“Biosphere Experiment” Intercomparison of atmospheric CO2 simulations based on biosphere fluxes from different terrestrial ecosystem models U. Karstens,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emissions in GEMS Data on emissions are needed for the 4 sub-systems GHG, GRG, AER and RAQ GEMS Project has dedicated tasks for emissions and surface fluxes.
Advertisements

Peter Cox (Met Office) Martin Heimann, Wolfgang Knorr (MPI-BGC) Tony Hollingsworth, Richard Engelen (ECMWF) Philippe Ciais, Philippe Peylin (LSCE) Alain.
Amospheric inversions: Investigating the recent inter-annual flux variations ! P. Peylin, C. Rödenbeck, P. Rayner, experimentalists, … Inverse models Data.
Atmospheric inversion of CO 2 sources and sinks Northern Hemisphere sink Jay S. Gregg.
Activity 2.3 Team CarboEurope-IP Meeting, Posen, Poland, 7-12 Oktober, 2007 Flask network (A 2.3) Multiple species measurement What is expected from A.
GHG Verification & the Carbon Cycle 28 September 2010 JH Butler, NOAA CAS Management Group Meeting Page 1 Global Monitoring, Carbon Cycle Science, and.
Improving Understanding of Global and Regional Carbon Dioxide Flux Variability through Assimilation of in Situ and Remote Sensing Data in a Geostatistical.
Persistence of nitrogen limitation over terrestrial carbon uptake Galina Churkina, Mona Vetter and Kristina Trusilova Max-Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry.
Niall P. Hanan 1, Christopher A. Williams 1, Joseph Berry 2, Robert Scholes 3 A. Scott Denning 1, Jason Neff 4, and Jeffrey Privette 5 1. Colorado State.
Slides for IPCC. Inverse Modeling of CO 2 Air Parcel Sources Sinks wind Sample Changes in CO 2 in the air tell us about sources and sinks Atmospheric.
CO 2 in the middle troposphere Chang-Yu Ting 1, Mao-Chang Liang 1, Xun Jiang 2, and Yuk L. Yung 3 ¤ Abstract Measurements of CO 2 in the middle troposphere.
The comparison of TransCom continuous experimental results at upper troposphere Takashi MAKI, Hidekazu MATSUEDA and TransCom Continuous modelers.
The Global Carbon Cycle Humans Atmosphere /yr Ocean 38,000 Land 2000 ~90 ~120 7 GtC/yr ~90 About half the CO 2 released by humans is absorbed by.
Estimation of daily CO 2 fluxes over Europe by inversion of atmospheric continuous data C. Carouge and P. Peylin ; P. Bousquet ; P. Ciais ; P. Rayner Laboratoire.
Atmospheric Research Inverting high temporal frequency data: latest results Rachel Law Peter Rayner, Ying-Ping Wang Law et al., GBC, 16(4), 1053, doi: /2001GB001593,
Prabir K. Patra, Shamil Maksyutov, A. Ito and TransCom-3 modellers Jena; 13 May 2003 An evaluation of an ecosystem model for studying CO2 seasonal cycle.
Upper-Air Inter-Comparison Experiment Update Presented By Philippe Peylin on behalf of Christopher Pickett – Heaps & Peter Rayner.
Evaluating the Impact of the Atmospheric “ Chemical Pump ” on CO 2 Inverse Analyses P. Suntharalingam GEOS-CHEM Meeting, April 4-6, 2005 Acknowledgements.
NOCES meeting Plymouth, 2005 June Top-down v.s. bottom-up estimates of air-sea CO 2 fluxes : No winner so far … P. Bousquet, A. Idelkadi, C. Carouge,
Modeling CO 2 and its sources and sinks with GEOS-Chem Ray Nassar 1, Dylan B.A. Jones 1, Susan S. Kulawik 2 & Jing M. Chen 1 1 University of Toronto, 2.
Modeling approach to regional flux inversions at WLEF Modeling approach to regional flux inversions at WLEF Marek Uliasz Department of Atmospheric Science.
Evaluating the Role of the CO 2 Source from CO Oxidation P. Suntharalingam Harvard University TRANSCOM Meeting, Tsukuba June 14-18, 2004 Collaborators.
Comparison of some Transcom Continuous Experiment results for Hegyhatsal and Cabauw tall towers A.T. Vermeulen*, G. Pieterse, L. Haszpra, and the Transcom.
TransCom continuous experiment – overview and diurnal results Rachel Law, Wouter Peters, Christian Rödenbeck and TC-continuous modellers.
Mesoscale inversions: from continental to local scales T. Lauvaux, C. Aulagnier, L. Rivier, P. Bousquet, P. Rayner, and others.
Modeling framework for estimation of regional CO2 fluxes using concentration measurements from a ring of towers Modeling framework for estimation of regional.
Inversion of continuous data over Europe : a pseudo-data analysis. C. Carouge and P. Peylin ; P. Bousquet ; P. Ciais ; P. Rayner Laboratoire des Sciences.
Hauglustaine et al., IGAC, 19 Sep 2006 Forward and inverse modelling of atmospheric trace gas at LSCE P. Bousquet, I. Pison, P. Peylin, P. Ciais, D. Hauglustaine,
Climate and the Carbon Cycle Gretchen Keppel-Aleks California Institute of Technology 16 October 2010.
Preparatory work on the use of remote sensing techniques for the detection and monitoring of GHG emissions from the Scottish land use sector P.S. Monks.
Optimising ORCHIDEE simulations at tropical sites Hans Verbeeck LSM/FLUXNET meeting June 2008, Edinburgh LSCE, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de.
Carboeurope Annual Meeting Poznan, 8-12 Oct Recent CO 2 gradients over Europe M.Ramonet, P.Ciais et al.
The seasonal and interannual variability in atmospheric CO 2 is simulated using best available estimates of surface carbon fluxes and the MATCH atmospheric.
Page 1© Crown copyright WP4 Development of a System for Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation Richard Betts.
Diurnal cycles of fossil fuel CO 2 : Comparison of model results with observations at Heidelberg and Schauinsland Felix Vogel 1 including work of: I. Levin.
InGOS – an integrating activity preparing for improved Greenhouse Gases monitoring over Europe Ingeborg Levin, Samuel Hammer, Dominik Schmithüsen, Ute.
Regional Inversion of continuous atmospheric CO 2 measurements A first attempt ! P., P., P., P., and P. Philippe Peylin, Peter Rayner, Philippe Bousquet,
Validating the GHG production chain at multiple levels Julia Marshall (MPI-BGC), Richard Engelen (ECMWF), Cyril Crevoisier (LMD), Peter Bergamaschi (JRC),
Terrestrial biosphere and global change: the carbon cycle at the land surface Han Dolman [ Wageningen, NL.
Nicola Pirrone GMOS Project Coordinator & Director CNR - Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research Rome, Italy Global Mercury Observation System - GMOS.
Modeling Modes of Variability in Carbon Exchange Between High Latitude Ecosystems and the Atmosphere Dave McGuire (UAF), Joy Clein (UAF), and Qianlai.
Presented by Global Coupled Climate and Carbon Cycle Modeling Forrest M. Hoffman Computational Earth Sciences Group Computer Science and Mathematics Division.
P. K. Patra*, R. M. Law, W. Peters, C. Rodenbeck et al. *Frontier Research Center for Global Change/JAMSTEC Yokohama, Japan.
A direct carbon budgeting approach to study CO 2 sources and sinks ICDC7 Broomfield, September 2005 C. Crevoisier 1 E. Gloor 1, J. Sarmiento 1, L.
WP11 highlights: introduction and overview EU FP6 Integrated Project CARBOOCEAN ”Marine carbon sources and sinks assessment” 5 th Annual & Final Meeting.
Investigating Land-Atmosphere CO 2 Exchange with a Coupled Biosphere-Atmosphere Model: SiB3-RAMS K.D. Corbin, A.S. Denning, I. Baker, N. Parazoo, A. Schuh,
Regional CO 2 Flux Estimates for North America through data assimilation of NOAA CMDL trace gas observations Wouter Peters Lori Bruhwiler John B. Miller.
An attempt to quantify fossil fuel CO 2 over Europe Ute Karstens 1, Ingeborg Levin 2 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie, Jena 2 Institut für Umweltphysik,
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific 2 nd ICAP Workshop Chapel Hill, North Carolina October.
Evaluation of CO and SF 6 as quantitative tracers for fossil fuel CO 2 : The Experimentalists’ view Ingeborg Levin 1, Ute Karstens 2, Ulrike Gamnitzer.
Atmospheric Inventories for Regional Biogeochemistry Scott Denning Colorado State University.
Evaluation of CO and SF 6 as quantitative tracers for fossil fuel CO 2 : The Experimentalists’ view Ingeborg Levin 1, Ute Karstens 2, Ulrike Gamnitzer.
10-11 October 2006HYMN kick-off TM3/4/5 Modeling at KNMI HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the.
CarboEurope: The Big Research Lines Annette Freibauer Ivan Janssens.
Combined 14 CO 2 and CO Observations: A key to high-resolution fossil fuel CO 2 records ? ! Ingeborg Levin 1 and Ute Karstens 2 1 Institut für Umweltphysik.
Intercomparison of Mesoscale and Global Atmospheric Transport Models over Western Europe P. Ciais2), A.T. Vermeulen1), C. Geels3), P. Peylin2), M. Gloor4),
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
Troposphere Strastosphere D. H. Gas phase chemistry Scavenging processes Fossil fuel Emissions Biomass burning emissions Biogenic emissions Boundary layer.
Using atmospheric CO2 data More than 100 CO2 records Use LMDz model as an “offline” transport tool based on “retro-plumes” (pre-calculated response function)
Potential of 14 CO 2 to constrain emissions at country scale Y. Wang, G. Broquet, P. Ciais, F. Vogel, F. Chevallier, N. Kadygrov, L. Wu, R. Wang, S. Tao.
Figure 10. Improvement in landscape resolution that the new 250-meter MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) measurement of gross primary.
CO2 sources and sinks in China as seen from the global atmosphere
Effect of anthropogenic nitrogen depositions on atmospheric CO2
Modeling of regional-scale PCB transport at the Bayonne Peninsula
Carbon Cycle Observations and Instrumentation
Effects of drought and fire on interannual variability in CO2 as derived using atmospheric-CO2 inversion Prabir K. Patra Acknowledgements to: M. Ishizawa,
Modeling of regional-scale PCB transport at the Bayonne Peninsula
CarboEurope Open Science Conference
Monika Kopacz, Daniel Jacob, Jenny Fisher, Meghan Purdy
Atmospheric CO2 and O2 Observations and the Global Carbon Cycle
Presentation transcript:

“Biosphere Experiment” Intercomparison of atmospheric CO2 simulations based on biosphere fluxes from different terrestrial ecosystem models U. Karstens, P. Peylin and CarboEurope terrestrial biosphere modellers CarboEurope atmospheric transport modellers

“Question” Can we validate / falsify the different terrestrial models with existing continuous European measurements ?

Biosphere experiment Strategy: Forward model simulations of atmospheric CO2 using biosphere fluxes from the model intercomparison in CarboEurope-IP Integration Differences in fluxes —> differences in CO2 concentration Comparison with observations of atmospheric CO2 as additional evaluation of simulated fluxes Problems: Biosphere fluxes are only available for Europe —> complete with ‘standard‘ global biosphere fluxes Sub-daily temporal resolution is needed —> reconstruct diurnal cycle based on REMO hourly radiation

Terrestrial Ecosystem Models daily GPP and respiration or hourly NEE available: models grid time 2002-2005 region 02 03 04 05 ANN 0.25° daily X - Europe BIOME-BGC JULES 1.0° hourly PIXGRO ORCHIDEE global 3-hrly

Forward transport model simulations Global transport models: LMDZ, TM5, TM3 Regional transport models: REMO, DEHM Lagrangian transport model: COMET 2002–2005 CO2 surface fluxes: Biospheric fluxes from CE model intercomparison (Europe) GPP and respiration -> 3-hourly fluxes ‘Standard‘ biospheric fluxes (global) BIOME-BGC, ORCHIDEE Fossil fuel emissions (global) TransCom 2002-2003 Sea-air exchange (global) TransCom 2002-2003

Transport model + different TEMs Hegyhatsal 115m

Transport model + different TEMs Hegyhatsal 115m

HUN (115 m) 2002 2003 Mean across tracers (3 models) 2002 2003 2002 2003 Mean across tracers (3 models) TM5 LMDZ REMO 2002 2003 Mean across models (5 tracers)

HUN (115 m) 2002 2003 Mean across tracers (3 models) 2002 2003 2002 2003 Mean across tracers (3 models) TM5 LMDZ REMO 2002 2003 Mean across models (5*2 tracers)

HUN (115 m) 2002 2003 Mean across tracers (3 models) 2002 2003 2002 2003 Mean across tracers (3 models) TM5 LMDZ REMO 2002 2003 Mean across models (10 tracers)

Standard deviation [ppm] Fossil fuel experiment Biosphere experiment Station Transport Tracer MHD 0.73 0.25 PAL 0.61 0.28 BSC 0.99 0.50 CMN 1.00 0.24 SCH 1.12 0.33 HUN115 1.42 0.60 SAC 2.22 1.15 CBW200 2.30 0.79 Station Transport Tracer MHD - - PAL 2.03 2.71 BSC - - CMN 0.89 1.03 SCH 1.67 1.81 HUN115 1.69 3.17 SAC - - CBW200 - - Transport differences Tracer differences ≈ 2 - 4 Transport differences Tracer differences ≈ 0.6 - 1

REMO+TEM-simulated CO2 July 2003 BIOME-BGC JULES ANN PIXGRO -18 -15 -21 -27 -9 -3 3 9 -24 -6 -12 6 ppm daytime sampled CO2 (bio) at 300 m

REMO+TEM-simulated CO2 July 2003 different fluxes outside Europe ORCHIDEE ORCHIDEE global BIOME-BGC global ORCHIDEE -18 -15 -21 -27 -9 -3 3 9 -24 -6 -12 6 ppm daytime sampled CO2 (bio) at 300 m

Comparison at mountain/tower sites REMO+TEM-simulated CO2 daytime sampled daily mean CO2 (bio+fos +oce)

Comparison at mountain/tower sites seasonal variations filtered daytime sampled daily mean CO2 (bio+fos +oce)

Comparison at mountain/tower sites internal vs. external sources filtered daytime sampled daily mean CO2 (bio+fos +oce)

Comparison at mountain/tower sites seasonal variation relative to Mace Head filtered daytime sampled daily mean CO2 (bio+fos +oce)

Comparison in lower troposphere REMO+TEM-simulated CO2 at 1000 m at 3000 m daytime sampled daily mean CO2 (bio+fos +oce)

Comparison in lower troposphere seasonal variations at 1000 m at 3000 m filtered daytime sampled daily mean CO2 (bio+fos +oce)

Comparison in lower troposphere seasonal variations at 1000 m at 3000 m filtered daytime sampled daily mean CO2 (bio+fos +oce)

Discussion What can we learn ? Next steps: Significant differences in some regions ! Differences due to transport smaller than due to fluxes ! Evaluation of regional TEM fluxes through a comparison of simulated and observed atmospheric CO2 ? Contribution from fluxes inside Europe vs. outside Europe ? Next steps: Evaluate simulations for time period 2002-2005 More models ? ! Feedback to biosphere modellers

Thanks for contributing to the biosphere experiment: Transport modellers: Bakr Badawy Camilla Geels Maarten Krol Christian Rödenbeck Alex Vermeulen Biosphere modellers: Galina Churkina Ralf Geyer Chris Jones Dario Papale John Tenhunen Kristina Trusilova Mona Vetter Nicolas Viovy CarboEurope Experimentalists for providing observation data