The Bologna Process Bergen, May

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
Advertisements

Quality, the assurance of improvement. Student Involvement in QA processes: The Catalan experience Esteve Arboix Madrid, October 2006.
Prof. V.J. Papazoglou on behalf of the Hellenic Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (HQAA) ENQA Seminar on Current Trends in the European Quality.
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
The role of Agency for Science and Higher Education Prof.dr.sc. Jasmina Havranek.
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
An Overview of Quality Assurance in the EHEA by Prof. Andreas G. Orphanides President of EURASHE, Rector of European University Cyprus, and Ex-President.
CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
HRK HRK Hochschulrektorenkonferenz 1 Higher Education in Germany Current Status and Challenges German-South African Rectors’ Forum 15 April 2013, Leipzig.
Law on Higher Education in the Republic of Macedonia Snezana Bilic – Sotiroska Coordinator National Tempus Office Ministry of Education and Science.
EUA Convention of European Higher Education Institutions Graz, May 2003 Theme III Consolidating a Quality Culture in Europe’s Universities.
Education and Culture LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FORMER GENERATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN RUSSIAN FEDERATION José Gutierrez Erasmus+ : Higher.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Implementing the Bologna Process: The experience of Estonia Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality.
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
Ministry of Education and Youth Republic of Moldova 1 Implementing the Bologna Process in the Republic of Moldova: Achievements and Problems Viorelia Moldovan-Batrinac,
University of Bologna, Italy TEMPUS LV-TEMPUS-SMHES – HESDESPI
Higher Education and Research: Mission and Interaction David Crosier CONFERENCE TO LAUNCH WORK ON A MASTER PLAN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN ALBANIA Tirana,
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
The European Dimension of Quality Assurance Henrik Toft Jensen EUA Conference “Quality Assurance in Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training.
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
National and institutional strategies in a changing landscape: A Norwegian reform proposal Sverre Rustad Vilnius, 17 April 2008.
Institutional Autonomy Thomas Estermann Head of Unit Governance, Autonomy & Funding Lithuanian Society of Young Researchers Conference Vilnius, Lithuania.
Quality Assurance Tools in the Management of Internationalization TEMPUS IV Project Tempus-2008-DE-JPGR Olena Tupakhina, Zaporizhzhya National University,
Bologna Process Information Briefing Tbilisi, Georgia 22 July 2008  Cynthia Deane  Ireland (With thanks to Prof Andejs Rauhvergers, Chairman of Stocktaking.
Information Session University of Novi Sad 20 November, 2007 TEMPUS IV.
The Governance and Management of European Universities – Future Trends Thomas Estermann Senior Programme Manager European University Association Targu.
Trends 2015 The implementation of the European Higher Education Area – 15 years on. Presentation and discussion on what the impact has been for European.
 Miločer, July 5,  The Law on Higher Education was adopted by the Parliament in October 21, 2003  This Law regulates the bases of higher education,
Legal framework for student participatiing in decison making process in Serbia V. Dondur University of Belgrade-Faculty of physical chemistry CAQA, HERE.
Improving the recognition system Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers President, Lisbon Convention Committee.
Strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of the Bologna Process: Spain Round Table Bratislava,10-12 October Guillermo Bernabeu, University of Alicante.
Dr Krzysztof Pawłowski Founder, former Rector, President of WSB-NLU in Nowy Sącz The wonderful world of a subsidized European university versus the terrible.
Curriculum reform Tirana 16th-17th March. A bit about ESIB ESIB-the National Unions of students in Europe is an umbrella organization representing over.
NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN AZERBAIJAN Prof. Dr. Natig YUSIFOV Azerbaijan University.
WORKSHOP 6: Quality Assurance after Bergen: Implementing the European Standards Contributions from Quality Assurance Networks Francisco Marcellán Director.
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
Funding and Governance of Higher Education in Norway Senior Adviser Mads Gravås Yerevan/Armenia/September
University autonomy and governance Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008.
University of Tirana. The University of Tirana was founded on 16 September 1957 under the name of State University of Tirana. The State University of.
Outline of the presentation Historic development Main principles Standards and guidelines Areas Stakeholders Internal QA, external QA, QA agencies Trends.
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
University governance in the Tempus countries Recent developments.
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
1 My background Experience from the Swedish Ministry for 5 years and the National Agency for HE for 3 years + Rector.
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CULTURE IN ROMANIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Regional Conference „From Quality Assurance to Quality Culture” Sarajevo, 5-6 december.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
For learning and competence The Finnish approach to NQF/EQF Dr. Carita Blomqvist, Head of Unit, Counsellor of Education Finnish National Board of Education.
Quality assurance, learning outcomes and qualification frameworks Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Principles of Good Governance
The Bologna Process and Tuning Project: Educational Structures in Europe Dag Wiese Schartum.
Accountability: an EU perspective
01/14/02 EUA CONVENTION of HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS General Introduction Eric FROMENT President Iits our way of implementing ther action plan since.
PEOPLES’ FRIENDSHIP UNIVERSITY OF RUSSIA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR
Quality Assurances System. Where we came from and where we are now
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
NATIONAL ACTION PLANS FOR RECOGNITION
Managers and Organizations
Introduction to the training
- Quality Assurance – Current perspectives
INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB
Per Nyborg Development in European co-operation
Quality assurance of higher education in the European Higher Education Area - developments and ways forward Paula Ranne, Deputy Director European Association.
The EU modernisation agenda for universities
quality culture in the EHEA
European Style Pilot Evaluations in Azerbaijan Higher Education Baku 20 June 2017 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Project Leader.
Recognition of Qualifications as a stepping stone for further integration Brussels, 26 June 2018.
WORKSHOPS RESULTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Presentation transcript:

The Bologna Process Bergen, 19-20 May Report from working group 4 INSTITUTIONAL AUTONOMY AND GOVERNANCE Rapporteur Christina Ullenius

How should public responsibility and institutional autonomy be balanced in the Bologna Process for optimal co-operation and division of labour between public authorities and autonomous institutions? Are there elements of institutional autonomy that are essential to the Bologna Process?

Does increasing institutional autonomy imply a stronger and more centralized institutional leadership? (Such as the appointment of a University President by the Executive Board instead of the Academic Senate electing a Rector?).

Does increasing institutional autonomy imply a stronger influence from external decision-makers (ministry of education) on the composition of the institutional leadership? Finally Should this theme be brought forward for further discussion in the Bologna process after Bergen?

Autonomy - accountability Autonomy defined within a legal framework Higher education institutions accountable to society at large Governments accountable to HEI for providing the necessary means to achieve Bologna objectives

The necessary means to obtain Bologna objectives A legal framework and financial means Trends IV identifies national level regulation that interferes with or restricts implementation of change Creative HEIs in a decentralised system contribute best to Bologna objectives; mobility, compatibility, comparability. How do we prove that we do the job better if we have autonomy on some issues?

The necessary means to obtain Bologna objectives – to be granted to HEI A legal framework; formal autonomy Academic autonomy; curricula, programs Financial autonomy; to prioritise Admission of students Recruitment, selection and management of staff Internal structure, governing bodies, etc

The necessary means to obtain Bologna objectives - governments A legal framework; State regulated degree structure Standardised credit system, e.g. ECTS Student support

Guiding principles Governance should be developed in balance with cultural framework Grant student participation Transparent decision-making structures Interaction with stake-holders Improved managerial skills in HEI leadership Avoid overregulation

Conclusions: There are issues to be brought forward in the Bologna process Best practice in governance? Change is necessary Remove legal obstacles to change and creativity Focus on QA, outcomes Trust in institutions to take charge of implementation of the Bologna process