From: Saccadic suppression during voluntary versus reactive saccades

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From: The Müller-Lyer Illusion: Investigation of a Center of Gravity Effect on the Amplitudes of Saccades Journal of Vision. 2010;10(1):11. doi: /
Advertisements

From: System gamma as a function of image- and monitor-dynamic range
From: Statistics for optimal point prediction in natural images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(6):2. doi: /9.6.2 Figure Legend:
From: Asymmetric interference between the perception of shape and the perception of surface properties Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):13. doi: /
From: Salience of unique hues and implications for color theory
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(6):10. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Responses of the human visual cortex and LGN to achromatic and chromatic temporal modulations: An fMRI study Journal of Vision. 2010;10(13):13. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(3):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Color signals in the primary visual cortex of marmosets
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Physiologic statokinetic dissociation is eliminated by equating static and kinetic perimetry testing procedures Journal of Vision. 2016;16(14):5.
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(13):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):3. doi: /4.9.3 Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
Figure Legend: From: Bayesian inference for psychometric functions
From: What are the units of storage in visual working memory?
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(9):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field
From: Breaking object correspondence across saccades impairs object recognition: The role of color and luminance Journal of Vision. 2016;16(11):1. doi: /
From: Event-related potentials reveal an early advantage for luminance contours in the processing of objects Journal of Vision. 2011;11(7):1. doi: /
Figure Legend: From: Fixations on low-resolution images
Figure Legend: From: The modern Japanese color lexicon
From: Temporal eye movement strategies during naturalistic viewing
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(11):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field Journal of Vision. 2012;12(11):23.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
From: Metacontrast masking within and between visual channels: Effects of orientation and spatial frequency contrasts Journal of Vision. 2010;10(6):12.
Figure Legend: From: An escape from crowding
From: Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location
Journal of Vision. 2012;12(6):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Contextual effects on real bicolored glossy surfaces
Journal of Vision. 2008;8(3):33. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
From: Does spatial invariance result from insensitivity to change?
Figure Legend: From: Color constancy and hue scaling
From: Low-level awareness accompanies “unconscious” high-level processing during continuous flash suppression Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):3. doi: /
Journal of Vision. 2004;4(6):4. doi: /4.6.4 Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Gating of remote effects on lightness
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(4):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(12):1. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Inhibition of saccade and vergence eye movements in 3D space
From: Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):17. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Expertise with multisensory events eliminates the effect of biological motion rotation on audiovisual synchrony perception Journal of Vision. 2010;10(5):2.
From: Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion Journal of Vision.
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(6):12. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: What's color got to do with it
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(10):3. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(15):21. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity Journal of Vision. 2004;4(9):1. doi: /4.9.1.
From: Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility
From: What predicts the strength of simultaneous color contrast?
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(6):13. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(10):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: The resolution of facial expressions of emotion
Journal of Vision. 2017;17(8):6. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):20. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations
Journal of Vision. 2016;16(3):28. doi: / Figure Legend:
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(4):15. doi: / Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate
From: StarTrek Illusion—General object constancy phenomenon?
Journal of Vision. 2006;6(5):2. doi: /6.5.2 Figure Legend:
Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech ;6(4):5. doi: /tvst Figure Legend:
Figure Legend: From: Analysis of human vergence dynamics
From: Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry
Figure Legend: From: The color constancy of three-dimensional objects
Presentation transcript:

From: Saccadic suppression during voluntary versus reactive saccades Journal of Vision. 2017;17(8):8. doi:10.1167/17.8.8 Figure Legend: (A) Average detection rate over all 15 valid subjects plotted as a function of luminance of the probe bar for voluntary (red) and reactive saccades (green). Error bars indicate standard deviation. The data of each condition was fit with a psychometric function as described in the text. The fit parameter are HO = 0.84, LO = 0, aO = 13.4 mcd/m2, and bO = 3.0 m2/mcd for the voluntary condition (R2 = 0.9993) and HR = 0.87, LR = 0.01, aR = 11.9 mcd/m2, and bR = 2.9 m2/mcd for the reactive condition (R2 = 0.9994). (B) Inflection points (i.e., detection thresholds) during both conditions were calculated for each subject individually as the luminance values at inflection point of the fit functions to the subject's response rates in the voluntary and reactive conditions. Detection thresholds are plotted in red for the voluntary condition and green for the reactive condition. The two thresholds of each subject are connected with a black line. (C) The mean difference between detection thresholds during voluntary and reactive saccades is 1.6 mcd/m2 (SD = 2.8). Date of download: 11/7/2017 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © 2017. All rights reserved.