FGDM Statewide Meeting: Family Finding and Re-entry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Advertisements

Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
Planning With Youth in Transition Tips, Tools and Techniques.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts Office of Children & Families in The Courts.
Understanding and Using CONCURRENT PLANNING To Achieve Permanency for Children and Youth
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
1 EDUCATION: Court Reports: What to include related to the Child’s Education.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Kathleen McNaught, Project Director ABA Center on Children and the Law National Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues Legal Center for Foster Care.
1. We Continually Examine our Use (Misuse) of Power, Use of Self and Personal Biases 1.We must be aware of and recognize how we use the power of the position.
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
ENHANCING FAMILY GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH FAMILIES EXPERIENCING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE April 8, 2010.
Judge Mark Pouley Commissioner Michelle Ressa October 9, 2012 ICW Summit.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
The Crime Victim Role: Family Group Decision Making and Restorative Group Conferencing Susan Blackburn Patti Noss April 23, 2014.
We all come from families. Families are big, small, extended, nuclear, multi- generational, with one parent, two parents and grandparents. We live under.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY. To learn about the Katie A. Settlement Agreement and its impact on the Child Welfare and Mental Health systems To appreciate the Shared.
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
Federal Updates on Kinship Care
A court dedicated to protecting children and promoting families
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Webinar: The Kinship Diversion Debate
Classroom Skill Building
Commit to Agency Mission and Values
Maryland Healthy Transition Initiative
Family Preservation Services
The Role of Education/Special Education Decision Makers
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Classroom Skill Building
Classroom Skill Building
209: Visitation: The Heart of Permanency Planning
Texas Homeless Network Conference
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Case Management Pre-Service Curriculum Specialty Track
Youth Leadership Advisory Team (Maine)
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
A New Approach to Servicing Families
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Classroom Skill Building
Place Matters Nothing Matters More to a Child Than a Place to Call Home 4/6/2019.
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Classroom Skill Building
The Preventing Sex Trafficking & Strengthening Families Act
Florida’s New Guardianship Assistance Program
Review of Title IV-E Waiver Opportunity
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

FGDM Statewide Meeting: Family Finding and Re-entry April 6, 2017 The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program

Section I: Welcome and Introduction Douglas Waegel, Deputy Director of Program Services, Chester County Children, Youth and Families and Michelle Kahan, Esquire, York County Hearing Officer

Learning Objectives Discuss family finding and relevant legislation Recognize how the FGDM model and family finding mitigate re-entry into out-of-home placement Discuss participatory case planning and how working collaboratively with families strengthens the child’s well-being The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program

Agenda Section I: Welcome and Introduction Section II: Family Finding Legislation Section III: Family Finding Statewide Implementation and Re-entry into Out-of-Home Placement Section IV: Family Finding and FGDM County Practice Section V: Wrap-Up

Session Purpose The FGDM Spring 2017 Statewide Meeting will focus on the key areas of family finding legislation, statewide implementation, and county practice. This presentation and discussion will explore the necessity of teaming with family members and supporting youth’s familial relationships to strengthen their protective factors and well-being, as well as further the understanding of how participatory case planning practices, including FGDM, address and/or prevent re-entry into out-of-home placement.

Section II: Family Finding Legislation Presenters: Honorable Jennifer L. Rogers, Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County and Christy Stanek, Judicial Program Analyst, Office of Children & Families in the Courts

Corresponding Learning Objective Discuss family finding and relevant legislation

Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) According to the Office of Children Youth and Families Bulletin 3130-12-03, Concurrent Planning Policy and Implementation, “The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA) was passed by congress to address permanency, outcomes, and safety for children and families in the child welfare system. ASFA focuses on preserving families while assuring child safe, permanency, and well-being. ASFA requires that County Children and youth agencies make reasonable efforts to finalized permanency plans as soon as a child enters substitute care, and that they be diligent in identifying a permanent family for the child.” (Office of Children, Youth and Families, 2013, p.2)

Family Finding and Kinship Care: Act 55 of 2013 This law was passed mandating the initiation of family finding for children entering the child welfare system and the continuation of family finding on an ongoing basis for children remaining in the system. (Act 55 of 2013)

Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Procedure Rules Effective October 1, 2015, the Supreme Court modified the PA Juvenile Court Procedure Rules to reflect the requirements of Act 55 of 2013. This modification included: Adding definitions Mandating certain steps to be taken by county agencies Requires judges to make findings The rules effected were: 1120, 1149, 1210, 1240, 1242, 1330, 1408, 1409, 1512, 1514, 1515, 1608, 1609, 1610, 1611, and 1635 (The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, 2015)

Rule 1120: “FAMILY FINDING” definition “The ongoing diligent efforts of the county agency, or its contracted providers, to search for and identify adult relatives and kin, and engage them in the county agency’s social service planning and delivery of services, including gaining commitment from relatives and kin to support a child or guardian receiving county agency services.” (The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, 2015)

Rule 1149: Family Finding This rule requires the court to inquire as to the county agency’s efforts to comply with family finding and place the court’s determination as to whether the county agency reasonably engaged in family finding on the record. Further the rule provides when family finding may be discontinued and when it shall resume. (The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, 2015)

Rule 1149: Family Finding The county agency’s efforts may include: Searching for and locating adult relatives and kin Identifying and building positive connections between the child and the child’s relatives When appropriate, supporting the engagement of relatives and kin in social service planning and delivery of services When appropriate, creating a network of extended family support to assist in remedying the concerns that led to the child becoming involved with the county agency When possible, maintaining family connections When in the best interests of the child and when possible, keeping siblings together in care (The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, 2015)

Rule 1210: Order for Protective Custody This rule states that, “At the time the court issues a protective custody order, the court shall inquire as to whether family finding efforts pursuant to Rule 1149 have been initiated by the county agency.” (The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, 2015)

Intent of the Legislation Act 55: Family Finding and Kinship Care were passed due to the following: Ensure that family finding occurs on an ongoing basis for all children entering the child welfare system. Identify and build positive connections between the child and the child's relatives and kin Support the engagement of relatives and kin in children and youth social service planning and delivery Create a network of extended family support to assist in remedying the concerns that led the child to be involved with the county agency (Act 55 of 2013)

“The Why…” How Does Family Finding affect the Courts?

The Pennsylvania Dependency Benchbook The Pennsylvania Dependency Benchbook along with the Family Finding-Key Questions Bench Card, are valuable resources for judges and judicial hearing officers in providing best practices regarding family finding. Inquiry should be made of the county agency in determining efforts in family finding and also should be made from the bench. Children and families should be reminded that family finding is a family driven process.

Family Finding and FGDM Key Questions According to the Pennsylvania Dependency Benchbook, “In Pa, family finding is often used as a foundational step toward a successful family conference.” (Office of Children and Families in the Courts/Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, 2014) Typically, judges asked questions from the bench cards to determine if family finding was done with the family and if they had a role in the decision making process. The Family finding and FGDM Key questions are divided into three categories for the: Children and Youth Agency Parent or guardian Youth (Office of Children and Families in the Courts/ Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, 2014)

Table Discussion Please identify four questions, other than the ones listed in the bench cards we reviewed, that one of the court participants could ask to better understand how the family was engaged. Please write these questions on flip chart paper.

Section III: Family Finding Presenter: Tina Phillips, Office of Children, Youth, and Families, Director of the Bureau of Policy, Programs and Operations

Corresponding Learning Objectives Recognize how the FGDM model and family finding mitigate re-entry into out-of-home placement Discuss participatory case planning and how working collaboratively with families strengthens the child’s well-being

Pennsylvania Child Welfare Mission and Vision “The state is committed to all Pennsylvania children and youth growing up in a safe, loving, nurturing, and permanent family and community to ensure this vision the state’s mission is to support the provision of quality services and best practices designed to ensure the safety, permanency, and well-being of Pennsylvania’s children, youth, and families.” Pennsylvania 2015-2019 Child and Family Services Plan (Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, 2014)

Values Building this Foundation Some of the values building this foundation include: Child, youth and family centered decisions Child and youth’s role and voice Collaboration Commitment to action Honest and respectful communication Pennsylvania 2015-2019 Child and Family Services Plan (Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, 2014)

Pennsylvania’s Identified Goals The Commonwealth is committed to achieving the following goals: Children and youth are free from incidents of abuse and/or neglect Children and youth achieve timely permanency Children, youth, and families receive services to ensure educational, physical, and emotional well-being Youth are supported through their transition to adulthood Children, youth, families receive quality, appropriate and effective services to meet their needs Pennsylvania 2015-2019 Child and Family Services Plan (Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, 2014)

Pennsylvania Child Welfare “Pa child welfare strives to be grounded in shared leadership, and a commitment to practice that is strength-based, solution focused and engages children, youth, and families in all facets of this work.” Pennsylvania 2015-2019 Child and Family Services Plan (Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, 2014)

Pennsylvania Child Welfare Practice Model The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Practice Model further outlines the components necessary to carry out the statewide mission. (The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center, 2013)

Pennsylvania Quality Service Review (QSR) The Pennsylvania Quality Service Review addresses many different practice performance indicators. Some of the indicators that closely relate to FGDM and family finding are: Engagement Role and Voice Teaming Maintaining Family Relationships (Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, 2016)

Pennsylvania Quality Service Review (QSR) In Round IV of the QSR, Pennsylvania scored as follows for the percentage of acceptable ratings for these indicators: Engagement: 68% of cases scored acceptable Role and Voice: 63% of cases scored acceptable Teaming: 59% of cases scored acceptable Maintaining Family Relationships: 69% of cases scored acceptable (Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, 2016)

FGDM and Family Finding FGDM and family finding are: Implemented under the same essence of strength-based and family lead practice Ultimately thought to increase the number of children staying safely in their homes and returned to their homes The goal is for state stakeholders to be united to reduce the number of children and youth who re-enter care, reduce time children and youth spend in the foster care system, reduce the level of care, increased use of kinship care when placement is needed, and increase placement stability. Pennsylvania 2015-2019 Child and Family Services Plan (Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, 2014) The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center

Effects of Legislation on Counties Some of these effects include: Family finding is not just a device to secure a placement resource for a child but is a process to create permanent connections or supports for a child in care Search options must be creative and cannot simply be basic computer searches and contacting last known addresses Networks are developed through family finding to assist in remedying the concerns for the child Judges and judicial hearing officers are required at each hearing to inquire as to the county agency’s efforts find and engage family (Act 55 of 2013; The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania, 2015 )

Core Beliefs Inherent to Family Finding Family finding’s core beliefs are: Every child has a family and every effort should be made to keep the child within that family Loneliness can be devastating and particularly felt by foster children Meaningful connections to family help a child develop a sense of belonging The most common factors in positive outcomes are meaningful connections and relationships with family (Office of Children and Families in the Courts, 2009)

Re-Entry So far, we have discussed the positive outcomes for children and youth that having meaningful relationships with family. It is also important to consider the children and youth who may not have experienced ongoing permanency and stability.

Family Finding and Re-Entry There is little research surrounding re-entry, however, it has been found that participatory case planning plays a vital role in child welfare practice to reduce re-entry. In family finding, it is not only important to find family members but to engage them in the participatory case planning process. (Hatton & Brooks, 2008)

Family Finding and Re-Entry Participatory case planning practice may appear differently in each county, however, this engagement needs be family and youth centered.   Participatory case planning includes, but is not limited to:  FGDM and family group conferencing Family team meetings/family team conferencing Team decision making meetings (Hatton & Brooks, 2008)

Re-Entry in Pennsylvania Re-entry occurs in every state across the country. In Pennsylvania there is still room for improvement. As we acknowledge in the findings of fiscal year 2016. (Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, 2017)

Table Discussion Please answer the following questions: What are you doing to address re-entry in your county? How are you using family finding and FGDM to address re-entry? Identify additional implementation strategies regarding family engagement participatory case planning that counties could use with children/youth and families experiencing re-entry from the Intake level throughout the life of a case? Please be prepared to share with the larger group.

Section IV: Family Finding and FGDM County Practice Presenter: Doug Waegel, Deputy Director of Program Services, Chester County Children, Youth, and Families

Corresponding Learning Objectives Discuss participatory case planning and how working collaboratively with families strengthens the child’s well-being

Family Finding and FGDM County Practice It is important to understand the Pennsylvania Legislation and statewide initiative of family finding and engaging families in the case planning and decision making process.   It is equally important, that each county implement family finding and engaging families in child welfare practice.

Successfully Achieving Family Finding and FGDM For family finding and FGDM to be achieved successfully, it is important for counties to uphold the state’s mission. Resources and strategies are needed to uphold the state’s mission throughout county implementation. County implementation and continuous quality improvement are dependent on many factors. Some of these factors include: Capacity Population Technology Urban/rural Cross-systems collaboration Community partnerships

County Panel Discussion Moderator: Douglas Waegel, Deputy Director of Program Services, Chester County Children, Youth and Families

Section V: Wrap-Up Douglas Waegel, Deputy Director of Program Services, Chester County Children, Youth and Families and Michelle Kahan, Esquire, York County Hearing Officer

Thank you!