Continuing Authorities Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Regulatory Program.
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers Budgeting Process
Plan Formulation: General
F1B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Risk Management Module F1: Authorities and Policies.
FDR1 - 1 Flood Risk management History/Mission/Policies.
BUILDING STRONG ® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District SARASOTA COUNTY – LIDO KEY HURRICANE & STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT City of Sarasota.
Restoring and protecting Louisiana’s coast January 18, 2011 CPRA Meeting David Peterson Asst. Attorney General and AG Designee to CPRA Civil Division Lands.
US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.
Post-Hurricane Ivan Emergency Habitat Restoration Larry E. Parson – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District Linda S. Lillycrop - U.S. Army Corps.
Sacramento District Regional Vegetation Variance Paige Caldwell, P.E. Emergency Manager.
Land Reclamation Eric Angat Teacher. 1. The Appalachian Region extend from _____________to ___________ MississippiNew York This Land is from Africa. Mississippi.
Flood Avoidance and Mitigation
Corps Regional Sediment Management and Habitat Restoration: Cape May, NJ J. Bailey Smith National Planning Center of Expertise for Coastal Storm Damage.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Overview of Public Law (PL) Advanced Measures Contingency Operations Directorate.
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Philadelphia District How to start the Corps’ Project Delivery Engine Local Sponsor Identifies A Problem and Requests Corps.
Dredging, Disposal Management and Impacts on Lake Sediments US Army Corps of Engineers.
Seattle District Seattle District U. S. Army Corps of Engineers U. S. Army Corps of Engineers.
NED COSTS And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning.
Savannah Harbor Expansion Project
DRAFT CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONTRACTS: Louisiana Coastal Area, Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, and Lake Pontchartrain & Vicinity Presented to the Coastal Protection.
Mouth of the Columbia River Jetties Major Rehabilitation.
1 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Indian River Lagoon North Restoration Feasibility Study Public Meeting September.
Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Lakes District At Louisiana State University CAP 206 Project US Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District.
Summary of Report on Coastal Risk Reduction and Resilience 1.
Ecosystem Restoration Module ER1: Authorities and Policies.
Chapter 33 Dam Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Give reasons why.
Multipurpose Planning Module M1: Multi-purpose Plan Formulation – Policies and Constraints BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Harbors Module NH1: Authorities and Policies. NH1 - 2 BU ILDING STRONG SM Student Learning Objectives Student will be able to:  Describe the Federal.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
Building Strong! May Deep Draft Navigation Cost Sharing Jeremy LaDart Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE.
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11 AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATION OR “It Takes Two to Tango"
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority June 8, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
Building Strong! May Deep Draft Navigation Module 2011 Planning Associates Class Jeremy LaDart Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE Mission Overview.
Roseau River Flood Damage Reduction Project Roseau, Minnesota.
US Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District FY04tpr\skbcongressional Civil Works Program Missions Missions Process Process Select Authorities Select Authorities.
The Coast 1. The Sea 2 Wind Waves The Sea 3 TidesCurrents 1.Long-Shore 2.Cross-Shore.
San Francisco Ocean Beach-Great Highway Erosion Control Project.
Central & Southern Florida Project George Horne Deputy Executive Director Operations & Maintenance Resource Area.
1 Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting April 13, 2005 Project Manager.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority February 26, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Subcommittee Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program (MsCIP) “Comprehensive Barrier Island Restoration Plan” PIANC 2012.
Coastal Hazards, Risk Assessment, and Property Damage Mitigation David M. Bush University of West Georgia.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
Botkin and Keller Environmental Science 5e Chapter 20 Water Supply, Use and Management.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
Beneficial Use of Dredge Materials: Introduction to Dredging and Policy J. Bailey Smith US Army Corps of Engineers April 4, 2011.
Healthy Coastal Ecosystems Preparing Your Coast. Fortifying the Coast  With shorelines under assault from rising seas, an acidifying ocean, and increasing.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Miles City, Montana Section 205 Gwyn M. Jarrett - Project Manager Omaha District April 27, 2016.
Objectives..describe and explain hard and soft flood prevention strategies Page GCSE Geography AQA A.
Back River Flooding and Shoaling Citizens Committee Back River Flooding and Shoaling Citizens Committee August 15, 2007.
Chapter 21 Water Supply, Use and Management. Groundwater and Streams Groundwater –Water found below the Earth’s surface, within the zone of saturation,
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
Overview of USDA - PL-566 Small Watershed Program - EWP Program Mahoning County FRM Informational Meeting August 16, 2016 Natural Resources Conservation.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
Nunavut Water Board Public Hearing
Mahoning County Informational Meeting USACE Programs, Authorities, and Ohio Silver Jackets Program Presented by: Ashley Stephens 16 August 2016.
Construction Management & Inspection
Galveston Bay Bottom Ecosystem System Features
SHORELINES.
Beach Erosion and Reclamation
Module 27 Continuing Authorities Program
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Working Group on estuaries and coastal zones
Levees, Dams, and other technology
Sacramento Environmental Commission January 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Continuing Authorities Program Section 14 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Erosion Authorized by section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Work under this authority allows emergency streambank and shoreline protection for public facilities, such as roads, bridges, hospitals, schools, and water/sewage treatment plants, that are in imminent danger of failing. The non-Federal sponsor is responsible for a minimum of 35% to a maximum of 50% of total project costs and the Federal Government is responsible for the remainder of total project costs. The Federal share of planning, design, and construction cannot exceed 1,500,000 per project. Section 103 Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction Authorized by section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Work under this authority provides for protection of public and private properties and facilities against damages caused by storm driven waves and currents by the construction of revetments, groins, and jetties, and may also include periodic sand replenishment. The non-Federal sponsor is responsible for 35% of that portion of total project costs assigned to hurricane and storm damage reduction, 50% of that portion of total project costs assigned to recreation, and 100% of that portion of total project costs assigned to privately owned shores and the Federal Government is responsible for the remainder of total project costs. The Federal share of planning, design, and construction cannot exceed 5,000,000 per project.

Continuing Authorities Program Section 107 Small Navigation Improvements Authorized by sec. 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Work under this authority is intended to provide improvements to navigation including dredging of channels and widening of turning basins. For commercial navigation improvements. The cost share varies by the depth of the improvements – for a depth of 20 feet or less, the non-Federal sponsor is responsible for 10% of total costs of the general navigation features; for a depth in excess of 20 feet but equal to or less than 45 feet, the non-Federal sponsor is responsible for 25% of total costs of the general navigation features. The non-Federal sponsor is also responsible for an additional 10% of total costs of the general navigation features that is offset by the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for the project. This additional 10% may be repaid over a period not to exceed 30 years. The Federal Government is responsible for the remainder of total costs of the general navigation features. For recreation navigation improvements – the cost share is 50% Federal and 50% non-Federal. The Federal share of planning, design, and construction cannot exceed 7,000,000 for each project. Section 111 Shore Damage Attributable to Federal Navigation Works Authorized by sec. 111 of the 1968 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Work under this authority provides for the prevention or mitigation of erosion damages to public or privately owned shores along the coastline of the United States when these damages are a result of a Federal navigation project. This authority cannot be used for shore damages caused by riverbank erosion or vessel-general wave wash. It is not intended to restore shorelines to historic dimensions, but only to reduce erosion to the level that would have existed without the construction of a Federal navigation project. The costs of implementing measures under this section must be shared in the same proportion as the cost sharing provisions applicable to the project causing the shore damage. If the Federal cost limitation of 5,000,000 will be exceeded on a project, specific congressional authorization is required prior to initiating the project.

Continuing Authorities Program Section 204 Regional Sediment Management & Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material Authorized by section 204 of the WRDA 1992, as amended - work under this authority provides for the use of dredged material from new or existing Federal projects to protect, restore, or create aquatic and ecologically related habitats, including wetlands. The cost share is 65% Federal and 35% non-Federal of the incremental cost above the least cost method of dredged material disposal consistent with engineering and environmental criteria. Cooperation in the preparation of comprehensive State or regional sediment management plans may be carried out at Federal expense. Projects for the purposes of protection, restoration, or creation of aquatic and ecologically related habitat, the costs of which do not exceed 750,000 and which are located in a disadvantaged community, may be carried out at Federal expense. Section 205 Small Flood Damage Reduction Projects Authorized by section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended - work under this authority provides for local protection from flooding by the construction or improvement of structural flood damage reduction features such as levees, channels, and dams. Non-structural alternatives are also considered and may include measures such as installation of flood warning systems, raising and/or flood proofing of structures, and relocation of flood prone facilities. For structural flood damage reduction projects - the non-Federal sponsor is responsible for a minimum of 35% to a maximum of 50% of total project costs and the Federal Government is responsible for the remainder of total project costs. For non-structural flood damage reduction projects - the cost share is 65% Federal and 35% non-Federal. The Federal share of planning, design, and construction cannot exceed 7,000,000 per project.

Continuing Authorities Program Section 206 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Authorized by section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, as amended - work under this authority may carry out aquatic ecosystem restoration projects that will improve the quality of the environment, are in the public interest, and are cost-effective. There is no requirement that an existing Corps project be involved. The cost share is 65% Federal and 35% non-Federal. The Federal share of planning, design, and construction cannot exceed 5,000,000 per project. Section 208 Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control Authorized by section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, as amended - work under this authority provides for local protection from flooding by channel clearing and excavation, with limited embankment construction by use of materials from the clearing operation only. The non-Federal sponsor is responsible for a minimum of 35% to a maximum of 50% of total project costs and the Federal Government is responsible for the remainder of total project costs. The Federal share of planning, design, and construction cannot exceed 500,000 for each project.

Continuing Authorities Program Section 1135 Project Modifications for Improvement of the Environment Authorized by section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended - work under this authority provides for modifications in the structures and operations of water resources projects constructed by the Corps of Engineers to improve the quality of the environment. Additionally, the Corps may undertake restoration projects at locations where an existing Corps project has contributed to the degradation. The primary goal of these projects is ecosystem restoration with an emphasis on projects benefiting fish and wildlife. The project must be consistent with the authorized purposes of the project being modified, environmentally acceptable, and complete within itself. The cost share is 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. The Federal share of planning, design, and construction cannot exceed 5,000,000 per project.