The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12):

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHILEAN ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE OUCOME RATING SCALE (ORS)
Advertisements

Standardized Scales.
ASSESSING RESPONSIVENESS OF HEALTH MEASUREMENTS. Link validity & reliability testing to purpose of the measure Some examples: In a diagnostic instrument,
Children’s subjective well-being Findings from national surveys in England International Society for Child Indicators Conference, 27 th July 2011.
Issues of Technical Adequacy in Measuring Student Growth for Educator Effectiveness Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. Director, Assessment & Standards Development.
Developing and validating a stress appraisal measure for minority adolescents Journal of Adolescence 28 (2005) 547–557 Impact Factor: A.A. Rowley.
Measurement Models and CFA Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
In the name of Allah. Development and psychometric Testing of a new Instrument to Measure Affecting Factors on Women’s Behaviors to Breast Cancer Prevention:
Psychological assessment through the Internet A reliability and validity study of online (vs. paper- and-pencil) versions of the General Health Questionnaire-28.
Multivariate Methods EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
22nd International Conference STAR, July Palma de Mallorca, Spain The Perceived Stress Scale. Preliminary Psychometric Study with Spanish HIV+
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WOMEN IN SHORT- AND LONG-TERM RELATIONSHIPS IN CUES FOR SEXUAL DESIRE Ana Carvalheira, PhD 1, Lori Brotto, Ph.D 2 & Isabel Leal, PhD.
Measurement in Exercise and Sport Psychology Research EPHE 348.
Development and Validation of Elder’s Satisfaction Questionnaire for patients Attending Dental Clinics By: Marjan Haghi PhD student in Gerontology University.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: om Sex Differences in Associations between Fear of Negative Evaluation (FNE) and Substance Use Lesley A.
1 Cronbach’s Alpha It is very common in psychological research to collect multiple measures of the same construct. For example, in a questionnaire designed.
Introduction to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) UCLA Center for East-West Medicine 2428 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite.
VALIDITY AND VALIDATION: AN INTRODUCTION Note: I have included explanatory notes for each slide. To access these, you will probably have to save the file.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Hilary Rhodes, PhD Ellen Bobronnikov February 22, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov Hilary Rhodes January 11, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 12 Reliability and Reliability Analysis.
This is a mess... How the hell can I validate the consumer behaviors’ scales of my SEM model? Maria Pujol-Jover 1, Irene Esteban-Millat 1 1 Marketing Research.
Applied Quantitative Analysis and Practices LECTURE#17 By Dr. Osman Sadiq Paracha.
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Interpersonal Relationships Anxiety Questionnaire 1 Carrie M. Brown, Ph.D.; 2 Brien K. Ashdown, Ph.D.; 1 Nastacia.
The Process of Psychometric Validation of an Instrument across Language and Culture Halfway around the World Huey-Shys Chen PhD, RN, CHES Assistant Professor,
1 DEVELOPMENT OF A DIALYSIS PATIENT SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE Phi Linh NGUYEN THI 1, Serge BRIANCON 1, Luc FRIMAT 2, (1) Epidemiologie et Evaluation Cliniques.
Mental health of nursing: There are differences between men and women? Saavedra, A. I. 1, Sánchez-López, M. P. 2 & Cuellar-Flores, I. 1, 2 1 Hospital Universitario.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 25 Critiquing Assessments Sherrilene Classen, Craig A. Velozo.
Understanding Populations & Samples
Understanding Populations & Samples
Correlaciones * La correlación es significante al nivel 0,05 (bilateral). ** La correlación es significativa al nivel 0,01 (bilateral). * La correlación.
“Excuse Me Sir, Here’s Your Change”
Survey Methodology Reliability and Validity
Some epidemiological principles and methods
Exploratory Factor Analysis
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Reliability Analysis.
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF CIS
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL)
Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati
Further Validation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale – II: Gender Measurement Invariance Harmon, K. A., Shigemoto, Y., Borowa, D., Robitschek, C.,
Mental Health of Romanian Women living in Spain
Chapter 4 Research Methods in Clinical Psychology
Parental Alcoholism and Adolescent Depression?
12th International Congress of Behavioral Medicine
Background and Context Research Question and Proposition
Evaluation of Ethiology
Analysis of Survey Results
Understanding Results
assessing scale reliability
20th European Congress of Psychiatry
HAEMODIALYSIS RECIPIENTS IN SELECTED HOSPITALS OF ANAMBRA STATE
Questions or comments:
Conclusions Context Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire Results
AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire – Portuguese Version Palmeira, A.1,2, Teixeira, P.2, Silva, M2. &
Class 4 Experimental Studies: Validity Issues Reliability of Instruments Chapters 7 Spring 2017.
Dr. Chin and Dr. Nettelhorst Winter 2018
First study published in JOGS.
Validation of the Portuguese DSM-IV-MR-J
EPSY 5245 EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez
Reliability Analysis.
SURVEYS VERSUS INSTRUMENTS
Evaluation.
University of Warwick, Department of Sociology, 2014/15 SO 201: SSAASS (Surveys and Statistics) (Richard Lampard) Index Construction (Week 13)
The Brief Mood Introspection Scale (BMIS) 30 Years Later: Norms and Validity Evidence from a Meta-Analysis . Rachael M. Cavallaro, Victoria M. Bryan.
STEPS Site Report.
First Hour - How can one measure intelligence?
UCLA Department of Medicine
Presentation transcript:

The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): 4th World Congress on Women´s Mental Health. 16-19 March 2011. Madrid, Spain The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Reliability and factor structure in the Chilean population María del Pilar Sánchez-López and Raquel Rivas-Diez Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain Introduction The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), was developed by Goldberg (Goldberg y Hillier, 1979) like a screening questionnaire to assess people´s overall psychological well-being and to detect non-psychotic psychiatric problems.  The GHQ-12 is a selfadministered questionnaire widely used and validated internationaly. The factorial structure is still currenly under debate. Previous studies have reported models of one to three factors. Recent results suggest that the GHQ-12 is a unidimensional measure, showing that multidimensional models are the result of a response bias on the items expressing negative mood states and multiple structural factors (Hankins, 2008a; Hankins, 2008b; Ye, 2009). With the application of confirmatory factor analysis, other researchers have been able to test a number of alternative models and have consistently found that a model of three factors (Anxiety/Depression, Social dysfunction and Loss of confidence) proposed by Graetz (1991), is fits the data better than other models (Campbell, Walker y Farrell, 2003; French y Tait, 2004; Shevlin y Adamson, 2005). To use the experience gained and allow comparison of results with data found in other cultures, we consider relevant to confirm the validation of the questionnaire in Chilean women and to assess for the first time a Chilean population dimensionality of instrument with confirmatory factor analysis. Results Reliability: Cronbach´s Alpha was calculated to analyze internal consistency. We found an alpha value of 0.86 for the entire Chilean women sample. Exploratory factor analysis: All factors have eigenvalues exceeding unity, a criterion used to guide the number of significant factors. The first factor accounts for more than a third of the variance in GHQ-12 (39.56%). While factors 2 and 3 are minor. The three factors together account for 59.48% of the variance in GHQ-12. Components of these three models are: distress or dysphoria (Anxiety/Depression, Social Dysfunction and Loss of confidence. Confirmatory factor analysis: Confirmatory factor analysis found that this three-factor model fits the model, with results very similar to he one-dimensional model to the covariance of the errors raised by Hankins (2008a). Objective The purpose of this study was to analyze the internal consistency and the factorial structure of the 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in Chilean women. Method → Women N = 371 → Age range: 18-72 → Mean age = 37.20 years → SD = 12.87 Participants Instruments GHQ-12: 12-Item General Health Questionnaire Consists of 12 items, each one assessing the severity of a mental problem over the past few weeks using a 4-point Likert-type scale (from 0 to 3) Procedure We proceeded to apply the instrument to a group of Chilean women. In Santiago of Chile was granted the sample through several universities (Universidad Mayor, Universidad Pontificia Católica de Chile), were provided instruments to several professional and was used the method “snowballing”; the data collection in Arica and Rancagua was done through the same procedure. In all cases the instrument was administered with a cover sheet indicating the directions for application. All our study participants gave their consent after explaining the purpose of research and the option to participate, ensuring their freedom to withdraw at any part of the study without any consequences. We also guarantee the anonymity of their data. In total 550 questionnaires were delivered, of whom about 150 are missing and the rest have been discarded for not having completed the instrument completely. Conclusions Results described support the conclusion that the GHQ-12 is an effective measure for assessing the psychological and detect non-psychotic psychiatric problems in Chilean women. With the results provided, will continue the process of adaptation of the GHQ-12, the instrument applies to men and increase the number of women to give more representative sample. This study provides further evidence of the multidimensionality of the GHQ-12, so the results are confirmed by several authors proposed international. The GHQ-12 contains three underlying factors identified as distress or Dysphoria (Anxiety/Depression), Social dysfunction and Loss of confidence, which together account for 59.48% of the variance. Evaluating factorial structure and psychometric properties of assessment measures in different cultural settings not only allows for the confirmation of its construct validity in a new cultural context but enables us to evaluate whether or not mental health symptoms cluster the same way across different cultural context (Gureje, 1991). References - Goldberg, D.P. & Hillier, V.F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139-145. - Graetz, B. (1991). Multidimensional properties of the General Health Questionnaire. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 26, 132–138. - Hankins, M. (2008a). The factor structure of the twelve item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): the result of negative phrasing? Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health 4, 10. - Hankins, M. (2008b). The reliability of the twelve-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) under realistic assumptions. BMC Public Health 8, 355. - Ye, S. (2009). Factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): The role of negative wording effects. Personality and Individual differences, 46, 197-201.