CLAS12 software workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Advertisements

1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson. Program Flow CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) HcalElectronicsSim HBHEDataFrame (or HF, or HO) SimHits DetId= ,
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.
CLAS12 CalCom Status Update CLAS Collaboration Meeting November 14, 2014.
Leroy Nicolas, HESS Calibration results, 28 th ICRC Tsukuba Japan, August Calibration results of the first two H·E·S·S· telescopes Nicolas Leroy.
K1.8 meeting Report from E05 group Toshiyuki Gogami 26 Dec 2014.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.
Hybrid measurement of CR light component spectrum by using ARGO-YBJ and WFCTA Shoushan Zhang on behalf of LHAASO collaboration and ARGO-YBJ collaboration.
Forward Carriage Commissioning CLAS Collaboration Meeting 6/19/2015CLAS12 CalCom Status Update1 ECAL PCAL FTOF Panel 1A FTOF Panel 1B Detector Status PMT.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
1 First Results of the SLD Cerenkov Polarimeter at the DESY test beam Oleg Eyser Daniela K äfer, Christian Helebrant, Jenny List, Ulrich Velte*
Masahiro Konno for the Aerogel groupDC Meeting, Apr/14/04 1 Status of Aerogel Reconstruction –Track association implemented in CGL. –Raw data (ADC, TDC)
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
Laser Measurements (as comparison to test beam data) Florian Lütticke University of Bonn 9 th VXD Belle 2 Workshop Valencia,
The photomultiplier tubes selection for KM2A electromagnetic particle detectors (EDs) hou chao IHEP The 2nd workshop of air shower detection at high altitudes.
10/8/ HMPID offline status D. Di Bari, A. Mastroserio, L.Molnar, G. Volpe HMPID Group Alice Offline Week.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
EC Software Suite 1 EcMon: Monitors raw, calibrated and reconstructed data in real-time with detector map navigation, strip- charts, histograms. Single-event,
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CLAS12 Workshop Jefferson Lab February 23, 2016 Time-of-Flight Software Status Jerry Gilfoyle, Evgeny.
Custom Classes DetectorShapeView2D: Detector mouseover callbacks (default is mouse click). EventControl:
Beam Line Data Analysis of the PMT and Quartz Coupling Zak Arcara.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Focal Plane Scanner Jie Pan * + for the scanner working group Laura Cobus*, Anna Micherdzinska* Jeff Martin*, Peiqing Wang + * University of Winnipeg /
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
OD Tuning: SK-IV Roger Wendell TMC Meeting
Event reconstruction for the RICH prototype beamtest data 2014
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
PreShower Characterisations
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
CEPC ScECAL Optimization for the 3th CEPC Physics Software Meeting
SHMS Aerogel Detector Construction is complete
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
Forward Tagger Simulations
Status of the PandaRoot simulation of the Forward RICH
Marcin Chrząszcz Cracow University of Technology Itamar Levy
CLAS12 Commissioning with Cosmincs
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ
Nick Markov, UCONN Valery Kubarovsky, JLAB
LHAASO-WCDA: Design & Performance
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
Simulation results for the upgraded RICH detector in the HADES experiment. Semen Lebedev1,3, Jürgen Friese2, Claudia Höhne1, Tobias Kunz2, Jochen Markert4.
Overview of CLAS12 Calibration
FORWARD CARRIAGE UPDATE – March-July 2015
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
Directional Optical Module Integration
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Deng Ziyan Jan 10-12, 2006 BESIII Collaboration Meeting
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
August 19th 2013 Alexandre Camsonne
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
西村美紀(東大) 他 MEGIIコラボレーション 日本物理学会 第73回年次大会(2018年) 東京理科大学(野田キャンパス)
Presentation transcript:

CLAS12 software workshop HTCC CLAS12 software workshop N. Markov, W. Phelps, A. Pucket, Y. Sharabian 2/21/16

Outline Simulation status Reconstruction status Calibration development Monitoring software Trigger studies Future plans

Simulation PMTs Mirror Detector: Angular coverage: θ=5o −35o, gemc: Realistic Mirror and Winston cone reflectance Realistic Quantum Efficiency of the PMT with Quartz Entry Window Realistic C02 gas transparency Realistic C02 gas refraction index Beam

Simulation 12 halfsectors over φ (15o each) 4 rings over θ (7.5o each), Total of 48 mirror segments monitored by 48 PMTs Ring 4 Ring 3 Ring 2 S e c t o r Ring 1 Halfsector Halfsector

Simulation 11 GeV electrons uniformly distributed over θand φ NPE 11 GeV electrons uniformly distributed over θand φ Number of photoelectrons increases with theta since the path of the electron in the C02 increases and so does intensity of the Cerenkov radiation Lower number of photoelectrons at the theta of 5, 12.5, 20, 27.5 and 35 is due to the fact that Cerenkov radiation cone splits between two mirrors of different rings or goes out of the mirrors at all (θ~5, θ~35) Lower number of photoelectrons between the sectors at φ ~ -150, -120, -90 etc. is due to the fact that Cerenkov radiation cone splits between two mirrors of different half sectors NPE

Reconstruction: clusters ~ 1.5 Mirrors in event To PMT 1 To PMT 2 Cerenkov radiation from single electron splits between two mirrors and is collected by different PMTs 1 Hit 2 Hits 3 Hits 4 Hits φ φ φ φ θ θ θ θ

Reconstruction: clusters φ1 φ2 θ1 5. Hit in 4 different mirrors θ2 Cluster is reconstructed between four mirrors. θ generated θ gen φ cluster θ cluster θ cluster

Reconstruction: clusters, timing T, ns T 4 T, ns T 4 Time is fixed within a given ring Every Ti corresponds to mirror number i T 3 T 3 T 2 T 2 T 1 T 1 θ φ L2, T2 Ring 2 Ring 1 PMT L1, T1 PMT L2, T2 L1, T1 target target

Time of the cluster Cluster time Ti measured time of the hit i in the cluster Tgi is calculated from detector geometry Tc, ns Cluster time

Calibration HTCC is part of the trigger – gain equalization is extremely important Establish Calibration Curve: Gain (HV) for every channel Choose certain gain for all channels Using Calibration Curve set the HV for each channel Check individual gains Adjust HV if needed

Calibration software Fit to PMT response to find a position of single photoelectron peak: signal + noise Fit stability SPE Peak Calibration curve Updated EVIO reader and fitting in Java: Multithreaded Optimized code ~ 2 minutes per fit on a single core

Monitoring Signal shape in time Active channel Select channel ADC spectrum, signal ADC spectrum, pedestal Npe within a given ring Detector schematics Based on common tools Integration with ccdb Implemented translational table LMS control

Trigger studies Correlation between HTCC and EC U plane V plane W plane HTCC ring EC Strip EC strip EC Strip Clear geometrical matching between HTCC and EC No need to sum over full sector Possibility to decrease noise

Future plans Implement a measured mirror and WC reflectance (under way) Implement signal digitization in gemc (under way) Introduce reconstruction with a quasi-real signal Finish development of calibration suite and obtain calibration curves for all 48 PMTs Finish development of monitoring software Continue trigger development