Fallacious Logic: Non Sequitur

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Advertisements

Four Rules of Aristotelian Logic 1. Rule of Identity: A is A 2. Rule of Non-Contradiction: A is not (-A) 3. Rule of Excluded Middle: Either A or (-A)
Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
THE ART OF PERSUASION. The goal of persuasive rhetoric is to establish a fact, encourage an audience to accept a belief or an opinion, or to convince.
Syllogisms Formal Reasoning.
Rhetorical Fallacies: Non Sequitur and Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, even further more, expanded, Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Review: Logic. Fallacy: Appeal to Novelty New is better.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
PHIL 120: Jan 8 Basic notions of logic
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Slippery Slope By Cam Means.  Logic, Critical Thinking, Argument (rhetoric)  Informal Fallacy  Small first step  Larger consequences later on Slippery.
Implied Implied – indicated or suggested Stated Stated –declared specifically or definitely CAUSE Effect.
Patterns of Deductive Thinking
What Are Essays? The Application of Reason. Define Rhetoric “Rhetoric is the art of persuasion. Its goal is to change people’s opinions and influence.
Odds and ends from the last EOC practice…
Politics and Rhetoric How did the essay go? How did the letter go? Plans for this unit include: Analyzing political speeches to determine what the candidates.
Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.
Grading Criteria for Assigment 1 Structure – –sense of time, present and past –conflict with two distinct sides –description of cause of conflict –shared.
The Science of Good Reasons
Deductive Arguments.
Types of reasoning… Deductive Those aimed at validity…attempt to convince us of the conclusion using linked premises (i.e. the premises directly link.
The construction of a formal argument
Apologetics: Other Syllogisms Presented by Eric Douma.
Logic The Lost Art of Argument. Logic - Review Proposition – A statement that is either true or false (but not both) Conjunction – And Disjunction – Or.
6.6 Argument Forms and Fallacies
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Spotting Fallacies. Fallacy Fallacies are those arguments which display errors in reasoning.
Arguments Arguments: premises provide grounds for the truth of the conclusion Two different ways a conclusion may be supported by premises. Deductive Arguments.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
Reasoning -deductive versus inductive reasoning -two basic types of deductive reasoning task: conditional (propositional) and syllogistic.
BEGGING THE QUESTION/ CIRCULAR REASONING BY: Jessica Greenwood And McKenzie Pedigo.
Rhetorical Proofs and Fallacies Week 10 – Wednesday, October 28.
Logical Fallacies. Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning.
1 WRITING THE ACADEMIC PAPER ——Logic and Argument Tao Yang
Formal logic The part of logic that deals with arguments with forms.
Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Fallacies
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Can be scary… if you fall for them!!
Logos—Logical Appeal (Logical Fallacies)
© 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.
Deductive Arguments.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
False Association, False Causation, False Authority, & Faulty Premise
Disjunctive Syllogism
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
Intro to Fallacies SASP Philosophy.
C/Maj Nicholas Schroder
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Logical Fallacies List
Evaluate Deductive Reasoning and Spot Deductive Fallacies
Fallacies.
Formulating a logical argument using Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Begging The question/circular reasoning
Logical Forms.
(1.4) An Introduction to Logic
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
Logical Fallacies.
Non Sequitur Definition: An argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises. In a non sequitur, the conclusion could be either true.
Modus ponens.
THE LAWS OF LOGIC Let’s be reasonable!.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Fallacious Logic: Non Sequitur Peter McKay & Lesley Goodaker

Origins and Function Latin origins Functions as a formal fallacy Latin origins which translate to “it does not follow” In a broad sense, a non sequitur is a logical fallacy, from the Latin word fallacia, meaning "trick.“   In rhetoric, NSs can be observed when a conclusion does not logically follow from the premises of an argument. systematic defect in deductive reasoning; “top down” approach; starts at the top with a very broad spectrum of information and they work their way down to a specific conclusion

Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle TYPE “FORM” EXAMPLE Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle All A is C. B is C. Therefore, B is A. All leaves on trees are green. U.S paper bills are green. Therefore, all U.S paper bills are leaves that grow on trees. Affirming the Consequent If A then B. B. Therefore, A. If it's raining then the streets are wet. The streets are wet. Therefore, it's raining. Denying the Antecedent If A then B. Not A. Therefore, not B. If I have an axe, I am a lumberjack.  I don’t have an axe, therefore I am not a lumberjack. Affirming a Disjunct Either A or B. It’s A. Therefore, it is not B. Either it's raining or the sun is shining. It's raining. Therefore, the sun is not shining. Denying a Conjunct Not both A and B. Not B. Therefore, A. John is not both a liberal and pro-life. John is not pro-life. Therefore, John is a liberal.

Identifying a Non Sequitur: Politics “If ‘experts’ could always be trusted to make the right moral decision, then public participation would not be necessary—but they cannot be, and so it is.” ~Carl Sagan

Identifying a Non Sequitur: Pop Culture

There are 5 common types of non sequiturs.

Works Cited Curtis, Gary N. "Taxonomy of the Logical Fallacies." Taxonomy of the Logical Fallacies. The Fallacy Files, n.d. Web. 20 Sept. 2015. Johnston, John. "Logical Fallacies Part II." Logical Fallacies Part II: Slippery Slope, False Analogy, & Non-Sequitur. College of the Redwoods, n.d. Web. 20 Sept. 2015. "Non Sequitur - Examples and Definition of Non Sequitur." Literary Devices. Literarydevices.net, 02 Jan. 2014. Web. 20 Sept. 2015. Sardinha, Anthony.  “JJBATAS Parody: Episode 9 (2/2)” Online video clip.  YouTube.  YouTube, 9 March 2010. Web. 18. Sept. 2015.