Injection region BLMs – ECR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K. Potter RADWG & RADMON Workshop 1 Dec WELCOME TO THE 4th RADWG & RADMON WORKSHOP 1 December 2004.
Advertisements

11 October 2006Basic Layout of LER G. de Rijk1 Basic Layout of LER  The basic idea  VLHC type magnets  LER in the LHC tunnel  Layout  LER experiment.
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Eva Barbara Holzer IEEE NSS, Puerto Rico October 26, Beam Loss Monitoring System of the LHC Eva Barbara Holzer, CERN for the LHC BLM team IEEE Nuclear.
2 nd BLMTWG meeting, B. Auchmann, O. Picha, with A. Lechner.
B. Auchmann, O. Picha, Joint CWG/BLMTWG Meeting August
LHC Beam Loss Monitors, B.Dehning 1/15 LHC Beam loss Monitors Loss monitor specifications Radiation tolerant Electronics Ionisation chamber development.
Simulation of multipacting thresholds G. Iadarola and A. Romano on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, 8 September, 2015.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Simulation comparisons to BLM data E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Tracking for Collimation Workshop 30/10/2015 E. Skordis1.
Eva Barbara Holzer July 16, LHC MPP Eva Barbara Holzer for the BLM team LHC MPP CERN, July 17, 2010 Proposal on Threshold Corrections for RC Filters.
Draft MD Planning Thu (3.11.) DayTimeMDMP Thu05:00 Ramp down, cycle 07: GeV: Injection stability and losses – check steering constraints, define.
Case study: Energy deposition in superconducting magnets in IR7 AMT Workshop A.Ferrari, M.Magistris, M.Santana, V.Vlachoudis CERN Fri 4/3/2005.
BLM internal beam abort request :24:50 Bernd Dehning CERN BE-BI MPP, B. Dehning.
HL-LHC WP14 2 nd meeting: Intercepting devices and failure cases to be studied Anton Lechner, Jan Uythoven.
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
2 nd BLMTWG meeting, B. Auchmann, O. Picha, with A. Lechner.
1 st BLMTWG Meeting, , B. Auchmann, O. Picha with help from M. Sapinski, E.B. Holzer, A. Priebe.
LTC 01/ Operational scenario of the BLM System L. Ponce With the contribution of B. Dehning, M. Sapinski, A. Macpherson, J. Uythoven, V. Kain, J.
Current BLM Threshold Families 1st BLM Thresholds WG Meeting Matti Kalliokoski.
Results of the 2007 BLM hardware tests in LSS5
Ion Commissioning: Thursday & Friday
The TV Beam Observation system - BTV
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Addressed questions for LTC
eRHIC FFAG Lattice Design
Injectors BLM system: PS Ring installation at EYETS
Overview of the project
RF interlocks for higher intensities (LMC 15 June)
Ideas and design concepts, and challenges
Long Shutdown for the LHC: Vacuum Beam Pipes
R&D of neutrino beam production for future (Multi-)MW proton facility:
MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection
Powering the LHC Magnets
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Beam dump on LHC beams dumped on 08:20:04 by SIS, following a failing BLM HV check in IR7.
Control systems plans & activities for HL-LHC during LS2
LHC BLM system: system overview
Disabling Rules.
Energy deposition studies in IR7 for HL-LHC
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Interpretation and use of BLM Data
Remote setting of LHC BLM thresholds?
Beam loss monitoring requirements and system description
Direct Dump Tests Modify
BLM planning 03/03/2014.
Assessment of BLM thresholds at cold magnets
J. Emery, B. Dehning, E. Effinger, G. Ferioli, C
Progress of SPPC lattice design
C.Octavio Domínguez, Humberto Maury Cuna
Test and start‐up procedures
BLM changes HV software interlock (SIS)
Sensitivity tests of BLM_S chamber in PSB dump
Saturday 2/4/ :00-09:00 Problems with SPS:
LS1 status 28/04/2014.
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Wednesday 09 March …:09:00: beta* measurement (1.5 m) by K-modulation and with AC-dipole excitation. 1/17/2019 LHC 8:30 meeting.
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
Warm Magnet Thresholds
Commissioning of the Beam Conditions Monitor of the LHCb Experiment at CERN Ch. Ilgner, October 23, 2008 on behalf of the LHCb BCM group at TU Dortmund:
Report on Beam Loss Monitors
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
Monday 6th 07:39 Dump fill #1854, RQ6.L2 tripped, followed by access
Tunnel hardware installation
Injection Region BLM changes
Thu :00 Dumped beams, refill for Pb-Pb physics. No more protons in 2011… Some changes: Increase of flat top total voltage to 14 MV. Feed-forward.
SPS Injection BIS - Draft requirements
Presentation transcript:

Injection region BLMs – ECR

Presented at the MPP meeting 13th December 2013 Re-distribution of quadrupole BLMs to dipole interconnects in the injection regions Layout and threshold changes to allow for higher injection losses and to replace SEM Monitors and filters (new LICs) Channels for possible injection timing blind-out

Re-distribution of quadrupole BLMs to dipole interconnects in the injection regions

Re-distribution of Arc and DS BLMs LS1: 1 out of 3 BLMs per arc quadrupole and beam will be moved to the dipoles magnets Aim: protect the dipoles against UFO-loss caused quenches The second BLMQI monitor per beam will be moved to the interconnect between two dipoles New position is on top of the interconnect Equal signal from B1 and B2 losses Expect somewhat smaller signal per lost proton Threshold to be determined by new simulations

Re-distribution of Dispersion Suppressor BLMs New locations 7 ICs Drawing represents IP2. IP8 changes are analogue to IP2 6 ICs P2 external IC+SF P2 as defined in (Grishin, 2013) P2

Layout and threshold changes to allow for higher injection losses and to replace SEM Locations for threshold changes have been identified as well – will be addressed later

Sensitivity and Dynamic Range Sensitivity of different monitors and filters: Comparison of dynamic range: Sensitivity Range   Relative Sensitivity A IC 1 B LIC 1 / 14 IC + SF (small filter) 1 / 20 C LIC + SF 1 / 280 IC + BF (big filter) 1 / 180 D LIC + BF 1 / 2520 E SEM 1 / 70000 SEM 3k Gy/s (from dump region) 1.6 MGy/s LIC+big filter ~1 Gy/s (from septum LICs in 2012) 58 kGy/s IC ~5E-2 Gy/s 23 Gy/s

General Remarks Required dynamic range is based on the October 2011 analysis from W. Bartmann. Request: Allow for 5 times the max. signal Additionally, there is at least another factor 2 increase possible by threshold changes Thresholds shown are for 450GeV and 40us running sum. They need to stay below 23 Gy/s. All monitors will have to have their thresholds at 450GeV adapted to allow injection losses – this is because we decided to start without bind-out.

Blind-able inputs Inputs defined as “blind-able”: Maximum 8 monitors per tunnel card Signal cable not too long (longest one in IP2: 60m) 3 tunnel cards in left IP2 3 tunnel cards in right IP8 They will be connected to one surface crate per IP Should it become necessary, the whole crate can be “blinded” during injection At start-up it will not be “blinded” It is still possible to move cards between blind-able and non-blind-able crates after start-up Input we want to be blind-able have to be combined with other monitors (where it is not important, for example because they are not connected to BIS, they are only for measurement)

IP2 Blind-able Inputs IP2 left grouped by tunnel cards: BLMQI.08L2.B1E10_MQML Requiring blinding BLMQI.08L2.B1E20_MQML BLMQI.08L2.B1E30_MQMl  moved to B-B BLMEL.08L2.B2I22_MBA Measurement only BLMEL.08L2.B2I21_MBA BLMEL.08L2.B2I30_MBB BLMEL.08L2.B2I22_MBB BLMEL.08L2.B2I21_MBB BLMQI.07L2.B1E30_MQM Requiring blinding BLMQI.06L2.B1E10_MQML BLMQI.06L2.B1E20_MQML BLMEI.06L2.B1E10_MSIB BLMEI.06L2.B1E20_MSIB BLMEI.06L2.B1E30_MSIB BLMEI.06L2.B1E10_MSIA BLMEI.06L2.B1E20_MSIA BLMEI.04L2.B2I10_TDI.4L2.B2 Requiring blinding BLMEI.04L2.B1E10_TDI.4L2.B1 BLMEI.04L2.B1E20_TDI.4L2.B1 BLMEL.04L2.B1E10_TCDD.4L2 Measurement only BLMEI.04L2.B1E10_MBXA

IP8 Blind-able Inputs BLMQI.07R8.B2E10_MQM Requiring blinding IC+SF BLMEL.08R8.B1I21_MBA Measurement only LIC+BF BLMEL.08R8.B1I22_MBA BLMEL.08R8.B1I30_MBA BLMEL.08R8.B1I21_MBB BLMEL.08R8.B1I22_MBB BLMEL.08R8.B1I23_MBB BLMEI.06R8.B2E20_MSIA in analogy to IP2 BLMEI.06R8.B2E10_MSIA BLMEI.06R8.B2E30_MSIB BLMEI.06R8.B2E20_MSIB BLMEI.06R8.B2E10_MSIB Requiring blinding BLMQI.03R8.B1I30_MQXA Requiring blinding BLMEI.04R8.B2E10_MBXB BLMEI.04R8.B2E20_TDI.4R8.B2 BLMEI.04R8.B2E10_TDI.4R8.B2 BLMEI.04R8.B1I10_TDI.4R8.B1 in analogy to IP2

83 LICs in IP2 and IP8 All SEMs in IP2 and IP8 are replaced by a LIC with a big filter No LIC is connected to BIS after LS1 (SEMS have never been connected to BIS, but a number of LICs have been in run1) With the exception of the ones installed at the BPMSW, the LICs are always at (nearly) the same location as an IC with/without filter. Their purpose is to increase the dynamic range for measurement. IP2 left IP8 right IP2 right IP 8 right BLMQL.08L2.B2I10_MQML 1 MBA, MBB cell 11 6 cell 8 MSIA, MSIB cell 6 - TCLIB TDI cell 4 3 TCTH TCTV TCDD TCLIA “DRIFT” BPMSW cell 1

Example: Q8 left of IP2 450 GeV threshold for IC 450 GeV thr. for LIC 450 GeV thr. for IC+SF 2011 monitor names (analysis Wolfgang) 2013 monitor names (if different from 2011) Monitor type 2013 After LS1 Name after LS1 (only noted if not straight forward) Move to blind-able rack Problem 7)   138.1 9.86 6.91 BLMQI.08L2.B1E10_MQML IC+SF yes BJSAP.B8L2 sensitivity 7 TeV 155.65 11.12 7.78 BLMQI.08L2.B1E20_MQML IC+SF, (or disconnect from BIS) 178.85 12.78 8.94 BLMQI.08L2.B1E30_MQML 22.15 1.58 1.11 BLMQI.08L2.B2I10_MQML BLMQL.08L2.B2I10_MQML 0.4 bar LIC 1.1 bar LIC No 18.15 1.30 0.91 BLMQI.08L2.B2I20_MQML IC IC+SF (or disconnect from BIS) 14.15 1.01 0.71 BLMQI.08L2.B2I30_MQML To be assessed

END

Problem with low sensitivity monitors (LIC, IC+filter) On some cold elements the noise level is above the threshold level General guideline: use IC+filter on blind-able monitors If we switch on the blinding, we can take away the filter, adapt the thresholds and reduce the problem of sensitivity at high energy.

Wolfgang analysis: MPP 30.9.2011 and Evian 2011

IP8 Blind-able Inputs IP8 has far fewer locations with high losses IP 8 right required blind-able input (not yet matched to tunnel cards): BLMQI.03R8.B1I30_MQXA To be assessed BLMEI.04R8.B2E10_TDI.4R8.B2 Yes BLMEI.04R8.B2E20_TDI.4R8.B2 BLMEI.04R8.B2E10_MBXB BLMEI.04R8.B2E10_TCTH.4R8.B2 BLMQI.05R8.B2E10_MQY BLMEI.06R8.B2E10_MSIB yes BLMQI.07R8.B2E10_MQM