Event Shapes in NC DIS at ZEUS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ZEUS high Q 2 e + p NC measurements and high-x cross sections A.Caldwell Max Planck Institute for Physics On behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration Allen Caldwell.
Advertisements

Low x meeting, Sinai Alice Valkárová on behalf of H1 collaboration LOW x meeting 2005, Sinaia H1 measurements of the structure of diffraction.
Event shape distributions at LEP Marek Taševský (Physics Institute Prague) for all LEP collaborations 21 April 2006 KEK-Tsukuba, Japan.
ISDM 2005, Kromeriz Kamil Sedlak, Jets in photoproduction at HERA 1 Jets in Photoproduction & at low Q 2 at HERA On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations.
Forward Jet Production at HERA, Patrick Ryan, Univ. of Wisconsin EPS2005, July 21, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin On Behalf of the H1 and.
QCD Studies at HERA Ian C. Brock Bonn University representing the ZEUS and H1 Collaborations.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Ursula Bassler, LPNHE-Paris, RUN II MC workshop 1 Monte Carlo Tuning: The HERA Experience Monte Carlo Models for DIS events Description of inclusive hadronic.
 s determination at LEP Thorsten Wengler University of Manchester DIS’06, Tsukuba, Japan.
High E T Jet Physics at HERA José Repond Argonne National Laboratory On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Small-x Workshop, Fermilab, March 28-30,
Inclusive Jets in ep Interactions at HERA, Mónica V á zquez Acosta (UAM) HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, July 19, Mónica Luisa Vázquez.
Luca Stanco - PadovaQCD at HERA, LISHEP pQCD  JETS Luca Stanco – INFN Padova LISHEP 2006 Workshop Rio de Janeiro, April 3-7, 2006 on behalf of.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 Inclusive Photoproduction of ρº, K*º and φ Mesons at HERA Andrei Rostovtsev (ITEP) ‏ on behalf of H1 Collaboration Published in H1 Collab., Phys. Lett.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Monday Meeting, Apr. 18th Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS.
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
V. Chiochia DIS 2003 Workshop Production of beauty quarks in deep inelastic scattering at HERA XI International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering St.
NEW RESULTS FROM JET PHYSICS AT HERA Thomas Schörner-Sadenius Hamburg University 2 nd HERA-LHC Workshop June 2006.
DIJET (and inclusive-jet) CROSS SECTIONS IN DIS AT HERA T. Schörner-Sadenius (for the ZEUS collaboration) Hamburg University DIS 06, April 2006 Tsukuba,
7 th April 2003PHOTON 2003, Frascati1 Photon structure as revealed in ep collisions Alice Valkárová Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Charles University.
Inclusive Diffraction at HERA Marcella Capua – INFN and Calabria University Small X and Diffraction FNAL Chicago (USA) 17 – 20 September 2003 on behalf.
David Milstead – Experimental Tests of QCD ITEP06 Winter School, Moscow Experimental Tests of QCD at Colliders: Part 1 David Milstead Stockholm University.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
Event Shapes, Alexander Savin University of WisconsinDIS 2006, April 21, Event Shapes in NC DIS at ZEUS Alexander A. Savin University of Wisconsin.
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
DIJET (and inclusive-jet) CROSS SECTIONS IN DIS AT HERA T. Schörner-Sadenius (for the ZEUS collaboration) Hamburg University DIS 06, April 2006 Tsukuba,
Recent multiplicity studies at ZEUS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinHadron Structure 2004, Sept. 1st University of Wisconsin, Madison on behalf of the.
K 0 S and  production at ZEUS, A. Savin, University of Wisconsin DIS 2006, April 22, K 0 S and  production at ZEUS Alexander A. Savin University.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
1 Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton Motivation Experimental Techniques charm and beauty cross sections in DIS for the H1 & ZEUS Collaborations Paul Thompson.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
H1 QCD analysis of inclusive cross section data DIS 2004, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, April 2004 Benjamin Portheault LAL Orsay On behalf of the H1 Collaboration.
1 Forward Jet/  0 Production in DIS at HERA On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations ICHEP August 2004, Beijing Didar Dobur, University of Freiburg.
A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.
Costas Foudas, Imperial College, Jet Production at High Transverse Energies at HERA Underline: Costas Foudas Imperial College
Event Shapes, A. Everett, U. WisconsinZEUS Meeting, March 6, Some Slides for Michele There is no subtitle.
F Don Lincoln f La Thuile 2002 Don Lincoln Fermilab Tevatron Run I QCD Results Don Lincoln f.
Luca Stanco - PadovaLow-x at HERA, Small-x Low-x AND Low Q 2 Luca Stanco – INFN Padova Small-x and Diffraction 2007 Workshop FermiLab, March 28-30,
1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.
A T : novel variable to study low transverse momentum vector boson production at hadron colliders. Rosa María Durán Delgado The University of Manchester.
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
F2bb from muon+jet final states at ZEUS
Particle Production and Fragmentation at HERA
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Open Heavy Flavour Production at HERA
DIS 2004 XII International Workshop
Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
Study of Multiplicity and Event Shapes using ZEUS detector at HERA
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Study of Multiplicity and Event Shapes using ZEUS detector at HERA
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Di-jet production in gg collisions in OPAL
Event Shapes, Jet Substructure and S at HERA
K0S and L production at ZEUS
Event Shape Variables in DIS Update
Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
New Results on 0 Production at HERMES
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
An Introduction to HERA Physics
Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Jet fragmentation results at CDF
Top mass measurements at the Tevatron and the standard model fits
Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Trijets in Neutral Current Deep Inelastic Scattering
Presentation transcript:

Event Shapes in NC DIS at ZEUS Alexander A. Savin University of Wisconsin On Behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration DIS 2006, Tsukuba, Japan

HERA Kinematic Variables Breit Frame Definition: q + 2xBP = 0 Q2, xBj, y 27.5 GeV 920 GeV W: invariant mass of the system recoiling against the scattered lepton y: measures inelasticity of interaction. y=1 – E’_e/E_e in proton rest frame Related to scattering angle ************** y=0: totally elastic x=0 when y=1. y=0 when x=1. ZEUS 98-00 (82.2 pb-1) 80 < Q2 < 20 840 GeV2 0.0024 < x < 0.6 DESY-06-042, hep-ex/0604032

Similar for the means and differential distributions Power Corrections Use power corrections to correct for non-perturbative effects in infrared and collinear safe event shape variable. Used to determine the hadronization corrections Two realms: pQCD and npQCD. pQCD is calculable: uses alpha-s. npQCD is not. Recent theoretical work [2], involving power corrections to event shape variables, provides a new approach to determine the hadronisation corrections compared to monte carlo event generators. The new work involves a phenomenological model based around an effective strong coupling which comes in at low Q. This model conveniently reduces the hadronisation corrections to be of a form containing alpha-s and a new phenomenological variable alpha-0. Define power correction….. Why do we care? –> because we can’t calculate features of npQCD hadronization Future plans involve the fitting of parton level next to leading order curves with power corrections to the mean distributions. This will then yield a value for not only alpha-s but also the new phenomenological variable alpha-0 and allow tests on its universality. Relate hadronization effects to power corrections. Q dependence of the means of the event shape parameters is presented, from which both the power corrections and the strong coupling constant are determined without any assumption on fragmentation models. Universal non-perturbative constant Similar for the means and differential distributions

Analysis Method Test validity of the power correction method by extracting from a fit to the data. For means: NLO + PC as a function of Q (DISASTER++/DISENT) For differentials: NLO + NLL + PC in bins of (x,Q2) (DISASTER++/DISPATCH/DISRESUM) Hessian method was used

Event-shape variables Axis Dependent: TT, BT, T, B Thrust Broadening Axis Independent: C, M2 C Parameter Jet Mass Sums are over all momenta in the current hemisphere of the Breit frame

Mean Event Shapes Comparison with the ARIADNE Parton level should be taken as indicative only Explain (and label) power correction and that one is negative Add first bullet: NLO + PC to agree with data Label and explain the double value thing

Mean Event Shapes Negative power correction Results of the NLO+PC fit Simultaneous fit for s and 0 Each shape fit separately NLO calculation using DISASTER++ Negative power correction Explain (and label) power correction and that one is negative Add first bullet: NLO + PC to agree with data Label and explain the double value thing

Mean Event Shapes Extracted parameters: Theoretical errors dominate. Consistent with the previous measurement Extracted 0 are consistent (except Tg ) with each other, slightly lower than H1 Extracted s values are consistent with each other, except BT and Tg High sensitivity of T to PDF Theoretical errors dominate. World Average

Shape Distributions Only high Q region is used ARIADNE describes data well Only high Q region is used

Shape Distributions NLO+NLL+PC NLO+NLL The differential distributions are fitted over a limited range. Bins for which theoretical calculations are not expected to be valid are omitted from fit. NLO+NLL+PC NLO+NLL

Shape Distributions The differential distributions are fitted over a limited range. Bins for which theoretical calculations are not expected to be valid are omitted from fit.

Extracted Parameters Extracted parameters Extracted s values are consistent with each other and H1 Major theoretical uncertainties Fit range ; Theoretical parameters: renormalization scale, logarithmic rescale factor, power factor in modification term etc

Test of Q-independency Consistent with being independent of the Q range

Event Shapes With Jets 2 jets y2 – resolution cut parameter (2+1) to (1+1) ; KOUT – out-of-plane momentum 2 jets Momentum out of plane

y2 parameter ARIADNE describes data well at high Q ; NLO describes data without hadronization correction LO: Leading order O(alpha_s) correction computed with DISENT Res: resummation of all leading next-to-leading logarithms of k/Q NP: leading 1/q non-perturbative corrections

Out-of-plane momentum LO: Leading order O(alpha_s) correction computed with DISENT Res: resummation of all leading next-to-leading logarithms of k/Q NP: leading 1/q non-perturbative corrections ARIADNE describes data well indicating significant hadronization corrections

Summary Mean values and differential distributions of event-shape variables have been measured at ZEUS in the kinematic region 80 < Q2 < 20 840 GeV2 and 0.0024 < x < 0.6 The data are well described by the ARIADNE MC Power-correction method provides a reasonable description of the data for all event-shape variables with 0 0.4-0.5 for most of the variables. The lack of consistency in the (aS,a0) extraction suggests the importance of high-order processes that are not yet included in the model Need some theoretical input to proceed with the jets event shapes