MAENTOUCH Simulation Giles Quéméner – IN2P3/LPC Caen

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Explosive joining of dissimilar metals: experiment and numerical modeling Anan’ev S.Yu., Andreev A.V., Deribas A.A., Yankovskiy B.D. Joint Institute for.
Advertisements

Creating and Measuring Very Uniform Magnetic Fields for a Polarized 3 He Target Mark Fassler, Tatsuya Katabuchi, and Thomas B. Clegg, University of North.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
MICE VC 17 Aug MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic shield.
Status report about the e-  identifier Study of shielding against the stray magnetic field at the downstream end of the spectrometer F. Huveneers, Gh.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.
What is SpeaD? SpeaD is a revolutionary tool...
Solenoid Magnetic Field Mapping Paul S Miyagawa University of Manchester Objectives Mapper machine Mapper software Simulation Corrections Fitting Future.
Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012.
M. Bonesini - MICE CM18 RAL 16/06/071 M. Bonesini INFN Milano Updates on TOF project.
New Small Wheel Background Charles Young (SLAC). NEW JD GEOMETRY New Small Wheel Background 2.
MICE CM30 Magnetic Shielding Update Mike Courthold 6 th July
Zhiwen Zhao (UVa), Paul Reimer (ANL) SoLID Collboration Meeting 2013/03.
1 Coordinate Detector: prototype design The Coordinate Detector (CDET): Three independent vertical planes with 15 cm plastic shield in front, all planes.
ALCPG09 Albuquerque, The new geometry of the ILD muon system in MOKKA N. D’Ascenzo, V. Saveliev, Obninsk State University / DESY U. Schneekloth.
LCWS14 Benoit CURE - CERN/PH Dept.1 International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders October 2014 Organized by the Vinca Institute of Nuclear.
M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)1 M. Apollonio – University of Oxford sizes for PID & shields.
GEANT Study of Electron ID and  0 Rejection for Containerized detectors Compare detectors in shipping containers to idealized continuous detector with.
Hcal Geometry and Assembly CLIC Meeting - LAPP December 2008, 15th.
1 W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting Feb , PSI W.Ootani ICEPP, University of Tokyo MEG experiment review meeting.
Detector studies, Radiation Simulations, Organization FCC Hadron Detector Meeting July 27 th 2015 W. Riegler.
Mechanical Status of EUDET Module Marc Anduze – 05/04/07.
1 Numerical study of the thermal behavior of an Nb 3 Sn high field magnet in He II Slawomir PIETROWICZ, Bertrand BAUDOUY CEA Saclay Irfu, SACM Gif-sur-Yvette.
Content  Turbulent Validation  Thermal Validation  Simple Model Test  Plans for Next Period.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Research student: Gustavo A. Gandara Montano
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Content  Mesh Independence Study  Taylor-Couette Validation  Wavy Taylor Validation  Turbulent Validation  Thermal Validation  Simple Model Test.
Muon PRS meeting January 21 st, 2003 Norbert Neumeister CERN EP / HEPHY Vienna Muon Barrel Geometry Description.
V. Vorobel, SuperNEMO meeting, Aussois Vacuum system upgrade Vacuum probe installed Spectrometer sealed – vacuum improved from 300 Pa to 7 Pa.
New software library of geometrical primitives for modelling of solids used in Monte Carlo detector simulations Marek Gayer, John Apostolakis, Gabriele.
Hit rate at high luminosity logical channels - ghosts – efficiency Toy Monte Carlo : # I have assumed a uniform particle distribution inside the TS # I.
SksMinus status Hyperball collaboration meeting 2009/3/11 K. Shirotori.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
PID PC 7th Sept MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
From: CHAPTER 8– Modeling with Modifiers 3DS MAX AND ITS APPLICATIONS Modeling with Modifiers James Martin High School Computer Multimedia and Animation.
14 Aug 2008PC New task at last meeting (29 July): MICE magnets will be bolted to steel plates on floor of MICE Hall What – if any – is the effect.
Marc Anduze – CALICE Meeting – KOBE 10/05/07 Mechanical R&D for Technological EUDET ECAL Prototype.
Reducing the Iron in the Endcap Yoke of CLIC_SiD Benoit Curé, Konrad Elsener, Hubert Gerwig, CERN CERN, June 2014 Linear Collider Detector Magnet Meeting.
1 COBRA Magnet Status W.Ootani MEG Experiment Review Meeting, Jul W.Ootani MEG Experiment Review Meeting, Jul
Downstream Cherenkov Gh. Grégoire University of Louvain MICE collaboration meeting RAL, October 28, 2004 Design study for the Technical Reference Document.
Magnetic Shielding and Creation of homogeneous magnetic field (1 st presentation) Research student: Gustavo A. Gandara Montano Supervisor: Bertalan Juhasz.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
26 Aug 2008PC Shield walls – extend the length of channel – will ‘pull’ field x y Coil Centred coil + 2 walls  X – Y asymmetry Off-centre coil +
W Prototype Simulations Linear Collider Physics & Detector Meeting December 15, 2009 Christian Grefe CERN, Bonn University.
Geometry Volume of Cylinders. Volume  Volume – To calculate the volume of a prism, we first need to calculate the area of the BASE of the prism. This.
Hcal Geometry and Assembly Videoconference January 2008, 24th.
1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.
Stereo Collab Meeting | CEA Saclay July-2015 Conclusions.
F. Kircher CLIC concept meeting 12/15/08 1 Some points about the superconducting magnet for a CLIC detector F. Kircher (CEA Saclay/DSM/Irfu/SACM) December.
Shielding the turbomolecular pump and the vacuum gauge 11 June 2013 Kiril Marinov ASTeC, MaRS, DL 1.
Magnetic Shielding Studies of the LHCb RICH Photon Detectors Mitesh Patel, Marcello Losasso, Thierry Gys (CERN )
Scintillator testing in Prague (update from Aussois)
CATHODE RAY OSCILLOSCOPE
Timepix+GEM project Field cage simulations
Summary of Muon Studies Yoke Discussion
Magnetic System Overview Solenoid and Anti-DID
Hcal Geometry and Assembly
support structure ACDTopCoreThickness + 2 * ACDFaceThickness
Magnetic System Overview Solenoid and DID
SiD Solenoid Status and Plans
Question 3 The proponents should show more details about the modification of the detector system to be built in P42 Answers 3-1. Liquid-Hydrogen Target.
CLIC DR Gradient Dipole
Development of models: FEM and Analytical
- chambers & absorbers -
Proposals of new electron cloud monitor in the PS
What is SpeaD? SpeaD is a revolutionary tool...
MUC simulation and reconstruction
How magnet opening affects PVDIS acceptance
Presentation transcript:

MAENTOUCH Simulation Giles Quéméner – IN2P3/LPC Caen Written in C++ in the ROOT-Cern framework Allow fast simulations with small details like mu-metal wires. Expertise from Pascal Vernin – Retired from CEA Saclay Many thanks to Pascal and Gilles for their help

Simple geometry 2 boîtes imbriquées 2 plans de PM Z = 1.70 Z = 3.10 Ecran 5.5 x 3.5 m2 Centre: (1.5,0,2,1.75) x y z Bobines Helmotz (0,-0.9,1.3)

Cut View Y=cste Plans PM Z=1.7 m 2.8 m Boîte externe Z=3.1 m 10 mm acier Centre = (3.8,0,1.7) 2.8 m 0.15 m Plaques de toit 2 x 10 mm acier 0.20 m 3.4 m Murs internes 10 mm acier 2.2 m Plaque de fond 10 mm acier Plaque de répartition Coussins d’air

Cut View X=cste Plans PM Z=1.7 m Boîte externe 4.2 m Z=3.1 m 10 mm acier 4.2 m Plaques de toit 2 x 10 mm acier Murs internes 10 mm acier 3.4 m Centre = (3.8,0,1.7) Plaque de fond 10 mm acier 0.20 m Only the external blue box and the IN20 wall have been simulated so far

Principle First validation of computed stray field: comparison with the field map provided by IN20 + independent calculations by P. Vernin: First trial with standard steel showed that this material is not efficient enough.  all simulations used soft iron. No real m_r curve implemented. Instead a rather safe m_r = 2000 is used and saturation (B>1.5 T) is checked in all cells.

Combination of soft iron box and IN20 wall (mm) Wall Saturation In wall Force on coils (N) Max field (G) 6 yes - 4 8 no 1.6 G 165 1.3 G 10 173 1.2 G

Combination of soft iron box and IN20 wall Example of 4 mm box, 8 mm wall

Mu-metal Shielding Mu-metal cylinder around the PMTs: 1.1 mm thick F = 219 mm h extended from 201 to 280 mm (but almost no effect at the level of the cathode and first dynode) x x x B vs Z computed along 3 different lines 5 cm mesh

Mu-metal Shielding Bx By Bz External field: Bx=0, By=0, Bz=1G Cylinder + grid + endcap NB: B<0.14 G in whole volume for Bx=1G, By=0, Bz=0 Bx By Bz

Mu-metal Shielding Bx By Bz External field: Bx=0, By=0, Bz=1G Cylinder, no grid, no endcap NB: B<0.14 G in whole volume for Bx=1G, By=0, Bz=0 Bx By Bz

Iron + Mu-metal boxes External box, outside the shielding structure Mu-metal box, tight to the inner face of the polyethylene

10mm external box + Mu-metal box

Iron + Mu-metal boxes External box, outside the shielding structure Mu-metal box, fixed to the inner face of the polyethylene

Margins Tried different thicknesses of iron and mu-metal. Meet the specification of 0.1 G between 6 and 8 mm of iron combine with 1 to 1.5 mm of mu-metal. Current design with 10 mm iron + 1.5 mm mu-metal. ~0.5 G inside the detector could be acceptable  The design provide some margin but we are sensitive to gaps between plates at the 2 mm level