European-XFEL summary: Cavities/Modules performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cavity Yield-Cost Models Peter H. Garbincius Fermilab IWLC2010 – Geneve October 2010 filename: PHG cavity yield-cost models oct2010.ppt.
Advertisements

Study on the magnetic shielding for superconducting cavities Juliette Plouin, Olivier Napoly, Claire Antoine, Antoine Daël (CEA) Mika Masuzawa, Kiyosumi.
Progress of ILC cavity gradient database and yield C.M. Ginsburg On behalf of the ILC Database Group Baseline Assessment Workshop, Tsukuba/WebEx September.
Superconducting Accelerating Cryo-Module Tests at DESY International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 (ECFA-CLIC-ILC Joint Meeting) Denis Kostin, MHF-SL,
Cavity performance vertical test → horizontal test → CM test C.M. Ginsburg On behalf of the ILC Database Group with special thanks to Detlef Reschke, Lutz.
SRF Cryomodule 2 Cavity Test Results Andy Hocker TD/SRF Dev Dept. All Experimenters Meeting, 10-OCT-2011.
What’s been Achieved and What’s to be Done K. Yokoya ILC Annual Meeting 2012/12/20 ILC Annual, Yokoya1.
Nick Walker, Brian Foster LAL, Orsay WP2: Coordination with the GDE.
Update on Global Cavity Database and Yield Evaluation DESY Database Group: D. Gall (DESY) V. Gubarev (DESY) S. Yasar (DESY) 28.Mar.2010Yamamoto/Ginsburg.
Superconducting rf test facility STF 1 Optical Inspection update at KEK Ken Watanabe ( KEK ) ILWS08 in Chicago 17-Nov-08.
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers Hamburg, Germany Unloaded Quality Factor.
Cavity Gradient for the R&D and ILC Operation Akira Yamamoto ILC-GDE SCRF Presented at the AD&I meeting held at DESY, Dec. 2-3, 2009 A, Yamamoto,
1 E. KAKO (KEK) 2012' May 28 Clermont 1 A_RD_03 R/D for the High Power Couplers for ILC Walid KAABI (LAL-Orsay, France) Eiji KAKO (KEK, Japan)
AAP Review on SCRF to be prepared Akira Yamamoto, Marc Ross, and Nick Walker ILC-GDE Project Managers To be presented at ILC-10, Beijing, March 26, 2010.
Cavity status; recent KEK activities : Hayano (1)STF CM-1 cavities are; MHI MV/m for CM-1 ILC cryomodule (3-rd VT) MHI MV/m for.
Update on S0, S1 for ILC R&D H. Padamsee, Cornell For the S0/S1 Task Force.
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
AD & I 15 August 2012 Marc Ross R&D for TDR Summary of TDP R&D items and baseline changes to RDR – to be included and highlighted in TDR text
A Satellite Meeting at IPAC-2010 SCRF Cavity Technology and Industrialization Date : May 23, 2010, a full-day meeting, prior to IPAC-2010 Place: Int. Conf.
F Fermilab ANL/FNAL SCPF EP/HPR Processing Status and Plan Allan Rowe TD/SRFDD.
Hamburg European Linear Collider Workshop ECFA LC2013 Krzysztof Krzysik XFEL AMTF Cavity and Module RF Measurement Procedures.
(1)[12~13/Dec/2009] Optical inspection (2)[14/Dec] frequency & field flatness measurement (3)[10/Mar/2010] pre-EP (5μm) (4)[11/Mar] EP1 (100μm) (5)[11/Mar]
Accelerator/ Medium Beta Cavities Paolo Michelato INFN Milano - LASA April 21, 2015.
Medium beta cavities Paolo Michelato, Paolo Pierini, Carlo Pagani INFN Milano - LASA.
KEK-STF Vertical Test and Diagnostics Brief History & Future Plan Vertical Test Facility Cavity Diagnostic System Example of MHI#7 Cavity Summary of T-mapping.
Current study status of high gradient at KEK Fumio Furuta KEK SCRF meeting Fermilab. Apr
ALCPG2011, 3/19- 23, SRF Group Institute of Heavy Ion Physics, Peking University ALCPG /3/19-23, Eugene, Oregon, USA RF superconducting Cavity.
ILC Gradient R&D Rongli Geng Jefferson Lab ILC Main Linac WebEx Meeting July 28, 2010.
ILC Cryomodule Industrialization in the U.S. R. Kephart (+ H Padamsee )
W. Singer. SRF2011, July 25 ‐ 29, 2011, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. XFEL Cavity Recipe for Mechanical Fabrication and Treatment Waldemar Singer/DESY.
Gradient Degradation Experience at Fermilab (NML/CM-1) Elvin Harms TTC Meeting, Beijing 5-8 December 2011.
Rongli Geng ILC Cavity Group Meeting October 25, 2011
Strategy and Status of Reference Cavities for European XFEL
Status and plans for the 3.9 GHz section of XFEL
ILC10 Beijing Global Design Effort
LLRF Research and Development at STF-KEK
ILC R&D Board Meeting: SRF Cavities Status and Plans
Hasan Padamsee Cornell University
Energy (ILC) and Intensity (Project X) SRF Cavity Needs
New Cavity Techniques and Future Prospects
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
Rongli Geng Jefferson Lab & GDE
SCRF Monthly WebEx Meeting Sept. 22, 2010
for the FNAL/ANL, JLab, and Cornell cavity teams
Evolving an ILC focused SCRF Facility from the XFEL Infrastructure
Crab Cavity R&D Plan Kirk 1 6/Dec/2016
Surface Analysis of the Quench Area Sample of Cavity Z111
N infusion study at DESY
Recent VT Results in the STF-2 cavities
2. SCRF General Preparation for the AD&I Preparation for AAP Review
Highlights from EU Global Design Effort
Degradation and possible sources Statistic of resonators
TTC topical-meeting on CW SRF 2013
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
CW accelerating module test progress at DESY
The European XFEL Experience and Lessons Learned
Performance of Superconducting Cavities for the European XFEL
Performance of Large Grain TESLA cavities
Matthias Liepe Zachary Conway CLASSE, Cornell University June 1, 2009
Nick Walker (DESY) EU GDE Meeting Oxford
Update on Dark current generation in ILC Main Linac
Development of Large Grain Cavities at DESY
EU-XFEL summary of performance degradation
Retreatment of Superconducting Cavities for the European XFEL
Vertical Test Results of 9-Cell Cavities for LCLS-II
TTC Meeting, 28 February - 2 March, 2011, Milan
LCLS-II HE R&D ongoing results
TTC Meeting, July , Saclay, France.
The LCLS-II HE High Q0 and Gradient R&D Program
Summary of the maximum SCRF voltage in XFEL
Presentation transcript:

European-XFEL summary: Cavities/Modules performance International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS2017 October 24, 2017 European-XFEL summary: Cavities/Modules performance

Outline European-XFEL cavities statistics data; European-XFEL modules statistics data; Conclusion.

European-XFEL cavities statistics data Maximum Gradient Statistics: VT Total Number: 832 Before Retreatment (754): E max 31.4 ± 6.7 [MV/m] RI (377): E max 33.0 ± 6.5 [MV/m] EZ (375): E max 29.8 ± 6.6 [MV/m] After Retreatment (832): E max 33.1 ± 4.9 [MV/m] RI (417): E max 34.7 ± 4.4 [MV/m] EZ (415): E max 31.5 ± 4.9 [MV/m] Laura Monaco 28.7% cavities retreated

European-XFEL cavities statistics data Flash BCP Goal XFEL: Eusable ≥ 23.6 MV/m Q0 ≥ 1.1010 Final EP Laura Monaco

European-XFEL cavities statistics data ILC TDR assumed VT acceptance > 28MV/m (XFEL >20 MV/m) Average of 35 MV/m (XFEL: 26 MV/m) Assumed first-pass yield: 75% 29% cavities retreated to give final yield of 90% >28 MV/m (35 MV/m average) 10% over-production assumed in value estimate RI results only (ILC recipe) ✔ More re-treatments - but mostly only HPR Number of average tests/cavity increases from 1.25 to 1.55 (1st+2nd) or 20% over-production or additional re-treat/test cycles Nick Walker

European-XFEL modules statistics data Nick Walker

European-XFEL modules statistics data count cavities with G ≥ 20% degradation matrix: Nick Walker

European-XFEL modules statistics data Rolling average of difference VT - CM Average delta per module vs module number Moving average over 10 modules plotted VT  CM difference statistics CM test is limited at 31 MV/m VT is clipped at 31 MV/m Nick Walker

Conclusion European XFEL cavities Vertical Tests statistics shows, that ILC cavity performance specifications (at least for the maximum gradient) are possible; More cavities re-treatments are needed - but mostly only HPR, and number of average tests per cavity increases from 1.25 to 1.55 (1st+2nd) or 20% over- production or additional re-treat/test cycles are to be considered; European XFEL Cryo Modules Tests shows some cavities performance degradation compared to the Vertical Test results, so the CM assembly needs some additional R&D attention and improvement; CM Tests statistics clearly shows an improvement of CM performance and decrease of CM – VT difference with CM production; There are clearly lessons to be learned and a room for improvements;

Thank You for Your attention End Thank You for Your attention