Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Virtual Memory Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Virtual Memory Organization Primary Memory Secondary Memory Memory Image for pi Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Names, Virtual Addresses & Physical Addresses Dynamically Executable Image Physical Address Space Bt: Virtual Address Space Physical Address Space Source Program Absolute Module Name Space Pi’s Virtual Address Space Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Locality Address Space for pi Address space is logically partitioned Text, data, stack Initialization, main, error handle Different parts have different reference patterns: 30% 20% 35% 15% <1% Execution time Initialization code (used once) Code for 1 Code for 2 Code for 3 Code for error 1 Code for error 2 Code for error 3 Data & stack Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Virtual Memory Every process has code and data locality Code tends to execute in a few fragments at one time Tend to reference same set of data structures Dynamically load/unload currently-used address space fragments as the process executes Uses dynamic address relocation/binding Generalization of base-limit registers Physical address corresponding to a compile-time address is not bound until run time Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Virtual Memory (cont) Since binding changes with time, use a dynamic virtual address map, Bt Virtual Address Space Bt Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Virtual Memory Primary Memory n-1 Physical Address Space Fragments of the virtual address space are dynamically loaded into primary memory at any given time Secondary Memory Each address space is fragmented Virtual Address Space for pi Virtual Address Space for pj Virtual Address Space for pk Complete virtual address space is stored in secondary memory Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Address Formation Translation system creates an address space, but its address are virtual instead of physical A virtual address, x: Is mapped to physical address y = Bt(x) if x is loaded at physical address y Is mapped to W if x is not loaded The map, Bt, changes as the process executes -- it is “time varying” Bt: Virtual Address Physical Address {W} Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Size of Blocks of Memory Virtual memory system transfers “blocks” of the address space to/from primary memory Fixed size blocks: System-defined pages are moved back and forth between primary and secondary memory Variable size blocks: Programmer-defined segments – corresponding to logical fragments – are the unit of movement Paging is the commercially dominant form of virtual memory today Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Paging A page is a fixed size, 2h, block of virtual addresses A page frame is a fixed size, 2h, block of physical memory (the same size as a page) When a virtual address, x, in page i is referenced by the CPU If page i is loaded at page frame j, the virtual address is relocated to page frame j If page is not loaded, the OS interrupts the process and loads the page into a page frame Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Addresses Suppose there are G= 2g2h=2g+h virtual addresses and H=2j+h physical addresses assigned to a process Each page/page frame is 2h addresses There are 2g pages in the virtual address space 2j page frames are allocated to the process Rather than map individual addresses Bt maps the 2g pages to the 2j page frames That is, page_framej = Bt(pagei) Address k in pagei corresponds to address k in page_framej Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Page-Based Address Translation Let N = {d0, d1, … dn-1} be the pages Let M = {b0, b1, …, bm-1} be page frames Virtual address, i, satisfies 0i<G= 2g+h Physical address, k = U2h+V (0V<G= 2h ) U is page frame number V is the line number within the page Bt:[0:G-1] <U, V> {W} Since every page is size c=2h page number = U = i/c line number = V = i mod c Consider Example – Figurer 12.9 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Demand Paging Algorithm Page fault occurs Process with missing page is interrupted Memory manager locates the missing page Page frame is unloaded (replacement policy) Page is loaded in the vacated page frame Page table is updated Process is restarted Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Modeling Page Behavior Let R = r1, r2, r3, …, ri, … be a page reference stream ri is the ith page # referenced by the process The subscript is the virtual time for the process Given a page frame allocation of m, the memory state at time t, St(m), is set of pages loaded St(m) = St-1(m) Xt - Yt Xt is the set of fetched pages at time t Yt is the set of replaced pages at time t Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 More on Demand Paging If rt was loaded at time t-1, St(m) = St-1(m) If rt was not loaded at time t-1 and there were empty page frames St(m) = St-1(m) {rt} If rt was not loaded at time t-1 and there were no empty page frames St(m) = St-1(m) {rt} - {y} The alternative is prefetch paging Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Static Allocation, Demand Paging Number of page frames is static over the life of the process Fetch policy is demand Since St(m) = St-1(m) {rt} - {y}, the replacement policy must choose y -- which uniquely identifies the paging policy Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Address Translation with Paging g bits h bits Virtual Address Page # Line # “page table” Missing Page Bt j bits h bits Physical Address Frame # Line # CPU Memory MAR Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Random Replacement Replaced page, y, is chosen from the m loaded page frames with probability 1/m Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 3 2 3 2 6 2 4 6 2 4 5 2 7 5 2 No knowledge of R not perform well Easy to implement 13 page faults Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Belady’s Optimal Algorithm Replace page with maximal forward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)FWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 2 3 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Belady’s Optimal Algorithm Replace page with maximal forward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)FWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 2 3 FWD4(2) = 1 FWD4(0) = 2 FWD4(3) = 3 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Belady’s Optimal Algorithm Replace page with maximal forward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)FWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 2 3 1 FWD4(2) = 1 FWD4(0) = 2 FWD4(3) = 3 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Belady’s Optimal Algorithm Replace page with maximal forward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)FWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 1 1 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Belady’s Optimal Algorithm Replace page with maximal forward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)FWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 FWD7(2) = 2 FWD7(0) = 3 FWD7(1) = 1 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Belady’s Optimal Algorithm Replace page with maximal forward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)FWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FWD10(2) = FWD10(3) = 2 FWD10(1) = 3 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Belady’s Optimal Algorithm Replace page with maximal forward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)FWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FWD13(0) = FWD13(3) = FWD13(1) = Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Belady’s Optimal Algorithm Replace page with maximal forward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)FWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 7 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 10 page faults Perfect knowledge of R perfect performance Impossible to implement Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Least Recently Used (LRU) Replace page with maximal backward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)BKWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 2 3 BKWD4(2) = 3 BKWD4(0) = 2 BKWD4(3) = 1 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Least Recently Used (LRU) Replace page with maximal backward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)BKWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 3 BKWD4(2) = 3 BKWD4(0) = 2 BKWD4(3) = 1 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Least Recently Used (LRU) Replace page with maximal backward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)BKWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 3 3 3 BKWD5(1) = 1 BKWD5(0) = 3 BKWD5(3) = 2 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Least Recently Used (LRU) Replace page with maximal backward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)BKWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 2 3 3 3 0 BKWD6(1) = 2 BKWD6(2) = 1 BKWD6(3) = 3 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Least Recently Used (LRU) Replace page with maximal backward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)BKWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 0 0 0 6 6 6 7 1 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 3 3 3 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Least Recently Used (LRU) Replace page with maximal backward distance: yt = max xeS t-1(m)BKWDt(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 Backward distance is a good predictor of forward distance -- locality Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
First In First Out (FIFO) Replace page that has been in memory the longest: yt = max xeS t-1(m)AGE(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 3 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
First In First Out (FIFO) Replace page that has been in memory the longest: yt = max xeS t-1(m)AGE(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 2 3 AGE4(2) = 3 AGE4(0) = 2 AGE4(3) = 1 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
First In First Out (FIFO) Replace page that has been in memory the longest: yt = max xeS t-1(m)AGE(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 3 AGE4(2) = 3 AGE4(0) = 2 AGE4(3) = 1 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
First In First Out (FIFO) Replace page that has been in memory the longest: yt = max xeS t-1(m)AGE(x) Let page reference stream, R = 2031203120316457 Frame 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 3 1 6 4 5 7 0 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 3 AGE5(1) = ? AGE5(0) = ? AGE5(3) = ? Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Belady’s Anomaly Let page reference stream, R = 012301401234 Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 FIFO with m = 3 has 9 faults FIFO with m = 4 has 10 faults Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Stack Algorithms Some algorithms are well-behaved Inclusion Property: Pages loaded at time t with m is also loaded at time t with m+1 Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 LRU Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Stack Algorithms Some algorithms are well-behaved Inclusion Property: Pages loaded at time t with m is also loaded at time t with m+1 Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 2 2 LRU Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Stack Algorithms Some algorithms are well-behaved Inclusion Property: Pages loaded at time t with m is also loaded at time t with m+1 Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 2 1 LRU Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Stack Algorithms Some algorithms are well-behaved Inclusion Property: Pages loaded at time t with m is also loaded at time t with m+1 Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 LRU Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Stack Algorithms Some algorithms are well-behaved Inclusion Property: Pages loaded at time t with m is also loaded at time t with m+1 Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 LRU Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Stack Algorithms Some algorithms are well-behaved Inclusion Property: Pages loaded at time t with m is also loaded at time t with m+1 Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 FIFO Frame 0 1 2 3 0 1 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Dynamic Paging Algorithms The amount of physical memory -- the number of page frames -- varies as the process executes How much memory should be allocated? Fault rate must be “tolerable” Will change according to the phase of process Need to define a placement & replacement policy Contemporary models based on working set Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Working Set Intuitively, the working set is the set of pages in the process’s locality Somewhat imprecise Time varying Given k processes in memory, let mi(t) be # of pages frames allocated to pi at time t mi(0) = 0 i=1k mi(t) |primary memory| Also have St(mi(t)) = St(mi(t-1)) Xt - Yt Or, more simply S(mi(t)) = S(mi(t-1)) Xt - Yt Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Placed/Replaced Pages S(mi(t)) = S(mi(t-1)) Xt - Yt For the missing page Allocate a new page frame Xt = {rt} in the new page frame How should Yt be defined? Consider a parameter, w, called the window size Determine BKWDt(y) for every yS(mi(t-1)) if BKWDt(y) w, unload y and deallocate frame if BKWDt(y) < w do not disturb y Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Figure 12‑11: The Working Set Window ri R = … 0 3 1 2 1 1 0 3 0 1 2 … W=3 The “Window” At virtual time i-1: working set = {0, 1} At virtual time i: working set = {0, 1, 3} Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Working Set Principle Process pi should only be loaded and active if it can be allocated enough page frames to hold its entire working set The size of the working set is estimated using w Unfortunately, a “good” value of w depends on the size of the locality Empirically this works with a fixed w Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Working Set Example Susceptible to thrashing is w is too small Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Working Set Example Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Working Set Example Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Working Set Example Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12 Segmentation Unit of memory movement is: Variably sized Defined by the programmer Two component addresses, <Seg#, offset> Address translation is more complex than paging Bt: segments x offsets Physical Address {W} Bt(i, j) = k Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Segment Address Translation Bt: segments x offsets physical address {W} Bt(i, j) = k S: segments segment addresses Bt(S(segName), j) = k N: offset names offset addresses Bt(S(segName), N(offsetName)) = k Read implementation in Section 12.6 Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12
Address Translation in Segmentation <segmentName, offsetName> S N segment # offset ? Limit Bt Relocation Missing segment + Limit Base P To Memory Address Register Operating Systems: A Modern Perspective, Chapter 12