Chemical Renal Denervation Update and Future Directions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hypertrophy Arrhythmia Oxygen Consumption Vasoconstriction Atherosclerosis Insulin Resistance Renal Sympathetic Afferent Nerves: Kidney as Origin of Central.
Advertisements

Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. Today’s discussion may regard information or indications not evaluated by.
Hypertension and The Kidney Update: Clinical Trials Paul J. Scheel, Jr., M.D. Director, Division of Nephrology The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
FFR vs Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation
Welcome Ask The Experts March 24-27, 2007 New Orleans, LA.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
10/5/2015. Hypertension GuidelinesDate JNC JNC JNC NICE Guidelines 2011 ESC / ESH Hypertension Guidelines ESC Guideline2007.
A Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
1 Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Questions June 24, 2008 Ira Krefting, MD.
Renal denervation for resistant hypertension: it’s time to reconsider!
Powered by Infomedica Infomedica Conference Coverage* of 26 th European Meeting on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection Paris (France), June 10-13,
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
Renal Sympathetic Denervation View From the EU
Global Experience with Peripheral DCBs/Stent Studies: C.R. Bard
Meeting of the Balkan Excellent Centers
Prairie Cardiovascular, Springfield, IL US
Eberhard Grube MD, FACC, FSCAI
The Vessix Global Clinical Program REDUCE-HTN: REINFORCE
Critical Appraisal of Devices for the Management of Hypertension
Lutonix® Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries Preliminary Six-Month Results from.
Rationale for Radiation Therapy for Nerve Denervation
Thomas F. Lüscher, FESC, FAHA, FRCP
OUS Data: What does the CE Mark Really Mean?
OneShot™ Renal Denervation System
FDA Pathway to Approval: Clinical Requirements for Renal Denervation
Critical Appraisal of the Current Ongoing Study Designs
Innovation Session CRT Meeting Washington, D.C. February 22, 2014
John C. Somberg, MD I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
From ESH 2016 | POS 7D: Jan Rosa, MD
Renal Denervation Next Steps
Endurant: A New Generation Endograft
Renal Denervation: the St. Jude experience
A Novel “Stent-On-A-Wire”Ultra Low Profile Stent Delivery System
University of Pennsylvania
Felix Mahfoud Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
Vascular Brachytherapy Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
Accelerating a Revolution in the Treatment of Hypertension
Medtronic Cardiovascular,
SMART Study: Sympathetic Mapping/Ablation of Renal Nerves Trial
A randomized controlled trial of distal renal denervation vs conventional mode of the intervention for treatment of resistant hypertension Stanislav Pekarskiy.
First-in-Man, First In The USA: What’s The Difference?
Renal Artery Brachytherapy for Sympathetic Renal Denervation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension: Preclinical safety study Ron Waksman, Issi Barbash,
A Fixed Guidewire Stent Delivery System
Mapping Sympathetic Nerve Distribution for
ABSORB Japan: 3-year Clinical and Angiographic Results of a Randomized trial Evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. Metallic Drug-eluting.
SYMPLICITY HTN-3: A Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Refractory Hypertension: Post Hoc.
Eric J Dippel, MD FACC Davenport, Iowa, USA February 19, 2017
Deputy Director, Division of Biostatistics No Conflict of Interest
FAVOR II Europe-Japan FAVOR II E-J
The Ardian Catheter Based Approach to Renal Denervation to Treat Refractory HTN: Results of the EU Randomized Clinical Trial Krishna Rocha-Singh, M.D.,
Benefits of US EFS: A Clinical Perspective
OCT-Guided PCI What needs to be done to establish criteria?
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
US Early Feasibility Studies (EFS)
Renal Sympathetic Denervation: The Academic View
MACE Trial Rationale, Study Design, and Current Status
CVRx Baroreflex Activation Therapy:
TECHNOLOGY UPDATE TIVUS (Cardiosonic)
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons – FDA View
Kirk P. Seward, PhD President and Chief Technology Officer
Traditional parenteral antihypertensive treatment
Resistant Hypertension: Initial Combinations of Medications
Why double blind, controlled randomized trials?
How and why this study may change my practice ?
Controlling High Blood Pressure
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
Clinician Referral Training
Presentation transcript:

Chemical Renal Denervation Update and Future Directions Tim A. Fischell, M.D., FACC, FSCAI Professor of Medicine Michigan State University

Tim A. Fischell, M.D. Ablative Solutions, Inc. Abbott Vascular   I have the following financial disclosures: Ablative Solutions, Inc. Founder, Co-Inventor Officer and Stockholder   Abbott Vascular Member, Medical Advisory Board

Important Disclosures About the Peregrine System™ Kit THE PEREGRINE SYSTEM KIT IS: An investigational product not currently approved in the United States Limited to investigational use in clinical trials Currently being studied as a combination drug/device product to evaluate safety and effectiveness for renal denervation in the TARGET BP I Trial under an investigational new drug (IND) application This presentation reports clinical data collected with the use of the CE Mark Peregrine System™ Infusion with a neurolytic agent (dehydrated alcohol) for the treatment of patients with systemic hypertension This presentation is intended solely to aid in scientific discussion and exchange surrounding the development and further evaluation of the product for this use

Post-Symplicity HTN-3 Analysis Suggests Design Flaws and “Inadequate Denervation”* Findings from Report Renal denervation will work only if sufficient ablation is provided 50% of patients did not receive the minimum of eight total ablations Adequate treatments (9-10 ablations/artery) with RF requires a vessel length of at least 4-5 cm The majority of patients don’t have vessels this long * Cardiology News: Renal denervation Proceeds as U.S. Trial’s Flaws Emerge, June 23, 2014; Kandzari et al, Eur Heart J, 2015

Alcohol-Mediated Denervation via Precise Nerve Targeting Device Perivascular Sites Where Device Infuses Alcohol Expanded View of Device Infusing Alcohol Site-specific delivery of alcohol targeted for local nerve inactivation Micro-volume (0.3 mL−0.6 mL) infused directly to the perivascular region Extracellular fluid helps spread alcohol circumferentially in the perivascular region Alcohol activity range self-limited through dilution by extracellular fluid CAUTION: The Peregrine System kit is currently being studied to evaluate safety and efficacy for renal denervation. It is an investigational product not approved in the US. Its use is limited to investigational use in clinical trials. The Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter is CE Marked, and only for use in the European Union

Alcohol-Mediated Neurolysis: Animation CAUTION: The Peregrine System kit is currently being studied to evaluate safety and efficacy for renal denervation. It is an investigational product not approved in the US. Its use is limited to investigational use in clinical trials. The Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter is CE Marked, and only for use in the European Union

Patient Treatment via Peregrine in Post-Market Study CAUTION: The Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter is CE Marked, and only for use in the European Union

Dose Response/Efficacy Based on Four Independent Surrogate Markers* % quadrants with injury: score of 3 or 4 (0 to 4 scale) Norepinephrine: % reduction relative to controls TH decrease: Maximum reduction = 4 Nerve injury score: 0 to 4 scale *Fischell, et al.; Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 16, 221-227 (2015) Quadrants with significant nerve injury(%) (%) Norepinephrine Reduction / Initial dose Current dose Alcohol-mediated dose response observed with multiple, independent bio-markers in animal studies

Global Clinical Road Map Summary: Stepwise Approaches to Evaluate Technology Safety/Performance N = 10 pts Study Closed for Enrollment CE Mark 5/1/15 First-Human-Use Study (Paraguay) N = 18 Study Complete RCT double-blinded 2:1 (RDN vs. no RDN) 100 pts Primary endpoint: mean 24-hour ABPM at 8 weeks Post-Market Study Single arm, open label, 0.6 mL alcohol/artery N = up to 120* Peregrine System™ Kit (Peregrine catheter + Alcohol) Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter (Peregrine catheter + Neurolytic agent e.g. alcohol) Global Europe Enrollment Underway IND Allowed to Proceed * As per Notified Body guidance CAUTION: The Peregrine System kit is currently being studied to evaluate safety and efficacy for renal denervation. It is an investigational product not approved in the US. Its use is limited to investigational use in clinical trials. The Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter is CE Marked, and only for use in the European Union

Clinical Trials: FIM and Pre-CE (N = 28 subjects; 38 procedures; 57 renal arteries) Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter successfully navigated to target site in all renal arteries, including complex anatomy (short, tortuous segments, etc.) Device performance appears to be successful during all 38 procedures with 97.3% device success (1 device failure prior to start of procedure in the FIM) All vessels (57 in 28 subjects) treated as intended Minimal to no sedation during the procedures, with short treatment time: average time/renal artery = 9 ± 5 min Minimal contrast (average 67 ± 25 mL/procedure) and radiation exposure (average 10 ± 12 min/procedure). FIM: Systolic Office BP Drop: mean -25 mmHg at 1-M, and mean -22 mmHg at 6-M Peregrine Study (pre-CE): Systolic Office BP Drop: mean -29 mmHg and -37 mmHg at 1-M and 3-M (n=10). 24-Hour systolic ABPM drop: mean -12 mmHg and -7 mmHg at 1-M and 3-M, and was maintained at 12-M (-7 mmHg) (n=10) CAUTION: The Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter is CE Marked, and only for use in the European Union. TCT2016 and on file at ASI.

Angiographic Follow-Up -> No Stenosis Angiographic Follow-Up -> No Stenosis* (n = 57 arteries in 28 Subjects) Baseline Baseline Baseline Baseline 6 Months 6 Months 6 Months 6 Months CAUTION: The Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter is CE Marked, and only for use in the European Union. *As adjudicated by independent core lab

The “Peregrine Post-Market” Study (Europe) (Enrollment & Treatment Stage) A Post-Market Study of Transcatheter Perivascular Renal Denervation for the Treatment of Hypertension using the Ablative Solutions Inc. Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter Study Designed to Satisfy Requirement of Notified Body Horst Sievert, MD Int. Cardiologist Peter Blankestijn, MD Nephrologist Atul Pathak, MD Hypertensionist Felix Mahfoud, MD Co-Lead Investigators and Steering Committee Members CAUTION: The Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter is CE Marked, and only for use in the European Union

The “Target BP I” Study (Global) A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Sham-Procedure-Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation with Alcohol as delivered by the Peregrine System Infusion Catheter in Hypertensive Subjects US: IND allowed by FDA to be initiated in the US – EU: Submission on hold Global Steering Committee David Kandzari, MD Int. Cardiologist Michael Weber, MD Hypertensionist Maurice Buchbinder, MD Melvin Lobo, MD Mathew Weir, MD Nephrologist Atul Pathak, MD Ronald Schmieder, MD Felix Mahfoud, MD Co-Principal Investigators (US) Co-Principal Investigators (Europe) CAUTION: The Peregrine System kit is currently being studied to evaluate safety and efficacy for renal denervation. It is an investigational product not approved in the US. Its use is limited to investigational use in clinical trials.

Summary/Conclusions Preclinical studies suggest that chemical renal denervation using alcohol, with the Peregrine System Infusion Catheter appears to provide substantial sympathetic denervation, with favorable safety profile. Early clinical studies (FIM and the Peregrine (pre-CE study)) suggested consistent safety and performance of the Peregrine Catheter. Anatomical safety at 6-month imaging by Angio and CTA with no apparent evidence of tear, dissection, or new restenosis in any of the 57 renal arteries treated, as confirmed by independent core labs Early data from these clinical studies suggest a signal of efficacy with drop in blood pressure at various stages of the follow-ups. Larger controlled randomized blinded studies are needed to validate efficacy. Patient enrollment continues in the Peregrine Post-Market Study in EU with treatment at the “new” volume of 0.6 mL/artery, with efficacy and safety data being collected. “Target BP I”: FDA allowed initiation of study under its IND in the US and the company expects to start enrollment in 2017. CAUTION: The Peregrine System kit is currently being studied to evaluate safety and efficacy for renal denervation. It is an investigational product not approved in the US. Its use is limited to investigational use in clinical trials. The Peregrine System™ Infusion Catheter is CE Marked, and only for use in the European Union