An Option for Increased Program Flexibility and Responsiveness A Service Plan Model for ABE Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meeting of State Commission Executive Directors Discussion of T/TA Prioirities/Issues, April 5, AC T/TA Funds projected for FY 06 Statutory Realities.
Advertisements

By V Misser. INTRODUCTION financial record management; financial record management; monitoring and evaluating spending trends; monitoring and evaluating.
Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
March 23, Todays Outcomes By the end of todays workshop, participants will be able to... Revise and/or finalize SAOs within their areas Discover.
DOL YouthBuild TA Collaborative Is Your House In Order?
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Creating an Early Childhood System Karen Ponder February 9, 2010 Arizona Early Childhood Task Force.
1 Strengthening Teaching and Learning: Educational Leadership and Professional Standards SABES Directors’ Institute July 2011.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Grant Writing Essentials
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
0 Private and Confidential Team Presentations Finance & Infrastructure, and IT Track Team Dr. M. Abul-Hamayel Dr. Musa Essayyad Dr. Ma’an Kousa Mr. Shaibu.
International Benchmarking – Comparing Like with Like– What about the Future? Ken Sloan, Director for Universities and Higher Education HESA International.
1 IT STRATEGY: S ETTING A D IRECTION FOR I NFORMATION R ESOURCES.
WAGGGS Policy & Guidelines: Adult Training, Learning and Development
Overview of UNDAF process and new guidance package March 2010 u nite and deliver effective support for countries.
Developmental Disabilities Administration Strategic Plan Process Update November 2009.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Ways EALD teachers can work in DECD schools
Technology Leadership
Donald R. Rainey, Sr., CPPB/VCO Director, Office of General Services Virginia Department of Social Services.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Dr. Jana Jagodick Polytechnic of Namibia, 2012 Project Management Chapter 3 Project Management for Strategic Goal Achievement.
Curriculum Standards in the SACSA Framework Module 7.
FLLLEX – Final Evaluation
Program Review In Student Affairs Office of the Vice President Division of Student Affairs Virginia Tech
Evaluation of Efforts to Broaden STEM Participation: Results from A Two-Day Workshop Planning Committee: Bernice Anderson Elmima Johnson Beatriz Chu Clewell.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
DISTRICT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ACADEMIC RETURN ON INVESTMENT (A-ROI)
Ahead of the Curve Social and Economic Impacts of Changing Demographics.
Review of the Operational Policies and Guidelines: key issues from a civil society perspective Sven Harmeling, Germanwatch Held.
From Output to Outcome: Quantifying Care Management Kelly A. Bruno, MSW and Danielle T. Cameron, MPH National Health Foundation Background Objectives Methods.
Outcomes-based Commissioning. What is commissioning? What is an outcome? How will we want to work with you?
University of Palestine Dept. of Urban Planning Introduction to Planning ( EAGD 3304 ) M.A. Architect: Tayseer Mushtaha Mob.:
OPTN Strategic Plan Maureen McBride United Network for Organ Sharing August 28, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Shaping Our Future Together What we Heard Alternatives and Opportunities Moving Forward February 23, 2015.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Briefing Notes.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
Planning for Results National Peer to Peer (NPtP) ROMA Training Project Goal 5 – Agencies improve capacity to Achieve Results.
WACTC 2014 Allocation and Accountability Recommendations - Briefing SBCTC October 2014.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
+ using Integrated Planning & Budget In a Participatory Governance Context Realizing our Foothill Vision 20/20.
Children’s Services Policy Early Years & Getting it Right for Every Child.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
UNESCO: Paris: June 2004 Second Global Forum on International Quality Assurance, Accreditation and the Recognition of Qualifications Widening Access.
Logic Model, Monitoring, Tracking and Evaluation Evaluation (Section T4-2)
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
CHAPTER 16 Preparing Effective Proposals. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS  Conducting a Preliminary Assessment  Prior to Writing the Proposal  How Fundable.
Commissioning Support Programme Post-16 Commissioning David Brown NASS Conference 9 th October 2009.
NFM: Modular Template Measurement Framework: Modules, Interventions and Indicators LFA M&E Training February
Single Plan For Student Achievement January 27, 2016 Los Angeles Unified School District Local District Northwest “Building Academic Excellence Through.
Facilities Planning Survey ANDERSON SCHOOL Marie Y. Judisch Activity 3 – Data Collection and Analysis EDLD 574 Field Experience.
SUNY Maritime Internal Control Program. New York State Internal Control Act of 1987 Establish and maintain guidelines for a system of internal controls.
How to Assess the Effectiveness of Your Language Access Program
OUTCOME MEASUREMENT TRAINING
Strategic Planning 3/31/2016.
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Accountability Issues in Proposal Writing
Professional development
Grant Writing 101.
Presentation transcript:

An Option for Increased Program Flexibility and Responsiveness A Service Plan Model for ABE Programs

Program Service Model Reflects a shift: In the focus in planning ABE program activities, In providing services, and In responding to accountability requirements.

This proposal… Compares two models The Existing Model Class Plan Model Suggested New Model Service Plan Model

Shared Components Both Share Access and Quality goals of the Strategic Plan. Both provide financial support and accountability measures that are essential to support adult learner goal achievement through high quality services. Both support the provision of services to our neediest and most vulnerable populations. CLASSPLANCLASSPLAN SERVICEPLANSERVICEPLAN

Shared Values Program planning that responds to learner needs and supports learner outcomes. A common foundation of services and supports necessary to foster student success. Uses Rates to fund programs to provide those supports and services. CLASSPLANCLASSPLAN SERVICEPLANSERVICEPLAN

An Accountability System that evaluates program performance and effectiveness, based on: Statement of Assurances Performance Standards Program Monitoring Shared Values (2) CLASSPLANCLASSPLAN SERVICEPLANSERVICEPLAN

What drives the need for a shift in how these shared values translate into practice? We are a system with finite resources: TIME MONEY PART-TIME STAFF

Recognize the need for structural elements What When Where AND Both models… (2) CLASSPLANCLASSPLAN SERVICEPLANSERVICEPLAN

Recognize the need for programmatic elements and outcomes~ Who Why How To What End Both models… (3) CLASSPLANCLASSPLAN SERVICEPLANSERVICEPLAN

Our system… Is fundamentally shaped by how we translate what we value into practice.

We know… That the strain on resources requires prioritization of how we spend our funding, our time, and our attention.

We know… (2) We need to consider both Structural and Programmatic/Outcome elements.

The Service Plan Model Proposes a shift in the balance of time and attention toward programmatic elements and outcomes…

The Service Plan Model (2) by giving programs the flexibility to manage resources outside of the current guidelines and rates.

Shifts the Balance What Who When Why Where How To What End The Service Plan Model… (3) CLASSPLANCLASSPLAN SERVICEPLANSERVICEPLAN

Funding and Accountability Uses rates to fund programs, not run them Ensures services and structural components through a Statement of Assurances Uses outcome and output data to gauge effectiveness

Funding and Accountability (2) Maintains a uniform level of expectation for ALL programs around standards: Student Services Staff Working Conditions Program Quality Equitable Access

Realities and Implications Programs will be able to more flexibly craft and describe their services and how those services address community and learner needs.

Realities and Implications (2) Different students will participate in different services based upon their needs and availability. It is unrealistic to expect that all/most learners will be enrolled in rates based classes at all times.

Realities and Implications (3) The needs of learners will span fiscal years~ Learner Persistence and Outcomes should be tracked across fiscal years.

Why is this context important to the work of this Performance-Based Funding Task Force? Focus on Outcomes Like performance based funding models, the service-plan model emphasizes student and program outcomes, as opposed to structural inputs.

Why is this context important to the work of this Performance-Based Funding Task Force? (2) Flexibility and Fairness If programs are to be held accountable for their performance, they must have flexibility to shape the programmatic and structural factors that impact performance.

Why is this context important to the work of this Performance-Based Funding Task Force? (3) Measurement If performance data is to drive the system, tools for collecting and reporting performance data must be able to accommodate the reality of students experiences by capturing participation beyond one fiscal year.

Why is this context important to the work of this Performance-Based Funding Task Force? (4) Endorsement The service plan model was overwhelmingly endorsed by the recent Strategic Planning Task Force. Further development of the model will be a focus of ACLS and the ABE Directors Council over the next several months.