Vikram V Dwarkadas University of Chicago

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SN 1987A spectacular physics Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
Advertisements

Thermal X-ray in SNR Patrick Slane Zhang Ningxiao.
Supernova Remnants Shell-type versus Crab-like Phases of shell-type SNR.
The Deaths of Stars The Southern Crab Nebula (He2-104), a planetary nebula (left), and the Crab Nebula (M1; right), a supernova remnant.
Modeling photon and neutrino emission from the supernova remnant RX J  Constraints from geometry  Constraints from spectral energy distribution.
RX J alias Vela Jr. The Remnant of the Nearest Historical Supernova : Impacting on the Present Day Climate? Bernd Aschenbach Vaterstetten, Germany.
Supernova remnants and molecular clouds Armand Fiasson LAPP - Annecy-le-vieux.
The Fermi Bubbles as a Scaled-up Version of Supernova Remnants and Predictions in the TeV Band YUTAKA FUJITA (OSAKA) RYO YAMAZAKI (AOYAMA) YUTAKA OHIRA.
2009 July 8 Supernova Remants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era 1 Modeling the Dynamical and Radiative Evolution of a Pulsar Wind Nebula inside.
X-ray Properties of Five Galactic SNRs arXiv: Thomas G. Pannuti et al.
From Progenitor to Afterlife Roger Chevalier SN 1987AHST/SINS.
Supernovae from Massive Stars: light curves and spectral evolution Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
3-D Simulations of Magnetized Super Bubbles J. M. Stil N. D. Wityk R. Ouyed A. R. Taylor Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Calgary,
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
New evidence for strong nonthermal effects in Tycho’s supernova remnant Leonid Ksenofontov 1 H.J.Völk 2, E.G.Berezhko 1, 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical.
Stellar Winds and Mass Loss Brian Baptista. Summary Observations of mass loss Mass loss parameters for different types of stars Winds colliding with the.
Zhang Ningxiao.  Emission of Tycho from Radio to γ-ray.  The γ-ray is mainly accelerated from hadronic processes.
Magnetic Fields in Supernova Remnants and Pulsar-Wind Nebulae 2013/12/18 Speaker : Yu-Hsun Cheng Professor: Yosuke Mizuno.
Alexander Kappes UW-Madison 4 th TeVPA Workshop, Beijing (China) Sep. 24 – 28, 2008 The Hunt for the Sources of the Galactic Cosmic Rays — A multi-messenger.
Molecular clouds and gamma rays
Fusion, Explosions, and the Search for Supernova Remnants Crystal Brogan (NRAO)
22 nd February 2007 Poonam Chandra Unusual Behavior in Radio Supernovae Poonam Chandra Jansky Fellow, National Radio Astronomy Observatory Astronomy Department,
Radio and X-ray observations of SN 2009ip Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics January 4, 2013 Collaborators: Raffaella Margutti (Harvard),
Are Stellar Eruptions a Common Trait of SNe IIn? Baltimore, MD 06/29/11 Ori Fox NPP Fellow NASA Goddard Based on arXiv:
Circumstellar interaction of supernovae and gamma-ray bursts Circumstellar interaction of supernovae and gamma-ray bursts Poonam Chandra National Radio.
Magnetohydrodynamic Effects in (Propagating) Relativistic Ejecta Yosuke Mizuno Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research University of Alabama in.
Progenitor stars of supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada.
Chapter 11 The Interstellar Medium
A Pulsar Wind Nebula Origin for Luminous TeV Source HESS J Joseph Gelfand (NYUAD / CCPP) Eric Gotthelf, Jules Halpern (Columbia University), Dean.
Low-Mass Star Formation, Triggered by Supernova in Primordial Clouds Masahiro N. Machida (Chiba University) Kohji Tomisaka (NAOJ) Fumitaka Nakamura (Niigata.
Expected Gamma-Ray Emission of SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (d = 50 kpc) E.G.Berezhko 1, L.T. Ksenofontov 1, and H.J.Völk 2 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute.
Y. Matsuo A), M. Hashimoto A), M. Ono A), S. Nagataki B), K. Kotake C), S. Yamada D), K. Yamashita E) Long Time Evolutionary Simulations in Supernova until.
「すざく」 による超新星残骸 RCW86 の観測 Suzaku Observations of Supernova Remnant RCW86 山口 弘悦 (理研) Hiroya Yamaguchi (RIKEN) ← Preliminary image of the Suzaku mapping observation.
JEREMY S. RITTER, MILOS MILOSAVLJEVIC, AND VOLKER BROMM Population III Stars HII Regions Supernovae Discussion The University of Texas at Austin LEFT:
A New Window on Radio and X-ray emission from Strongly Interacting Supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada Collaborators: Roger Chevalier,
American Astronomical Society – Austin, TX (2008) Patrick Slane (CfA) In collaboration with: D. Helfand (Columbia) S. Reynolds (NC State) B. Gaensler (U.
Time-Dependent Spectra of Cosmic Rays escaped from SNRs Igor Telezhinsky, DESY, Zeuthen, Germany. Vikram Dwarkadas, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
The X-Ray Universe 2008, Granada, Spain, May 28, 2008 Chandra Monitoring of X-Ray Evolution of SNR 1987A Sangwook Park Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics.
Cosmic-ray helium hardening 1. Galactic cosmic ray 3. Cosmic-ray helium hardening 4. Summary Contents Yutaka Ohira and Kunihito Ioka High energy accelerator.
U.A. Dyudina, A.P. Ingersoll, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, Objectives We study lightning on Jupiter using spatially resolved.
ALMA observations of Molecules in Supernova 1987A
V.N.Zirakashvili, V.S.Ptuskin
Cosmic Rays & Supernova Remnants love story: The Importance
Complete the worksheet on differences between fusion and fission…
CSI in SNRs You-Hua Chu Inst of Astron and Astroph
Winds Driven by Massive Star Clusters
Do We Live Within a Large Local Void?
Observation of Pulsars and Plerions with MAGIC
Supernova Progenitors From Stellar Populations And Supernova Remnants
SN 1987A: The Formation & Evolution of Dust in a Supernova Explosion
Chandra HETG Spectra of SN 1987A at 20 Years
Supernova Interaction with Dense Mass Loss
Chandra Science Highlights
A one-dimensional look at the recent HETG data
DIFFUSE RADIO SOURCES in GROUPS and POOR CLUSTERS
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts
Mid-infrared Observations of Aged Dusty Supernovae
X-ray and Radio (and Optical) Observations of Cassiopeia A
High Energy emission from the Galactic Center
RADIO EMISSION FROM SNe & GRBs, AND THE NEED FOR SKA
Chapter 11 The Interstellar Medium
Cosmic-ray acceleration by forward and reverse shocks in young SNR
Observations: Cosmic rays
International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy
Massive star clusters as Sources of Galactic Cosmic Rays (arXiv:1804
Supernova Nucleosynthesis and Extremely Metal-Poor Stars
Dust Enrichment by Supernova Explosions
Spallation l-process (spallation):
HETG Spectral-imaging of SN1987A
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Presentation transcript:

Vikram V Dwarkadas University of Chicago Evaluating the Gamma-Ray Emission from SN 1987A, the Closest Visible Supernova to us in the last 300 years Vikram V Dwarkadas University of Chicago

Simple Analytic Model (Dwarkadas, 2013, MNRAS,434, 3368) (Drury, Aharonian & Volk 1994) Use Chevalier (1982) self-similar solution (n>5, s=0 for constant density, s=2 for wind) April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

Simple Analytic Model (Dwarkadas, 2013, MNRAS,434, 3368) (Drury, Aharonian & Volk 1994) Mass = Swept-up mass Energy in Cosmic Rays = Some fraction of available shock energy at timestep For s=0 (constant density), ECR ~ t5m-2 , for m> 2/5, increases with time. For s=2 (wind), ECR ~ 3m – 2, increases for m>2/3 (Sedov value) Energy available at shock front equal total SN energy ONLY at Sedov stage. April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

Simple Analytic Model Core-collapse SNe, evolve in stellar winds. If steady wind, s=2 Note that, since m < 1, the emission is decreasing with time, after an early approach to maximum energy. April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

Simple Analytic Model Constant density medium, s=0 (Type Ia Sne) If m> 2/5 , which it should be if the remnant has not yet reached the Sedov phase, then the emission is always increasing with time. Note: Emission proportional to density squared, not simply density, as in older SNRs. April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

SN 1987A The closest SN in over 300 years Hubble images show an interesting structure, with an equatorial ring and two rings at higher latitudes. The increasing X-ray and radio emission after 3 years indicated the presence of an HII region interior to the ring (Chevalier & Dwarkadas 1995). We can model the interaction within the equatorial plane and outside the equatorial plane (no ring interaction). April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

SN 1987A - 3 Ring Circus April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

Formation of SN 1987A CSM Interaction of the low density wind from the Blue supergiant progenitor of SN 1987A, with the red supergiant wind from the previous epoch. Calculated with ionization-gasdynamics code AVATAR (VVD & Rosenberg 2013). April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

SN 1987A April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

SN 1987A April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

(Dewey, Dwarkadas et al. 2012, ApJ, 752, 103) D. Dewey et al. 2012 ApJ 752 103 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/103 HETG(MEG) spectra and full hydrodynamics-based models. The HETG-07 (top) and HETG-11 (bottom) data (black) are reasonably fit by the total (HII plus nominal clumped-ER) model spectra (red). The HII-shocked-CSM (blue) and the HII-shocked-ejecta (green) components are also shown individually. (Dewey, Dwarkadas et al. 2012, ApJ, 752, 103) Progenitor BSG: Wind velocity ~500 km/s, Mass-loss rate < 10-8 msun/yr. April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

SN 1987A Assuming the parameters in Dewey et al (2012), n=9, we get Fg(87A)(> 100 MeV) = 4.04 x 10-10 cm-2s-1 If we assume a spectral index close to the shock of 2, and emissivity qg=10-17, then the TeV flux is given by: Fg(87A)(> 1 TeV) = 8.1x 10-14 cm-2s-1 This is somewhat larger than the HESS upper limit, but given the approximations (and the approximations in the upper limit) it is not too bad. April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

SN 1987A recently Fransson et al, 2015, ApJL, 806, 1 Upper panel: HST images of SN 1987A with WFC3 in the F625W filter on days 8717 (2011 January 05), 9480 (2013 February 06), and 9975 (2014 June 15). Middle panels: difference images of 2013–2011, 2014–2013, and 2014–2011, respectively. Blue means fainter and red brighter. Inside the ring the asymmetric ejecta can be seen. Note the gradual appearance of several small spots, as well as diffuse emission, outside the inner ring in the SE. New spots can also be seen in the NE, as well as to the NW. Note that the two new spots in the NW do not coincide with the stars labeled in the upper left image. The residuals in the SE corner of the difference images are due to a saturated star and the radial streak NW of the ring in the two first difference panels is due to a diffraction spike of a star outside the field shown. Fransson et al, 2015, ApJL, 806, 1

SN 1987A Recent observations with IR, optical and X-ray show that by day 10,000 the SN shock has exited the equatorial ring, and is now expanding in lower density material. Since the emission goes as ρ2, it will therefore not increase as fast as it was. This complicates calculations of the future gamma-ray flux. Unfortunately at this point it is not possible to evaluate the density, and density profile, into which the material is expanding. If it is likely a wind then the density would decrease as r-2. The forward shock will be expanding in the lower density medium, but the reverse shock will still be in the dense ring. One could imagine particle acceleration at both shocks, which further complicates the matter. The lower density, and decreasing emission with time if it is in a wind medium, will mean that the overall emission will decrease with time. CTA has a higher sensitivity than HESS , but it still seems possible that CTA will NOT detect SN 1987A. Note (several approximations made, especially that although shock moving through different density media, self-similar solutions still apply). April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

Questions and Discussions

Summary & Conclusions SN Environment is very important!!!! Young core-collapse SN will typically interact with the freely expanding wind of the progenitor star first, followed by a constant density region. The density may decrease considerably in Type IIP SNe, or increase some in Type Ic. A simple estimate can be made of the hadronic flux using DAV 1994, the Chevalier self-similar solutions, and some approximations. Suggests that Cas A emission is hadronic, and that 87A may be detectable in a few years. April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

Summary SNR propagation in the ambient medium depends on the structure of the ambient medium, the structure of the material ejected in the SN explosion, and the energy and mass of the ejected material. Although SNR evolution is traditionally classified as going through various phases, a SNR could spend most of its time in transition between these phases, and thus may not be adequately described by the self-similar solutions. April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

Summary (Contd) The Sedov stage is NOT reached when the swept-up mass equals the ejecta mass, it generally takes a lot longer than that. In some cases it could be truncated or totally bypassed. SN shocks can become radiative depending on their velocity and the ambient density. This can happen at any time, not necessarily in the radiative stage. April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays

Application to Cas A A SNR expanding in a dense RSG wind. Mass-loss rate - 2 * 10-5 Msun/yr, wind velocity 10 km/s, ESN= 4. * 1051 ergs, n=10.12 (Chevalier & Oishi) Fg(CasA)(> 100 MeV) = 5.5 x 10-8 cm-2s-1 Fermi best fit suggests only 2% energy in cosmic rays, explosion energy 2.*1051 ergs Then: Fg(87A)(> 100 MeV) = 1.1 x 10-8 cm-2s-1 Comparable to Fermi result. Suggests hadronic emission for Cas A. April 13 2016 ISSI - Cosmic Rays