Introduction to Negligence

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Precedent in action The operation of the doctrine of precedent is easier to understand by looking at specific examples. The English case of Donoghue v.
Advertisements

PREPARED BY ERROL GOODRIDGE SAFETY AND HEALTH OFFICER LABOUR DEPARTMENT Case Law : Safety and Health.
Legal Liability Common law negligence Statutory obligations.
What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
« Torts » Geneviève Saumier Faculté de droit McGill 20 April 2010 Continuing Education Series "Think Ahead – Une pensée d’avance" Common Law:
Copyright © 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited CANADIAN BUSINESS AND THE LAW Second Edition by Dorothy Duplessis Steven Enman Shannon.
Torts and Legal Liability Craig A. Wallace, P.Eng
HI5018 Introduction to Business Law Week 4 Law of Torts (2)
Negligence.
The Legal Obligations of Safety Auditors Do safety auditors belong to any profession? What is a profession?
 West Key Number System Having Fun with the Digests!
Professional Accountability Judicial system –Criminal justice system Criminal liability –Civil justice system Civil liability Professional self regulation.
14 The Law of Negligence and Liability for Negligent Professional Advice © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved.
By Monika, Max, Vanja, Nicole KEY PRINCIPLES OF NEGLIGENCE.
Unit 31 Negligence.  failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances, or taking action.
Torts Dennis J. Kehm, Jr.. Welcome to………. Tort…….
Liability in Negligence
Foundations of Australian Law Fourth Edition Copyright © 2013 Tilde Publishing and Distribution Chapter 6 The tort of negligence.
Tutorial Business Law Law of Tort. Question 1 The driver of a car driving at a fast speed hits a pedestrian who had just stepped down from the footpath.
1 Acme Electronics: Student Coaching Slides. 2 Question 1: Negligence Define Prima Facie Case – Plaintiff’s Burden Defenses – Defendant’s Burden.
Negligence. Homework 20.1 and 20.2 – read Chapter and 20.2 – read Chapter 20.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Negligence by Snježana Husinec. Negligence  failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances,
1 Introduction to the Law of Tort Introduction to the Law of Tort Negligence Negligence and the Duty of Care.
Law of Tort Tutorial Week 9-10 Question 3 Topic: Duty of Care Presented by Charles and David.
COMMON LAW CIVIL LIABILITY LAW OF TORTS 1 Environmental Law.
CHAPTER 12: NEGLIGENCE THE BASICS Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
Tort An outline understanding of tort liability based on fault. Negligence An understanding of: duty of care; breach of duty of care; damage (limited to.
Chapter 20. Conduct that falls below the standard established by law for protecting others against unreasonable risks of harm Surgeon forgets to remove.
Legal Aspects DEFINITIONS –Statutory law –Common (case) law –Public law and Private law –Criminal law and Civil law.
Understanding Business and Personal Law Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2 The Law of Torts A person can commit an unintentional tort, when he.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Negligence and Strict Liability Section 4.2.
Pure Economic Loss. Outline 1.Exam format. 2.The Charter and tort law. 3.Pure economic loss. 4.Negligent misrepresentation. 5.Pulling it all together.
Defences to negligence
Liability in negligence for injury to people and damage to property
Negligence - Revision BUS107 Commercial Law Week 5 Lecture.
Section 4.2.
Duty of Care.
Neglect Torts Chapter 20.
Tort and negligence.
Tort Law Unit 2 AOS 1: Torts, including negligence, defamation and related defences.
Found and Lost: Student Coaching Slides
Types of English Civil Law
THE LAW OF TORTS WEEK 4.
Intentional Interference with the Person
The Law of Torts.
Standard of Care.
Involuntary Manslaughter
2.03 Civil Law.
Found and Lost: Student Coaching Slides
Negligence and other torts
Special Duties of Care, cont.
Negligence.
Found and Lost: Student Coaching Slides
Negligence Torts Chapter 14 Pg 415.
Unit 15 The Law of Torts.
The Law of Torts.
The Law of Torts.
Negligence.
REMOTENESS OF DAMAGE.
Can you recall the 'holy trinity' of negligence from yesterday?
Section Outline Unintentional Torts Negligence Strict Liability
Negligence (疏忽) When a person owes a duty of care to another and breaches that duty which cause damage (physical/emotional and consequential ecomonic loss)
Smart Binary Center: Student Coaching Slides
Negligence and Other Torts
Tort Law Summary.
Negligence.
Civil Law 3.4 negligence.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Negligence

Outline Finish Remedies. Introduce Negligence. Introduce the Concept of Duty of Care. Discuss “Foreseeability”.

Fact Scenario Health Canada recommends irradiation. Healthy Foods uses an alternate method to sanitize its cans. Contaminated can renders beans toxic. Ms. Hungry made ill, misses 4 weeks of work and has digestive problems.

Donoghue v. Stevenson You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who then, in law is my neighbour? The answer seems to be persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question.

Solomon’s Elements: Duty of Care Standard of Care (and its breach) Causation Remoteness of Damage Actual Loss Defences

Osborne’s Elements: Negligent Act (standard of care and breach) Causation Damage Control Devices: Duty of Care Remoteness of Damage

Anns v. Merton London Borough Council Is there a sufficient relationship of proximity between the plaintiff and defendant? If so, there is a prima facie duty of care. Should the duty be negated, restricted or modified on policy grounds?

Duty of Care Test Summarized: Does the alleged duty of care fall within an established category? Yes – duty of care exists. If no, was the harm reasonably foreseeable? No – no duty of care. If yes, was there a sufficient relationship of proximity between the parties? No – no duty of care. If yes, a prima facie duty of care exists. Defendant must now demonstrate that there are residual policy considerations that negate or limit the duty of care.

Foreseeability Addressed at 3 different points: duty of care, breach of standard of care, and remoteness.

Foreseeability in the context of the duty of care inquiry: At the time of the alleged negligence, was it reasonably foreseeable to a person in the defendant’s position that carelessness on his or her part could create: a risk of injury, to the plaintiff (or class of persons to which the plaintiff belongs).