Updates of convection scheme in the 5km resolution operational system

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JMA Takayuki MATSUMURA (Forecast Department, JMA) C Asia Air Survey co., ltd New Forecast Technologies for Disaster Prevention and Mitigation 1.
Advertisements

1 Numerical Weather Prediction Parameterization of diabatic processes Convection III The ECMWF convection scheme Christian Jakob and Peter Bechtold.
Hirlam Physics Developments Sander Tijm Hirlam Project leader for physics.
Development of Data Assimilation Systems for Short-Term Numerical Weather Prediction at JMA Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA) Y. Honda, Y. Ikuta, J. Fukuda, Y.
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
Influence of the Subcloud Layer on the Development of a Deep Convective Ensemble Boing et al., 2012.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
GFDL Geophysical Fluid Dynamics GFDL Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey AM2 cloud sensitivity to details of convection and cloud.
NOAA/NWS Change to WRF 13 June What’s Happening? WRF replaces the eta as the NAM –NAM is the North American Mesoscale “timeslot” or “Model Run”
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
GFS Deep and Shallow Cumulus Convection Schemes
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
Large-Eddy Simulation of a stratocumulus to cumulus transition as observed during the First Lagrangian of ASTEX Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen.
1 Numerical Weather Prediction Parameterization of diabatic processes Convection III The ECMWF convection scheme Christian Jakob and Peter Bechtold.
ICTP Regional Climate, 2-6 June Sensitivity to convective parameterization in regional climate models Raymond W. Arritt Iowa State University, Ames,
Moisture observation by a dense GPS receiver network and its assimilation to JMA Meso ‑ Scale Model Koichi Yoshimoto 1, Yoshihiro Ishikawa 1, Yoshinori.
CONVECTIVE PARAMETERIZATION For the Lesson: Precipitation Processes December 1998.
Current status of AMSR-E data utilization in JMA/NWP Masahiro KAZUMORI Numerical Prediction Division Japan Meteorological Agency July 2008 Joint.
Vertical Structure of the Tropical Troposphere (including the TTL) Ian Folkins Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science Dalhousie University.
Convective Parameterization Options
Case Study Example 29 August 2008 From the Cloud Radar Perspective 1)Low-level mixed- phase stratocumulus (ice falling from liquid cloud layer) 2)Brief.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Yanjun Jiao and Colin Jones University of Quebec at Montreal September 20, 2006 The Performance of the Canadian Regional Climate Model in the Pacific Ocean.
An air quality information system for cities with complex terrain based on high resolution NWP Viel Ødegaard, r&d department.
Tropical Severe Local Storms Nicole Hartford. How do thunderstorms form?  Thunderstorms result from moist warm air that rises due to being less dense.
1. Introduction Boundary-layer clouds are parameterized in general circulation model (GCM), but simulated in Multi-scale Modeling Framework (MMF) and.
New CRM diagnostics dedicated to convective parameterization J-I Yano P. Bechtold, J.-P. Chaboureau, F. Guichard, J.-L. Redelsperger and J.-P. Lafore LMD,
Georg A. Grell (NOAA / ESRL/GSD) and Saulo R. Freitas (INPE/CPTEC) A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air.
APR CRM simulations of the development of convection – some sensitivities Jon Petch Richard Forbes Met Office Andy Brown ECMWF October 29 th 2003.
Continuous treatment of convection: from dry thermals to deep precipitating convection J.F. Guérémy CNRM/GMGEC.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
JMA Japan Meteorological Agency QPE/QPF of JMA Application of Radar Data Masashi KUNITSUGU Head, National Typhoon Center Japan Meteorological Agency TYPHOON.
A physical initialization algorithm for non-hydrostatic NWP models using radar derived rain rates Günther Haase Meteorological Institute, University of.
Convective Parameterization in NWP Models Jack Kain And Mike Baldwin.
Cirrus anvil cumulonimbus T (skewed) LCL (Lifting Condensation Level) LFC (Level of Free Convection) EL (Equilibrium level) p overshooting CAPE Sounding.
Background – Building their Case “continental” – polluted, aerosol laden “maritime” – clean, pristine Polluted concentrations are 1-2 orders of magnitude.
Convective Parameterization Jack Kainand Mike Baldwin OAR/NSSL/CIMMS.
Lessons learned from JMA global and regional model development Junichi Ishida and colleagues at JMA WGNE-31, April 2016 CSIR, Pretoria, South Africa.
Japan Meteorological Agency / Meteorological Research Institute
Performance of ALARO0 baseline in pre-operational testing
Development of nonhydrostatic models at the JMA
Convective Parameterization
MM5- and WRF-Simulated Cloud and Moisture Fields
Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA)
Gregory L. West and W. James Steenburgh
Grid Point Models Surface Data.
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
Application Of KF-Convection Scheme In 3-D Chemical Transport Model
On the role of entrainment at the grey zone scales
How do models work? METR 2021: Spring 2009 Lab 10.
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
Water Budget of Typhoon Nari(2001)
Multiscale aspects of cloud-resolving simulations over complex terrain
BRETTS-MILLER-JANJIC SCHEME
Improving computational stability with time-splitting of vertical advection considering 3-dimensional CFL condition Kohei Kawano1, Kohei Aranami1, Tabito.
Recent changes in the ALADIN operational suite
April 12, 2018 Hing Ong ATM 419/563 Cumulus parameterization: Kain-Fritsch scheme and other mass-flux schemes This lecture is designed for students who.
Han, J. , W. Wang, Y. C. Kwon, S. -Y. Hong, V. Tallapragada, and F
Sensitivity of WRF microphysics to aerosol concentration
Tong Zhu and Da-Lin Zhang 2006:J. Atmos. Sci.,63,
Some Verification Highlights and Issues in Precipitation Verification
A Multiscale Numerical Study of Hurricane Andrew (1992)
Ming-Jen Yang and Robert A. House Jr. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123,
Convective Parameterization in NWP Models
Kurowski, M .J., K. Suselj, W. W. Grabowski, and J. Teixeira, 2018
Sensitivity to WRF microphysics/ Cu parametrisation
Effect of topographical resolution on cirrus clouds
D. C. Stolz, S. A. Rutledge, J. R. Pierce, S. C. van den Heever 2017
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
Presentation transcript:

Updates of convection scheme in the 5km resolution operational system Kengo Matsubayashi Numerical Prediction Division, Japan Meteorological Agency with Tabito Hara, Kohei Aranami and Kohei Kawano November 30, 2016 4th International Workshop on Nonhydrostatic Models Hakone, Japan

Current operational NWP systems at JMA NWP systems at JMA (deterministic) Newly developed non-hydrostatic numerical model called ASUCA has been launched into operation as the 2km LFM since 2015. JMA even plans to introduce ASUCA into the 5km grid spacing operational model (MSM) this winter. Parameterization schemes including convection are also updated, and many improvements are made. Global Meso Local Objectives Short- and Medium-range forecast Disaster reduction Short-range forecast Aviation forecast Disaster prevention NWP model Global Spectral Model(GSM) Meso-Scale Model(MSM) Local Forecast Model (LFM) Horizontal resolution TL959 (0.1875 deg) 5 km (817x611) 2 km (1581x1301) Vertical levels / Top 100 0.01 hPa 48 21.8 km 58 20.2 km Forecast Hours (Initial time) 264 hours 39 hours (every 3 hours) 9 hours (every hour) Forecast model GSAM JMA-NHM ASUCA Domain Global Meso Local 2 2

Improvement in a precipitation forecast Observation Radar obs. and MSLP(analysis) New MSM Current MSM

Improvement in the precipitation forecast Threat score Bias score overestimated better Updates of physical processes improved accuracy of precipitation forecasts measured by the threat score remarkably. In particular the convection scheme strongly affects prediction accuracy.

Convection parameterization 4 Parameterized processes convection initiation updraft entrainment detrainment microphysics condensation, evaporation freezing, melting sedimentation downdraft compensational subsidence 5 7 2 3 6 1

Convection scheme in MSM Based on Kain and Fritsch(1990; KF) Overhauling the KF scheme in detail Just entirely changing the current scheme with another one seldom enhances the accuracy because other compensational errors often arise. It is necessary to thoroughly analyze the current scheme. The current scheme was carefully inspected using not only 3D model but also SCM, which exposed a lot of problems.

Overhauling Too high convective cloud top Large difference of heating rate between deep and shallow convection. Too much precipitation over windward side of mountains Less sedimentation produced in convective updraft around freezing level. Parcel produced by entrainment below cloud base is not identical to updraft parcel at cloud base. Double count between resolved and parameterized vertical transport. In the tropics, heating rate is relatively weak compared to midlatitudes. Shallow convection is triggered even in zero CAPE condition. KF keeps heating rate constant for convectional lifetime(~30mins). Ice and water categories KF produces

Too high convectional cloud top Cloud top height(CTH) of the parameterized convection in the MSM is often too higher than that estimated by satellite observations. [m] [m] [m] CTH estimated by satellite (Himawari 8) observation parameterized convection CTH parameterized - observed

The relation between CTH and entrainment Entrainment dilutes buoyancy and vertical velocity of updraft. Weaker entrainment rate leads to larger Available Buoyant Energy(ABE) and higher CTH. Too high CTH implies entrainment is too weak. In the KF scheme, the strength of convection highly depends on ABE (CAPE closure). 𝐾 𝑧 𝜃 𝑒𝑠 : enrivonment 𝜃 𝑒 weak entrainment large ABE strong entrainment small ABE updraft parcel

Too high convectional cloud top One of the causes of excessively high parameterized CTH is related to too small entrainment rate. Entrainment rate 𝜀 𝑢 in the KF scheme 𝑅 is a constant and the only parameter to change, but not observable. 𝜀 𝑢 ∝ (−0.03𝛿𝑝) 𝑅 𝑅:updraft radius

Too high convectional cloud top Histogram of the parameterized CTH – observed CTH changed 𝑅 such that the parameterized CTH becomes consistent with observation. Since the original 𝑅 (weak entrainment) caused too strong convection, the modified 𝑅 weaken the strength of convection. As a result dry bias over lower troposphere is also reduced. original 𝑅(1000m) [m] modified 𝑅(750m) [m]

Convection Parameterization(CP) updates in MSM The updated CP scheme significantly improves quantitative precipitation forecasts and reduces dry bias over the lower troposphere. Refinement of entrainment rate, triggering, treatment of sedimentation were critical for this improvement. Threat score Bias score Qv ME Qv RMSE [kg/kg] [kg/kg]

The importance of CP in 5km resolution However relatively heavy precipitation is still overestimated. With aggressively exerted CP (weaken entrainment rate over lower layer) predicting precipitation accuracy can be further enhanced. however dry bias becomes more serious. Threat score Bias score [kg/kg]

The importance of CP in 5km resolution reference w/ aggressively exerted CP Observation The precipitation predicted by reference is too strong and it occurs in few grid (grid point storm). On the other hand, aggressive CP can stabilize before grid point storm arise. It is estimated that grid scale vertical updraft lacks processes such as entrainment which weaken vertical updraft.

The importance of CP in 5km resolution Entrainment weakens convection activity by incorporating dry air outside cumuli and dilutes moist air inside, however it is too small to resolve. Detrainment and convective initiation are also unresolved. If stabilization by CP is weak, poorly resolved entrainment/detrainment and convective initiation lead to frequent excessively strong updrafts and too intense precipitation.

Convection parameterization in high resolution In high resolution model, convectional vertical transport is partially resolved. Convection permitting Scales of processes such as entrainment/detrainment, convective initiation are too small to resolve. These processes should be still parameterized. Grey zone

Summary Overhauled convection scheme in MSM. rather than entirely changing the current scheme with another one SCM reveals a lot of problems in the KF scheme. Exposed problems are fixed and forecast accuracy is improved. CP is inevitable at 5km resolution NWP model. Even in high resolution models which can resolve vertical transport, smaller unresolved phenomena around convection should be still parameterized.