WIMP search from XMASS-I fiducial volume data with

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Masaki Yamashita XMASS at Kamioka Large Scale Cryogenic detector in the underground laboratory Masaki Yamashita Kamioka observatory, ICRR, Univ. Of Tokyo.
Advertisements

1 Aaron Manalaysay Physik-Institut der Universität Zürich CHIPP 2008 Workshop on Detector R&D June 12, 2008 R&D of Liquid Xenon TPCs for Dark Matter Searches.
Status of the XMASS experiment S. Moriyama for the XMASS collaboration Kamioka observatory, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Univ. of Tokyo, July 27,
Status of XMASS experiment Shigetaka Moriyama Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo For the XMASS collaboration September 10 th, 2013.
Study of alpha backgrounds using flash ADC in the XMASS experiment Feb. 22nd, 2013 ICRR, Suzuki-Lab. M2 Osamu Takachio.
DMSAG 14/8/06 Mark Boulay Towards Dark Matter with DEAP at SNOLAB Mark Boulay Canada Research Chair in Particle Astrophysics Queen’s University DEAP-1:
The XMASS 800kg Experiment Jing LIU IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo TAUP2011, Munich XMASS collaboration: Kamioka Observatory, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo : Y. Suzuki, M.
Activity for the Gerda-specific part Description of the Gerda setup including shielding (water tank, Cu tank, liquid Nitrogen), crystals array and kapton.
Monte Carlo Testing of a Gamma Veto System for LUX Ryan Sacks Mentors: Daniel Akerib and Michael Dragowsky Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve.
Prototype of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detector Wang Zhimin IHEP, Daya Bay.
Status of Ultra-low Energy HPGe Detector for low-mass WIMP search Li Xin (Tsinghua University) KIMS collaboration Oct.22nd, 2005.
Status XMASS experiment M. Nakahata for XMASS collaboration Kamioka Observatory, ICRR, University of Tokyo Dark2007, September 28, 2007.
PANDAX Results and Outlook
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
Measurement of Kr background in the XMASS experiment ICRR master’s course in physics Keisuke Hieda 1.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Cygnus 2013/06/05 Nagoya univ. H.Uchida for XMASS collaboration 1.
TAUP2007, Sendai, 12/09/2007 Vitaly Kudryavtsev 1 Limits on WIMP nuclear recoils from ZEPLIN-II data Vitaly A. Kudryavtsev Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Annual Modulation Study of Dark Matter Using CsI(Tl) Crystals In KIMS Experiment J.H. Choi (Seoul National University) SUSY2012, Beijing.
Low background techniques from XMASS Low Radioactivity Techniques 2013 Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso Assergi (AQ), Italy, April 10-12, 2013 Hiroshi.
XMASS 2012 Shanghai Particle Physics and Cosmology Symposium Hiroshi Ogawa (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Sep. 16 th, 2012.
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
Yasuhiro Kishimoto for KamLAND collaboration RCNS, Tohoku Univ. September 12, 2007 TAUP 2007 in Sendai.
The current status of XMAS S Introduction Current status of prototype detector Next step Summary Cryodet 1 Y.Koshio for XMASS collaboration (Kamioka observatory,
Iwha Womans University 2005/04/22 Hyunsu Lee & Jungwon Kwak Current Limit of WIMP search with CsI(Tl) crystal in KIMS 이현수 *, 곽정원, 김상열, 김선기, 김승천,
XMASS experiment Current status 10 th ICEPP Symposium in Hakuba 16 Feb 2004 Yohei Ashie ICRR Univ.of Tokyo.
NEWAGE Hironobu Nishimura ( Kyoto University) K. Miuchi T. Tanimori, H. Kubo, S. Kabuki, A. Takada, K. Hattori, K. Ueno, S. Kurosawa, T.Ida, S.Iwaki A.
in Beijing August 18, 2004 Recent status of the XMASS project Physics goals at XMASS Overview of XMASS Current status of R&D Summary.
Data Processing for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Aksel Hallin Queen’s, October 2006.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
KPS Chonbuk University 2005/10/22 HYUNSU LEE Status of the KIMS dark matter search experiment with CsI(Tl) crystals Hyun Su Lee Seoul National.
Muon and Neutron Backgrounds at Yangyang underground lab Muju Workshop Kwak, Jungwon Seoul National University 1.External Backgrounds 2.Muon.
WIMP search Result from KIMS experiments Kim Seung Cheon (DMRC,SNU)
? At Yangyang beach, looking for something in the swamp of particles and waves. 1 The recent results from KIMS Seung Cheon Kim (Seoul National University)
1/27/2016Katsushi Arisaka 1 University of California, Los Angeles Department of Physics and Astronomy Katsushi Arisaka XAX 10.
Activities on double beta decay search experiments in Korea 1.Yangyang Underground laboratory 2.Double beta decay search with HPGe & CsI(Tl) 3.Metal Loaded.
XMASS experiment Ultra-low BG, multi-purpose detector 3kg fiducial volume (FV) prototype detector 1ton (100kg FV) detector for DM Search S. Moriyama for.
Current status of XMASS experiment 11 th International Workshop on Low Temperature Detectors (LTD-11) Takeda Hall, University of Tokyo, JAPAN 8/1, 2005.
DARK MATTER SEARCH Carter Hall, University of Maryland.
1 Status and background considerations of XMASS experiment Yeongduk Kim Sejong University for the XMASS collaboration LRT2006 Oct. 3, 2006.
ZEPLIN III Position Sensitivity PSD7, 12 th to 17 th September 2005, Liverpool, UK Alexandre Lindote LIP - Coimbra, Portugal On behalf of the ZEPLIN/UKDM.
Second Workshop on large TPC for low energy rare event detection, Paris, December 21 st, 2004.
CsI Veto Detector Performance Study He Dao DMRC. Tsinghua University For KIMS Collaboration.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
PyungChang 2006/02/06 HYUNSU LEE CsI(Tl) crystals for WIMP search Hyun Su Lee Seoul National University (For The KIMS Collaboration)
Seoul National University Han-wool Ju CUNPA Kick-off Meeting Aug.22-23, 2013.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Status of ULE-HPGe Experiment for WIMP Search in YangYang
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
“Performance test of a lead glass
Double Beta Decay of 48Ca with CaF2(Eu) - ELEGANT VI -
Status of 100Mo based DBD experiment
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Muon and Neutron detector of KIMS experiment
Neutron backgrounds in KamLAND
2nd International Workshop on Double Beta Decay
XAX Can DM and DBD detectors combined?
Sr-84 0n EC/b+ decay search with SrCl2 crystal
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
杨勇 上海交通大学 On Behalf of the Collaboration 粒子物理数据分析基础和前沿研讨会,2016/9/13
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
MEG実験の液体Xe検出器について 東大 ICEPP  森研究室 M1 金子大輔.
Anti-Neutrino Simulations
XMASS Y. Suzuki (for the XMASS Collaboration) Kamioka Observatory,
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Neutrino Magnetic Moment : Overview
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

WIMP search from XMASS-I fiducial volume data with background prediction 15th International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP 2017) Jul. 24–28, 2017, Sudbury, ON, Canada 26th of Jul. 2017 (14:45–15:00) A. Takeda for the XMASS Collaboration

Experimental site Japan Tokyo Kamioka Mine Kamioka Mine KamLAND Super-K XMASS(Lab-C) CANDLES IPMU Labx1 CLIO NEWAGE Lab2/EGad Experimental site Kamioka Mine ~1000m underneath Mt. Ikenoyama. (2700 m.w.e.) Tokyo Kamioka Mine Japan 10 m 10.5 m Kamioka mine Lab-C Water tank XMASS I detector

XMASS-I detector Inner detector Single phase liquid xenon detector. (832 kg xenon for sensitive region) 642 low background PMTs. (2 inch, HAMAMATSU R10789) → each PMT signal is recorded by 10-bit 1GS/s waveform digitizers. High light yield: ~15 PE/keV. Outer detector 10 m x 10.5 m water tank with 72 PMTs (20 inch) for active muon veto and passive radiation shield. 10 m 10.5 m Inner detector Outer detector 642 PMTs (R10789) 832kg liquid xenon 72 PMTs (20 inch)

Self-shielding of g-ray background Traces of U-chain gamma-rays from PMTs Owing to high atomic number (Z=54), external gamma-ray background (mainly coming from PMTs) can be shielded by liquid xenon itself. By selecting events occurred in the restricted inner volume (fiducial volume) low background can be achieved. Fiducial volume

Detector calibration Tank top ~5m Water tank Stepping motor Magnetic linear and rotary motion feed-through Top PMT ~5m Gate valve Tank top Water tank Various RI sources can be inserted inside the sensitive volume w/o interrupting detector operation. Used for light yield monitoring, optical parameter tuning, energy and timing calibration etc. RI Energy [keV] diameter [mm] Geometry (1) 55Fe 1.65(*1), 5.9 10 2pi source (2) 109Cd 8, 22, 25, 88 5 (3) 241Am 17.8, 59.5 0.17 2pi/4pi source (4) 57Co 59.3(*2), 122 0.21 4pi source (5) 137Cs 662 cylindrical (*1) 4.2 keV (averaged) L-shell X-ray escape from 5.9 keV K-shell X-ray. (*2) Tungsten K-shell X-ray used for detector housing. 57Co source N.Y. Kim et al., NIM A 784 (2015) 499–503 Source rod (Ti ) 19mm 4mm 0.21mm Active region is concentrated on 1.8 mm edge region

Vertex reconstruction (based on timing, R(T)) Using FADC hit timing of each PMT. Timing constant for 2–10 keV events: 25±2ns. Position reconstruction is done by using likelihood method from probability density function for each PMT. P(t) : probability density function xi, ti : PMT position and hit time vg : group velocity in Lxe (110mm/ns) 241Am calibration data (5–10 keV) Reconstructed z [cm] z = 0cm z = 20cm z = 40cm Rate [/sec/cm] z PMTs z = 0cm z = +20cm z = +40cm … z = -20cm z = -40cm detector calibration Source position along vertical axis (z-axis) → Surface events > 38 cm are effectively removed from this distribution. R(T) < 38 cm selection is used for event reduction.

Vertex reconstruction (based on photo electron, R(PE)) Position reconstruction Making acceptance map: Many grid points are defined inside whole detector volume including detector surface. Events are generated at each grid point and photo-electrons (pe) expected in each PMT are calculated by our MC. From measured pe and scaled acceptance map (m) in (1), position is calculated where following likelihood is maximum. Γ(x): Gamma function (Γ(n) = (n-1)!, n>0) z PMTs z = 0cm z = +20cm z = +40cm … z = -20cm z = -40cm detector calibration Source position along vertical axis (z-axis) Reconstructed position distribution of 57Co events (122 keV)

Evaluation of RI activities in XMASS-I (1/2) Based on RI screening for detector materials mainly with HPGe detector. RI activities are evaluated by spectrum fitting for > 400 pe (~30 keV) between data and MC with constraints from screening results. MC/data Black line: real data Uncertainty of activity Statistic error ex. RI screening results for PMT with HPGe detector. PMT + base (whole measurement) mBq/PMT 232Th 1.80±0.31 238U 2.26±0.28 210Pb 200±100 60Co 2.92±0.16 40K 9.10±2.15 PMT aluminum seal Bq 238U–230Th 1.5±0.4 210Pb 2.85±1.15 232Th 0.096±0.018 235U–207Pb ~1.5 x 4.5%

Evaluation of RI activities in XMASS-I (2/2) 210Pb in copper surface and bulk a events selection from scintillation decay time. 210Pb in copper surface/bulk were estimated from shape of energy spectrum caused by 210Po a decay. 210Pb in the bulk of OFHC copper was also measured independently by a low background a-particle counter. (XIA Ultra-Lo-1800) RI in liquid xenon Coincidence analysis was used. 222Rn: 214Bi – 214Po (164 us) 85 Kr: b–g (1.015 us, 0.343%) 14C and 39Ar were estimated from spectrum fitting. 210Po in copper bulk (continuous) or on surface (peak) 1st events (214Bi candidates) 2nd events (214Po candidates) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 ×103 NPE Events bulk surface Down stream of 222Rn Events Number of photo electrons (NPE)

Data reduction Live time: 705.88 days 2013/Nov. /20 – 2016/Mar./29 Standard cut + R(T)<38cm + R(PE)<20cm Main parts of standard cut w/o Cherenkov cut Cherenkov cut R(T) < 38 cm cut R(PE) < 20 cm cut 0 50 100 150 200 250 NPE Reconstruction energy [keVee] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 [/day/kg/keVee] 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 Events 1 10 102 103 104 105 106 107 Data reduction Live time: 705.88 days 2013/Nov. /20 – 2016/Mar./29 Standard cut: Reduction of Cherenkov event is effective. Main origin of Cherenkov events is b-ray in PMT quartz window emitted from 40K in PMT photo-cathode. R(T) < 38 cm and R(PE) < 20 cm cuts give another O(10-3) reduction. Event rate after applying all cuts: ~4×10-3 /day/kg/keVee @5–5.5 keVee (signal efficiency: ~30%)

Background prediction with MC XMASS MC based on Geant4. Detail detector geometry and responses of PMT and DAQ were included. Optical parameters of LXe were traced with our periodical calibration (57Co and 60Co). RI activities for each material were implanted. Same live time as that of data. Same reduction as that for data was applied. Standard cut + R(T)<38cm + R(PE)<20cm cut Blue histogram : all MC with statistical error Pb210 Plate bulk N.R. Pb210 Ring bulk Internal PMT Al seal Pb210 Surface PMT gamma [/day/kg/keVee] 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 MC only Reconstruction energy [keVee] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Main BG origin is not internal but detector surface events (miss-reconstructed events).

Miss-reconstructed events Structure around PMT Events occurring on surface of copper plate are wrongly reconstructed to inside of the fiducial volume with some probabilities because closest PMT has small solid angle for these events. Light leakage from a gap around boundary between plate and plate makes special pattern, but, sometimes wrongly reconstructed inside the fiducial volume. Large miss-recon. Gap Small miss-recon. Copper plate PE pattern of gap event Light leakage from gap quartz window Gap ~100 um PMT Copper ring Position where scintillation happens Scintillation photons

Systematic error evaluation All the possible systematic errors were evaluated Contents Systematic error 2-15 keVee 15-30 keVee (1) Plate gap geometry +6.2/-22.8% +1.9/-6.9% (2) Ring roughness +6.6/-7.0% +2.0/-2.1% (3) Cu ref dependence +5.2/-0.0% +2.5/-0.0% (4) Plate floating +0.0/-4.6% +0.0/-1.4% (5) Al seal dependence +0.7/-0.7% +0.0/-0.0% (6) Reconstruction +3.0/-6.2% (7) Timing (decay time, TTS) +4.6/-2.9% +0.4/-5.3% (8) Timing (response in detector surface) +0.0/-8.0% (9) Absorption & scattering +0.7/-6.7% +1.5/-1.1% (10) Dead tube origin +10.3/-0.0% +45.2/-0.0% (11) N.R. Related to surface condition: it mainly affects to miss-reconstruction rate. (1) Geometry of gap between plates coming from installation accuracy of plates. (2) Roughness of ring surface inside the gap. (3) Reflection of plate surface. (4) Floating of plate coming from installation accuracy of each plate. (5) Geometry and property of aluminum seal (6) Related to reconstruction: grid dependency and rate of miss-reconstruction. (7,8) Uncertainty for scintillation decay time and response of PMT. (9) Optical parameters of LXe. (10) Effect of dead PMTs (10 dead PMTs exist) (11) for 206Pb recoil from 210Po a decay on copper surface.

Systematic error evaluation All the possible systematic errors were evaluated Contents Systematic error 2-15 keVee 15-30 keVee (1) Plate gap geometry +6.2/-22.8% +1.9/-6.9% (2) Ring roughness +6.6/-7.0% +2.0/-2.1% (3) Cu ref dependence +5.2/-0.0% +2.5/-0.0% (4) Plate floating +0.0/-4.6% +0.0/-1.4% (5) Al seal dependence +0.7/-0.7% +0.0/-0.0% (6) Reconstruction +3.0/-6.2% (7) Timing (decay time, TTS) +4.6/-2.9% +0.4/-5.3% (8) Timing (response in detector surface) +0.0/-8.0% (9) Absorption & scattering +0.7/-6.7% +1.5/-1.1% (10) Dead tube origin +10.3/-0.0% +45.2/-0.0% (11) N.R. Related to surface condition: it mainly affects to miss-reconstruction rate. (1) Geometry of gap between plates coming from installation accuracy of plates. (2) Roughness of ring surface inside the gap. (3) Reflection of plate surface. (4) Floating of plate coming from installation accuracy of each plate. + Real data MC systematic error RI activity error statistic error [/day/kg/keVee] 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 Reconstruction energy [keVee] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Standard cut + R(T)<38cm + R(PE)<20cm cut ← Real data is well explained with background MC.

WIMP search with background evaluation in fiducial volume + Data ・ BGMC + WIMP(90% C.L.) ■ 1s error for best fit 705.88 live days data applying fiducial volume data reduction were used. (standard + R(T)<38cm + R(PE) < 20cm cut) Energy spectrum of data was fitted with background MC and WIMP MC in the energy range of 2–15 keVee considering systematic error in both background and WIMP MC. Best fit result is consistent with no WIMP case, then 90% C.L. upper limit on the WIMP-nucleon cross section was derived. Our preliminary limit is 2.2×10-44 cm2 for 60 GeV WIMP mass. WIMP 60 GeV, 2.2e-44 cm2(90%CL) This work (FV analysis) XENON1T (2017) LUX (2017) PandaX-II (Run8+Run9) DarkSide-50 (2015) XMASS(2013) DAMA/LIBRA(Na) XMASS (mod. 2017) CDMS-Si (2014) CoGeNT (2013)