Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Experimental and Model Study on Variable Mass Flow for Horizontal Wells With Perforated Completion J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062901-062901-7. doi:10.1115/1.4037026 Figure Legend: (a) Frictional pressure drop gradient versus Re with different perforation density without inflow, (b) frictional pressure drop gradient versus Re with different perforation diameter without inflow, and (c) frictional pressure drop gradient versus Re with different perforation phasing without inflow
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Experimental and Model Study on Variable Mass Flow for Horizontal Wells With Perforated Completion J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062901-062901-7. doi:10.1115/1.4037026 Figure Legend: (a) Total pressure drop gradient versus flux ratio with different perforation density with inflow, (b) total pressure drop gradient versus flux ratio with different perforation diameter with Inflow, and (c) total pressure drop gradient versus flux ratio with different perforation phasing with inflow
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Experimental and Model Study on Variable Mass Flow for Horizontal Wells With Perforated Completion J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062901-062901-7. doi:10.1115/1.4037026 Figure Legend: (a) “Mixing” pressure drop gradient versus flux ratio with different perforation density with inflow, (b) “mixing” pressure drop gradient versus flux ratio with different perforation diameter with inflow, and (c) “mixing” pressure drop gradient versus flux ratio with different perforation phasing with inflow
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Experimental and Model Study on Variable Mass Flow for Horizontal Wells With Perforated Completion J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062901-062901-7. doi:10.1115/1.4037026 Figure Legend: (a) The pressure drop gradient versus flux ratio with Re = 5000 of axial flow and (b) the pressure drop gradient versus flux ratio with Re = 15,000 of axial flow
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Experimental and Model Study on Variable Mass Flow for Horizontal Wells With Perforated Completion J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062901-062901-7. doi:10.1115/1.4037026 Figure Legend: Precision verification of frictional pressure drop calculation model
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Experimental and Model Study on Variable Mass Flow for Horizontal Wells With Perforated Completion J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062901-062901-7. doi:10.1115/1.4037026 Figure Legend: (a) Precision verification of “mixing” pressure drop calculation model with Re = 5000 in axial flow and (b) precision verification of “mixing” pressure drop calculation model with Re = 15,000 of axial flow
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Experimental and Model Study on Variable Mass Flow for Horizontal Wells With Perforated Completion J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017;139(6):062901-062901-7. doi:10.1115/1.4037026 Figure Legend: (a) Precision verification of total pressure drop calculation model with Re = 5000 of axial flow and (b) precision verification of total pressure drop calculation model with Re = 15,000 of axial flow