C.Baltay and S. Perlmutter December 15, 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRM 2 – what I heard Fit in a Falcon 9 3 year prime science phase includes a microlensing survey, supernova survey, galactic plane survey and GO program.
Advertisements

CMSC 2006 Orlando Active Alignment System for the LSST William J. Gressler LSST Project National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) Scott Sandwith New.
Spectroscopy of Saturn
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
R. Pain9/18/2008 LSST-SNAP complementarity Reynald Pain IN2P3/LPNHE Paris, France Page 1.
September 22, 2006 Natalia Kuznetsova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The Super/Nova Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Natalia Kuznetsova Natalia Kuznetsova.
Observational Astrophysics II: May-June, Observational Astrophysics II (L2)
Observational Astrophysics II: May-June, Observational Astrophysics II (L2) Getting our NIRF What do want to do? 1.Image a selected.
The Nearby Supernovae Factory: Spectrograph Calibration Ben Dilday Advisor: Rick Kessler, CfCP Physics 335 Autumn 2003.
Filters Proposed for the Supernova Survey Tod Lauer, Bob Nichols, Saul Perlmutter, Charlie Baltay Adam Riess, Peter Garnavich, Mark Phillips Jeff Kruk.
Naoyuki Tamura (University of Durham) Expected Performance of FMOS ~ Estimation with Spectrum Simulator ~ Introduction of simulators  Examples of calculations.
Natalie RoeSNAP/SCP Journal Club “Identification of Type Ia Supernovae at Redshift 1.3 and Beyond with the Advanced Camera for Surveys on HST” Riess, Strolger,
SNLS : Spectroscopy of Supernovae with the VLT (status) Grégory Sainton LPNHE, CNRS/in2p3 University Paris VI & VII Paris, France On behalf of the SNLS.
Application of Gravitational Lensing Models to the Brightest Strongly Lensed Lyman Break Galaxy – the 8 o’clock arc E. Buckley-Geer 1, S. Allam 1,2, H.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
Beating Noise Observational Techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 11 Textbook.
The LSST Exposure Time Calculator was developed to model the effects of LSST design changes on signal-to-noise ratio and survey depth. The ETC utilizes.
WFIRST-AFTA Ops Concept Overview DRAFT 1. Multiple surveys with different requirements to implement the various science programs –High Latitude Survey.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Type and redshift distributions 65 candidates have been observed between June 2003 and May Redshift is measured by using emission and/or absorption.
SNLS: Overview and High-z Spectroscopy D. Andrew Howell (Toronto) for the SNLS Collaboration (see: for full list)
The Observations of LAMOST Jianrong Shi NAOC 1/
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Telescope Guiding with a HyViSI H2RG Used in Guide Mode Lance Simms Detectors for Astronomy /2/09.
18 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
XBSM Analysis - Dan Peterson Review of the optics elements: Pinhole (“GAP”), FZP, Coded Aperture Extracting information from the GAP what is the GAP width?
DRM1 design description SDT 5/17/12 1. WFIRST DRM candidate design summary At SDT6 2/2-3/2012 consensus for full-up mission, aka “DRM1” was: 1.3m aperture,
MIRI Optical System CDR, 6 th & 7 th December 2006 Mid InfraRed Instrument 07-1 Optical System Critical Design Review (CDR) TIPS Presentation: Margaret.
The WFIRST Microlensing Exoplanet Survey: Figure of Merit David Bennett University of Notre Dame WFIRST.
Alternate design considered by the JDEM Interim Science Working Group (ISWG) C Baltay March 10-11,
Michael Levi (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), M. Lampton (UCBerkeley Space Sciences Lab), and M. Sholl (UCBerkeley Space Sciences Lab) WFIRST:
The SNLS has been allocated large amount of spectroscopic follow-up time at the VLT, Gemini North and South, Keck and Magellan. Example of a spectrum of.
MIRI Dither Patterns Christine H Chen. Dithering Goals 1.Mitigate the effect of bad pixels 2.Obtain sub-pixel sampling 3.Self-calibrate data if changing.
Type Ia Supernovae and the Acceleration of the Universe: Results from the ESSENCE Supernova Survey Kevin Krisciunas, 5 April 2008.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
WFIRST DRM2 candidate design – payload summary At SDT7 3/1-2/2012 consensus for concepts w/out overlap w/ other mission, aka “DRM2” was: 1.1m aperture,
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
Extended Detector Cutoff Considerations WFIRST Project Office May
Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University.
Two useful methods for the supernova cosmologist: (1) Including CMB constraints by using the CMB shift parameters (2) A model-independent photometric redshift.
ETC Block Diagram. Source Spectrum is derived from: Spectra Type –Stellar (50 stellar types) –Galaxies (elliptical, spiral) –QSO Luminosity Profile –point.
MPI Semiconductor Laboratory, The XEUS Instrument Working Group, PNSensor The X-ray Evolving-Universe Spectroscopy (XEUS) mission is under study by the.
R. PainEDEN, Dec Reynald Pain LPNHE, Univ. Paris, France Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
Mitesh Patel Co-Authors: Steve Warren, Daniel Mortlock, Bram Venemans, Richard McMahon, Paul Hewett, Chris Simpson, Rob Sharpe
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. The empirical radius of a planet is shown as a function of mass, by the blue curve,
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
Z Equals Twenty from Antarctica Lifan Wang. 宇宙学 Type Ia SNe at Maximum.
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
JWST-MIRIM (The MIRI Imager)
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
A photometric method to classify high-z supernovae found with HSC
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
JWST NIRCam Time Series Observations
H Stacked Images Reveal Large Numbers of PNe in the LMC
LSST : Follow-up des SN proches
Supernova Surveys with WFIRST DRM1 and DRM2
Chris Willott, Loic Albert, René Doyon, and the FGS/NIRISS Team
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
Preliminary estimates
Design of a New Coded Aperture
Observational Prospect of NIREBL
Design of a New Coded Aperture
Observational techniques meeting #6
Presentation transcript:

C.Baltay and S. Perlmutter December 15, 2014 Supernova Survey with the 2.4 m Mirror A more detailed presentation of the Feb 15, 2013 Survey C.Baltay and S. Perlmutter December 15, 2014

WFIRST –AFTA Baseline 2.4 m on axis mirror Imager with Assume 6 months for Supernova Survey 2.4 m on axis mirror Imager with 18 H4RG detectors (6x3) 0.11 “/pixl 0.28 sq degrees Filter wheel with 4 filters. IFU Integral Field Spectrometer R = 75 2.0 micron λ cutoff

Assume 4 Filter Bands Δ λ = λ / 4.5 λ Central Δ λ λ Range 1 (Y) 1.15 0.26 1.02 – 1.28 2 (J) 1.45 0.32 1.29 – 1.61 3 (H) 1.80 0.40 1.60 – 2.00 4 (K) 2.25 0.50 2.00 – 2.50 These were the four filter bands for DRM1 and 2. We planned on using bands 2,3,4 with the 2.5 micron cutoff. For DRM A with a 2.0 micron cutoff we plan on using bands 1,2,3. We will fine tune these when the filter bands for DRM A are chosen.

Supernova Survey Strategy Use the 0.28 sq degree imager to discover supernovae in two filter bands Use IFU spectra to type supernova and get redshift, S/N=6 per resolution element ,expect to need spectra of two candidates for one good Type 1a Use IFU spectra to get light curves with roughly a 5 day rest frame cadence, 8 spectra on light curve (including the typing and the deep spectra) from -10 rest frame days before peak to +25 rest frame days past peak, S/N = 3.75 per resolution element (S/N = 15 per synthetic filter band) 1 reference spectrum after supernova has faded, for galaxy subtraction with S/N = 6 per resolution element 1 deep spectrum near peak to confirm Sne Ia classification,for subtyping, spectral feature ratios etc. with S/N = 10 per resolution element

Survey Cadence Plan to run supernova survey for 6 months spread over 2 years calendar time. Plan on supernova survey with a 5 day cadence, 30 hours per visit (2*365/5)*30 hrs/24 = 182 days = 6 months

Supernova Survey Strategy Do a 3 tier survey, scanning different areas of sky for different redshift ranges Tier Z max Sky Area Sq Degrees 1 0.4 27.44 2 0.8 8.96 3 1.7 5.04

Survey Areas (6x3 Imager) We want square areas so we can continuously monitor it as we go around a corner every three month with a 90 degree turn of the detector plane For DRM A assume 18 H4RG detectors are arranged in a 6 x 3 pattern so the imager is not square For example Two imager footprints make a 6x6 sensor square 8 imager footprints make a 12x12 square etc

Square Survey Areas for 6x3 Imager Pattern Sensors Area(sq degrees) No of shots 1 W x 2 H 6 x 6 0.56 2 2 W x 4 H 12 x 12 2.24 8 3 W x 6 H 18 x 18 5.04 18 4 w x 8 H 24 x 24 8.96 32 5 W x 10 H 30 x 30 14.00 50 6 W x 12 H 36 x 36 20.16 72 7 W x 14 H 42 x 42 27.44 98 8 W x 16 H 48 x 48 35.84 128 DRM A has 18 H4RG detectors with 10 micron pixels The image plane is 6 detectors Wide and 3 detectors High A pattern of 2W x 4 H is 8 image planes arranged 2 in the W direction and 4 in the H direction No of shots is number of exposures to cover the area in a filter We should stick with these patterns for best efficiency

Supernova Imaging Exposure times Started with Alex Kim’s estimates of exposure times to get S/N = 4 in two bands with a 1.1m unobstructed view mirror telescope with 50% thruput at 12 days before peak Scaled to a 2.4 m mirror with 78% clear aperture and a 61% thruput, scale factor 0.78*(2.4/1.1)2*(0.61/0.50) Z Range 1.1m Exp Time 2.4m Exp Time < 0.4 60 sec 13 sec < 0.8 300 67 < 1.7 1200 265 Add 42 seconds for slew and settling time

Time for search with Imager Z range S/N=4 Exp Time Read+Slew time Exposures Hours/visit < 0.4 13 sec 42 sec 98x2 3.0 hrs < 0.8 67 42 32x2 1.9 <1.7 265 18x2 3.0 7.9 hours per visit for searching times 132 visits for search is a total of 43 days. This leaves 183 – 43 = 140 days for spectroscopy

Estimation of the Supernova Signals The supernova signal in the three filter bands in counts/sec/band was calculated by Alex Kim by transforming the observer frame filter bands to the supernova rest frame and evaluating the flux in these rest frame bands. These were done for a 1.3 m unobstructed view mirror assuming a thruput of 50%. These were scaled to a 2.4 m telescope with a 22% obstruction as 0.78*(2.4/1.3)2 Corrected for a 61% thruput, 0.61/0.50 Scaled by a factor of 1.2 to agree with Chris Hirata’s estimates

Supernova Signal - counts/sec/filter band Z Band 1 Band 2 Band 3  0.15 59.924 45.702 28.058 0.25 28.582 20.045 15.162 0.35 15.794 11.997 9.802 0.45 9.727 8.687 6.860 0.55 7.894 6.635 4.747 0.65 6.784 5.079 3.670 0.75 6.193 3.792 3.065 0.85 5.419 2.942 2.818 0.95 4.427 2.802 2.376 1.05 3.767 2.715 2.057 1.15 3.094 2.547 1.708 1.25 2.751 2.461 1.440 1.35 2.475 2.296 1.289 1.45 2.242 2.019 1.323 1.55 2.179 1.819 1.325 1.65 2.064 1.639 1.270 For a 2.4 m dia obstructed view mirror Adjusted for telescope thruput of 0.61 Wavelengths < 2.0 μ Scaled to Chris Hirata’s Dec 12, 2012 report

Estimation of Exposure Times Exposure times in each of the filter Bands for a S/N=15 in each band Calculated Signal to Noise as: S/N = signal/σtot = (st)/[st + npix(Zt+Dt+r2) ]½ npix = no of pixels in image S/N = 15 required signal to noise s is SNe signal in counts/sec/band Z is the Zodi bckgrd in cts/sec/pix D is the dark current in cts/sec/pix r is the read noise

Read Noise Estimate Assume 5.24 sec/read, 10.48 sec/read pair m = (exp time)/10.48, the number of read pairs R = noise per read pair (20 for imaging, 15 for IFU) f = read noise floor (5 for imaging, 4 for IFU) Read Noise ={ [( R/√ m)*√3]2 + f2}½

Parameters used in the Exposure Time Calculations Imaging IFU Spectra Signal to noise per band S/N 4 15 No of pixels npix 12.6 32x3 wide Zodi Bkgrd Z 0.36 cts/pix/sec 0.022 cts/pix/sec Dark Current D 0.015 e/pixel/sec 0.010 e/pixel/sec Read noise Single Read Floor 20.0 e/read 5 e 15.0 e/read 4 e Pixel area Apix (arcsec2) (0.11)**2 (0.15)**2 Wavelength λ Center of band Range admitted Δλ in zodi background Width of filter band < 0.02μ Spectrometer Resolution R = 75

IFU exposure Times (seconds) Z Band 1 Band 2 Band 3 0.15 60.87 72.07 101.86 0.25 86.07 112.36 140.92 0.35 122.78 154.39 184.12 0.45 171.72 189.85 235.56 0.55 195.33 229.15 315.58 0.65 214.41 282.06 389.50 0.75 224.91 362.91 451.98 0.85 247.47 457.56 479.03 0.95 293.55 469.70 561.58 1.05 337.56 475.39 645.79 1.15 405.96 499.97 786.19 1.25 452.40 510.66 950.65 1.35 500.26 543.74 1077.37 1.45 551.35 621.03 1031.84 1.55 563.08 693.27 1019.94 1.65 592.90 777.20 1066.06 Exposure times to get S/N = 15 per synthetic filter band 1 S/N = 3 per resolution element (2 pixels ea) Add 42 seconds to each exposure time for readout and slewing

IFU Exposure Times for various S/N Used the S/N formula to estimate exposure times vs Redshift for the 1.02 to 1.28 μ Band 1 With R=75, we have 155 Å / resolution element at 1.15 μ Will have 2555/155 = 16 resolution element in dispersion direction S/N per resolution element = (S/N per band 1)/sqrt(16) Relative Exp Time S/N per filter Band S/N per res el 1.0 15 3.7 1.8 24 6.0 2.4 30 7.5 3.6 40 10 4.4 48 12 6.8 60

IFU Spectra Planned for each Supernova No/SNe Relative Time S/N per resel S/N per Filter Typing 2 1.8 6 24 Light Curve 1.0 3.75 15 Deep at Peak 1 3.6 10 40 Galaxy Ref Total

IFU Spectrometer, Lightcurves from Spectra Use imaging to discover supernovae in two filters with S/N>4 in each Use IFU spectrometer for Sne ID and to get points on the lightcurve with S/N=15 per synthetic band ( S/N=3 per pixel). Get an additional deep spectrum (S/N=10)near peak and one reference spectrum later with S/N = 6 per pixel Mode Low z z < 0.4 Area Time Hours Medium z z < 0.8 Area Time Hours High z z < 1.7 Time per visit Imaging Discovery 27.44 55sec 3.0 8.96 109s 1.9 5.04 307s 3.0 8 hrs Spectra for ID&Typing 27.44 varies 8.96 varies 5.04 varies 5 hrs Spectra for lightcurves 27.44 varies 9 hrs Deep Spectra 8.96 varies Galaxy Ref 5.04 varies 3 hrs

Error Model Used Statitical errors Measurement error σmeas = 8 % with S/N = 15 spectra per filter band 2 and one deep spectrum near peak with S/N=47 per filter band Intrinsic spread σint = 8 % with IFU deep spectra Gravitational lensing error σlens = 0.07*z Statistical σstat = [σmeas2 + σint2 + σlens2]½/√n Systematic errors Systematic error σsys = 0.01(1+z)/1.8 Total error per z bin Total error σtot = [σstat2 + σsys2]½

2.4m IFU Deep, Spectro Lightcurves, FoM=312 <Z> SNe SNe SNe SNe σstat σ/√N σsys σtot Low z Mid z Hi z Total 0.15 46 14 8 69 0.114 0.014 0.006 0.015 0.25 139 44 24 208 0.114 0.008 0.007 0.011 0.35 269 86 47 402 0.116 0.006 0.008 0.009 0.45 0 144 78 223 0.117 0.008 0.008 0.011 0.55 0 211 115 327 0.120 0.007 0.009 0.011 0.65 0 280 152 136 0.122 0.010 0.009 0.014 0.75 0 349 189 136 0.125 0.011 0.010 0.014 0.85 0 0 233 136 0.128 0.011 0.010 0.015 0.95 0 0 270 136 0.131 0.011 0.011 0.016 1.05 0 0 297 136 0.135 0.012 0.011 0.016 1.15 0 0 311 136 0.139 0.012 0.012 0.017 1.25 0 0 313 136 0.143 0.012 0.012 0.018 1.35 0 0 304 136 0.147 0.013 0.013 0.018 1.45 0 0 282 136 0.152 0.013 0.014 0.019 1.55 0 0 253 136 0.157 0.013 0.014 0.020 1.65 0 0 222 136 0.162 0.014 0.015 0.020

Numbers of Supernovae 3011 Supernovae Total 2725 Supernova Total Number of Supernovae per z = 0.1 bin Redshift

Error on Distance Measurement Distance Error per z = 0.1 bin Redshift

Figures of Merit For the Supernova Survey only FoM = 312 Supernova with Stage III prior FoM = 582

FoM dependence on no of SNe per bin No of Sne per 0.1 redshift bin Figure of Merit FoM 80 287 100 298 120 306 136 312

FoM dependence on no of SNe per bin No of supernovae per 0.1 redshift bin