How do I show that two compound propositions are logically equivalent?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 21: Truth Tables.
Advertisements

Truth Tables How to Make and Use. Making a Truth Table To determine the number of rows other than the heading row. To determine the number of rows other.
3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.
PROOF BY CONTRADICTION
Uses for Truth Tables Determine the truth conditions for any compound statementDetermine the truth conditions for any compound statement Determine whether.
BIG IDEA: REASONING AND PROOF ESSENTIAL UNDERSTANDING: To use logic and truth tables to determine truth values of compound statements. MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE:
Propositions and Truth Tables
Chapter 1 Section 1.4 More on Conditionals. There are three statements that are related to a conditional statement. They are called the converse, inverse.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence.
BY: MISS FARAH ADIBAH ADNAN IMK. CHAPTER OUTLINE: PART III 1.3 ELEMENTARY LOGIC INTRODUCTION PROPOSITION COMPOUND STATEMENTS LOGICAL.
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 2 Section 1.1 Fri, Jan 19, 2007.
Logic Disjunction A disjunction is a compound statement formed by combining two simple sentences using the word “OR”. A disjunction is true when at.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 3 Logic.
How do I show that two compound propositions are logically equivalent?
Thinking Mathematically
Section 1.2: Propositional Equivalences In the process of reasoning, we often replace a known statement with an equivalent statement that more closely.
COMP 170 L2 Part 3 of Course Chapter 3 of Textbook.
Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Lecture 1 Section 1.1 Wed, Jan 12, 2005.
Thinking Mathematically Arguments and Truth Tables.
Venn Diagrams Truth Sets & Valid Arguments Truth Sets & Valid Arguments Truth Tables Implications Truth Tables Implications Truth Tables Converse, Inverse,
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Analyzing Arguments Section 1.5. Valid arguments An argument consists of two parts: the hypotheses (premises) and the conclusion. An argument is valid.
Thinking Mathematically Logic 3.4 Truth Tables for the Conditional and Biconditional.
Conditional statement or implication IF p then q is denoted p ⇒ q p is the antecedent or hypothesis q is the consequent or conclusion ⇒ means IF…THEN.
CS-7081 Application - 1. CS-7082 Example - 2 CS-7083 Simplifying a Statement – 3.
Truth Tables, Continued 6.3 and 6.4 March 14th. 6.3 Truth tables for propositions Remember: a truth table gives the truth value of a compound proposition.
Chapter 1 – Part 3 ELEMENTARY LOGIC
Chapter 1 Propositional Logic
Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
Presented by: Tutorial Services The Math Center
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
AND.
DISCRETE MATHEMATICS CHAPTER I.
Truth Tables and Equivalent Statements
CHAPTER 3 Logic.
Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
The Conditional And Circuits
Classwork/Homework Classwork – Page 90 (11 – 49 odd)
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
2.1 Propositions and Logical Operations
Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
Discrete Mathematics Lecture # 2.
Truth Tables How to build them
Logic – Bell Ringer.
Chapter 8 Logic Topics
Chapter 3 Introduction to Logic 2012 Pearson Education, Inc.
1.2 Propositional Equivalences
Propositional Equivalences
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I
TRUTH TABLES.
Discrete Mathematics Lecture 2: Propositional Logic
Logical Truth To show a statement A is a logic truth (tautology) ...
Deductive Arguments: More Truth Tables
1.2 Propositional Equivalences
6.3 Truth Tables for Propositions
Truth tables Construct a truth table for the following statements:
Discrete Mathematics Lecture 2: Propositional Logic
Statements of Symbolic Logic
Section 3.7 Switching Circuits
And represent them using Venn Diagrams.
1.2 Propositional Equivalences
Section 3.3 Truth Tables for the Conditional and Biconditional
Truth Tables for the Conditional and Biconditional
CHAPTER 3 Logic.
2-2 Logic Part 2 Truth Tables.
A THREE-BALL GAME.
CHAPTER 3 Logic.
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
Truth Tables for Conditional and Biconditional Statements
Presentation transcript:

How do I show that two compound propositions are logically equivalent? Truth Tables How do I show that two compound propositions are logically equivalent?

Warm Up 11/4/10 Write the following statements in symbols: p: It is snowing q: It is the month of January It is not snowing and it is March It is snowing and it is the month of January It is the month of January only if it is snowing. It is snowing or it is January.

Creating Truth Tables To create truth tables you start with the columns for the propositions p, q, and when needed, r. Then you build the table to show the compound propositions If the final column of the two tables are equivalent, then we say that the statements are logically equivalent

Create Truth tables for and p q p q T F T F T F F F F F T T F T F T F T T F T T T T Because the last two columns are the same these compound propositions are logically equivalent

Example Two – DeMorgan Properties Create and fill in the truth table for p q p q T F T F

YOU DO: Construct Truth tables for: and Are they logically equivalent? p q p q T F T F

YOU DO: Are the following compound propositions logically equivalent?

Construct a truth table for p q What do you notice about the last column? This is called a TAUTOLOGY – when the last column is all true T F

THREE PROPOSITIONS Construct the truth table for p q r T F T T T F T T

Construct a truth table for: p q r T F