Technical Workshop on Gender and Irrigation Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Small-Scale Irrigation Technical Workshop on Gender and Irrigation To insert your implementing partner institutional logo, go to View >> Slide Master, and replace the gray box with your logo, placing it to the right of the USAID logo at the bottom. No text or partner logos can be placed within the upper blue banner. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, March 9-10, 2016 Photo credit: IWMI Flickr, Ghana, 2011; Passarelli, Ghana, 2015

Workshop objectives: Key question: What gender issues matter in irrigation/agricultural water management? To do this, we will: Exchange knowledge and learn from each other’s experiences Develop a diagnostic checklist Learn about communication strategies Join a network and stay in touch to collaborate in the future!

Write down on your index card and then meet someone new to share: What are your main challenges to addressing gender in your current work? Examples: knowledge gaps on specific topics; uncertainties in how to design, implement, or monitor; internal capacity within organization; support within the organization for gender work What do you hope to get out of this workshop and why? Examples: specific tools, concepts, approaches Participants given different colored index cards for 1 and 2 Post

Case Studies Day 1: Form groups Take volunteers for rapporteurs (stay with 1 case study) Note taker, stays with the case study, reports back during debrief Count off 1 to 5 to form 1 group per case study Start in the case study of your group number After 30 minutes, rotate to the next case study on the list: Nigist Shiferaw, Send a Cow Dr. Tizita Mulugeta, Agricultural Transformation Agency Tibebu Koji, Oxfam America Dr. Seifu Admassu, Bahirdar University/ILSSI Likie Nigussie, IWMI Stay with their group Cant’ choose what case study you go to – have to go to the next one on the list

Case Studies: discussion guidelines 10 minute presentation on the case 15 minutes discussion using the checklist What gender issues are most important in this case study? How was gender addressed in this case study? (or could be) 5 minute synthesis discussion on suggestions for the checklist: What questions worked best? What questions should be added? Then ROTATE TO THE NEXT CASE STUDY 30 minutes per case study Make sure to clearly indicate NUMBER for each case study – use same as in agenda for clarity

Case Studies Day 2: Form groups Take volunteers for rapporteurs (stay with 1 case study) Count off 1 to 4 to form 1 group per case study Start in the case study of your group number After 30 minutes, rotate to the next case study on the list: Lemessa Mekonta, IRC Likie Nigussie, IWMI Dr. Meron Teferi Taye, Water and Land Resource Centre/REACH Dr. Kebede Manjur and Dr. Shewit Abraham, Mekelle University Stay with their group Cant’ choose what case study you go to – have to go to the next one on the list

Brief overview of the case (where and what is the project) Case Studies: Rapporteur reports back on: (5 minutes per rapporteur, 30 min total) Brief overview of the case (where and what is the project) 2-3 questions that worked well to identify gender issues (checklist questions or others) 2-3 suggestions for the checklist

Case Studies: Checklist experts Choose a section of the checklist to become an expert on Household and community-level Access to technology Water governance Impacts of irrigation Assign people – they can trade if they want Likie, Elizabeth, and Sophie go to each group and assign people a section of the checklist Sophie will introduce the three sections and that we will ask for a leader in each group for each section

15 minutes to discuss this section of the checklist: Form small groups with other checklist experts (household, community, impacts) 15 minutes to discuss this section of the checklist: What worked well? What didn’t work well? What should be changed, questions to add? Report back to the group (5 minutes per group, 15 minutes total) Choose 2-3 things to change or questions to add? During the tea break, use the time to get tea and then go to your groups. Leaders/experts go to their groups – others can choose which section they want to discuss. Will save notes and circulate on each case study after – so don’t worry about too much detail people can get it later

Thrive Blog: Big Question Series Show at some point Encourage people to comment and add their questions We will do a synthesis post Can also write a blog pots in response if they are interested

Findings from Day 1 Intentions Fill in here with insights/groupings from intention setting activity Emphasis of workshop Remaining gaps What else do we still need to know?

Closing discussion for small groups: What did you find most useful from this workshop? In what ways did the workshop help you prepare to overcome challenges to gender integration in your work? How do you plan to use what you learned from this workshop in your work? What are remaining knowledge gaps? Take a few minutes to look at the index cards from day 1 with people’s intentions to remember what you wanted to learn from the workshop. Get in small groups and discuss these 3 questions; Designate a note taker and someone to report back Have notetaker write on the flip chart so we get to keep the notes afterwards

Thank you! Source: IWMI.