modified after MG of USSR (1969)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Prospecting
Advertisements

Kerogen, thermal maturity, crude oil inclusions, & pyrobitumens in Bowser and Hazleton Group, Bowser Basin, B.C. L.D. Stasiuk and N.S.F. Wilson Natural.
For hydrocarbons. OPEN ROUND COLOMBIA 2010 CAUCA-PATIA AREA January, 2010.
Petroleum Geology Class 745
Oil Shale Deposits of Jordan “Genesis and Mode of Occurrences through Petroleum Geochemical Signatures” By Geologist Hazem Ramini Head of Policies & Contracts.
Mineralogical and TOC Trends in the Ohio Utica Shale Jake Harrington Dr. Julie Sheets, Dr. Dave Cole, Dr. Sue Welch, Mike Murphy, Alex Swift SEMCAL.
Application to 1-D Basin Modeling
Deep Gas Reservoir Play, Central and Eastern Gulf
Composition and Abundance of Organic Matter in Sedimentary Rocks
Hydrocarbon migration
For hydrocarbons. OPEN ROUND COLOMBIA 2010 GUAJIRA AREA January, 2010.
Marlan W. Downey, Julie Garvin, RC Lagomarsino, David F. Nicklin.
Petrological insights into thermal maturity, source rocks, migration, diagenesis L.D. Stasiuk and N.S.F Wilson Natural Resources Canada Geological Survey.
Kerogen Kerogen - a re-cap
Requirements for an Oil Field Source rock Reservoir rock Cap rock Timing of migration Temperature.
B-G PARTNERS, LLC Started in 1983, Started in 1983, Has three managing members of the General Partner and over one hundred and fifty Limited Partners,
Unconventional Petrophysical Analysis in Unconventional Reservoirs
Petroleum Systems (Part One) Source, Generation, and Migration GEOL 4233 Class August, 2011.
Estimation and destination of some of the eroded Post Mid-Miocene sediments using a classic method- Vitrinite Reflectance (VR). 28 TH of February, 2013.
West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey
HGS Petroleum Exploration Methods What Geologists and Geophysicists
Origin of Petroleum. Results of 2005 AAPG Research Conference.
Introduction to Petroleum Geochemistry
The Carboniferous shales of the Midland Valley of Scotland: geology and resource estimation Mike Stephenson (BGS) Director of Science and Technology Presenting.
New Evidences for the Formation of and for Petroleum Exploration in the Fold- Thrust Zones of the Central Black Sea Basin of Turkey Samil Sen et. al 2013.
| Bangladesh Shale Gas – Final Report │DMT | Slide 1 Presentation of Final Report – Preliminary Study on Shale Gas Potentiality in.
Petroleum System.
Roger J. Barnaby 2006 GCAGS MEETING
The Eagle Ford Shale Outcrop Studies Related to the Oil and Gas Potential of a Major Unconventional Reservoir. Brian E. Lock University of Louisiana, Lafayette.
Petroleum Geochemistry for Source Rock Evaluation
 Source Rock Definitions  Source rock: A unit of rock within which sufficient hydrocarbons have been generated, and from which sufficient hydrocarbons.
Department of Geology and Geological Engineering Van Tuyl Lecture Series- Spring :00-5:00 p.m. in Berthoud Hall Room 241 Thursday, February 4, 2016.
Study of the Niobrara Formation in the Borie Field Abdulaziz Muhanna Alhubil, Gabrijel Grubac, Joe Lawson, Rachael Molyneux & David Scadden.
Chapter 1.  In order to have hydrocarbon to accumulate we need to have sediment basin, High level of organic materials, and temperature/pressure.  Source.
INTRODUCTION Shale gas systems are self containing petroleum systems (i.e. source, reservoir and seal all inclusive) They form continuous accumulation.
Yao Tong, Tapan Mukerji Stanford University
An Integrative Modeling Of Ras Budran Field, Gulf Of Suez, Egypt
Petroleum Geochemistry using Wireline Logs “LogGeoChem”
Advance Seismic Interpretation Project
Aitalokhai Joel EDEGBAI
Devin R. Fitzgerald, CPG – Geologist, EMF Geoscience, Inc.
SUMMARY OF RESEARCHES MOHAMED M. EL NADY 2016.
Source Rock BY: ABDELRAHMAN AHMED ALI ABDELRAHMAN UNDER SUPERVISOR OF:
The Eagle Ford Shale Outcrop Studies Related to the Oil and Gas Potential of a Major Unconventional Reservoir. Brian E. Lock University of Louisiana,
Source Rock Analysis of Cambay Shale, North Cambay Basin, Gujarat, India Vaishali Sharma , Anirbid Sircar School of Petroleum Technology, Pandit Deendayal.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
L.D. Stasiuk and N.S.F Wilson Natural Resources Canada
OPK-3 Mud Gas Analysis Fig. 1 Comparison of d15N nitrogen vs. d13C methane measured on a RFT Gas sample from OPK-3A vs. samples within NAM's concession.
S. R. Kelemen, M. Afeworki, H. Freund M. L. Gorbaty, M. Sansone, M
1University of Nottingham 2Natural History Museum 3GeoArktis As
Marc BLAIZOT, June the 13th,
Oil or Gas??? Should there be a difference in seismic response (AVO) between an oil-filled reservoir and a gas-filled reservoir? Model response with different.
Location of Wells.
Cretaceous Salta Basin – Argentina.
SCRF - Multidisciplinary
Sterane Distributions
The Kitchen Source Organic-Rich Rocks, usually shales
Thermal maturity of OM (원소) 조성 Vitrinite reflectance 동위원소 색 형광 ESR.
Calculated maturity (vitrinite reflectance values; Sweeney & Burnham 1990) at the top of the Hot Shale unit over four time steps: (a) modelled maturity.
by Jashar Arfai, and Rüdiger Lutz Petroleum Geology Conference
Yao Tong, Tapan Mukerji Stanford University
Petroleum System Elements
Algae = Hydrogen rich = Oil-prone Wood = Hydrogen poor = Gas-prone
Ch.9 Diagenesis, Catagenesis, & Metagenesis
Calculated maturity (vitrinite reflectance values: Sweeney & Burnham 1990) at the top of the Posidonia Shale unit over four time steps: (a) modelled maturity.
Chapter 2: A Tropical Alberta
The Mars Pathfinder Atmospheric Structure Investigation/Meteorology (ASI/MET) Experiment by J. T. Schofield, J. R. Barnes, D. Crisp, R. M. Haberle, S.
An Integrated Methodology Quantifying the Links Between Rock Physics- and Geochemical- Properties in Organic-Rich Shales Amos Nur, Department of Geophysics,
Geochemistry and Organic Petrology of the Anna Shale (Pennsylvanian) and Pyrite “Suns” in Southwestern Illinois Jacob Dyson1, Susan Rimmer1, Scott Erick2.
What are Lebanon’s oil and gas prospects
Presentation transcript:

modified after MG of USSR (1969)

Moghilev-Podolisk Group Nagoriany Formation Kalius Member Kalius Member - gray to black argillites, occasionally interbedded by nodular and lenticular phosphorites and cone-in-cone carbonate mounds and crusts. modified after Velikanov et al., 1983

Study area – northern part of the Republic of Moldova Study area – northern part of the Republic of Moldova. Naslavcea village and Naslavcea quarry

Boundary between Quaternary alluvial deposits (Q) and the Kalius Member (PR3) Naslavcea quarry

Outcrop N1 N 48⁰ 28’ 48.1” E 27⁰ 33’ 48.8” Altitude = 104 m (Naslavcea quarry) N 48⁰ 28’ 48.1” E 27⁰ 33’ 48.8” Altitude = 104 m

Outcrop N2 N 48⁰ 27’ 55.5” E 27⁰ 35’ 01.6” Altitude 103m (Naslavcea village, near the church) N 48⁰ 27’ 55.5” E 27⁰ 35’ 01.6” Altitude 103m

Measured rock-eval pyrolysis and additional derived parameters Sample Depth (m) S1 S2 S3 Tmax TOC(%) MINC(%) HI OI S1+S2 PI S2/S3 PC SD065 143.8-199.4 0.16 2.12 0.31 438 1.08 0.13 196 29 2.28 0.07 6.84 0.19 RZ021 192.5-242.5 0.01 0.09 0.24 436 0.06 0.15 150 400 0.10 0.38 RZ023 178.0-181.5 0.08 1.69 0.22 0.89 0.34 190 25 1.77 0.05 7.68 K1 0.60 439 0.67 0.12 90 19 0.66 4.62 K2 0.04 443 0.54 111 15 0.64 7.50 K3 0.03 0.11 0.18 442 1.99 61 100 0.14 0.21 0.61 K4 441 0.30 70 30 2.33 0.02 K5 0.20 5.67 75 0.17 1.07 K6 0.39 444 6.52 47 229 K7 445 0.36 1.39 94 2.00 K8 0.48 440 0.50 96 22 0.51 4.36 K9 0.68 0.55 124 18 0.71 6.80 K10 0.25 4.79 72 88 0.82 K11 0.84 138 33 0.90 4.20 K12 0.78 0.41 0.62 126 66 0.85 1.90 K13 0.52 106 40 0.59 2.62 K14 0.35 0.56 86 62 1.37 K15 0.00 10 257 K16 0.70 0.37 189 K17 0.43 153 K18 0.63 23 147 K19 21 159 K20 0.65 0.29 224 K21 5 273 K22 14 286 K23 437 367 -  Terminology: S1 = mg HC/g rock S2 = mg HC/g rock S3 = mg CO2/g rock PI (Production Index) = S1/(S1+S2) HI (Hydrogen Index) = mg HC/g Corg OI (Oxygen Index) = mg CO2/g Corg

Modified van Krevelen diagram

Cross plot of rock-eval Tmax verus Hidrogen Index (HI) data showing the range in thermal maturity as well as hydrocarbon generative (kerogen) types of samples

HI (Hydrogen Index) versus TOC plots of samples

(after Waples’ Method, 1985) Quantitative (Volumetric) Molel for calculating the volume of hydrocarbons (after Waples’ Method, 1985) HC = (k)*(TOC)*(HI)*(f), where: HC – hydrocarbon volume in million of barrels/cubic mile; when transformed into SI units: million of barrels/cubic mile * 0.0381247 = million m3/km3; k – conversion constant (0.7 of a shale of approx. 2300 – 2400 kg/m3 specific weight gives a hydrocarbon equivalent of approximately 900 kg/m3 oil; TOC – average content of the total organic carbon in wt.%; HI – average hydrogen index in mg of hydrocarbons/g TOC; f – fractional conversion (0) – immature organic matter and (1) – mature organic matter; the considered values are based on measured vitrine reflectance; Average TOC = 0.8 % Average HI = 180 mg HC/g Corg Kerogen type III can generate 20% oil and 80% gas. Oil = 20% * 0.8 % = 0.16 Gas = 80 % * 0.8% = 0.64 TOC (Total Organic Carbon) HI (Hydrogen Index) k (conversion constant) f ?

Maturation Early Peak Late Maturity Ro (%) Tmax (◦C) Immature 0.20–0.60 <435 Mature Early 0.60–0.65 435–445 Peak 0.65–0.90 445–450 Late 0.90–1.35 450–470 Postmature >1.35 >470 Conversion values from Tmax to Vitrinite Reflectance (Ro) (after Peters and Cassa, 1994) Tmax 438⁰C <-> Ro 0.62-0.63

Ro = 0.62-0.63; For oil f = 0; For gas f = 0.02; Curves showing the relationship between Ro values and fractional conversion (f) of Types III (humic to mixed), II (kerogenous to kerogenous bacterial), and I (kerogenous algal) kerogens to oil (top, left to right) and gas (bottom) (after Sluijk and Nederlof, 1984).

Obtained volumes: Volume of generated oil = 0.7 (k) * 0.16 (TOC) * 180 (HI) * 0 = 0 millions of m3 per km3; Volume of generate gas = 0.7 (k) * 0.64 (TOC) * 180 (HI) * 0.02 = 1.6128 million barrels oil equivalent in gas; or 9.6768 billion cubic feet per cubic mile of source rock; or 0.065739 million m3 per km3 of source rock; For expulsion of hydrocarbons to take place, a threshold value of the generation of approximately 50 million barrels of hydrocarbons must be reached (after Momper, 1978). No hydrocarbons were generated during the geological time.

Conclusions: the analyzed samples show that the range in thermal maturity is between 435-440 ⁰C, thus they are in the early mature window; the modified van Krevelen diagram and the HI versus Tmax cross plot indicates that the kerogen type in the Kalius Member is primarily Type III gas-prone kerogen, but there is also a type II/III oil/gas-prone kerogen input; based on the obtained data the Neoproterozoic Kalius Member is a potential source rock that could generate hydrocarbons if the proper geological conditions are met; it is possible that hydrocarbons where generated at depths higher than 1000 m, but the analyses of cores from new boreholes is required;

References: 1. K. E. Peters, M. R. Cassa, Applied source rock geochemistry, AAPG Memoir 60, 1994, pp. 93-120 2. L. Nunez-Betelu, J. I. Baceta, Basics and application of Rock-Eval/TOC pyrolisis: an example from the uppermost Paleocene/lowermost Eocene in the Basque Basin, western Pyrenees, 1994, pp. 43-62 3. J. A. Momper., Oil migration limitations suggested by geological and geochemical considerations, in Physical and Chemical Controls on Petroleum Migration: AAPG Continuing Education Course Note Series, No.8, Tulsa, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1978, pp. B1-B60. 4. D. Sluijk, and M. H. Nederlof, Worldwide geological experience as a systematic basis for prospect appraisal, in G. Demaison and R.J. Murris, eds., Petroleum Geochemistry and Basin Evaluation: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 35, Tulsa, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1984, pp. 15-26. 5. D. W. Waples, Geochemistry in Petroleum Exploration. D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985, pp. 73-154 6. В. А. Великанов, Е. А. Асеева, М. А. Федонкин, Венд Украйны, Наукова Думка, 1983, с. 159. 7. Министерство Геологий СССР, Геология МССР, Издательство Недра, Москва, 1969, с. 452