HEPD BTF and Trento Facility Calorimeter preliminary results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VETO Analysis Update Michael Wood University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline Introduction and basics Reconstruction packages Efficiencies Simulation.
Advertisements

H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
Data analysis BTF 23 e 24 mag 05 T1 T2 500MeV electrons Repetition Rate 50 Hz Pulse Duration 1-10 ns Current/pulse 1 to 8 particles σ XY ~2mm Max Electronic.
LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics Lorenzo Bonechi on behalf of the LHCf Collaboration * University.
Checking the Acd hardware veto setting The hardware veto is generated in the front-end electronics Discriminator with coarse and fine settings Both are.
1 Analysis of TOF data Yordan Karadzhov St.Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia.
Status on Testbeam Analysis Jianchun Wang Syracuse University VELO meeting, August 28, 2007.
Software parallel session summary MICE collaboration meeting INFN, Frascati 27/6-05.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
M.Gallinaro, ``Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors’’, Siena, October slide 1 The CDF MiniPlug Calorimeter Forward Physics Conceptual.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
1 HBD Commissioning (II) Itzhak Tserruya HBD group meeting November 28, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
DE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct )
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
Yury Gurchin June 2011 MEASUREMENT OF THE CROSS-SECTION IN DP-ELASTIC SCATTERING AT THE ENERGIES OF 500 AND 880 MEV AT NUCLOTRON.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
MRPC Beam GSI Yongjie Sun University of Science and Technology of China.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
Test of the GEM Front Tracker for the SBS Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab F. Mammoliti, V. Bellini, M. Capogni, E. Cisbani, E. Jensen, P. Musico, F. Noto,
Test of Electromagnetic Calorimeter modules for HADES, Mainz Sep.2009 A.Krása, F. Křížek, J. Pietraszko, Y. Sobolev, J. Stanislav, A. Reshetin, P. Tlustý.
Fiber target simulation for S-2S experiment Toshiyuki Gogami 2015/10/15.
Feb 24, Abnormal Events in HF: TB04, Simulation, and Feb.08 Fermi Testbeam Anthony Moeller (U. Iowa) Shuichi Kunori (U. Maryland) Taylan Yetkin (U.
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
CALO Meeting–September 2 nd 2015 Calorimeter Upgrade Electronics: June 2015 Test Beam E. Picatoste Universitat de Barcelona, Institut de Ciències del Cosmos.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
Working group on photon vetoes Meeting on June 7 th : 1.Status of Geant4 simulations 2.Discussion on LAV structure 3.Discussion on readout 4.News on Spaghetti.
M. Bonesini - CM 22 RAL October 081 TOF0 status M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
PHOBOS at RHIC 2000 XIV Symposium of Nuclear Physics Taxco, Mexico January 2001 Edmundo Garcia, University of Maryland.
Prototypes photon veto detectors for NA62 experiment CERN M. Raggi - INFN/Frascati for the NA62 Photon Veto Working Group LNF, RM1, NA, PI, SOFIA First.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
Rita Carbone, RICAP 11, Roma 3 26/05/2011 Stand-alone low energy measurements of light nuclei from PAMELA Time-of-Flight system. Rita Carbone INFN Napoli.
SHIP calorimeters at test beam I. KorolkoFebruary 2016.
Tracker Neutron Detector: INFN plans CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting - Saclay 2-3 December 2009 Patrizia Rossi for the INFN groups: Genova, Laboratori.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Energy and time resolution for a LYSO matrix
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
*Institute of Space Science
Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Italy, May 2015
Claudia Cecchi University of Perugia and INFN
Marcin Chrząszcz Cracow University of Technology Itamar Levy
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
BTF microbunching structure with Micro-Channel Plate PMT
HERD Prototype Beam Test
LNF - Beam Test Facility Apr. 28 – May 03
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
HADES Collaboration meeting XXII,
FW status for the upcoming HADES beam time
HADES Collaboration meeting XXII,
LNF - Beam Test Facility Sept. 29 – Oct. 04
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
NUCLEUS-NUCLEUS COLLISION Centrality Determination For NICA/MPD
PrimEx II 0 analysis status
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Bi-Weekly Meeting 2004/09/08 Susumu Oda
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
Analysis Drift velocity of the SDD Detector
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Presentation transcript:

HEPD test @ BTF and Trento Facility Calorimeter preliminary results Beatrice Panico Giuseppe Osteria Francesco Perfetto Valentina Scotti INFN Napoli

HEPD accelerator test HEPD QM Electrons Frascati BTF (25 April- 01 May 2016) Energy range 30 Mev – 150 MeV HEPD FM Frascati BTF (3-5 October 2016) Energy range 30 Mev – 120 MeV Protons Trento facility (8-12 November 2016) Energy range 37 MeV – 228 MeV

Electrons Test @ BTF QM & FM Setup HEPD has been placed on a movable platform. HEPD connected to EGSE which manages the main Power (29.5 V), the CANBUS and RS422 communications. The EGSE and the platform are both remotely controlled from the Control Room. All the measurements have been done with the beam perpendicular to the HEPD window except for 2 positions

Test @ BTF: configurations The HEPD has been tested with electrons beam of different energies and incident position. The Beam Energies used for tests are: 150 – 120 – 90 – 60 – 45 - 30 MeV. The tests have been performed at different incident beam positions Window Silicon ladder Trigger Counters Calorimeter Veto Runs taken with: different trigger masks different veto settings Hot and Cold chains different PMT thresholds

Electrons 30 MeV Side A + Side B Pedestals subtracted Trigger paddle T5 ADC distribution Side A + Side B Pedestals subtracted 1st Calorimeter pad P1

Electrons 30 MeV Total charge measured in the Calo (∑i Pi) 1 e-

Electrons 30 MeV Total charge measured in the Calo (∑i Pi) 2 e-

Electrons 30 MeV Total charge measured in the Calo (∑i Pi) 3 e-

30 MeV - Total charge measured vs. number of hit Calo counters Electrons 30 MeV 30 MeV - Total charge measured vs. number of hit Calo counters Number of hit plane of th calorimeter

Electrons 30 MeV Total charge measured in the Calo for different impact point of the beam

Electrons 45 - 120 MeV 45 MeV Sigma/peak 60 MeV 0.07 Sigma/peak 0.11 0.10 90 MeV Sigma/peak 0.10

Electrons 45 - 120 MeV Energy resolution

Simulated data Electrons 80 MeV Electrons 100 MeV

Electrons 30 – 120 MeV Energy loss in the Calo Event selection: No Lateral Veto Hit No Bottom Veto Hit More than 12 crossed planes

Electrons 30 – 120 MeV Energy loss in the Lyso Event selection: No Lateral Veto Hit No Bottom Veto Hit More than 12 crossed planes Counts are normalized to LYSO central counts

Electrons 60 – 120 MeV Energy loss in the Lyso 60 MeV Sigma/peak 0.09 Event selection: No Lateral Veto Hit No Bottom Veto Hit More than 12 crossed planes One electron in the trigger plane Energy loss in the Lyso 60 MeV Sigma/peak 0.09 120 MeV Sigma/peak 0.14 90 MeV Sigma/peak 0.09

Proton Test @ Trento facility FM Setup HEPD has been placed on a movable platform. HEPD connected to EGSE which manages the main Power (29.5 V), the CANBUS and RS422 communications. The EGSE and the platform are both remotely controlled from the Control Room. All the measurements have been done with the beam perpendicular to the HEPD window Beam Energies: 37 – 51 – 70 – 100 – 125 – 154 – 174 – 202 – 228 MeV

Protons 51 -174 MeV Number of hit Calo planes

Protons 37 – 100 MeV Energy loss in the Calo 37 MeV Sigma/peak 51 MeV 0.11 51 MeV Sigma/peak 0.09 70 MeV Sigma/peak 0.08 100 MeV Sigma/peak 0.08

Protons 125 – 228 MeV Energy loss in the Calo 125 MeV Sigma/peak 0.07 0.17 228 MeV Sigma/peak 0.08 174 MeV Sigma/peak 0.09

Protons 174 – 228 MeV Energy loss in the LYSO 174 MeV 154 MeV Sigma/peak 0.09 154 MeV Sigma/peak 0.33 228 MeV Sigma/peak 0.05

Electrons and protons Energy loss in the Calo Fully contained protons Not contained protons

Electrons and protons Energy Resolution

Electrons and protons Particle Identification (only Calo) Protons 100 MeV No lateral Veto Hit No Bottom Veto Hit preliminary Electrons 90 MeV No lateral Veto Hit No Bottom Veto Hit

Conclusions HEPD calorimeter is able to measure electrons in the energy range 30-150 Mev with an energy resolution better than 10%. HEPD calorimeter (FM) was able to measure protons in the energy range 37 – 228 MeV with a good linearity and with an energy resolution better than 10% Preliminary results on particle identification (electron/proton)