Goal of the workshop To define an international roadmap towards colliders based on advanced accelerator concepts, including intermediate milestones, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conference xxx - August 2003 Fabrizio Gagliardi EDG Project Leader and EGEE designated Project Director Position paper Delivery of industrial-strength.
Advertisements

November 2004 The Research Infrastructures in FP7 DG RTD – Directorate ‘Structuring ERA’
Advancing Alternative Energy Technologies Glenn MacDonell Director, Energy Industry Canada Workshop on Alternatives to Conventional Generation Technologies.
SINBAD Ralph W. Aßmann Leading Scientist, DESY LAOLA Collaboration Meeting, Wismar
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
A Possible Strategy Towards a Future Lepton Collider Tor Raubenheimer SLUO Annual Meeting September 17, 2009.
Research Infrastructures The Research Infrastructures in FP7.
The current overall EU policy framework: Europe 2020 strategy, Innovation Union and Energy 2020 Strategy On March 2010, the Commission presented a Communication.
IAEA, Vienna November 2007 SOME PROSPECTS FOR IMPROVING FINANCING OF DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR POWER INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNICAL WORKSHOP ON THE ISSUES FOR THE.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
1 ESFRI and the European Roadmap for Research Infrastructures Elena Righi European Commission OPTICON, Edinburgh, June 2006.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
1 Research Infrastructures in FP7 EUDET Annual Meeting 19 October 2006, Munich Dr. Gerburg Larsen European Commission, RTD-B.3 - Research Infrastructures.
Developing a result-oriented Operational Plan Training
1 INFRA : INFRA : Scientific Information Repository supporting FP7 “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author.
ATTRACT is a proposal for an EU-funded R&D programme as part of H2020 for sensor, imaging and related computing (ICT) development Its purpose is to demonstrate.
Technology Strategy Board Driving Innovation Participation in Framework Programme 7 Octavio Pernas, UK NCP for Health (Industry) 11 th April 2012.
Draft Collaboration Model for HLLHC-DS HLLHC-DS Meeting 20th July 2010.
1 Support for New Research Infrastructures in the EU 7 th Framework Programme for Research Elena Righi European Commission SKADS Workshop, Paris, 4 September.
E.Elsen European LC Workshop, Cockcroft, UK, Jan 2007 Perspectives for European LC R&D.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and Industry Bob Jones EGEE-II Project Director Final EGEE Review CERN, May 2006.
Astroparticle Physics for Europe ASPERA – 2 Workpackage 5 1. Workpackage 5 - European-wide common calls and other common actions Deborah Miller, STFC.
Microsoft Office Project 2003: Selling EPM in your Organization Matt Wilson Business Solutions Specialist LMR Solutions.
WP8 – Innovation Support Kelly Vavasi General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) 1 st Innovation Dialogue Forum Becici, 8-9 November 2010.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Concluding remarks R. Aleksan CERN, November 25, 2005 CARE is almost 2 year old What comes next ?
“Linear collider studies: This heading includes the total funding for CTF3, the CLIC study and the CLIC/ILC collaboration as well as the CERN’s participation.
1 Tunnel implementations (laser straight) Central Injector complex.
1 ASTRONET Coordinating strategic planning for European Astronomy.
World Wide Study of Physics and Detectors for a future e + e - Linear Collider David J. Miller; towards a WWS response to ILCSC/ICFA How do we propose.
F. Richard LAL/Orsay 1 ELAN in 2006 Annual Meeting.
EuCARD-2 is co-funded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement European Network for.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
Horizon 2020 – 2016 Transport Call
CLIC project 2012 The Conceptual Design Report for CLIC completed – presented in SPC, ECFA and numerous meetings and conferences, also providing basis.
E.Elsen GDE Meeting, Beijing, Feb 2007 Perspectives and Planning for European LC R&D.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
H. PERO, E uropean Commission European policy developments and challenges in the field of Research Infrastructures.
WP leaders meeting R. Aleksan October 5 th, 2009 TIARA 1.Objectives 2.General Context 3.Building TIARA 4.Conclusion.
FISCO2 – Financial and Scientific Coordination Work Package dedicated to ENSAR2 management WP leader: Ketel Turzó WP deputy: Sandrine Dubromel ENSAR2 Management.
WP6 – Inter-operability with e-Infrastructures Sergio Andreozzi - WP6 Task Leader Strategy and Policy Manager, EGI.eu Helix Nebula - 1st Year Review 1.
Ian Bird LCG Project Leader Summary of EGI workshop.
TIARA-PP Governing Council 1 representative per contractor TIARA-PP Coordinator Industry advisory committee? Project Management (WP1) Project Office Dissemination.
Planning Engagement Kickoff
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
European Network for Novel Accelerators (EuroNNAc2): WP7
Prototyping with industry WP5: Round Table Discussion
European Network for Novel Accelerators (EuroNNAc)
From EuCARD-2 to ARIES TIARA Meeting, Warsaw, 19 June 2017
The European Strategy for Particle Physics
Input to Strategy currently planned
Coordinated Accelerator R&D in Europe
for the EURISOL Steering Committee
It is all about extreme high acceleration gradients
Introduction to the Workshop
Process of the 2nd update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics FCC week, 29 May 2017, Berlin Sijbrand de Jong, President of the CERN Council (slides.
European Network for Novel Accelerators (EuroNNAc)
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
WP4 Positioning European Astroparticle Physics in the world-wide context WP leader CNRS Partners: FOM, IFIN-HH, FRS-FNRS/FWO, FCT Total work: 22 months.
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
AMICI WP1 – Management, coordination and dissemination
TOP6 – WP4 Coordination and Management JPICH Coordination Office
Employee engagement Delivery guide
ASTRONET Coordinating strategic planning for European Astronomy
CHAIN KoM – Rome, 13 December 2010
Juan Gonzalez eGovernment & CIP operations
TOP6 – WP4 Coordination and Management JPICH Coordination Office
Presentation transcript:

Goal of the workshop To define an international roadmap towards colliders based on advanced accelerator concepts, including intermediate milestones, and to discuss the needs for international coordination. https://indico.cern.ch/event/569406/overview

Defining an international roadmap (preliminary one) Merging existing roadmaps and workshop discussions Finalize the work initiated at the workshop (WG, workshop committee)

Output of the workshop Synthesis published within the next 3 months Advanced Linear Collider roadmap proposal Other title suggestions More detailed/technical document for ESR, end of 2018: organisation to prepare it?

Do we need other workshops? How frequently? Discussion sessions at conferences (IPAC, EAAC) 1 beginning 2018 1 every two years?

HOW to set-up an ICALC? International Collaboration for Advanced Linear Collider Identify a group of researchers from different parts of the world motivated to work part of their time on collider design involvement of conventional accelerator labs With what type of funding?

From the US Strategy The significant cost of R&D facilities strongly influences the roadmap for advanced accelerator R&D. •Makes difficult (expensive) pursuit of multiple approaches in parallel. •Drives early (too early?) down-selection of approaches. •Cost strongly influenced the ARD Subpanel, which was charged to meet specific budget scenarios. •An international AARD program, with some level of international coordination, is more capable of mounting the future facilities needed to explore multiple promising approaches. Page 13

Personal vision for PWA in Europe Objectives PWA should become a technology corner stone of AS&T PWA should build a strong, united and coordinated community of developers and users PWA should carefully agree and define for which application present technical knowledge and technology is most appropriate and set realistic timescales i.e. PWA should be careful of NOT “over selling machines” that are still “dreams”: credibility is very important PWA should demonstrate that one can use this technology for user dedicated facilities, i.e. a full accelerator system should be operated reliably for users An attractive, yet realistic, roadmap and strategy for accelerators (regularly updated) should be elaborated and should be input and/or integrate national and input to international roadmaps At least one user oriented facility using PWA should be constructed in Europe in the 2020’s (should be the showcase of PWA in Europe) A Design Study for an Energy Frontier Accelerator should launched in the early 2020’s

Personal vision for PWA in Europe Objectives (cont’d) PWA community should augment the R&D in a coordinated way and use the available and planned EC instruments A European PWA R&D roadmap and strategy using the infrastructures in Europe, i.e. What R&D should be done, who does it and where… PWA should be visible at the EC level, not only for getting some funds, but also to gain credibility PWA should use the EC tools as lever arms for getting additional national funding,

Personal vision for PWA in Europe (cont’d) How to achieve the above objectives Continue and Amplify collaborative R&D Why : to get full system multistage reference simulation code(s) to bring the technology to higher TRL to build up a large community with common R&D objectives Who : All communities interested in PWA technologies, including labs, universities and industry How : through ARIES and future TIARA coordinated initiatives Reinforce the coordination with a larger integration of European partners Why : to increase visibility and community weight in Europe to provide access to existing R&D infrastructures Who : All communities interested in PWA technologies, in particular relevant infrastructure owners How : through ARIES (EuroNNAc and PBT) through Education and Training activities dedicated to PWA

Personal vision for PWA in Europe (cont’d) Roadmap and Strategy of PWA with clear priorities before 2019 Why: - to provide a high visibility of PWA in Europe - to show coordinated, united and mature community to the decision makers - to have PWA strategy partially included in other roadmap/strategy (e.g. PP, Light Source, Laser…) Who: - All communities interested in PWA technologies, including at government levels How: - through EuroNNAc and dedicated workshops (e.g. EAAC2017…) (Why not setting up a strategy preparatory group as for PP?) - by being active and participating to national roadmaps

Personal vision for PWA in Europe (cont’d) Be ready to propose the construction of a user oriented accelerator in Europe in 2018-2019 with credible site(s) Why : to demonstrate the usability and appropriateness of PWA to provide a clear option for States and decision makers to be included in Roadmap such as ESFRI, PP, Light Sources… to be included in H2020 calls of Preparatory Phases Who : All partners interested in constructing a user-oriented facility including at government levels How : through EuPRAXIA, the success of which is mandatory Engage in the preparation of a HE frontier DS proposal Why : to (possibly) be included in Roadmap such as ESFRI, PP, Light Sources… to be included in H2020 calls of DS in 2019 Who : All partners interested in studying a user-oriented energy frontier facility, including at government levels How : Set up a Task Force, Down selecting technologies for a proposal!

Do we need dedicated facilities? Do existing facilities correspond to our needs?

Strategy for funding AARD for collider applications? involvement of conventional labs