SPS – RFD Experience and Evolution to LHC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
Advertisements

 Outline: ◦ 325 MHz Superconducting Spoke Resonators in the Project X Linac (HINS front end). ◦ SSR1 Single Spoke Resonator with β g =.21: Fabrication.
Slim crab cavity development Luca Ficcadenti, Joachim Tuckmantel CERN – Geneva LHC-CC11, 5th LHC Crab Cavity Workshop.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
SPX - Cavity WBS U , U , U Genfa Wu SRF Scientist Accelerator Systems Division/RF Group DOE Lehman CD-2 Review of APS-Upgrade.
201 MHz and 805 MHz Cavity Developments in MUCOOL Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Nufact 2002 Workshop, London,
Cavity design Fundamental parameters : frequency, beta, number of cells (gaps), Eacc Optimisation : R/Q, surface fields / Eacc, Qex, damping of HOMs, kloss,
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
New HOM coupler design Demountable Damped Cavity (DDC) Sokendai, The graduated university for advanced studies. KEK, LL / Ichiro Cavity Group October 21,
Status of RFCC-Module Development Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting at INFN-LNF, Frascati,
201 MHz NC RF Cavity R&D for Muon Cooling Channels
ESS cavities interfaces
Page 1 Jean Delayen HyeKyoung Park Center for Accelerator Science Department of Physics, Old Dominion University and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator.
Zenghai Li SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LHC-CC13 CERN, December 9-11, 2013 HOM Coupler Optimization & RF Modeling.
Cavity status; recent KEK activities : Hayano (1) STF CM-1 cavities are; MHI-014: 3-rd VT:36MV/m (finished) MHI-015: 3-rd VT: > 18.4MV/m.
KEKB Crab Development K. Hosoyama (KEK) Crab Cavity for HER Crab Cavity for LER Crab Cavity for KEKB History of Crab Cavity R&D Characteristics of Crab.
Status of crab crossing studies Presented by NAKANISHI Kota (KEK) 2008/1/25.
DEFLECTING CAVITY OPTIONS FOR RF BEAM SPREADER IN LCLS II
Binping Xiao On behalf of the DQWCC team 12/09/2013
The design of elliptical cavities Gabriele Costanza.
201 MHz Cavity Status and Test Plans at MTA MICE Collaboration Meeting at RAL, UK October 22 ~ 24, 2005 Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley.
STF EP, VT commissioning by FNAL AES001 H. Hayano, KEK
2.1GHz cavity without cell-to-cell coupling slots – 1.875” beam pipe Binping Xiao Aug
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
Dr G Burt (CI), Dr R. Rimmer (Jlab), H. Wang (Jlab) & B. Hall (CI)
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
6 TH C RAB C AVITY W ORKSHOP – December 9-11, 2013, CERN (Geneva, Switzerland) Silvia Verdú-Andrés Silvia Verdú-Andrés on behalf of (BNL) Sergey Belomestnykh,
2.1 GHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL June 15, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  June 15, 2015.
SPS D OUBLE -Q UARTER W AVE C RAB C AVITIES D ISCUSSION ON CAVITY PREPARATION PROCEDURES CERN, 28 October 2015 Silvia Verdú-Andrés, Toohig fellow at BNL.
Americas Cavity Specification C.M. Ginsburg (Fermilab) On behalf of the Fermilab cavity crew October 20, 2010.
CRAB for HL-LHC KEK activity 2010DEC Yoshiyuki MORITA.
FNAL efforts on LHC Crab Cavity R&D (Proposals for R&D sub-tasks, resources and schedule) Nikolay Solyak.
RF-Dipole Cavity: Processing and RF Measurements Procedure
Page 1 Subashini De Silva Center for Accelerator Science Old Dominion University CAVITY II – RF-DIPOLE CAVITY TEST RESULTS LHC – CC-13, CERN December 9-11,
Update on S0 Work in the Americas Region Mark Champion 17 June 2008.
 =1 cavity: parameters Dimensions for cavity fabrication before any chemical polishing and at room Temp. outer ½ cell pick-up side inner ½ cells outer.
LHC Cryostat evaluation Nikolay Solyak Thanks Rama Calaga, Tom Peterson, Slava Yakovlev, Ivan Gonin C11 workshop. FNAL, Oct 27-28, 2008.
A Four Rod Compact Crab Cavity for LHC Dr G Burt Lancaster University / Cockcroft Institute.
Update on LHC 800MHz Crab Cavity Conceptual Design Liling Xiao, Zenghai Li Advanced Computations Department, SLAC Presented at LARP-CM12, April 9, 2009.
HOMSC Fermilab HOM Couplers for CERN SPL Cavities K. Papke, F. Gerick, U. van Rienen 1 Work supported by the Wolfgang-Gentner-Programme.
Page 1 Jean Delayen Center for Accelerator Science Old Dominion University RF Dipole Cavity Design and Plans LARP Review Fermilab, 10 June 2013.
SRF COLLABORATION MEETING MAY.2016 ESS MEDIUM BETA CAVITY MANUFACTURING CEA Saclay/ESS ECCTD WU Cavités | Enrico Cenni.
RF Modeling of the LHC Crab Cavity Zenghai Li SLAC Zenghai Li LARP CM20 April 8-10, 2013.
TE-type Sample Host Cavity development at Cornell Yi Xie, Matthias Liepe Cornell University Yi Xie – TE cavity developments at Cornell, TFSRF12.
Andrew BurrillFall 2011 Project X Collaboration Meeting 650 MHz Developments at JLAB Andrew Burrill for the JLab Team.
ICFA Workshop on High Order Modes in Superconducting Cavities July First Experience with an HOM Coupler for the 56 MHz Quarter Wave SRF Cavity Qiong.
Page 1 Jean Delayen Subashini De Silva Center for Accelerator Science Department of Physics, Old Dominion University and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator.
Page 1 Subashini De Silva Center for Accelerator Science Department of Physics, Old Dominion University and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility.
Guillaume Olry on behalf the IPN Orsay SPIRAL2 team TTC Meeting – Milan, 28 Feb-3 March 2011.
LHC Crab Cryostat Integration and Planning Meeting – some outcomes
CERN – Zanon discussions
RF Dipole HOM Electromagnetic Design
SRF Crabbing Cavity R&D
Warm measurements on cavities/HOMs
Crab Cavity HOM Coupler Specification Drawings & Tolerances
Odu/slac rf-dipole prototype
DISCUSSION Flashback Diagram flow Dream world Main points
LHC Crab Cavity Conceptual Design at SLAC
Design Fabrication and Processing Group H. Padamsee
HL-LHC-UK: UK contribution to HL-LHC Crab Cavities and evolution
Double Quarter Wave Crab Cavity
Crab Cavity Manufacturing Readiness Meeting
RF-Dipole Cavity Update
UK RFD Pre-Series cryomodule
RF modes for plasma processing
DQW HOM Update and Recent Developments
CEPC Waveguide HOM 5-cell and 2-cell Cavity Study and EP Facility
Challenges, Progress and Plans of SRF CH-Structures
Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

SPS – RFD Experience and Evolution to LHC International Review of the Crab Cavity Performance for HiLumi SPS – RFD Experience and Evolution to LHC

Outline PoP and SPS RFD Cavities SPS-RFD Experience Cavity processing plan Frequency recipe  Expected and measured SPS-RFD Lessons Learned Changes proposed in cavity processing plan Evolution to LHC Design modifications of RFD cavity for LHC

Proof of Principle (PoP) – RFD Cavity 53 cm 34 cm Operates in TE11 like mode Cylindrical shaped cavity Fabricated at Niowave Inc. Parameters Value Units Frequency 400 MHz Nearest HOM 590 Deflecting Voltage (Vt*) 0.375 MV Peak Electric Field (Ep*) 4.02 MV/m Peak Magnetic Field (Bp*) 7.06 mT Bp*/Ep* 1.76 mT/ (MV/m) Stored Energy (U*) 0.195 J [R/Q]t 287.0 Ω Geometrical Factor (G) 140.9 RtRs 4.0×104 Ω2 At Et* = 1 MV/m E Field B Field Teflon Bead Al Bead

PoP RF Test Results Surface treatment and rf testing done at Jefferson Lab Test I – April, 2012 Test II – June, 2014 Test at CERN – October, 2014 JLab results were confirmed Cavity reached a VT of 7.0 MV Cavity was retested with Nb coated flanges provided by CERN Q0 increased by a factor of 3 from 4×109 to 1.2×1010 Multipacting was processed easily and did not reoccur 3.4 MV JLab 3.4 CERN

SPS – RFD Cavity Properties Frequency 400.79 MHz Aperture 84 mm Nearest HOM 633.5 Ep* 3.6 MV/m Bp* 6.2 mT [R/Q]t 429.7 Ω Geometrical Factor (G) 106.7 RtRs 4.6×105 Ω2 At Et* = 1.0 MV/m Vt 3.4 MV 33 56 E Field H Field 281 mm 194 mm Operates in TE11 like mode Next HOM is 1.5 times fundamental mode Multipacting is improved compared to PoP cavity Surface fields are lower compared to PoP cavity Shunt impedance higher compared to PoP cavity Reduced multipoles components with curved poles

Full SPS – RFD Cavity

HOMs for SPS-RFD Cavity Design Pick Up probe FPC H-HOM (Hi-pass filter) V-HOM (selective coupling) Only 2 HOM couplers FPC/HOM ports oriented to keep clearance for the second beam pipe Selective coupling (V-HOM) to reduce the number of filters Couplers at locations of low field region on cavity body 7 mm offset incorporated into the probe tip to enhance coupling to the dipole modes at around 2 GHz Minimizes RF heating on the coupler components Small RF power leakage through the coupler, ~1.5W, due to asymmetry Location preserves field symmetry FPC coupler: QL = 5.0×105 H-HOM coupler with 30 degree hook orientation with no change to filter elements Hook shaped coupler reduces RF heating  69 W

HOMs for SPS-RFD Cavity Design Qext calculated using Omega3P (SLAC ACE3P suite) for modes up to 2 GHz Solid lines are the impedance budget for dipole HOMs (blue) and accelerating HOMs (red) respectively Damping scheme meets the LHC High-Luminosity Upgrade impedance requirements

SPS – RFD Cavity Processing Plan Surface Polishing Bulk BCP Trimming Final Weld Heat Treatment Light BCP High Pressure Rinse Assembly Low Temp Bake RF Test Mechanical grinding un-even weld / surface pits Total removal of 140 microns Re-processing of RFD-001 Trimming of center body for frequency 3 mm weld trimming Bulk BCP Heat Treatment Light BCP High Pressure Rinse Assembly Low Temp Bake RF Test Welding of end plates to center body 600 oC for 10 hours in furnace Total removal of 20 microns Rinsing in 2 iterations Proper rotation to drain cavity completely Cavity assembly of cavity in clean room 120 oC bake for 36 hours Test with and without HOM couplers

Frequency Recipe Step (Recipe for 20 C, 50 % and 1013.25 mbar) Δf [kHz] fn [MHz] Cavity after trimming and thinning 399.840296 Shift due to bulk BCP (140 microns) -39.441 Cavity after bulk BCP 399.800855 Weld shrinkage 115.645 Weld bead 5.000 Cavity after final weld 399.921500 Shift due to light BCP (20 microns) -5.762 Cavity after light BCP 399.915738 Shift due to mounted couplers 4.906 Fully assembled cavity with HOM couplers 399.920644 Pressure effect (760 Torr differential) -60.800 Dielectric effect air to vacuum 130.341 Evacuated cavity at 20 C 399.990185 Thermal shrinkage 572.877 Cooled down cavity at 4.2 K 400.563062 Shift due to change in skin depth 28.000 Pressure from 760 Torr to 23 Torr in He tank 58.960 Cooled down cavity at 2.0 K 400.650022 Shift due to tuner activation to its mid range 150.000 Cavity with tuner activated 400.800022 Lorentz detuning -10.022 Operational cavity with RF on 400.790000

Trimming Sensitivity Trimming sensitivity for RFD cavities df/dz = -119.85 kHz/mm Measured sensitivity: CAV001: -129.3 kHz/mm CAV002: -116.1 kHz/mm dz/2

Lessons Learned – 1 Perform bulk BCP after final welding of the cavity Bulk BCP of the two SPS-RFD cavities were done before final weld to control the frequency shift due to processing Due to quality of final welds additional bulk BCP was done on both RFD cavities Frequency shift due to bulk BCP  40 kHz (140 microns removal) Frequency shift is comparatively small  Not a critical parameter in frequency control

Horizontal BCP/EP tool – (ANL) Lessons Learned – 2 Perform chemical etching and high pressure rinsing in horizontal orientation Currently bulk BCP, light BCP and high pressure rinsing are done in vertical orientation Horizontal orientation preferred To achieve uniform removal Better acid circulation and drainage Horizontal BCP/EP tool – (ANL)

Lessons Learned – 2 Warm tuning of RFD cavity can be done by push/pull of center body Experience from fixing the center body of RFD-CAV-001

RFD-CAV-001 RF Test Preparation Beam Port – VHOM Side Beam Port – HHOM Side FPC Port HHOM Port Pick Up Port VHOM Port Calculations at 1.0 J with Stainless Steel flanges Conductivity of stainless steel 6.99×106 S/m Port Power Loss [W] Q Beam Port (HHOM) 2.64×10-5 9.53×1013 Beam Port (VHOM) 2.71×10-4 9.30×1012 FPC Port 5.76×10-5 4.37×1013 HHOM Port 6.52×10-4 3.86×1012 VHOM Port 3.02×10-9 8.34×1017 Pick Up Port 1.69×10-18 1.49×1027 Total 1.01×10-3 2.50×1012

RFD-CAV-001 RF Test Preparation VHOM and HHOM ports are blanked HHOM blanked with a Nb coated flange RFD test results Two rf tests on RFD-001 RFD-002 ready to be testsed RF results Multipacting was processed easily Surface resistance  9 nΩ Lorentz detuning  Pressure sensitivity  55 kHz/torr FPC Port (Iput test probe) Qext ~ 5×109 Pick Up Port (PickUp test probe) Qext ~ 2×1011 Safety valve

RFD-CAV-001 RF Test Results

RFD Cavity Design Changes for LHC Modified pickup port (To be confirmed with CERN) Pickup port radius increased to 40 mm from 20 mm for easy cavity processing Pickup probe coupling: 2.7×1010 to extract 1 W at operating field No change on cavity properties or on HOM spectrum and damping Increase height of FPC, HHOM and VHOM ports for convenience in assembly

Summary No major modifications to RFD cavity design for LHC Two SPS-RFD cavities have been fabricated and processed RFD-CAV-001  Completed RFD-CAV-002  To be tested Cavity reached Vt=4.4 MV Epk=45 MV/m and Bpk=77 mT  Much room for improvements Achieved 3.4 MV with a Q0 of 8.5×109 No major alteration to the cavity processing plan; Recommendations for future cavities Preference to do bulk BCP after final welding Horizontal orientation while cavity processing (BCP and HPR) No major modifications to RFD cavity design for LHC Modified pick up port Increased port height

Frequency Measurements – RFD-CAV-001

Frequency Measurements – RFD-CAV-002