Constructional requirements from ITk-Strips

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Endcap assembly update C Buttar UK-SCT-MB RAL 2 nd Sept 04.
Advertisements

ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
ATLAS Module building at Glasgow
Design Ash finished electric hybrid tracing to connector fields –Changes to allow for HCC-less and HCC running on one hybrid awaiting final confirmation.
4/25/2006 Puneeth Kalavase, UC, Santa Barbara On behalf of US Tracker Outer Barrel group Construction and Testing of CMS “Rods”
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
QA during Stave Core Assembly Stephanie Qing Yang (Oxford) 25 th Sept 2014 WP4 f2f meeting at RAL.
CMS ECAL End Cap EDR Meeting CERN 28 Nov. to 29 Nov 2000 A.B.Lodge - RAL 1 ECAL End Cap CMS ECAL End Cap Engineering Design Review. EDR meeting held 28.
ATLAS Tracker Upgrade Stave Collaboration Workshop Oxford 6-9 February 2012 ABC 130 Hybrid.
13 Dec. 2007Switched Capacitor DCDC Update --- M. Garcia-Sciveres1 Pixel integrated stave concepts Valencia 2007 SLHC workshop.
17/06/2010UK Valencia RAL Petals and Staves Meeting 1 DC-DC for Stave Bus Tapes Roy Wastie Oxford University.
Material calculation of petal core variants Sergio Díez Cornell with input from many people CERN AUW, 3 rd Nov 2014.
Stave Core QC Peter Sutcliffe RAL 24 th Sept 2014.
VELO upgrade Front-end ECS LHCb upgrade electronics meeting 12 April 2012 Martin van Beuzekom on behalf of the VELO upgrade group Some thoughts, nothing.
1 WP3 Bi-Weekly Meeting Activities at Liverpool 1.Evaluation of Compact DCDC converter Designed to match up to an ABC130 module 2.Status of FIB’d hybrid/module.
Silicon Inner Layer Sensor PRR, 8 August G. Ginther Update on the D0 Run IIb Silicon Upgrade for the Inner Layer Sensor PRR 8 August 03 George Ginther.
A.A. Grillo SCIPP-UCSC ATLAS 10-Nov Thoughts on Data Transmission US-ATLAS Upgrade R&D Meeting UCSC 10-Nov-2005 A. A. Grillo SCIPP – UCSC.
Stave Module Status Tony Affolder The University of Liverpool On behalf of cast of thousands… ATLAS Upgrade Week November 10,
ATLAS SCT End-Cap C Integration 1.Introduction: to the SCT within ATLAS 2.End-Cap C Reception at CERN 3.Final Assembly 4.Integration with the TRT 5.Combined.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
2 Silicon pixel part Done and to be written Written! Under way To be done Introduction 1.Hybrid Pixel Assembly Concept 2.Silicon sensor 1.First thinned.
Strip Module Working Group Meeting 16 th May 2012 Hybrids A Greenall.
Strip Stave cores Stephanie Yang ATLAS upgrade Oxford activities, January 2015.
Michał Dwużnik, for the SCT collaboration
Thermo-mechanical petal status Sergio Díez Cornell 23Jan 2015.
BNL Role In ITK 1.Current R&D Roles 2.Proposed Production Role 3.Activities now until TDR (early 2017) 4.Resources and Infrastructure 5.Personnel 1 D.
1M. Ellis - 17th May 2007 SciFi Decoding (Everything you never wanted to know but couldn’t avoid going over and over)  VLSB Data (unpacking to AFE, MCM,
Stave Hybrid/Module Status. Modules Stave Module Building 2 Mechanical Chip Gluings Mechanical Wirebonding Electrical Chip Gluings Electrical Wirebondings.
Neil Jackson University of Liverpool Hiroshima Symposium June THE ATLAS SEMICONDUCTOR TRACKER (SCT) A PRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE ATLAS.
End-of-stave region. 2 Space Z-dimension is critical –Keep gap small (might help getting rid of stubs) Edge of last barrel silicon (at corner) is 1277.
Peter W. PhillipsATLAS SCT Week, CERN, September/October 2002 Electrical Tests of SCT modules using RODs Peter W Phillips Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
ABC130 Hybrid/module and HCC Bond Detail ABC130 Left & Right Handed Hybrid and Module Topology Original proposal – same flavour hybrids Hybrid-module.
23/01/2007ID Software Workshop1 SCT performance from the SR1 endcap data Satoru Mima Okayama University ID Software Meeting 23-Jan Noise Study -
Strip Tracker Costing Analysis Status Carl Haber July 25, 2011.
Sergio Díez Cornell, Berkeley Lab (USA),
EOS and type I Prototype Service Modules Mike Dawson (Oxford), Rob Gabrielczyk (RAL), John Noviss (RAL) 19 th January 2015 ATLAS Upgrade Activities, Oxford.
UK Participation in phase-II tracker upgrade o Brief Overview of R&D work to date1 slide o Scope of Interest of UK institutes2 slides o Task list & Institute.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Stave Core Electrical Considerations Ned Spencer (UCSC), Sergio Diez (DESY), David Lynn (BNL) Local Support Assembly, AUW Nov
Steinar Stapnes, LHCC June The ATLAS inner detector TRT endcap A+B TRT endcap C TRT barrel SCT barrel SCT endcap Pixels uWhole ID sits inside bore.
SLHC SCT Hybrid (CERN 2nd July 2007)1 SLHC SCT Hybrid Concept Ashley Greenall The University of Liverpool.
Noise results from SR1 combined SCT barrel tests Summary of some initial results Alan Barr, UCL Pepe Bernabeu, Valencia.
Serial Power Distribution for the ATLAS SCT Upgrade John Matheson Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the SP Community Thanks to Richard Holt (RAL),
Charles University in Prague Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Brief presentation Zdenek Dolezal.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
EC: 7 DISK concept Preliminary considerations
ASICs1 Drain Current Digitizer Chip (DCD) Status and Future Plans.
Si Sensors for Additional Tracker
Berkeley status Aug 10th, 2012.
of the Upgraded LHCb Readout System
ATLAS Internal ID Service Integration
Summary LBNL LSWG meeting
MODULE QUALIFICATION STATUS AT LIVERPOOL
End-cap Mechanics FDR Overview of the Project
? ENDCAP: Mechanics IFIC-Valencia.
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Mechanics: (Tim).
Mini-drawers, FE-ASIC , Integrator
Graham Beck, QMUL, WP4 RAL 2 May 2013
Database requirements from ITk-Strips for DAQ loads
LOI Backup Document: R&D
ATLAS ITK WP3 WP3 Bi-weekly meeting
Design and fabrication of Endcap prototype sensors (petalet)
Radiation Laboratory Meeting
RPC Detector Control System
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
RPC Detector Control System
Changes in the Canadian Census of Population Program
Updates on the Silicon Tracker 2S Module
Presentation transcript:

Constructional requirements from ITk-Strips Andy Blue, on behalf of ITK strips community

Contents Breakdown of components for Strips Upgrade Max numbers of parts in the Build What do we want to record? Suggestions Visual Inspection Photos Integration with RFiD & Barcodes Naming Conventions Summary Meeting on ITk production databases

Strip Tracker Components Attempted to contact as many as possible to get outline/ideas for the strip community’s plans for production numbers & database preferences Based on LOI layout 5 layers, stubs, etc. However LOI is “worst case” scenario in terms of no of parts All other cases would see reduction in part numbers List is also incomplete Other necessary components for the build GBT’s, Fibre optics, DCDC/SP boards, HV switches etc. And does not detail 1MHz Readout designs New hybrids, multiplexing chips…. Meeting on ITk production databases

Strip Tracker ‘Parts’ Very simplistic outline for just now Stave/ Petal Cores Tapes Eos Staves/Petal s Sensors ABC ASICs Modules Hybrids HCCs Will work this way Panels Meeting on ITk production databases

Strip Tracker Components From LOI CERN-LHCC-2012-022 ; LHCC-I-023 Meeting on ITk production databases

Strip Tracker Components HCC Multiplexing ASIC Sensor Hybrid LV Powering Board (Liverpool, RAL & BNL) ABC ASIC Barrel Module: Composed of 2 Hybrids and 1 sensor Each Hybrid has 10 x ABC130 readout chips 1 x HCC multiplexing chip 1 x LV Powering board Meeting on ITk production databases

Strip Tracker Components R5 module R4 module R3 module R2 module R1 module R0 module S0 S1 H0 H1 H2 H3 Petal: Composed of 5 different modules with 13 Hybrid variants 7-12 x ABC130 readout chips /Hybrid ~1 x HCC multiplexing chi/Hybrid ~1 x LV Powering board Meeting on ITk production databases

Assumptions Item ‘Pass’ Yields (%) Stave / Petal Mounting 100% + 1% Spare Module Production 95 Hybrid Production ABC ASIC Probing 90 HCC ASIC Probing Sensors I will now go through the estimated numbers for each component in the build Meeting on ITk production databases

Numbers: Barrel No Staves 216 256 128 600 606 Modules /Stave(Stub) 26 Short Strip Staves Long Strip Staves Stubs Total (After yield) Totals No Staves 216 256 128 600 606 Modules /Stave(Stub) 26 4 No Modules 5616 6656 512 12784 13557 Hybrids/Module 2 1 No. Hybrids 11232 18400 20489 No. ABC ASICs 112320 66560 5120 184000 225377 No. HCCs No. DCDC/SP Boards 13357 Meeting on ITk production databases

# Modules/Both sides of Petal Numbers: Endcap # Modules Total After Yield Total R5 Modules 1792 1810 R4 Modules R3 Modules R2 Modules 896 905 R1 Modules R0 Modules 8064 8552 Endcap # Disks 14 # Petals/Disk 32 # Petals 448 # Modules/Both sides of Petal 18 # Modules 8064 R5 R4 R3 R2 R1 R0

Numbers: Endcap R1 to R4 Hybrids Hybrids 105 % Hybrids ABC ASICs/Hybrid #ABC ASICs For 100% #ABC ASICs for 105% R5 H0 896 941 9 8145 8553 R5 H1 R4 H0 8 7240 7602 R4 H1 R3 H0 7 6335 6652 R3 H1 R3 H2 R3 H3 R2 H0 12 10860 11403 R1 H0 11 9955 10453 R1 H1 R0 H0 R0 H1 Total 11648 12233 113 102265 107382

And Finally Endcap Totals After Yield Totals Modules 8064 8552 Hybrids 11648 12223 ABC ASICs 107832 112752 HCCs Barrel Totals After Yield Totals Modules 12784 13557 Hybrids 18400 20489 ABC ASICs 184000 225377 HCCs Will use these numbers as the basis for the following build numbers Of course these numbers will change once the yield estimates become more fixed Meeting on ITk production databases

What do we want to record? –Stave/Petal Core Item Data Type Comments Foam Block Lot number from manufacturer Density Pipe Lot number Pressure test results Flow tests/impedance Epoxy Facings Pre-preg number Bus Tape excel or text file, photos in jpeg Resistance measurements in excel Survey results Electrical tests Honeycomb Meeting on ITk production databases

What do we want to record? –Stave/Petal Tests Item Data Type Comments QC results excel file excel file, plots Component weights Flatness/thickness Bending Statistics Thermal Performance Delamination Tests Petal/Stave electrical test .dat , eps 3 point Gain Threshold Noise Occupancy Meeting on ITk production databases

What do we want to record? - Modules Item Data Type Comments Hybrids .dat , eps 3 Point Gain Threshold Noise Occupancy # dead, masked channels ABC ASICs Wafer map, .dat, .eps Wafer tests Sensors .dat I-V C-V bow for some Modules # dead, masked channels survey HCC Bustape ?? Data from tape testing Meeting on ITk production databases

What do we want to record? Currently .eps/.ps files produced from hybrids and module scans are ~1.2Mb Strobe delay + Threshold scan + Noise Occupancy scan ~= 4Mb/object ~54k Objects* = ~ 216 GB *this is just hybrids and modules and doesn’t include dat/txt files Meeting on ITk production databases

What do we want to record? We would like to trace "service" material Glues Jigs Test frames Test setups From EC database experience “We were able to trace the number of components available, where we could expect shortage of them, etc.” “This saved us in a couple of occasions. It also helped to monitor the learning slope of the production and to detect weak points in the chain…” Meeting on ITk production databases

Visual Inspection - Photos Has been a request to have the ability to add photos Trace defects/visual inspection stage through Sensor -> Hybrid -> Module -> Stave/Petal assembly ~ 54k objects (hybrids + modules) x 3 photos = 150k photos This an issue? Meeting on ITk production databases

RFiD - Barcodes Strips community have began to integrate RFiDs onto hybrids. The current design for the ABC130 Barrel Hybrids use LXMS31ACNA-010 EPC memory (Electronic Product Code): 240 bit unique device ID User memory: 512 bits TID: 64 bits, unique address assigned by the IC manufacturer Scanning of RFiDs could also allow tracing of components throughout the build project Beginning to think about linking RFiD IDs of hybrids to any future database naming conventions Meeting on ITk production databases

Naming Conventions Still at early stages for Barrel More developed for Endcap due to greater number of Hybrids/Modules (next slide) So far only gone as far as convention for actual objects Not where it was made/location etc. Meeting on ITk production databases

Naming Conventions For EC, numbering scheme to be implemented, e.g. R0H1S0 (Ring 0, Hybrid 1, Sensor 0). R5 module R4 module R3 module R2 module R1 module R0 module S0 S1 H0 H1 H2 H3 Meeting on ITk production databases

Summary Hopefully we have been able to gather information that will help for Components Max part numbers Input to database Developing all the time We have (at present ) have no input regarding “type of database” Feedback seems to be the previous SCT database was very good Meeting on ITk production databases