RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-02

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RSVP-TE Extensions for SRLG Configuration of FA
Advertisements

Draft-liu-mpls-rsvp-te-gr-frr-00 By H. Autumn Liu & Sriganesh Kini 76 th IETF, Hiroshima Japan.
1 Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-05 Author.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Understanding MPLS TE Components.
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-01 Chandrasekar Ramachandran Markus.
1 Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-00 Author list: Tarek Saad
Pseudowire Endpoint Fast Failure Protection draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-00 Rahul Aggarwal Yimin Shen
PW Endpoint Fast Failure Protection draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-02 Yimin Shen (Juniper Networks) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc) Wim Henderickx.
PW Endpoint Fast Failure Protection draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-03 Yimin Shen (Juniper) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc) Wim Henderickx (Alcatel-Lucent)
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 12 FastReRoute (FRR) - Big Picture.
MPLS H/W update Brief description of the lab What it is? Why do we need it? Mechanisms and Protocols.
SMUCSE 8344 Constraint-Based Routing in MPLS. SMUCSE 8344 Constraint Based Routing (CBR) What is CBR –Each link a collection of attributes (performance,
1 Fabio Mustacchio - IPS-MOME 2005 – Warsaw, March 15th 2005 Overview of RSVP-TE Network Simulator: Design and Implementation D.Adami, C.Callegari, S.Giordano,
IETF 68, MPLS WG, Prague P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-01.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal.
P2MP MPLS-TE FRR with P2MP Bypass Tunnel draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-00.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal (Juniper) IETF 67, MPLS WG,
1 Traffic Engineering With MPLS By Behzad Akbari Fall 2008 These slides are based in parts on the slides of Shivkumar (RPI)
1 Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-03 Author list: Tarek Saad
Protection and Restoration Definitions A major application for MPLS.
1 IETF- 56 – TE WG- SAN FRANCISCO Inter-AS MPLS Traffic Engineering draft-vasseur-inter-AS-TE-00.txt Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang.
1 IETF-81, MPLS WG, Quebec City, Canada, July, 2011 draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-06.txt MPLS WG IETF-81 Quebec City, Canada July, 2011.
Draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00IETF 84 MPLS: 30 July Ingress Protection for RSVP-TE p2p and p2mp LSPs draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00.
IP Traffic Engineering RSP draft-shen-ip-te-rsp-01.txt Naiming Shen Albert Tian Jun Zhuang
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-00 Chandra Ramachandran Yakov Rekhter.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 79th IETF - BeiJing Signaling Extension for MPLS Ring Yong Huang.
1 77th IETF, CCAMP WG, Anaheim, CA, USA March 2010 Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter- domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-03.txt.
Draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01IETF 90 MPLS1 Proxy MPLS Traffic Engineering Label Switched Path(LSP) draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01 Zhenbin Li, Xinzong Zeng.
Establishing P2MP MPLS TE LSPs draft-raggarwa-mpls-p2mp-te-02.txt Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-00 Yimin Shen (Juniper Networks) Yuji Kamite (NTT Communication) IETF 83, Paris, France.
82 nd Taipei Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Huawei.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions For Fast Reroute of Bidirectional Co-routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-00.txt Author list: Mike Taillon
Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Ingress Local Protection draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection-04 Huaimo Chen, Raveendra Torvi Autumn Liu, Tarek Saad,
86th IETF – Orlando, USA J. Asghar IJ. Wijnands S.Krishnaswawy V. Arya draft-asghar-pim-explicit-rpf-vector-01
Analysis on Two Methods in Ingress Local Protection.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-03
BGP extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery in a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-pce-bgp-disco-attribute-03.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
Residence Time Measurement draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-02
Zhenbin Li, Li Zhang(Huawei Technologies)
Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang - Infonet
P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels
draft-liu-pim-single-stream-multicast-frr-01
RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-01 Author list: Rakesh.
draft-atlas-rtgwg-mrt-mc-arch-02
Presenter: Jeffrey Zhang
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
IETF 96 (MPLS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh Kireeti Kompella (presenting)
Yimin Shen (Juniper) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc)
Francois Le Faucheur Cisco
78th IETF Meeting - Maastricht 27th, July 2010
Explicitly advertising the TE protocols enabled on links in OSPF
PLR Designation in RSVP-TE FRR
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-06 Authors: Mike Taillon.
MPLS Traffic Engineering
LDP Extensions for RMR draft-esale-mpls-ldp-rmr- extensions
Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter-domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-01.txt Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems.
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
CHAPTER 8 Network Management
Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura Mach Chen Ilya Varlashkin
Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Egress Local Protection
draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-00
IETF 98 (MPLS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh (presenting) Kireeti Kompella
LSP Fast-Reroute Using RSVP Detours
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
IETF 102 (TEAS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh (presenting) Kireeti Kompella
draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-00
IP RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for P2P IP-TE LSP Tunnels Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Vishnu Pavan Beeram, Juniper.
Jia He Italo Busi Jeong-dong Ryoo Bin Yeong Yoon Peter Park
Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang
Pseudo-Wire Protection
Presentation transcript:

RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-02 Yimin Shen (Juniper Networks) Yuji Kamite (NTTC) IETF 86, Orlando

The idea An LSP is signaled with an ERO of strict hops. 1. Path (dest = P3, ERO = i1, i2, i3) 3. Path (dest = P3, ERO = i3) i1 i2 i3 P1 PLR P2 MP P0 6. Resv 4. Resv P3 2. Path 5. Resv bypass LSP P4 An LSP is signaled with an ERO of strict hops. If a link/node is in failure state, the router upstream adjacent to the failure (i.e. PLR) can reroute the LSP by signaling a backup LSP through a existing bypass LSP. Detects failure based on the strict ERO. Finds an existing bypass LSP that is protecting the failed link/node. Egress of the bypass LSP (i.e. MP) terminates the backup LSP, re-creates the original LSP, and signals it towards destination. LSP is protected during setup time, i.e. initial Path message signaling.

The established LSP LSP i1 i2 i3 P 1 PLR P 2 MP P 0 backup LSP P 3 bypass LSP P 4 LSP appears as if it was originally set up along the desired path and then failed over to the bypass LSP. PLR’s notification to ingress: PLR sets “local protection in use” flag in Resv. PLR sends PathErr of “tunnel locally repaired”. Benefits: The LSP is established with a minimal delay. Path re-computation and re-signaling may follow up at a slower pace, if applicable.

Use Cases LSPs with pre-defined strict EROs that cannot be modified or recomputed by ingress on the fly. Statically configured. Computed offline, based a topology that assumes no network failure. LSPs with a strict requirement for setup time. Cannot tolerate the delay introduced by PathErr propagation, TE info update, path re-computation, re-signaling, etc. Solution: First bring up LSP; Then re-compute and re-signal path, and resolve network failure. Traffic sharing between sibling sub-LSPs of P2MP LSP. If a sibling sub-LSP is already been protected by a bypass LSP, the new sub- LSP being signal shall also use the bypass LSP.

Extension to RSVP A "setup protection desired" flag for Attribute Flags TLV of LSP_ATTRIBUTES object. Two new LSP Attribute TLVs for conveying the original source IP address of protected LSP from PLR to MP. Protected LSP Sender IPv4 Address TLV. Protected LSP Sender IPv6 Address TLV. Carried by the LSP_REQUIRED_ATTRIBUTES of Path message of the backup LSP. Used by MP for recreating the protected LSP.

Next Steps Comments? WG adoption?