Wet tropospheric correction comparison for Jason-2 mission between

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
26/11/2012 – Observatoire de Paris Analysis of wind speed evolution over ocean derived from altimeter missions and models M. Ablain (CLS)
Advertisements

Coastal Altimetry Meeting, Silver Spring, 5-7 February 2008Page n° 1/19 The wet tropospheric correction for coastal altimetry T. Strub S. Brown F. Mercier.
04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Clima en España: Pasado, presente y futuro Madrid, Spain, 11 – 13 February 1 IMEDEA (UIB - CSIC), Mallorca, SPAIN. 2 National Oceanography Centre, Southampton,
Coastal Altimetry Workshop February 5-7, 2008 Organized by: Laury Miller, Walter Smith: NOAA/NESDIS Ted Strub, Amy Vandehey: CIOSS/COAS/OSU With help from.
Spatial-Temporal Parametric Model with Covariance Structure based on Multiple Satellite Altimetry for Predicting and Interpolating Sea Surface Heights.
Impacts of Climate Change on Physical Systems PPT
Principles of Sea Level Measurement Long-term tide gauge records  What is a tide station?  How is sea level measured relative to the land?  What types.
1 Assessment of the CFSv2 real-time seasonal forecasts for Wanqiu Wang, Mingyue Chen, and Arun Kumar CPC/NCEP/NOAA.
HY-2A Satellite Altimetric data Evaluation in the Arctic Ocean Yongcun Cheng Ole Baltazar Andersen.
OSTST Hobart 2007 – SLA consistency between Jason-1 and TOPEX data SLA consistency between Jason-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon data M.Ablain, S.Philipps,
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
Citizens Climate Lobby Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference March, 15, Lancaster, PA OBSERVED AND MODELED GLOBAL AND REGIONAL (MID-ATLANTIC STATES) CLIMATE.
CCI CCMUG meeting | 2-4th June 2014, Exeter, UK ESA’s Sea Level Climate Change Initiative M Ablain 1, G. Larnicol 1, A.Cazenave 2, B. Meyssygnac 2, J.Legeais.
Changes in Floods and Droughts in an Elevated CO 2 Climate Anthony M. DeAngelis Dr. Anthony J. Broccoli.
Is sea level rise larger near the coast? Remko Scharroo Altimetrics LLC, Cornish, New Hampshire Eric Leuliette and Laury Miller NOAA / Laboratory for Satellite.
2007 OSTST meeting Y. Faugere (CLS) J. Dorandeu (CLS) F. Lefevre (CLS) Long period errors observed at Envisat crossovers and possible impact of tides.
Meeting of the CCl/OPACE2 Task Team on National Climate Monitoring Products How might NCMPs contribute in future IPCC reports ? Fatima Driouech TT on national.
OSTST Hobart 2007 – Performance assessment Jason-1 data M.Ablain, S.Philipps, J.Dorandeu, - CLS N.Picot - CNES Jason-1 GDR data Performance assessment.
Objective Data  The outlined square marks the area of the study arranged in most cases in a coarse 24X24 grid.  Data from the NASA Langley Research Center.
Page 1 HEND science after 9 years in space. page 2 HEND/2001 Mars Odyssey HEND ( High Energy Neutron Detector ) was developed in Space Research Institute.
Improved Satellite Altimeter data dedicated to coastal areas :
Jason-1/Envisat cross-calibration Y. Faugere (CLS) J. Dorandeu (CLS) N. Picot (CNES) P. Femenias (ESA) Jason-1 / Envisat Cross-calibration.
Local and global calibration/validation P. Bonnefond, S. Desai, B. Haines, S. Nerem and N. Picot Jason-1 - T/P Sea Surface Height Formation Flying Phase.
Don Chambers Center for Space Research, The University of Texas at Austin Josh Willis Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology R.
2600 High Latitude Issues Data Editing AlgorithmInterestApplicability E1E2ENTPJ1J2G1C2 MSS based editingImproved data editingXXXxxxxx Fine tuned.
A high-resolution Aquarius OI SSS L4 analysis: 3-year, near-global, weekly, 0.5 degree grid Oleg Melnichenko, Peter Hacker, Nikolai Maximenko, and James.
The relationship between sea level and bottom pressure in an eddy permitting ocean model Rory Bingham and Chris Hughes Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory.
The impact of solar variability and Quasibiennial Oscillation on climate simulations Fabrizio Sassi (ESSL/CGD) with: Dan Marsh and Rolando Garcia (ESSL/ACD),
Orbit comparison for Jason-2 mission between GFZ and CNES (POE-D) The GFZ orbit is referred to as GFZ in the following study The CNES orbit is referred.
Inverse Barometer correction comparison for Envisat mission between Corrections based on JRA-55 and ERA-Interim atmospheric reanalyses The JRA-55 correction.
Winter Outlook for the Pacific Northwest: Winter 06/07 14 November 2006 Kirby Cook. NOAA/National Weather Service Acknowledgement: Climate Prediction Center.
Validation of the TMR and JMR Wet Path delay Measurements using GPS, SSM/I, and TMI Shailen Desai Shannon Brown Bruce Haines Wenwen Lu Victor Zlotnicki.
Orbit comparison for ERS-2 mission between GFZ and REAPER The GFZ orbit is referred to as GFZ in the following study The REAPER orbit is referred to as.
Wet tropospheric correction comparison for Jason-1 mission between GPD V2.0 (FCUP) and GPD V1.1 corrections The GPD V2.0 correction is referred to as GPD_V2.0.
SCM x330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
The Derivation of Snow-Cover "Normals" Over the Canadian Prairies from Passive Microwave Satellite Imagery Joseph M. Piwowar Laura E. Chasmer Waterloo.
Sea Level_cci AGU 2014 J Benveniste 1, G Gilles 2, A Cazenave 3,4, M Ablain 2, J F Legeais 2, Y Faugère 2, B Lucas 5, S Dinardo 6, J A Johannessen 7, D.
The impact of lower boundary forcings (sea surface temperature) on inter-annual variability of climate K.-T. Cheng and R.-Y. Tzeng Dept. of Atmos. Sci.
Validation strategy MARCDAT-III meeting - Frascati, Italy - May 2011 The validation phase to compare all the algorithms together and to select the best.
The validation and user assessment of the SL-CCI products has been performed through: - Internal consistency check and comparison with in-situ data. -
ESA Climate Change Initiative Sea-level-CCI project A.Cazenave (Science Leader), G.Larnicol /Y.Faugere(Project Leader), M.Ablain (EO) MARCDAT-III meeting.
Dry Troposphere Correction comparison for Jason-2 mission between the JRA55-based and the ERA-Interim-based corrections The JRA55-based correction is referred.
Wet tropospheric correction comparison GPD V2.0 (FCUP) and GPD V1.1 corrections for ERS-1, ERS-2, Envisat, Jason-1, Jason- 2, TOPEX/Poseidon Synthesis.
Confidence envelop of the Global MSL time- series deduced from Jason-1 and Jason-2 altimetric missions. M. Ablain, L. Zawadzki (CLS), A. Cazenave, B. Meyssignac.
North Atlantic Oscillation and its Influence on Ozone in London
L. Carrère, Y. Faugère, E. Bronner, J. Benveniste
L. Carrère, F. Lyard, M. Cancet, L. Roblou, A. Guillot
Mid Term II Review.
Climate Change Initiative
Orbit comparison for ERS-1 mission between GFZ and REAPER
Description of the climate system and of its components
Overview of Downscaling
Institut für Meteorologie
Air-Sea Interactions The atmosphere and ocean form a coupled system, exchanging heat, momentum and water at the interface. Emmanuel, K. A. 1986: An air-sea.
A.K. Gueye, S Janicot, A.M. Lezine LOCEAN, P. Braconnot LSCE
Requirements for microwave inter-calibration
Question 1 Given that the globe is warming, why does the DJF outlook favor below-average temperatures in the southeastern U. S.? Climate variability on.
Dynamics of ENSO Complexity and Sensitivity
Climate Change Initiative
Aquarius SSS space/time biases with respect to Argo data
Meng Zhang (张萌), Hans von Storch
Quantitative verification of cloud fraction forecasts
CO2 forcing induces semi-direct effects
Atlantic Ocean Forcing of North American and European Summer Climate
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
Evaluation of IRI-2012 by comparison with JASON-1 TEC and incoherent scatter radar observations during the solar minimum period Eun-Young Ji,
Presentation transcript:

Wet tropospheric correction comparison for Jason-2 mission between GPD V2.0 (FCUP) and GPD V1.1 corrections The GPD V2.0 correction is referred to as GPD_V2.0 in the following study The GPD V1.1 correction is referred to as GPD_V1.1 Lionel Zawadzki, Michael Ablain (CLS)

Wet tropospheric correction comparison for Jason-2 mission Introduction: We will observe and analyse the impact of the new GPD wet troposphere correction V2.0 by comparison to its previous version V1.1 for Jason-2 mission and climate applications The main differences between the two corrections are described in the corresponding technical note In order to determine the impact of the new wet troposphere correction in terms of climate applications and temporal scales, we will try in this study to indicate for each impact detected if it’s a positive (+) or a negative (-) impact : No impact detected Low impact Significant impact

Global Mean Sea Level Jason-2 Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) GPD_V2.0 Versus GPD_V1.1 Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Mesoscale Signals < 2 months Significant impact detected on Global Mean Sea Level trend 0.23 mm/yr on the Global MSL is significant. Temporal evolution of SLA mean calculated globally.

Global Mean Sea Level No impact detected on Inter annual Signals Jason-2 Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) GPD_V2.0 Versus GPD_V1.1 Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Mesoscale Signals < 2 months No impact detected on Inter annual Signals The figure below shows the mean difference between the two corrections calculated globally by cycle.

Global Mean Sea Level Jason-2 Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) GPD_V2.0 Versus GPD_V1.1 Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Mesoscale Signals < 2 months No impact detected on Annual and Semi-annual Signals

Mesoscale Jason-2 Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) GPD_V2.0 Versus GPD_V1.1 Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Mesoscale Signals < 2 months No impact detected on a short temporal scale (signals < 2 months): Crossovers Variance Differences are generally positive but inferior to 0.1 cm² The map of SSH crossovers Variance Differences shows that the low degradations are mainly at mid-latitudes, below 50°.

Mesoscale Map of Variance differences of Sea Surface Height at crossovers between the GPD_V2.0 and GPD_V1.1 corrections (over all the period): Low degradations between ±20 and ±50° latitudes (+0.2 cm²) Temporal evolution of Variance differences of Sea Surface Height at crossovers between two GPD corrections : No significant impact over all the period

Regional Mean Sea Level Jason-2 Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) GPD_V2.0 Versus GPD_V1.1 Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Mesoscale Signals < 2 months Low impact detected on Regional Mean Sea Level We observe a low impact (~ +0.2 mm/yr) globally

Regional Mean Sea Level Map of Sea Level Anomaly differences between two GPD corrections (over all the period)

Regional Mean Sea Level Jason-2 Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) GPD_V2.0 Versus GPD_V1.1 Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Mesoscale Signals < 2 months Low impact detected on Annual and Semi-Annual Signals amplitude differences reach -2mm for annual signal in coastal areas (see figures on next slide), Semi-annual signals differences are below ±1mm. It’s not possible to determine which correction is the best one for theses scales

Regional Mean Sea Level Map of Sea Level Anomaly differences amplitude for annual signal Map of Sea Level Anomaly differences amplitude for semi-annual signal SLA with GPD_V2.0 amplitude – SLA with GPD_V1.1 amplitude : annual signal SLA with GPD_V2.0 amplitude – SLA with GPD_V1.1 amplitude : semi-annual signal

Regional Mean Sea Level Map of Sea Level Anomaly differences phase for annual signal. Map of Sea Level Anomaly differences phase for semi-annual signal. To be noted a phase value equal to 30° corresponds to a period of one month SLA with GPD_V2.0 phase – SLA with GPD_V1.1 phase: annual signal SLA with GPD_V2.0 phase – SLA with GPD_V1.1 phase : semi-annual signal

Regional statistics between corrections Map of Mean differences between GPD_V2.0 and GPD_V1.1 (extension period) On this map we observe clearly differences in the tropical band. Considering a global bias, the impact is about 2mm in this area Map of Standard deviation differences between GPD_V2.0 and GPD_V1.1 (extension period) On this map we observe differences up to 3mm near coasts, but generally stays below 2mm

Wet tropospheric correction comparison for Jason-2 mission To conclude: GPD_V2.0 correction extension shows performances equivalent to its previous version. Performances at crossovers are equivalent and the analysis of MSL shows no degradation nor improvement over this period. There is however a strong impact on the long term evolution at global scale Jason-2 Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) GPD_V2.0 Versus GPD_V1.1 Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Mesoscale Signals < 2 months