Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: Classification of modeling approaches

Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: Graphical view of the radar liquid cooling simulation model

Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: Process for specification, development, and V&V of a simulation model, supported by UQ using the component output uncertainty method. The original workflow described in Ref. [24] is here detailed in terms of possible input data used and extended with two additional dash-masked steps showing the concept of using the component output uncertainty method to support the traditional model validation against the measurement data. The dashed activities represent the UQ, and the dashed arrows indicate that the UQ make use of data from the component-level validation and is a support to the model-level validation.

Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: A new uncertain component (dashed) based on an original component (in this case a pipe component) connected with an uncertainty description component (here named UC). The original component's nominal pressure drop Δpcomponent is shown, as well as the added uncertainty in the pressure drop ΔpUC.

Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: Left: Simulation results for a ±50% variation of the pressure uncertainty parameter of a pipe component with relative output uncertainty. Right: Simulation results for a ±50% variation of the temperature uncertainty parameter of a pipe component with relative output uncertainty.

Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: Left: Simulation results plotted together with the measurement data. Each dot represents a steady-state measurement point, and each circle represents a simulation result for the corresponding boundary conditions. Right: The residual E for varying mass flow, computed from S and D with corresponding boundary conditions.

Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: Histogram representing the estimated relative output uncertainty (URUC) of the pump's pressure difference

Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: Mean value comparison of heat load inlet pressure and temperature using Monte Carlo sampling and LHS, respectively

Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: Resulting PDF and CDF for the heat load inlet pressure using Monte Carlo sampling and LHS, respectively

Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: LHS 250 intervals; scatter plots including result from the linear regression, R2-values in title of each subplot

Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 2017;2(1):011006-011006-12. doi:10.1115/1.4035716 Figure Legend: Monte Carlo, 1.5 × ·105 samples; scatter plots including the result from linear regression, R2-values in title of each subplot