Angle-Domain RTM: a Dip-Angle Construction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Advertisements

Multiple Removal with Local Plane Waves
Stacked sections are zero offset sections
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Angle-domain parameters computed via weighted slant-stack Claudio GuerraSEP-131.
Mathias Alerini Gemini kollokvium
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Imaging of diffraction objects using post-stack reverse-time migration
Earth Study 360 Technology overview
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution in Common Offset Domain Jianxing Hu University of Utah.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Raanan Dafni,  Dual BSc in Geophysics and Chemistry (Tel-Aviv University).  PhD in Geophysics (Tel-Aviv University).  Paradigm Geophysics R&D ( ).
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
V.2 Wavepath Migration Overview Overview Kirchhoff migration smears a reflection along a fat ellipsoid, so that most of the reflection energy is placed.
Automatic Wave Equation Migration Velocity Analysis Peng Shen, William. W. Symes HGRG, Total E&P CAAM, Rice University This work supervised by Dr. Henri.
EXTENDED FWI In the Common Offset, Plane wave, and Shot Domains: Case studies on OBS and towed streamer data Papia Nandi-Dimitrova, William W. Symes &
Mitigation of RTM Artifacts with Migration Kernel Decomposition Ge Zhan* and Gerard T. Schuster King Abdullah University of Science and Technology June.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Imaging Normal Faults in Alluvial fans using Geophysical Techniques: Field Example from the Coast of Aqaba, Saudi Arabia Sherif M. Hanafy 28 October 2014.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Signal Analysis and Imaging Group Department of Physics University of Alberta Regularized Migration/Inversion Henning Kuehl (Shell Canada) Mauricio Sacchi.
Reflection seismograms
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
1 Prestack migrations to inversion John C. Bancroft CREWES 20 November 2001.
3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Bob Estill ( Unocal) Jianhua Yu (University of Utah)
Raanan Dafni,  PhD in Geophysics (Tel-Aviv University)  Paradigm R&D ( )  Post-Doc (Rice University) Current Interest: “Wave-equation based.
. Lakeside Drive and Manzanita Lane to the north corner of Jasper Lane and Manzanita Lane.
PROCESSING FOR SUBSALT IMAGING: A NEW AND FIRST TWO WAY MIGRATION METHOD THAT AVOIDS ALL HIGH FREQUENCY ASYMPTOTIC ASSUMPTIONS AND IS EQUALLY EFFECTIVE.
Suppression of multiples from complex sea-floor by a wave- equation approach Dmitri Lokshtanov Norsk Hydro Research Centre, Bergen. Dmitri Lokshtanov Norsk.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology Field measurements and mapping Terminology on folds and folds Stereographic projections From maps to cross-sections.
Papia Nandi-Dimitrova Education Rice University, PhD Geophysics 2012-Present University of Wyoming, MS Geophysics2005 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Stacked sections are zero offset sections
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Making Marchenko imaging work with field data and the bumpy road to 3D
Dmitri Lokshtanov Norsk Hydro Research Centre, Bergen.
HOCIGs and VOCIGs via Two-way Reverse Time Migration
R. G. Pratt1, L. Sirgue2, B. Hornby2, J. Wolfe3
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Imaging (and characterisation) of diffractors
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method
Skeletonized Wave-equation Inversion for Q
Skeletonized Wave-Equation Surface Wave Dispersion (WD) Inversion
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
INTRODUCTION STRF: 50m reflection line with dx=1.0m
The Wave Equation Modeled
Kristopher Innanen and Arthur Weglein University of Houston
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Direct horizontal image gathers without velocity or “ironing”
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Review of Coherent Noise Suppression Methods
High Resolution Velocity Analysis for Resource Plays
Prestack depth migration in angle-domain using beamlet decomposition:
Reflected, Refracted and Diffracted waves
Presentation transcript:

Angle-Domain RTM: a Dip-Angle Construction Raanan Dafni Annual Report Meeting TRIP 2016

Outline RTM HOCIG ADCIGν ADCIGγ Beneficial??

Subsurface Offset to Angle Domain Radon Transform Relations: HOCIG h x x’ ADCIGγ z ADCIGν h x’ z z p q ADCIGνγ h x’ p z q

Subsurface Offset to Angle Domain Synthetic example: -5º dipping reflector Image Section (h=0) HOCIG kinematic artifacts ADCIGγ ADCIGν ADCIGνγ z(m) -40 γ(º) 20 2000 z(m) -40 ν(º) 40 2000 -20 40 -20 20 50 ν(º) -50 z(m) 2000 kinematic artifacts 4000 -40 40 -50 50 γ(º) ν(º)

Image Quality Enhancement Dip-domain construction

Dip-Domain Specularity Filter Filter Design: ADCIGν Specularity Filter (Fspec) ν(º) ν(º) -40 40 -40 40 z(m) 2000 Nz Nν

Dip-Domain Specularity Filter Kinematic artifacts elimination. Original Filtered (Wspec) Filtered (Wdiff) h(m) h(m) h(m) HOCIG: -2000 2000 -2000 2000 -2000 2000 z(m) 2000 γ(º) γ(º) γ(º) ADCIGγ: -40 40 -40 40 -40 40 z(m) 2000

Dip-Domain Specularity Filter Filter efficiency when velocity errors are present. 90%V 110%V Original Filtered (Wspec) Original Filtered (Wspec) HOCIG: ADCIGγ:

Dip-Domain Specularity Filter Field Data Example (Offshore east Mediterranean Sea): Image Section (h=0): HOCIG: Filtered HOCIG: Filtered Image Section (h=0):

Dip-Domain Specularity Filter Field Data Example (Offshore east Mediterranean Sea): ADCIGγ: Filtered ADCIGγ: ADCIGν: Specularity Filter:

Dip-domain construction Diffraction Imaging Dip-domain construction

Diffraction Imaging (example#1) Specularity Filter for Diffraction Imaging: Separate reflections from diffractions. x z Wspec: Specular (Reflections) Wdiff: Non-Specular (Diffractions) x x z z

Diffraction Imaging (example#1) Specularity Filter for Diffraction Imaging: Separate reflections from diffractions. Original Wspec: Specular (Reflections) Wdiff: Non-Specular (Diffractions)

Diffraction Imaging (example#1) Specularity Filter for Diffraction Imaging: Separate reflections from diffractions. ADCIGν Specularity Filter

Diffraction Imaging (example#2) Specularity Filter for Diffraction Imaging: Detect faults and small-scale discontinuities. Velocity Image Section (h=0)

Diffraction Imaging (example#2) Specularity Filter for Diffraction Imaging: Detect faults and small-scale discontinuities. Specular Non-Specular

Diffraction Imaging (example#3) Field data example – Viking Graben (Mobil Corporation, 1994): Stack section. t(s) 500 cmp(#) 1000 2 1 1500 2000 Un-collapsed hyperbolic curves as indication of diffractions

Diffraction Imaging (example#3) Field data example – Viking Graben (Mobil Corporation, 1994): RTM image section (h=0). z(m) 500 cmp(#) 1000 2000 1500 (Madiba and McMechan, 2003) 1 2 PALEOCENE BCU PA JURASSIC GB

Diffraction Imaging (example#3) Field data example – Viking Graben (Mobil Corporation, 1994): HOCIGs.

Diffraction Imaging (example#3) Field data example – Viking Graben (Mobil Corporation, 1994): ADCIGν.

Diffraction Imaging (example#3) Field data example – Viking Graben (Mobil Corporation, 1994): Specularity Filter.

Diffraction Imaging (example#3) Field data example – Viking Graben (Mobil Corporation, 1994): Before Specularity Filter. z(m) 500 cmp(#) 1000 2000 1500

Diffraction Imaging (example#3) Field data example – Viking Graben (Mobil Corporation, 1994): After Specularity Filter. z(m) 500 cmp(#) 1000 2000 1500

Velocity Model Optimization Conclusions Image Interpretation Velocity Model Optimization Specular Enhancement Diffraction Imaging Reflection Tomography Migration Velocity Analysis FWI HOCIG ADCIGν ADCIGγ Amplitude Analysis Amplitude Variation with Angle (AVA) Angle-Domain Technology, based on Wave-Equation Methods.

Thank you! Acknowledgments: The Rice University Inversion Project (TRIP) members and sponsors. Shell International Exploration and Production Inc. for their sponsorship. The Israeli Ministry of National Resources for partial financial support. Thank you!