Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
Various ways to beat the Standard Quantum Limit Yanbei Chen California Institute of Technology.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL Feb. 16 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
Experiments towards beating quantum limits Stefan Goßler for the experimental team of The ANU Centre of Gravitational Physics.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Experimental Characterization of Frequency Dependent Squeezed Light R. Schnabel, S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, and K. Danzmann.
Optomechanical Devices for Improving the Sensitivity of Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunnong Zhao for Australian International Gravitational wave Research.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
Quantum noise observation and control A. HeidmannM. PinardJ.-M. Courty P.-F. CohadonT. Briant O. Arcizet T. CaniardJ. Le Bars Laboratoire Kastler Brossel,
S. ChelkowskiSlide 1WG1 Meeting, Birmingham 07/2008.
LIGO-G R Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala PAC 12, MIT June 2002 Present status and future plans.
Some Ideas About a Vacuum Squeezer A.Giazotto INFN-Pisa.
Opto-mechanics with a 50 ng membrane Henning Kaufer, A. Sawadsky, R. Moghadas Nia, D.Friedrich, T. Westphal, K. Yamamoto and R. Schnabel GWADW 2012,
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Optical Spring Experiments With The Glasgow 10m Prototype Interferometer Matt Edgar.
AIC, LSC / Virgo Collaboration Meeting, 2007, LLO Test-mass state preparation and entanglement in laser interferometers Helge Müller-Ebhardt, Henning Rehbein,
Opening our eyes to QND technical issues (workshop and open forum) “It’ll be the blind leading the blind” - Stan Whitcomb “You can see a lot by looking”
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Advanced Gravitational-wave Detector Technologies
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Detuned Twin-Signal-Recycling
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Squeezing in Gravitational Wave Detectors
Quantum noise reduction using squeezed states in LIGO
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
New directions for terrestrial detectors
Overview of quantum noise suppression techniques
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Yet another SQL? Tobias Westphal
MIT Corbitt, Goda, Innerhofer, Mikhailov, Ottaway, Pelc, Wipf Caltech
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Quantum Noise in Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Quantum Noise in Gravitational-wave Detectors
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen February 2004
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005
Advanced LIGO Quantum noise everywhere
Quantum Optics and Macroscopic Quantum Measurement
Squeezed states in GW interferometers
Quantum studies in LIGO Lab
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Advanced LIGO A Quantum Limited Interferometer
LIGO Quantum Schemes NSF Review, Oct
Nergis Mavalvala MIT December 2004
“Traditional” treatment of quantum noise
Squeezed Input Interferometer
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Advanced Optical Sensing
Radiation pressure induced dynamics in a suspended Fabry-Perot cavity
Measurement of radiation pressure induced dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005

Advanced LIGO

A Quantum Limited Interferometer LIGO I Ad LIGO Seismic Suspension thermal Test mass thermal Quantum

Limiting Noise Sources: Optical Noise Shot Noise Uncertainty in number of photons detected a Higher circulating power Pbs a low optical losses Frequency dependence a light (GW signal) storage time in the interferometer Radiation Pressure Noise Photons impart momentum to cavity mirrors Fluctuations in number of photons a Lower power, Pbs Frequency dependence a response of mass to forces Shot noise: Laser light is Poisson distributed  sigma_N = sqrt(N) dE dt >= hbar  d(N hbar omega) >= hbar  dN dphi >= 1 Radiation Pressure noise: Pressure fluctuations are anti-correlated between cavities  Optimal input power depends on frequency

Initial LIGO

Sub-Quantum Interferometers

Some quantum states of light Analogous to the phasor diagram Stick  dc term Ball  fluctuations Common states Coherent state Vacuum state Amplitude squeezed state Phase squeezed state McKenzie

Squeezed input vacuum state in Michelson Interferometer GW signal in the phase quadrature Not true for all interferometer configurations Detuned signal recycled interferometer  GW signal in both quadratures Orient squeezed state to reduce noise in phase quadrature X+ X- X+ X- X+ X-

Back Action Produces Squeezing Vacuum state enters anti-symmetric port Amplitude fluctuations of input state drive mirror position Mirror motion imposes those amplitude fluctuations onto phase of output field b1 b2 f Squeezing produced by back-action force of fluctuating radiation pressure on mirrors a1 a2 “In” mode at omega_0 +/- Omega  |in> = exp(+/- 2*j* beta) S(r, phi) |out> Heisenberg Picture: state does not evolve, only operators do. So |out> vacuum state is squeezed by factor sinh(r) = kappa/2 and angle phi = 0.5 arcot(kappa/2). Spectral densities assuming input vacuum state: S_b1 = exp(-2 r) ~ 1/kappa when kappa >> 1 S_b2 = exp(+2 r) ~ kappa S_{b1 b2} = 0

Frequency-dependent coupling constant Couples radiation pressure to mirror motion Newton’s law Cavity pole a b Amplitude  b1 = a1 Phase  b2 = -k a1 + a2 + h Radiation Pressure Shot Noise

Sub-quantum-limited interferometer Narrowband Broadband Broadband Squeezed X+ X- Quantum correlations Input squeezing

Squeezing – the ubiquitous fix? All interferometer configurations can benefit from squeezing Radiation pressure noise can be removed from readout in certain cases Shot noise limit only improved by more power (yikes!) or squeezing (eek!) Reduction in shot noise by squeezing can allow for reduction in circulating power (for the same sensitivity) – important for power-handling

Squeezed vacuum Requirements Generation methods Challenges Squeezing at low frequencies (within GW band) Frequency-dependent squeeze angle Increased levels of squeezing Generation methods Non-linear optical media (c(2) and c(3) non-linearites)  crystal-based squeezing Radiation pressure effects in interferometers  ponderomotive squeezing Challenges Frequency-dependence  filter cavities Amplitude filters Squeeze angle rotation filters Low-loss optical systems

Squeezing using back-action effects

The principle A “tabletop” interferometer to generate squeezed light as an alternative to nonlinear optical media Use radiation pressure as the squeezing mechanism Relies on intrinsic quantum physics of optical field-mechanical oscillator correlations Squeezing produced even when the sensitivity is far worse than the SQL Due to noise suppression a la optical springs

The Ponderomotive Interferometer

High circulating laser power High-finesse cavities Key ingredients High circulating laser power 10 kW High-finesse cavities 15000 Light, low-noise mechanical oscillator mirror 1 gm with 1 Hz resonant frequency Optical spring Detuned arm cavities

Optical Springs Modify test mass dynamics Suppress displacement noise (compared to free mass case) Why not use a mechanical spring? Displacements due to thermal noise introduced by the high frequency (mechanical) spring will wash out the effects of squeezing Connect low-frequency mechanical oscillator to (nearly) noiseless optical spring An optical spring with a high resonant frequency will not change the thermal force spectrum of the mechanical pendulum Use a low resonant frequency mechanical pendulum to minimize thermal noise Use an optical spring to produce a flat response out to higher frequencies

Detuned cavity for optical spring Positive detuning Detuning increases Cavity becomes longer Power in cavity decreases Radiation-pressure force decreases Mirror ‘restored’ to original position Cavity becomes shorter Power in cavity increases Mirror still ‘restored’ to original position

Assumed experimental parameters

Noise budget

Noise budget – Equivalent displacement

What do we already know? Detailed simulation of noise couplings Uses first fully quantum mechanical simulation code for a GW interferometer (Corbitt) Used in AdLIGO simulations (Fritschel and Popescu) “Exported” to Hannover and Glasgow (Schnabel and Strain) Location and infrastructure LASTI laser, vacuum envelop and seismic isolation Cavity geometrical parameters Mini-mirror suspensions

High finesse cavity tests What’s next Design completion Suspension Control system High finesse cavity tests Suspended-mirror high-finesse cavity – optical tests, laser characterization Suspended mini-mirror – includes mirror dynamics and radiation-pressure coupling Complete interferometer

Why is this interesting/important? First ever (?) demonstration of radiation-pressure induced squeezing Probes quantum mechanics of optical field-mechanical oscillator coupling at 1 g mass scales Test of low noise optical spring Suppression of thermal noise Simulations and techniques useful for AdLIGO and other GW interferometers Quantum optical simulation package Michelson detuning Role of feedback control in these quantum systems

QND techniques needed to do better Conclusions Advanced LIGO is expected to reach the quantum noise limit in most of the band QND techniques needed to do better Squeezed states of the EM field appears to be a promising approach Factors of 2 to 5 improvements foreseeable in the next decade Not fundamental but technical Need to push on this to be ready for third generation instruments