Martha Carvour, MD, PhD March 2, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CQ Deng, PhD PPD Development Research Triangle Park, NC 27560
Advertisements

Analysis & Expressing Resultd in Clinical Trials Dr. Khalili.
天 津 医 科 大 学天 津 医 科 大 学 Clinical trail. 天 津 医 科 大 学天 津 医 科 大 学 1.Historical Background 1537: Treatment of battle wounds: 1741: Treatment of Scurvy 1948:
Journal Club General Medicine C- 4/3/14
The Cochrane Reviews of Acupuncture Doris Hubbs, MD, FACP April 26, 2013.
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the main consumer watchdog for numerous products: Drugs and biologics (prescription.
Clinical Trials Medical Interventions
Welcome Ask The Experts March 24-27, 2007 New Orleans, LA.
IRB PRESENTATION REGULATORY PATHWAYS HDE – PMA William Hellenbrand MD Director – Pediatric Cardiology Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons.
Luveris ® New Drug Application ( ) Kate Meaker, M.S. Statistical Reviewer Division of Biometrics II Kate Meaker, M.S. Statistical Reviewer Division.
Testing People Scientifically.  Clinical trials are research studies in which people help doctors and researchers find ways to improve health care. Each.
Clinical Trials “What you need to know” April 2, 2008.
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the main consumer watchdog for numerous products: Drugs and biologics (prescription.
Sarah Struthers, MD March 19, 2015
What is a Clinical Trial (alpha version) John M. Harris Jr., MD President Medical Directions, Inc.
Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Assessment.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
Clinical Trial Designs An Overview. Identify: condition(s) of interest, intended population, planned treatment protocols Recruitment of volunteers: volunteers.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Testing, Piloting and Evaluating RiskMAP Interventions Annette Stemhagen, DrPH, FISPE Vice President, Strategic Development Services.
Diagnosing Mental Disorders- The Multiaxial Approach
Preparing for the 2 nd Hourly. What is an hourly? An hourly is the same thing as an in-class test. How many problems will be on the hourly? There will.
Statistics for the board September 14 th 2007 Jean-Sebastien Rachoin MD.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
FDA’s Osteoporosis Guidance Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Division of Metabolic and Endocrine Drugs Eric Colman, MD September 25, 2002.
1 Study Design Issues and Considerations in HUS Trials Yan Wang, Ph.D. Statistical Reviewer Division of Biometrics IV OB/OTS/CDER/FDA April 12, 2007.
How To Design a Clinical Trial
“Journey of a Drug” From Test Tube TO Prescribing Physician.
Compliance Original Study Design Randomised Surgical care Medical care.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation The Purpose and Fundamentals of Statistics in Clinical Trials.
What about VIOXX?. Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on Vioxx (APPROVe) Vioxx (rofecoxib) versus Placebo Basic Clinical Trial Objective: Assess whether Vioxx.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial of Decitabine versus Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed.
Purpose of Clinical Trials Assess safety and efficacy of Experimental treatments New combinations of drugs New approaches to surgery or radiation therapies.
Randomized Controlled CTN Trial of OROS-MPH + CBT in Adolescents with ADHD and Substance Use Disorders Paula Riggs, M.D., Theresa Winhusen, PhD., Jeff.
Rene Descartes: “I think; therefore I am.”. 3.3: Data Ethics Statistics Chap 3: Designing Experiments.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
The PRECIS-2 tool: Matching Intent with Methods David Hahn, MD, MS, WREN Director Department of Family Medicine & Community Health University.
1 Clinical Studies Section of Labeling Joseph Porres, M.D., Ph.D. Medical Officer Division of Dermatologic and Dental Drug Products FDA.
Drug Development Process Stages involved in Regulating Drugs
Is a Clinical Trial Right for Me?
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look
Prof. Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade
Intention-to-treat population
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
Improving Adverse Drug Reaction Information in Product Labels
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
Clinical Trials Medical Interventions
Joensuu H et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract LBA1.
Figure 2 Underreporting by physicians of specific treatment-associated symptoms by physicians in the TORCH trial Figure 2 | Underreporting by physicians.
A SOAP Approach to Clinical Research Design and Analysis
Diacerein orphan drug development for epidermolysis bullosa simplex: A phase 2/3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial  Verena Wally,
Alalia Berry, MD, William W. Busse, MD 
دانشیار دانشکده دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید صدوقی یزد
Clinical Trials.
Speeding access to therapies
Section III: Neurohormonal strategies in heart failure
These slides highlight an educational report from a late-breaking clinical trials presentation at the 58th Annual Scientific Session of the American College.
Observational Studies vs. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)
Efficacy and Safety of the Seven-Day Buprenorphine Transdermal System in Opioid- Naïve Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain: An Enriched,
Section III: Neurohormonal strategies in heart failure
Current and emerging management options for Clostridium difficile infection: what is the role of fidaxomicin?  O.A. Cornely  Clinical Microbiology and.
Evidence Based Practice
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Efficacy and Safety of the Seven-Day Buprenorphine Transdermal System in Opioid- Naïve Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain: An Enriched,
How Should We Select and Define Trial Estimands
Translating Data From Trial to Practice
Presentation transcript:

Martha Carvour, MD, PhD March 2, 2017 IM EBM Boards Review Martha Carvour, MD, PhD March 2, 2017 No financial disclosures

Question 1 A new treatment for scleroderma is evaluated in a phase III randomized clinical trial. The treatment demonstrates a clinically and statistically significant improvement in symptoms over a 12-month course. Besides the effect of the treatment on disease symptoms, which of the following can be assessed with this phase III study? The likelihood that a patient with scleroderma will benefit from the treatment The effect of the treatment on disease symptoms in different patient populations affected by scleroderma The relative rates of serious adverse events in the treatment and placebo groups The 10-year risks of the treatment compared to the 10-year benefits of the treatment

Question 1 A new treatment for scleroderma is evaluated in a phase III randomized clinical trial. The treatment demonstrates a clinically and statistically significant improvement in symptoms over a 12-month course. Besides the effect of the treatment on disease symptoms, which of the following can be assessed with this phase III study? The likelihood that a patient with scleroderma will benefit from the treatment The effect of the treatment on disease symptoms in different patient populations affected by scleroderma The relative rates of serious adverse events in the treatment and placebo groups The 10-year risks of the treatment compared to the 10-year benefits of the treatment

Question 1 The main objective of this question is to distinguish between phases III and IV. Phase III assesses the effects (desired and adverse) in the population that was under study during the period of study. The relative rates of serious adverse events in the treatment and placebo groups  Phase III. Phase IV permits study over more diverse clinical populations and longer time periods. The effect of the treatment on disease symptoms in different patient populations affected by scleroderma  Phase IV. The 10-year risks of the treatment compared to the 10-year benefits of the treatment  Phase IV.

Question 2 A new treatment for scleroderma is evaluated in a phase III randomized clinical trial. During the study, some patients in the placebo group receive medications that are similar to the study drug. These are prescribed by their personal physicians. However, when the study is analyzed, these patients are classified as placebo recipients. What is this kind of analysis called? Post hoc analysis Intention-to-treat analysis Per-protocol analysis As-treated analysis

Question 2 A new treatment for scleroderma is evaluated in a phase III randomized clinical trial. During the course of the study, some patients in the placebo group received medications that were similar to the study drug. These were prescribed by their personal physicians. However, when the study is analyzed, these patients are classified as placebo recipients. What is this kind of analysis called? Post hoc analysis Intention-to-treat analysis Per-protocol analysis As-treated analysis

It’s The Thought (ITT) that counts. Question 2 The main objective of this question is to distinguish between common approaches to analyzing clinical trial data. Intention-to-treat (ITT): Analyze according to the treatment that was intended (by randomization) Per-protocol: Analyze those who actually received the treatment as intended (typically non-random) As-treated: Analyze according to what actually happened (typically non-random) It’s The Thought (ITT) that counts.