Financial Reporting – Evolution of Global Standards Chapter 9 Financial Reporting – Evolution of Global Standards

Accounting numbers are important when making contracts. Eg. Why are FRSs needed? Accounting numbers are important when making contracts. Eg. Management and directors' pay is often related to the firm's performance. The required performance may not be achieved under one method of producing accounting reports, but it could be under an alternative method. With no restraints, the methods used to produce the report can be changed to suit the desired performance requirements.

Role of accounting numbers in defining contractual entitlements – temptation to manage the numbers Typical ways to influence accounting measures: Delay discretionary expenditure to the next accounting period, for example research, advertising, training expenditure Delay amortisation, for example make optimistic sales projections in order to classify research as development expenditure which can be capitalised and Reclassify deteriorating current assets as fixed assets to avoid the need to recognise a loss under the lower of cost and net realisable value rule applicable to current assets.

Role of accounting numbers in defining contractual entitlements – temptation to manage the numbers Mandatory standards restrict management’s ability to adopt measures such as those listed above. This affects wealth distribution within the firm. For example, IF managers cannot delay the amortisation of development expenditure, bonuses related to profit will be lower and there will be a transfer of wealth from managers to shareholders. Profit before amortisation $10,000 $10,000 Amortisation 2,000 - Profit after amortisation 8,000 10,000 10% bonus to managers 800 1,000 Profit available to shareholders 7,600 9,000

Shareholders are in the dark Shareholders are usually unaware that financial statements are inaccurate. Only aware in restricted circumstances When a third party has a vested interest in revealing adverse facts following a takeover, or When a company falls into the hands of an administrator, inspector or liquidator, whose duty it is to enquire and report on shortcomings in the management of a company.

Arguments in support of standards Comparability Need to make valid inter-company comparisons of performance and trends Credibility Credibility lost if companies select different accounting policies for similar events Discipline Comparisons are distorted if companies can select accounting policies with the intention of disguising changes in performance and trends.

Arguments against standards (Continued) Consensus-seeking Can lead to the issuing of standards that are over- influenced by those with easiest access to the standard setters as the subject matter becomes more complex, for example capital instruments

Arguments against standards (Continued) Overload Too many standards Too detailed Too general-purpose and fail to recognise the differences between large and small entities Too many standard setters with differing requirements, for example FASB, IASB, ASB, national Stock Exchange listing requirements.

Reasons for differences in reporting The character of the national legal system The way in which industry is financed The relationship of the tax and reporting systems The influence and status of the accounting profession The extent to which accounting theory is developed Accidents of history Language.

Ways in which industry is financed Different information needs Equity investors Objective information for stewardship Fair information for investment decision-making Reliance on external information Loan creditors Banks principal lenders and shareholders Access to internal information Published disclosures less relevant.

Relationship of the tax and reporting systems Reporting and tax separate Separate rules for calculating profit for tax Financial reporting less prescriptive. Primacy to taxation rules - Allowance only if in the financial accounts - Possible misinterpretation when comparing different companies - Example: treatment of depreciation.

Influence and status of the accounting profession Where market-sensitive information is needed Reliable and relevant information required Growth of established profession and audit function Impact on accounting regulation. Where there has been less need for market- sensitive information - Less need for expertise - Less need for financial management.

Accidents of history Effect of commercial scandals Pooling resources In US led to SEC being set up In UK led to publishing accounting standards Financial reporting less prescriptive Pooling resources External pressures Joining EU and becoming subject to Directives Imposed.

US GAAP There has been competition for international supremacy between US GAAP and IFRSs UK and the USA systems of financial reporting have much in common, BUT In the USA there are more rules than in the UK, and A greater standardisation and disclosure of information.

US GAAP (Continued) Legislation No direct equivalent of the UK Companies Acts in the USA The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is responsible for requiring the publication of financial information for the benefit of shareholders. Power to dictate the form and content of reports Monitors financial reports.

US GAAP – Standard setting FASB The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) sets accounting standards in the USA, and issues: Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, which deal with specific issues Statements of Concepts, which give general information Interpretations which clarify existing standards Emerging Issues Task Force.

US GAAP – other mandatory pronouncements The APB The Accounting Principles Board (APB) publishes Opinions The AICPA The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) publishes Accounting Practice Bulletins and Opinions APB and AICPA pronouncements should all be regarded as mandatory.

The wider reach of IFRS Transition to IFRSs occurring in EU, Africa and Asia-Pacific Region, but different national editions of IFRSs appearing China - in the process of converting Chinese Accounting Standards to be compliant with IFRS. Current standards are substantially compliant

Progress towards adoption by the USA of International standards Since 2002, there has been collaboration between the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the IASB to the development of high-quality, compatible accounting standards that could be used for both domestic and cross- border financial reporting. This convergence is continuing in 2015.

Review questions 1. Why is it necessary for financial reporting to be subject to (a) mandatory control and (b) statutory control? 2.‘The most favoured way to reduce information overload was to have the company filter the available information set based on users’ specifications of their needs.’ Discuss how this can be achieved given that users have differing needs.

References Elliott, Barry, Elliott Jamie, Financial Accounting and Reporting 15th Edition chapter 9