automated alignment noise projections (10 min.) Coherence Differential end mirror tx mode almost limiting => more power on Q1p diode + whitening filter => alternative: improve corrector cut-off (but: need all margin for high LF gain)

Recent Gc-Ali upgrades Sensing – Filtering – Driving available Driving switch needed during thermal transient (switch NE-WE => Common-Differential) Noise injection For measurement of open loop transfer functions Filtering gain change on-fly For migrating all gain changes from DSP to Gc Noise Sensing Filtering Driving DSP Global control

Alignment OL transfer function measurements Differential end tx Excellent fit with Matlab model Gain adjustment => matrix calibration Differential end ty ? Less excellent fit But still good in the important region (a few Hz)

Diff end tx error signal Other improvements Thermal transient robustness Improved by switching on 1. differential 2. common end alignment Driving matrix NE/WE => NE+WE/NE-WE after thermal transient PR alignment acts on reference mass Local control on marionette remains on High gain filters (end mirror control) Further tuning needed Sometimes more gain than needed => Rather invest in HF cut-off Histogram Diff end tx error signal

Plans up to scientific run I Improve alignment stability (filter work) Sometimes oscillations during thermal transient Check stability in bad weather conditions Reduce alignment noise 10-50 Hz: alignment noise starts becoming important Error signal improvement (B1p: more light + preshaping) Filter tuning (LF gain / HF cutoff trade-off) Continue transfer function measurements Line injections for better coherence Understand model deviations Measure resonance frequencies: rad. pressure effects? Update sensing matrix Continue alignment globalization More logical system: all gain adjustments in Gc, …

Plans up to scientific run II Common mode error signal improvement Create composite error signal (mix Q22_ACLF + Q21_DCHF) Observe beam centering loops Improve if needed (up-conversion, better centering, …) Centering of input mirrors? TBC

To be done if needed Switch BS/ISYS <-> NI/WI control LA on NI/WI mirrors BS/ISYS steer beams in arms Globalize other LA degrees of freedom PR, BS PR alignment Keep LC on marionette on? Optimize IMC alignment filters Reduce LF beam jitter (higher gain) Increase 8 MHz modulation index First understand where locking signal perturbation comes from

End

Alignment configurations tx IB PR BS NI NE WI WE ty IB PR BS NI NE WI WE 10 d.o.f. fast alignment WSR1 08/09 – 11/09/2006 tx BM PR BS NI NE WI WE ty BM PR BS NI NE WI WE 6 d.o.f. fast alignment; input beam and BS control WSR10 09/03 – 12/03/2007 7 d.o.f. fast alignment; input beam and BS control XX Linear alignment XX LA (ref. mass) XX Drift control XX Local control XX DC error signal XX DC + AC err.sig.

WSR10 sensing matrix BMS PR BS NI NE WI WE ThetaX 0.5 B1p_q1_ACq 4 B2_q1_ACp 2 B5_q1_ACq -0.5 B8_q1_ACp -1.5 B2_q1_DC 1 B7_q1_DC -1.5 B7_q2_DC 1 B8_q1_DC -0.8 B8_q2_DC BMS PR BS NI NE WI WE ThetaY -0.6 B1p_q1_ACq 4 B2_q1_ACq 0.4 B8_q1_ACq 4 B2_q1_DC -1 B7_q2_DC -0.7 B8_q2_DC * Filtered in Gc sensing

WSR10 alignment control overview Beam Diode Demod. Loop Arm diff. B1p Q Fast Arm common B2 1 2 for centering - PR B5 BS B8 P (tx) Q (ty) Fast (tx) Drift (ty) NI B7 1+2 Drift WI BMS

WSR10 alignment filtering Sensing Filtering Driving DSP Global control Sensing Filtering 1 DC Filtering 2 Initial Filtering 3 Boost DSP PR tx --- Ref.mass + mario LC PR ty End tx INITIAL BOOST End ty

WSR10 alignment driving Sensing Filtering Driving DSP Common End Global control Driving 1 Initial_Driving Driving 2 Driving Common End => NE => NE+WE Differ. => WE => NE-WE